Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FLUENT 10 kW
2~12 m/s
1~4
6 m/s
(CP,max=0.239) 3
(CP,max=0.304) 2 6.5%
(=34)
0.25 2~4
m/s 2 6~ 12 m/s
2~3
Abstract
The vertical axis wind turbine (VAWT) has an inherent unsteady aerodynamic behavior due to
the variance of angle of attack with the revolutionary angle, causing the generation of the turbulence
wake and the wake interaction between blades. In addition, the support arm will also disturb wind
flow motion, generating counter torque when the blades are rotating, affecting the characteristic of
blade loading and the performance of VAWT. To date, few studies have done in these area.
This research uses computational fluid dynamics software FLUENT to simulate the
three-dimensional aerodynamics flow of a 10 kW slant-H-rotor VAWT, which has the unique design
of curve blades. The effect of support arm and tower is also considered. Solution of
three-dimensional flow is obtained to study thrust of blades, the development of vortex shedding
when dynamic stall occurs under incoming velocity is from 2 to 12 m/s with various tip speed ratio
(1-4). Another key point of the study is to investigate the effect of arm correction, the geometry
with/without arm on blade loading and on the performance of VAWT. Finally, the appropriate
operation condition under various wind velocity for slant-H-rotor VAWT are summarized. The
simulation result indicates the geometry with/without arm make huge difference on blade loading
and the performance of VAWT, the maximum power coefficient (CP,max) is 0.239 at tip speed ratio of
3 for geometry with blade-only, while CP,max is 0.304 at tip speed ratio of 2 for geometry with blade,
arm and tower. For the effect of arm correction, result shows counter torque causing by arm reduces
the power coefficient significantly under tip speed ratio is 3 and 4 with various wind velocity. In
terms of power coefficient higher than 0.25, the appropriate operation condition for slant-H-rotor
VAWT are summarized. When wind velocity is 2 to 4 m/s, the appropriate tip speed ratio is 2, while
wind velocity is 6 to 12 m/s, the appropriate tip speed ratio is 2 to 3.
Keywords:
III
...............................................................................................................................................I
Abstract ............................................................................................................................................... II
.................................................................................................................................................... III
....................................................................................................................................................IV
.............................................................................................................................................. VII
.............................................................................................................................................. XII
......................................................................................................................................... XIII
......................................................................................................................................1
1.1 ....................................................................................................................1
1.2 ...................................................................................................................4
1.2.1 ............................................................................................................4
1.2.2 .................................................................................................6
1.3 ...............................................................................9
1.4 ..............................................................................................................................17
1.5 ..............................................................................................................................18
..................................................................................................................20
