Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. 10
2. - 13
3. 17
4. 20
5. 22
6. 24
7. 29
8. -31
9. - 33
10. 35
11. -36
12. -38
13. -40
14. 42
15. -44
1. 48
2. 51
3. 53
4. 56
5. 58
6. / -65
7. / -67
8. - 70
9. -75
10. 1 82
11. 24 85
1. 89
2. 92
3. 95
4. / -100
5. -102
6. -104
7. 106
8. 111
9. 114
10. /117
93525A526
9361
A936796125
A
393825A
93825A
AA
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
10
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2. CSR
3.
1. 9622
2.
11
3. 955
4.
5.
6.
1. 245
2. 2008
3.
12
12
2-3
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
13
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
14
5. 978290970081417(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) 3.2.1.2
636479
7. 12
7
1.http://law.moj.gov.tw..
2.http://www.judicial.gov.tw/
3.http://biolaw.law.ntu.edu.tw/
4.http://www.doh.gov.tw/newdoh/90-law//law-1.htm
5. 2008-11
6.
20 1999- 11
15
6.
7.2005
48(11):39-42
8.15 2010-041
9. 201014361-67
10.997
47.p.2-p.6
1. 2008-11
2.-
2006-03
3. 2005-10
4.1332004-02
5.-.. 2007-09 1
6.-II 2006-091
7.- 2008-091
16
1.
2.
3. systematic review
4. (meta-analysis)
1.
17
2.
3. meta-analysis
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4. meta-analysis
1.
2.
3.
4. meta-analysis
1. CSR
2.
18
1.Hackshaw AK, Paul EA, Davenport ES. Evidence-based Dentistry-An Introduction. 2006,
Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford, UK, 1st edition.
2.-2007
1.Thomas MV. Evidence-based Dentistry. Dent Clin N Am 2009, Vol. 53, Issue 1, pp.
1-168.
2.Sutherland SE, Evidence-based Dentistry, Part I-VI. J Can Dent Assoc 2001; 67:204-6,
277-80, 320-3, 375-8, 442-5, 582-5.
19
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. SOP
1.
2. B
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
20
4. SOP
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
1. ?
2.
3. SOP
1. CSR
2.
1.SOP2004
1.2001
21
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
22
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2. 99-100
3. TQM
4. PDCA
5. 5S
1. CSR
2.
1.2008
1.2008
2.2010
23
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4. time out
5.
6.
24
7. vital sign
SOAP
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. mini-CEXDOPSCSR
25
SOAP
2.
3.
1. 2005
2. 2009
1.Richards, Joan, R.N., Keogh, James Edward. Medical charting desmystified. 2008,
McGraw-Hill desmystified series, McGraw-Hill, New York.
26
1.Identification
2.C.C
3.P.I
4.PDH
5.PMH
6.Family History
1.()
1.Toothache at ## for 2 days
2.
2.right face swelling for 1 week
3.
3.Sudden onset of toothache at ##
today
4.
4.Asking for dental check-up
Periodontal problem
Mandibular fracture
:
Allergy to penicillin
1.(
Hospitalization for facial trauma
)
DM
2.
Hypertension
regular medication(
Heart disease
)
Cancer, DM, Hypertension, liver disease, heart
DM
disease
7.Personal
History
()
1.present
Cigarette
illness
Alcohol
2.
Betel nut
8.Social History
family Divorced
lifeeating habit
Alcohol
27
9.Dental Exam.
10.Laboratory
data
11.Image Study
12.Impression
13.Plan
C.F:
1.#__ Percussion pain
2.Tenderness,induration
3.Swelling over ___
4.missing:
(:
5.caries:
)Dental charting
6.ill-fitted prosthesis:
7.residual root:
8.incomplete endo:
9.impaction:
Biopsy result: cystic change was
Blood testculture study
confirmed
1.Taken FM PA x-ray:
Crown fracture was seen on ---2.Check bite-wing x-ray:
Caries was noted on
3.Check panoramic film(pano x-ray Supernumbery tooth was found
local findingnegative finding)
between-4.Dental CT:
1.Tentative diagnosis( 1.Adult periodontitis
)
2. MPD syndrome
3. Class II with Deep bite
symptomrule
out or rule in
3.
Tx options:
A.
B.
Patient chose option __A or B
Periodontitis with infectionantibiotic prescribed
to reduce infection before further periodontal
treatment or examination.
Tx. Plan:
1.:poor oral hygiene suggest
brushing teeth after each meal. Use of dental floss
2.
14.
