I 0 J -

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
MOBILEMEDIA IDEAS, LLC
Plaintiff,
v.
APPLE INC.
Defendant.
Dated: December 11, 2012
)
)
)
)
) Civ. No. 10-258-SLR
)
)
)
)
VERDICT SHEET
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 9858
We, the jury, unanimously find as follows:
I. U.S. Patent No. 6,070,068 ("The '068 Patent")
A. Direct Infringement
1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the '068 patent is
found in the accused Apple iPhones (hereinafter, "Apple's iPhones")?
Checking 'yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
Claim Verdict on direct
infringement
23 yes 0 no
24 0 no
B. Indirect Infringement - Inducing Infringement
2. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that Apple has induced the infringement of claim 23 and/or claim 24 of the
'068 patent?
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
Claim Verdict on inducement
of infringement
23 0 yes
24 0 yes [1f no
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 2 of 8 PageID #: 9859
C. Validity
3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
asserted claims of the '068 patent are invalid as being anticipated?
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
Claim No Yes
{VaHd) (Invalid,
anticipated)
23 ~ D
24
g'
D
4. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
asserted claims of the '068 patent are invalid as being obvious?
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
Claim No Yes
{Valid) {Invalid due to
obviousness)
23 ~ D
24
rt(
D
2
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 3 of 8 PageID #: 9860
11. U.S. Patent No. 6,253,075 ("The '075 Patent")
A. Direct Infringement
1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 5, claim 6, and/or claim 10 of the '075
patent is found in Apple's iPhones?
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
If you answer "no" with respect to claim 5, you must answer "no" with
respect to dependent claim 6 for purposes of this question.
Claim Verdict on direct
infringement
5 0 no
6 0 no
10 0 no
3
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 4 of 8 PageID #: 9861
B. Indirect Infringement - Inducing Infringement
2. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that Apple has induced the infringement of claim 5 and/or claim 6 of the '075
patent?
Checking 'yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
If you answer "no" with respect to claim 5, you must answer "no" with
respect to dependent claim 6 for purposes of this question.
Claim Verdict on inducement
of infringement
5 0 yes
6 0 yes
4
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 5 of 8 PageID #: 9862
C. Validity
3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that the
asserted claims of the '075 patent are invalid as being obvious?
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
If you find that claim 5 is valid and not obvious, you must find that
dependent claim 6 is also valid and not obvious for purposes of this
question.
Claim No Yes
(Valid) (Invalid due to
obviousness)
5 ~ 0
6
g-'
0
10
[{('
0
5
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 6 of 8 PageID #: 9863
- ......
Ill. U.S. Patent No. 6,427,078 ("The '078 Patent")
A. Direct Infringement
1. Do you find that MobileMedia has proven, by a preponderance of the
evidence, that each and every limitation of claim 73 of the '078 patent is found in
Apple's iPhones?
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for MobileMedia.
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the Apple.
Claim Verdict on direct
infringement
73 Vyes D no
B. Validity
2. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
claim 73 of the '078 patent is invalid as being anticipated?
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
Claim No Yes
(Valid) (Invalid,
anticipated)
73 ~ D
6
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 7 of 8 PageID #: 9864
3. Do you find that Apple has proven, by clear and convincing evidence, that
claim 73 of the '078 patent is invalid as being obvious?
Checking "no" below indicates a finding for the MobileMedia.
Checking "yes" below indicates a finding for Apple.
Claim No Yes
(Valid) (Invalid due to
obviousness)
73 ~ D
7
Case 1:10-cv-00258-SLR-MPT Document 507 Filed 12/13/12 Page 8 of 8 PageID #: 9865