2.1 .............................................................................................................20
2.1.1 ..........................................................................................................20
2.1.2 Darrius ..................................................................................22
2.2 .............................................................................................................................24
2.3 ..................................................................................................26
2.3.1 ......................................................................................................26
2.3.2 ..............................................................................................................27
2.3.3 ...........................................................................................................28
2.3.4 ..................................................................................................................30
IV
2.3.5 ...........................................................................................................34
2.3.6 ..............................................................................................................36
2.4 .........................................................................................................................37
2.4.1 ..................................................................................................................37
2.4.2 ......................................................................................................37
......................................................................................................................40
3.1 ........................................................................................................................40
3.2
..........................................................................................................................41
3.2.1 k- ...................................................................................................41
3.2.2 Realizable k- ...........................................................................................42
3.3 .............................................................................................................................43
3.3.1 ..........................................................................................................44
3.4 .............................................................................................................................45
3.5 .........................................................................................................................45
3.6 .............................................................................................................................46
3.6.1 ..................................................................................................................46
3.6.2 ..................................................................................................................48
3.6.3 ......................................................................................................49
..............................................................................................................................51
4.1 ............................................................................................................................51
4.2 .............................................................................................................................52
4.3 .........................................................................................................54
4.4 .................................................................................................................................54
4.5 .................................................................................................................55
4.5.1 ..............................................................................................................55
4.5.2 ...........................................................................................................57