28
1.problem-oriented
(active problem) SOAP
,
Subjective data:
Objective data:
Assessment:or (impression)
diagnosis
Plan:()
Time-out,
indicationcomplicationresult
99
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
29
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
30
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
1.
2.
31
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
32
1.
2. 64
1. 64
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
33
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
34
84
87
...
..
35
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
1.
2.
36
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1. DOPS
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
37
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
1.
2.
38
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
39
1.
2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
40
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
41
1.
2.
3.
4.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
42
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
1.4(1) (2)
(3) (4)
2000
43
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
44
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2. mini-CEX
3.
45
6.
a.
b.
46
1.
2. X
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
48
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2. mini-CEX
3. CSR
4.
49
1.SCI
50
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
51
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2. DOPS
3. CSR
52
1. 24
2.
3. 91X
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
53
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3. (DOPS)Task-specificGeneral performance
Task-specificX
General performance
4.
54
1.
2.SCI
55
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3. (problem-based learning; PBL)(Evidenced- based Medicine;
EBM)
4.
56
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. DOPS
2.
3.
1.Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Case selection and treatment planning. InPathways of the
Pulp 9th ed, PA, USA, Mosby, Elsevier, pp. 86-91, 2006.
2.Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Preparation for treatment. InPathways of the Pulp 9th ed,
PA, USA, Mosby, Elsevier, pp. 97-135, 2006.
57
1. 19
2.
3.
4.
5.
(1) #11#31)
(2)
(3)
58
X
6.
(1) #38,48
< >
X
<
>
X
X X
59
8.
(1)
(2) #11&21
9.
Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, 5th Edition, Edited by Jan Lindhe;
chapter14 Trauma from occlusion: periodontal tissues p349~362; chapter19
Aggressive Periodontitis, p428~458; chapter 25 Concepts in Periodontal Tissue
Regeneration, p541569.
Needleman IG, Worthington HV, Giedrys-Leeper E, Tucker RJ. Guided tissue
regeneration for periodontal infra-bony defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr
19;(2):CD001724.
Tonetti MS, Cortellini P, Lang NP, Suvan JE, Adriaens P, Dubravec D, Fonzar A,
Fourmousis I, Rasperini G, Rossi R, Silvestri M, Topoll H, Wallkamm B, Zybutz M.
Clinical outcomes following treatment of human intrabony defects with GTR/bone
replacement material or access flap alone. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical
trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2004 Sep;31(9):770-6.
Lang,N.P.,Bartold, P.M., Cullinan, M., Jeffcoat, M., Mombelli, A. et al. : Consensus
Report: Aggressive Periodontits. Ann Periodontol 1999;4:53.
Drfer CE. Antimicrobials for the treatment of aggressive periodontitis. Oral Dis.
2003;9 Suppl 1:51-3. Review.
60
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
61
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.
2. (DOPS)
3.
2.Jan Linde, Niklaus P. Lang, Thorklid Carring: Clinical Periodontology and Implant
Dentistry, 5th edition, 2007.
I
R
I
Mast. Mucosa
R
Furcation
Buccal
I
Recession(F)
R
I
Probing(F)
R
Palatal
I
Probing(P)
R
I
Recession(P)
R
#18 #17 #16 #15 #14 #13 #12 #11 #21 #22 #23 #24 #25
I
R
I
Mast. Mucosa
R
Furcation
Lingual
I
Recession(L)
R
I
Probing(L)
R
Buccal
I
Probing(B)
R
I
Recession(B)
R
#28
4
4
6
6
BI
5
4
MI
3
3
3
3
4
3
000
000
224
112
000
000
555
423
000
000
6210
425
000
000
323
323
000
000
224
213
000
000
323
423
000
000
259
225
000
000
329
225
000
000
435
222
000
000
1027
523
000
000
523
322
000
000
823
523
000
000
325
423
000
000
746
423
000
000
635
333
000
000
322
223
443
342
000
000
423
322
000
000
527
327
000
000
222
223
000
000
322
313
000
000
323
322
000
000
327
324
000
000
338
327
000
000
323
312
000
000
857
333
000
000
324
223
000
000
222
313
000
000
323
323
000
000
724
523
000
000
424
324
000
000
353
333
000
000
#48 #47 #46 #45 #44 #43 #42 #41 #31 #32 #33 #34 #35
#36
#37
#38
#27
+
+
5
4
Mobility
+
+
5
3
#26
5
3
1
1
5
3
4
4
4
4
3
3
5
3
DI
6
5
DIBI
4
3
4
3
BI
3
3
4
4
2
2
3
2
4
5
+
1
5
4
000
000
332
323
000
000
836
425
000
000
523
224
000
000
223
323
000
000
312
212
000
000
212
212
000
000
316
316
000
000
222
222
000
000
212
212
000
000
226
226
000
000
723
413
000
000
312
322
000
000
622
523
000
000
333
323
NA
NA
NA
NA
853
522
000
000
629
516
000
000
723
214
000
000
323
313
000
000
313
323
000
000
313
213
000
000
317
315
000
000
313
213
000
000
323
313
000
000
327
312
000
000
823
512
000
000
322
313
000
000
712
412
000
000
222
233
000
000
233
323
000
000
Mobility
5
4
5
4
3
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
0
63
No
Loss of Attachment?