V
4.6 .............................................................................................................58
..........................................................................................................................62
5.1 ..............................................................................................................................62
5.2 ..............................................................................................62
5.2.1 ...........................................................................................................62
5.2.2 ...............................................................................................................79
5.3 .........................................................................................................................82
5.3.1 ..........................................................................................................82
5.3.2 ......................................................................................92
5.4 ..............................................................................95
........................................................................................................................100
6.1 ....................................................................................................................................100
6.2 ...................................................................................................................................101
..........................................................................................................................................103
VI
1.1 ......................................................................................1
1.2 [4] .....................................................................................................4
1.3 [1] ...........................................................................................................5
1.4 Cp [7] ...........................................................................................................5
1.5 [1] .....................................................................................................7
1.6 1931 Darrieus [8] .................................................................................8
1.7 (Eole, 4 MW) [11]..........................................................................8
1.8 Quiterevolution qr5 [13] .................................................................9
1.9 (a) I-WIND (b) I-WIND ......................................18
2.1 [1] .......................................................................................................20
2.2 [1] ...................................................................................................22
2.3 ...............................................................................................25
2.4 ...................................................................................................25
2.5 [1] .......................................................................................................27
2.6 [28] .............................................................................................28
2.7 [51] .........................................................................................................28
2.8 ()[34].............................................................29
2.9 ( M )[32] ................................................30
2.10 [56] ...............................................................................................................31
2.11 [57] ...........................................................................................32
2.12 ()[57]...............................................................................32
2.13 [34] ...................................................................32
2.14 Darrieus [60] .........................................................33
2.15 [66] ....................................................................................................35
VII
XII
Ab
(m2)
As
(m2)
(m2)
A3
(m2)
(induction factor)
CD
(drag coefficient) CD =
CL
(lift coefficient) CL =
CP
(power coefficient) CP =
CQ
(torque coefficient) CQ =
CT
C1C2C3
k-
(m)
FD
(N)
FL
(N)
FN
(N)
FQ
(N-m)
FT
(N)
FT , disc
(N)
XIII
FD
1
U 2 cL
2
FL
1
U 2 cL
2
P
1
U 3 As
2
FQ
1
U 2 As R
2
FT
1
U 2 cL
2
FT , mom
(m.kg/s2)
FQ , D
(N.m)
Gb
(kg/m.s3)
Gk
(kg/m.s3)
(m)
Htower
(m)
(Hz)
(m2/s2)
(m)
m
(kg/s)
N arm
(W)
(Pa)
(Pa)
p1
(Pa)
p2
(Pa)
p3
(Pa)
(m)
Re
(Reynolds number)
R0
(m)
(s)
(m/s)
Ua
(m/s)
U eff
(m/s)
XIV
Ut
(m/s)
(m/s)
U1
(m/s)
U2
(m/s)
U3
(m/s)
x (m/s)
y (m/s)
z (m/s)
YM
(kg/ms3)
y+
(degree)
(degree)
(degree)
(s)
(degree)
(m2/s3)
(degree)
(N.s/m2)
(N.s/m2)
XV
R
U
(kg/m3)
Prandtl
Prandtl
(rpm)
Nc
R
arm
mean
min
max
XVI
1.1
(windmill)
[1]
(horizontal axis wind turbine, HAWT)
(vertical axis wind turbine, VAWT) 1.1
(rated power)(AWEA)(large-scale wind turbine)
500 kW (small-scale wind turbine) 100
kW
1.1
1
1970
1.2 [2]
[3]
(building
integrated) ( 1.2)[4]
[5]
[6]
1.2 [4]
1.2
1.2.1
1.3
1.1 2~3
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 40% 1.4
(6)
(7)
1.3 [1]
1.4 (Cp)[7]
1.2.2
1.1
(1)
(2)
(3) 40%
(4)
(5)
1.5
1. (Savonius)
20%
2. (Darrieus)
(support
arm)
3. H Darrieus
Savonius Darrieus
1.5 [1]
Erisson [12]
H
1.3
H
8
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
1.3 [12]
1.3
vortex cascade
Strickland [15]
2 NACA0012 0.13~0.25
23 2105~2.8105 1~10
(4)
17 NACA0015 0.14 2
1.08105~1.35105 1~11
Paraschivoiu [20]
(induced velocity)
5
NACA0015 0.15 2 3
10
1~11
(4)
Vortex Larsen[21]
vortex
[22, 23](4)Strickland [24]
vortex
vortex vortex
Paraschivoiu Allet [25]
vortex 17
NACA0015 1~10 vortex
Islam [26]
vortex
NACA0015NACA0018
90o
105 106
106 107
Darrieus
(transition regime)
Deglaire [29]
(1)
(2)
(3)
Wernert [30]
Fujisawa
Takeuchi [31] PIV (particle image velocimetry) Darrieus
1~3
12
Darrieus
51057105 2~4
(roll-up)
[36]
NACA0015
SST k- 2.5
0o
NACA0012
13
k-
25 o30 o40 o 30 o
30
Beri Yao [38]
NACA0018 30%
15o(NACA2415)(=0.1~1)
RNG k- 3.6105
=0.1~1 NACA0018 (=3.5)
0.3
8 m/s-10 o~60 o 2 4 20 40 cm
NACA0024NACA4420NACA4520 8~15cm
0.25 40 cm 15 cm 10
NACA0024 4
(S1210)
(NACA0018)
14
Darrieus
NACA0015
RNG k- 4.3~5.8 m/s
20%
Darrieus NACA0015
3
15
90
NACA633-018 0.6~1.4 m/s 43.7~90
43.7~60
Kirke [44]
(1)
(2)
(3) (toroidal vortex)
[45]
(1)
(2)
(3)
16
Li Calisal [46]
1.4
[37]
17
10 kW
2~12 m/s
1~4
1.5
18
10 kW
19
2.1
2.1.1
1926 Betz [48]
(stream tube)
(actuator disk) 2.1
U U 3
:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5) (thrust force)
(6)
(7)
2.1 [1]
20
(2.1) U (freestream wind speed) U 3 U1 U 2
FT , mom =U ( AU ) U 3 ( A3U 3 )
(2.1)
m
AU = A3U 3 = m
FT , mom = m (U U 3 )
(2.2)
1
1
p + U = p1 + U1
2
2
(2.3)
1
1
U 2 = p3 + U 3
2
2
(2.4)
p2 +
p = p3
U1 = U 2
FT , disc = A1 ( p1 p2 )
(2.5)
p1 p2 (2.3)(2.4)(2.5)
1
FT , disc = A1 (U 2 - U 32 )
2
(2.6)
(2.2)(2.6) m = AU
1 1
U1 =
1
(U 2 +U 3 )
2
(2.7)
(induction
factor)
a=
U -U1
U
(2.8)
(2.8) U1 U 3
U1 = U (1 a )
(2.9)
U 3 = U (1 2a )
(2.10)
P
21
P=
1
1
A1 (U 2 U 32 )U1 = AU
1 1 (U + U 3 )(U - U 3 )
2
2
(2.11)
(2.9)(2.10)(2.11) A 1 = A s ()
P=
1
2
3
1 AsU 3 4a (1- a )2
AU
1 4a (1- a ) =
2
2
(2.12)
Cp =
1
U 3 As
2
(2.13)
(2.12)(2.13)
C p = 4a (1- a )
a =
(2.14)
1
C p ,max = 0.5926 Betz
3
(2.9)(2.10)(2.6)
1
U 2 As 4a (1 a )
2
FT , disc
CT =
= 4a (1 a )
1
2
U As
2
FT , disc =
(2.15)
(2.16)
2.2 [1]
2.1.2 Darrius
Wilson Lissaman [49] Darrius
U1 = U (1 a )
22
(1) (pitch angle) = 0
(2) CD = 0
(3) CL = 2 sin
(4) c R
Darrius
dx +
dx = Rd sin
(2.17)
(2.18)
(2.19)
(2.18)(2.19) U a = U (1 a ) U t = R
a=
c R
sin
2R U
(2.20)
N 1 =
a=
Nc
sin
2R
(2.21)
FQ = cRU 2 (1 a ) sin 2
2
(2.22)
1 4 Nc 3 Nc 2
FQ = ( NcRU 2 )
+
32 R
2 3 R
2
Nc 1 4 Nc 3 Nc
3
1 8
C p =
+
a + a2
= 2 a
32 R
8
R 2 3 R
2 3
23
(2.23)
(2.24)
2.2
2.3 (azimuthal angle)
= 0~180(upwind) = 180~360(downwind) U eff
U eff FD (drag force) FL (lift force)
FT FN (thrust force)(normal force)
2.4
U a sin
R + U a cos
= tan 1
sin
1
= tan
+ cos
(2.25)
U a
U a U a = U
sin
+ cos
= tan 1
(2.26)
sin cos
+ cos
= tan 1
(2.27)
U eff =
(U a sin ) + ( R + U a cos )
2
(sin ) + ( + cos )
= U
(2.28)
U eff = U
(2.29)
FL = CL cLU eff2
2
FD = CD cLU eff2
2
(2.30)
(2.31)
FN = FL cos + FD sin
(2.32)
FT = FL sin FD cos
(2.33)
24
FT , mean =
1
2
FT d
(2.34)
FQ = NFT ,mean R
(2.35)
P = FQ
(2.36)
2.3
2.4
25
2.3
2.3.1
2.5
(1) (cut-in speed)
(2) (rated wind speed)
(3) (cut-out speed)
Cp =
P
1
U 3 As
2
= f ( , U , c, R, L, , , N )
(2.37)
(1) ()
(2) (U)
(3) (c)
(4) (R)
(5) (L)(aspect ratio)
(6) ()
(7) ()
(8) (N)
[45]
(1) 1 =
Ab c
Nc
=
= 1 =
As R
R
(solidity)
(2) 2 =
L
2 = 2 =
R
1 c
(3) 3 =
(4) 4 =
U R
(5) 4 4 =1 4 =
U c
26
2.5 [1]
2.3.2
(blade section)
McCroskey [52]
Darrieus
27
2.6 [28]
2.7 [51]
2.3.3
Darrieus
2.8
2.9
Leishman [54]
(1)
28
(2)
(3)
2.8
McCroskey [55]
2.8 ()[34]
29
2.9 ( M )[32]
2.3.4
Carr [56]
2.10
(reattachment)
30
2.10 [56]
Fujisawa Shibuy [57](PIV) Darrieus
2.11(vortex shedding)
2.12
Ferreira [34] PIV
Re=51057105=2~4
(roll-up)
2.13
31
2.11 [57]
2.12 ()[57]
2.13 [34]
32
2.14
1~4
2.1 [52]
(reduced frequency)Tsang
[61]
K=
c
( 1) tan 1 ( 2 1) 2
2R
(2.38)
K > 0.05 K
[65](2.38) c/R
2.3.5
(flow
curvature)
(1) (virtual chamber)Migliore [66]
(1)
(2)
34
0.2~0.6
0.62
2.15 [66]
2.3.6
NACA 4412
2.17
Jacobs
Sherman [71] Re=8104 NACA XX12 =-5~25
Sheldahl Klimas [72]Ostowari
Naik [73] Re=1.5105~2.5105=0~24
=10~16
Kirke Lazauskas [74] TSR=0~4.5
2.18
TSR=0~2
CQ, max TSR Claessens
[75]
2.17 [1]
36
2.18 ( CQ )[74]
2.4
2.4.1
(parasitic drag)
Kirke
[44]
(1)
(2)
(3) (toroidal vortex)
2.4.2
H Darrieus
Kirke [44]
37
2.19
2.19 [44]
[45]
(1)
(2) 2.20
(3)
2.20 [45]
38
R
R
1
FQ , D ( ) = r dFD ( r , ) = r U eff2 CD dAarm
0
0
2
(2.39)
(2.40)
1 2 R 4 2 R 3
U 2 R 2
FQ , D ( ) =
+
U cos +
cos 2 CD c
2 4
3
2
(2.41)
FQ , D ( ) d = FQ , D 2
(2.42)
(2.41)(2.42)
FQ , D
1 2 R4 U 2 R2
= c
+
CD
2 4
4
(2.43)
CQ , D =
N arm FQ , D
N A
1
= ( 2 + 1) arm arm CD
1
As
U 2 As R 4
2
(2.44)
N arm
CP , D = CQ , D =
N A
1 3
+ ) arm arm CD
(
4
As
CD
39
(2.45)
ANSYS_FLUENT
-(Reynolds-averaged NavierStokes equations,
RANS)
3.1
-
u u w
+
+
=0
x y z
(3.1)
-
x
2u 2u 2 u
u
u
u
p
+v +w = + 2 + 2 + 2
y
z
x
y
z
x
x
(3.2)
2 v 2v 2 v
v
v
v
p
+v +w = + 2 + 2 + 2
y
z
y
x
x y z
(3.3)
2w 2w 2w
w
w
w
p
u
+v
+w = + 2 + 2 + 2
y
z
z
y
z
x
x
(3.4)
u
y
u, v, w x, y, z
40
3.2
Realizable k- k-
Realizable k-
3.2.1 k-
k- Launder Spalding [79]
k-
(turbulence kinetic energy, k)(dissipation rate, )
k-
(k)
( k ) + ( kui ) =
t
xi
x j
t
+
k
k
+ Gk + Gb YM
x j
(3.5)
()
( ) + ( ui ) =
t
xi
x j
t
2
+
+
G
G
+
C
G
(
)
1
k
3 b
2
x j
k
(3.6)
Gk Gb YM
k
41
k k
t = C
(3.7)
3.1 k- [80]
k-
C1
C2
1.44
1.92
Realizable
1.44
C2
C3
0.09
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.2
1.9
3.2.2 Realizable k-
Realizable (t) C
( k ) + ( ku j ) =
t
x j
x j
t
+
k
k
+ Gk + Gb YM
x j
(3.8)
()
( ) + ( ui ) =
t
xi
x j
t
2
+
+
C
S
C
+ C1 C3 Gb (3.9)
1
2
x j
k
k +
k
C1 = max 0.43,
, = S , S = 2 Sij Sij Gk Gb
+ 5
YM C2 C1 k
Prandtl
42
k- (t)
t = C
(3.10)
Realizable k- C
C =
A0 + As
kU *
(3.11)
U * Sij Sij +
i j ij
(3.12)
= 2 = A0=4.04As= 6 cos
ij
ij
ijk k
ij
ij
ijk k
ij
1
3
= cos1 ( 6W ),W =
Sij S jk Ski
1 u u
, S = Sij Sij , Sij = ( i + i ) 3.1
3
S
2 xi x j
3.3
k- (free shear flow)
k k-
(viscous sublayer)
3.1
y+
y+
u y
(3.13)
u =
(3.14)
(wall function)
(buffer layer)
43
3.1
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) Ekman
3.1 [80]
3.3.1
Launder Spalding [79]
44
ln( Ey* )
(3.15)
y* =
C1/ 4 k 1/2
U C 1/4 k 1/ 2
p yp
U * = P P
w /
(3.16)
3.4
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
3.5
ANSYS_FLUENT [80]
45
3.2
[81]
3.2 [80]
3.6
3.6.1
ANSYS_FLUENT
(segregated solver)(coupled
solver)
46
v dA = dA + S dV
V
(3.17)
v A S
V
Nf
Nf
f v f f Af = ( f )n Af +SV
(3.18)
N f f f A f f f v f A f
( f )
n
a p = nb anb nb + b
(3.19)
a p anb nb nb (3.18) f
f
1
=
V
Nf
A
f
(3.20)
f f = + S
= F ( )
t
(3.21)
F ( )
3 n +1 4 n + n 1
= F ( )
2t
(3.22)
n + 1 n n 1 ( t + t )( t )
( t -t )t F ( )
47
n+1 = n - n 1 + tF ( n +1 )
4
3
1
3
2
3
(3.23)
3.6.2
ANSYS_FLUENT
3.3
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
48
3.3 CFD
3.6.3
J f =J f + d f ( pco - pcl )
(3.24)
J f J f pco pcl
df =
A2f
ap
(pressure-linked equation)
Nf
Nf
J f Af = vn Af = 0
(3.25)
J f =J f + d f p co - p cl
(3.26)
J f J f
J f =J f + J f
(3.27)
SIMPLE J f
- pcl ) p
J f =d f ( pco
(3.28)
p (3.26)(3.28)(3.25)
+b
a p p = anb pnb
nb
Nf
b = J f Af
f
50
(3.29)
4.1
10 kW
Solidwork 4.1
4.1 10 kW
51
4.2
4.1 10 kW
(L)
7m
(c)
0.62 m
(R)
3m
(As)
42 m2
()
70
(Larm)
2.764 m
()
30
(H)
5.025 m
(R0)
0.8 m
(Htower)
9m
(Rtower)
0.205 m
4.2
10 kW
4.34.4
24
52
4.3
4.4 x-y
53
4.3
4.3
4.4
SIMPLE
ANSYS_FLUENT 10-3
4.4
10-3
U=6 m/s=3
4.5
t 0.1s
0.01s
54
4.5 (t)(CQ)
4.5
Ferreira [82]
k- Laminar
[80](skewness)
FLUENT 0.80.9
4.5.1
55
1:1 4.2
321 1540
Cp,mean 4.7
Mesh1 Cp,mean 0.233Mesh2 0.257Mesh3
0.264Mesh4 0.253 3.1% Mesh2
Mesh4 (0.4%) Mesh2 647
4.2
Mesh1
0.21106
0.64
3106
0.83
3.21106
Mesh2
0.23106
0.53
6.24106
0.8
6.47106
Mesh3
0.49106
0.69
8.7106
0.83
9.19106
Mesh4
0.8106
0.69
1.46107
0.83
1.54107
4.5.2
U=6 m/s=3 Mesh2
t 0.01~0.001s t >0.01s t=0.01s
4.8 Cp
Cp
Cp,mean 4.9
t=0.001s0.0025s0.005s0.01s Cp,mean 0.28
0.240.250.26 4% t=0.01s
0.001s 2%
t=0.01s t=0.01s
57
4.6
4.34.4
4R (12 m) 12R (36 m)
58
1.5 U=12
m/s=4
4R6R 4.10
4 R -8.2~1.3 Pa
-0.96 Pa 6R -4.1~ 2.1 Pa-0.06 Pa xyz
4.11~ 4.13
(u, v, w)= (12, 0, 0) 4
R u 12~12.48 m/sv 0~0.2 m/sw -0.02~
59
60
61
5.1
1.
2.
3.
U=612m/s
=1~4
U=23
461112 m/s=1~4
10 kW
U=6 m/s=1~4
5.2
5.2.1
62
63
0~ 63 = 2 CT,max 0.88
CT,max 0.470.61 U=12 m/s 5.6
U=
6 m/s CT,max 0.95 CT,max 0.420.64
0~90 240
U=12 m/s 5.8
U=6 m/s CT,max
U=612 m/s CT,max 196182
64
66
67
6 m/s 12 m/s
=0~90=0~90
U=12 m/s
U=6 m/s
=296397132
5.9~5.13 U= 6 m/s=3 X-Y
=29 5.9
=63 5.10
=97 5.11
=63 =132
5.12
68
5.9 =29(U=6
5.11 =97(U=6
5.12 =132(U=6
5.13 =29
5.14 = 63
5.13~ 5.16
=29 5.13
=63 5.14
=97 5.15
=132 5.16
5.15 =97
5.16 =132
(29
97)
(97166)
5.17~ 5.21
=29 5.17
=63 5.18
70
=97 5.19
=132
5.20
()
5.17 =29(U=6
5.18 =63(U=6
71
5.19 =97(U=6
5.20 =132(U=6
5.21 =29
5.22 =63
5.21~ 5.24
=29 5.21
=63 5.22
=97 5.23
=63
=132 5.24
(
)
5.23 =97(U
5.24 =132
73
(29
97)
(97
166)
5.25
=286 5.26
=251
=320 5.27
=354 5.28
5.29~5.32
=251 5.29
=354 5.32
(251320)
(320354)
74
5.25 =251(U=
5.26 =286(U=
5.27 =320(U=
5.28 =354(U=
5.29 =251
5.30 =286(U=
(U=6 m/s=3pmin =-649 Papmax =365 Pa) 6 m/s=3pmin =-890 Papmax=317 Pa)
75
no low pressure
zone
low pressure
zone
5.31 =320
5.32 =354
5.33~ 5.36
=251 5.33
=286
5.34
=251
=320 5.35
=354 5.36
76
5.33 =251(U=
5.34 =286(U=
5.35 =320(U=
5.36 = 354(U=
5.37~5.40
=251 5.37
=286 5.38
=320 5.39
=354
5.40
(251320)
(320354)
5.37 =251
(U=6 m/s=3Umin =0 m/sUmax=30 m/s)
5.38 =286
(U=6 m/s=3Umin =0 m/sUmax=27 m/s)
78
5.39 =320
5.40 =354
5.2.2
[41]
28<<148
79
=234 5.44~5.46
(=180~360)
5.41 =28
5.42 =28
80
5.43 =28
5.44 =243
5.45 =243
5.46 =243
5.3
5.3.1
10 kW
U=1112 m/s=1~4
U=11 m/s=1~4 5.475.48
without arm
=12 5.47
=3 5.48
39159279 =4 5.48
=1234 0.8251.5630.8490.214
=1234 0.8391.5660.8040.096
1.7%0.19%-5.3%-55.14%
=1234 0.8411.5790.8920.214
=1234 0.8561.5830.850.106
1.780.25-4.71-50.47%
82
83
mean
5.2
CT,min (=27o)Blade1Blade2Blade3
-161124219N CT, max (=98o) 431179249 N
Blade1 5.535.54
CT,min Blade1
Blade2
Blade1 CT,max Blade1
Blade2 Blade3
Blade2Blade3 CT,min
86
5.54CT,max (=98o)(U=
5.555.56
CT,min Blade1
CT,max Blade1
Blade2 CT,min
Blade1
Blade2 CT,max
Blade3 =267oCT,min
Blade2Blade3
Blade3
=338oCT,max
Blade2Blade3
87
wake
wake
vortex
wake
vortex
88
CT,min 5.57
Blade1 Blade2
CT,max 5.58
Blade1
CT,min Blade2 Blade3
666 Pa)
626 Pa)
Blade1
89
Blade3
vortex
vortex
wake
vortex
5.615.62
CT,min CT,max CT,max
CT,min 5.635.64
CT,min CT,max
CT,min CT,max
91
5.3.2
5.65
4 m/s
4 m/s 1~4
4 m/s 2~3
14 10 kW
2
14
4
2~12m/s
92
1~2
3~ 4 3 6 m/s
4 4 m/s
10 kW
2 m/s 1234 0.0170.050.033
0.002 kW 4 (=3 rpm) -0.008
kW 4 4 m/s
5.66
=1
8.2~8.8% =2
6m/s 30%
=3 2~6m/s
10%
1.3~1.6% =4 3~6m/s
6.8% 6~12m/s 2%
3.1~4.9%
0.25
5.1
2~4 m/s 2 6~
12m/s 2~3
(=1, 2)
(=3, 4)
93
5.65
5.66
94
5.1
(m/s)
(rpm)
(kW)
13
0.05
0.24
19
0.19
0.28
25
0.47
0.29
2~3
38~57
1.43~1.69
0.26~0.3
(1.35~1.69)
(0.24~0.3)
9.02~ 11.06
0.26~0.32
(8.53~11.08)
(0.25~0.32)
12.29~14.5
0.28~0.33
11
12
2~3
70~105
2~3
76~115
(11.71~14.54)
( )
(0.26~0.33)
5.4
5.3
U=6 m/s
=1~4 5.675.68
blade only
=123
4 0.5180.9930.7670.355=1
234 0.8061.4690.8280.183 =12
3 =4
1.96
Blade1
95
96
Blade1Blade2Blade3 69o189o309o
6851 NBlade1Blade2Blade3 40 o160o
280o-32 N16 N65 N Blade1
5.695.70
Blade1
CT,max Blade1Blade2Blade3
124o244o4o 7689-27NBlade1
Blade2Blade3 95o215o335o 116 N47 N74 N
Blade3 5.715.72
Blade3
Blade3
Blade2
(U=6 m/s=2
97
(U=6 m/s=2pmin=-1688
(U=6 m/s=2
Papmax=666 Pa)
5.735.74
without
armwith arm without arm
2 0.304
6.5%[44, 46]
(=4)
99
6.1
10 kW
2~12 m/s 1~4
(1)
6 m/s
12 m/s
=0~90
(29
97)
(97166)
(251320)
(320354)
=28
28<<148
100
(2)
(=12)
(=34)
10 kW 2 m/s 11 m/s
0.25 2~4
m/s 2 6~12 m/s
2~3
(3)
6 m/s(CP,max=0.239) 3
(CP,max=0.304) 2 6.5%
6.2
1.
Ferreira [52]
PIV
2.
Kirke [44]
101
3.
4.
5.
102
[1] Manwell, J.F., McGowan, J.G., Rogers, A.L. (2002). Wind Energy Explained: Theory, Design
and Application, Wiley & Sons.
[2] Gipe, P. (1995). Wind Energy Comes of Age, Wiley & Sons.
[3] Ackermann, T., Soder, L. (2002). An overview of wind energy-status 2002, Renewable and
Sustainable Energy Reviews 6:67-128.
[4] Cruz, J.I., Arribas, L. (2009). Wind energy the factsPart ITechnology, Research Centre for
Energy, Environment and Technology, Madrid, Spain.
[5] Mertens, S. (2003). The energy yield of roof mounted wind turbines, Wind Engineering
27(6):507-518.
[6] Sharpe, T., Proven, G. (2010). Crossflex: concept and early development of a true building
integrated wind turbine, Energy Buildings 42:2365-2375.
[7] (2007)
[18] Klimas, P.C., Sheldahl, R.E. (1978). Four aerodynamic prediction schemes for vertical-axis
wind turbines a compendium, Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, Report No.:
SAND78-0014.
[19] Worstell, M.H. (1979). Aerodynamic performance of the 17-m darrieus wind turbine,
Albuquerque: Sandia National Laboratories, Report No.: SAND78-1737.
[20] Paraschivoiu, I. (1981). Double-multiple streamtube model for Darrieus wind turbines, Second
DOE/NASA wind turbines dynamics workshop, NASA CP-2186:19-25, Cleveland.
[21] Larsen, H.C. (1975). Summary of a vortex theory for the cyclogiro, Proceedings of the second
US National Conferences on Wind Eng. Research: p. V8-1-3.
[22] Fanucci, J.B., Walter, R.E. (1976). Innovative wind machines: the theoretical performance of a
vertical-axis wind turbine, Proceedings of the vertical-axis wind turbine technology workshop,
Sandia National Laboratories, Report No.: SAND76-5586.
[23] Wilson, R.E. (1980). Wind-turbine aerodynamics, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodynamics 5:357-372.
[24] Strickland, J.H., Webster B.T., Nguyen T. (1979). A Vortex model of the darrieus turbine: an
analytical and experimental study, J. Fluids Eng 101:500-505.
[25] Paraschivoiu, I., Allet, A. (1995). Viscous flow and dynamic stall effects on vertical-axis wind
turbines, International J. Rotating Machinery 2(1):1-14.
[26] Islam, M., Ting, D. S.-K., Fartaj, A. (2008). Aerodynamic models for Darrieus-type
straight-bladed vertical axis wind turbines, Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 12:
1087-1109.
[27] Berg, D.E., Klimes, P. C., Stephenson, W. A. (1990). Aerodynamic design and initial
performance measurements for the Sandia 34-m diameter vertical-axis wind turbine,
Proceedings of the Ninth ASME Wind Energy Symposium, ASME.
[28] Lissaman, P.B.S. (1983). Low Reynolds number airfoils, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.15:223-239.
[29] Deglaire, P. (2010). Analytical aerodynamic simulation tools for vertical axis wind turbines,
PhD thesis, Uppsala University.
[30] Wernert, P., Geissler, W., Raffel, M., Kompenhans, J. (1996). Experimental and numerical
investigations of dynamic stall on a pitching airfoil, AIAA J. 34(5):982-989.
[31] Fujisawa, N., Takeuchi, M. (1999). Flow visualization and PIV measurement of flow field
around a Darrieus rotor in dynamic stall, J. Visualization 1(4):379-386.
[32] Leishman, J. (1990). Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 23012 aerofoil, Exp Fluids
9(1):49-58.
[33] Raffel, M., Kompenhans, J., Wernert, P. (1995). Investigation of the unsteady flow velocity
field above an airfoil pitching under deep dynamic stall conditions, Exp Fluids 19(2):103-111.
[34] Ferreira, C.S., Kuik, G.V., Bussel, G.V., Scarano. F. (2009). Visualization by PIV of dynamic
104
[36] (2010)
17
[37] Gupta, R., Biswas, A. (2010). Computational fluid dynamics analysis of a twisted three-bladed
H-Darrieus rotor, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy, doi:10.1063/1.3483487.
[38] Beri, H., Yao, Y. (2011). Numerical simulation of unsteady flow to show self-starting of
vertical axis wind turbine using Fluent, J. Applied Science 11(6):962-970.
[39] El-Samanoudy, M., Ghorab, A.A.E., Youssef, Sh.Z. (2010). Effect of some design parameters
on the performance of a Giromill vertical axis wind turbine, Ain Shams Eng. J.,
doi:10.1016/j.asej.2010.09.012.
[40] Kirke, B.K., Lazauskas, L. (2010). Limitations of fixed pitch darrieus hydrokinetic turbines
and the challenge of variable pitch, Renewable Energy, doi:10.1016/j.renene.2010.08.027.
[41] Howell, R., Qin, N., Edwards, J., Durrani, N. (2010). Wind tunnel and numerical study of a
small vertical axis wind turbine, Renewable Energy 35:412-422.
[42] Scheurich, F., Fletcher, T.M., Brown, R.E. (2010). The influence of blade curvature and helical
blade twist on the performance of a vertical-axis wind turbine, 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences
Meeting and Exhibit.
[43] Shiono, M., Suzuki K., Kiho, S. (2002). Output characteristics of darrieus water turbine with
helical blades for tidal current generations, Proceedings of The 12th International Offshore and
Polar Engineering Conference.
[44] Kirke, B.K. (1998). Evaluation of self-starting VAWT for stand-alone applications, Ph.D thesis,
Griffith University.
[45] Darrieus wind turbine analysis. http://windturbine-analysis.netfirms.com/index.htm
[46] Li, Y., Calisal, S.M. (2010). Three-dimensional effects and arm effects on modeling a vertical
axis tidal current turbine, Renewable Energy 35:2325-2334.
[47] http://www.iwind.com.tw/
[48] South, P., Mitchell, R., Jacobs, E. (1983). Strategies for the evaluation of advanced wind
energy concepts, Solar Energy Research Institute USA, SERI/SP-635-1142.
[49] Wilson, R.E, Lissaman, P.B.S. (1974). Applied aerodynamics of wind power machines, Oregon
State University Corvallis.
[50] Favier, D., Maresca, C., Rebontf, J. (1982). Dynamic stall due to fluctuactions of velocity and
incidence, AIAA J. 20:1281-1288.
105
[51] Rinoie, K., Takemura, N. (2004). Oscillating behavior of laminar separation bubble formed on
an aerofoil near stall, The Aeronautical J. 108:153-163.
[52] McCroskey. W.H. (1982). Unsteady Airfoil, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 14:285-311.
[53] Leishman, J.G. (1990). Dynamic stall experiments on the NACA 23012 aerofoil, Exp. Fluids
9:49-58.
[54] Leishman, J.G. (2000). Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press.
[55] McCroskey, W., Carr, L., McAlister, K. (1976). Dynamic stall experiments on oscillating
airfoils, AIAA J. 14(1):57-63.
[56] Carr, L. (1988). Progress in analysis and prediction of dynamic stall, J. Aircraft 25:6-17.
[57] Fujisawa, N., Shibuya, S. (2001). Observations of dynamic stall on Darrieus wind turbine
blades, J. Wind Eng. & Ind. Aerody. 89:201-214.
[58] Abramovich, H. (1987). Vertical axis wind turbines: a survey and bibliography, Wind Eng.
11(6):334-343.
[59] Noll, R.B., Ham, N.D. (1982). Effects of dynamic stall on SWECS, J. Sol. Energy Eng.
104:96-101.
[60] Paraschivoiu, I. (2002). Wind Turbine Design with Emphasis on Darrieus Concept,
Polytechnic International Press.
[61] Tsang, K.K.Y., So, R.M.C., Leung, R.C.K., Wang, X.Q. (2008). Dynamic stall behavior from
unsteady force measurements, J. Fluids and Structures 24:129-150.
[62] Ho, C.M., Chen, S.H. (1981). Unsteady wake of a plunging airfoil, AIAA J. 19(11):1492-1494.
[63] Chang, J.W., Eun, H.B. (2003). Reduced frequency effects on the near-wake of an oscillating
elliptic airfoil, KSME International J. 17(8):1234-1245.
[64] Laneville A., Vittecoq, P. (1986). Dynamic stall: The case of the vertical axis wind turbine, J.
Solar Energy Eng. 108:140-145.
[65] Ervin, A., Christian, P., Thierry, M. (2006). A numerical approach for estimating the
aerodynamic characteristics of a two bladed vertical Darrieus wind turbine, Proc. the 2nd
Workshop on Vortex Dominated Flows 95-102.
[66] Migliore, P.G., Wolfe, P.G., Fanucci, J.B. (1980). Flow curvature effects on Darrieus turbine
blade aerodynamics. J. Energy 4:49-55.
[67] Mays, I., Holmes, B.A. (1979). Commercial development of the variable geometry vertical
axis windmill. International Power Generation, Surrey, UK.
[68] Templin, R.J. (1974). Aerodynamic performance theory for the NRC vertical-axis wind turbine,
National Research Council, Canada, National Aeronautical Establishment Laboratory
Technical Report LTR-LA-160.
[69] Baker, J.R. (1983). Features to aid or enable self-starting of fixed pitch low solidity vertical
106
107