Loss of Attachment?
Yes
No
Yes
Periodontal
health with
history of
periodontitis
Yes
Periodontal
health
Periodontitis
Gingivitis
Evidence of rapidly
developing disease?
No
Yes
Chronic periodontitis
Aggressive Periodontitis
Yes
Esthetic concern?
Maintenance
No
Surgery
Yes
Repeat root planning
Indication of GTR?
(eg. Deep narrow intrabony
defect > 4mm)
No
Resective or inductive
osseous surgery
64
Yes
GTR
76
1.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
1.
65
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3. (DOPS)Task-specificGeneral performance
Task-specificX/
General performance
4.
66
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
67
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4. (Ferrule effect)(biological width)(Emergence
profile)
5. (retention)(resistance)(anti-rotation)
6.
1.
2.
3. (DOPS)Task-specificGeneral performance
Task-specificX/
General performance
4.
68
69
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
(1)
(2)
70
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
3.
(1)
(2)
(3)
4.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
71
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4. CSR
1. , .
. 1998. .
2. .
5-181998.
3. .
27-361998.
4. 1999
.
5.
1999 .
72
7. 2000.
8. 2005.
9. 4-edition
2009 , .
10.
1(3)2005.
11.
20072610
12.
2006-2008
13.. , --.
, 2010, 11.
1.
B 90(3):279-87
1991.
2. .B .
15;1-14, 1994.
3.
19(2)34-472004.
4.
1999.
5. 2003.
6.
2005.
7. :
2005-2006.
73
6. ...89.8.1 98-1112000.
8. ,
. , 2006.2511.
9. 2007
10.2006
11.Gluck GM, Morganstein W M. Jongs Community Dental Health (fourth edition),
Mosby, 1998.
12.Gewrink KV. Community Oral Health Practice for the Dental Hygienist, Saunders,2002.
13.Cappelli DP, Mobley CC, Prevention in Clinical Oral Health Care, Mosby,2008.
74
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1. /
2.
(1)
a.
b.
75
c.
d.
e.
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
1.
1.
1.
(1)
(2)
(3)
2.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
76
1.2001
2.
3.2005
4.2005
5.1999
6.1998
1.1999
2.2009
77
3.CSR
()
78
()
()
6(
)
(:
)
08:00-09:00
09:00-09:30
09:30-10:30
11:30-12:30
12:30-13:00
13:00~
79
SOP
(
)
80
-1
18
17
16
15
14
13
12
11
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
54
53
52
51
61
62
63
64
65
85
84
83
82
81
71
72
73
74
75
48
47
46
45
44
C
F
M
R
S
43
42
31
31
32
caries
fractured crown
malocclusion
residual root(s)
calculus
33
34
35
36
37
1
38
81
55
28
1.
2.
3. 20086
20086152008629
4.
a. 61519
176cm62kg
b. 618
c. 622
d. 629
82
-1
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2. (I&D)
3.
83
4.
5.
1. DOPS
2.
3.
4.
84
-24
1.
2.
24
24
: 2010100720101013
4.
a. 100749
155cm67kg
38
CBCWBC
13000pencillin testAugmentin
b. 1011
c. 1013
85
3. 201010
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
86
-24
2
1
1. CSR
2.
3.
4.
24
87
1. 34179cm66kg
2. sialolith of left submandibular gland combined
with sialoadenitis
3.
4. 3
5.
a. 92036.8112/83mmHg78/min
2.5cm X 2.5cm
fever
#37#47 #18,#28malposition
#48Xpanoramic film)
radiolucent arearadio-opaque)
occlusal filmgenical process
0.3
b. 927
89
1.
2. X
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3. ludwigs angina
4.
5.
90
1.
2. DOPS
3.
1.
91
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3. problem-based learning; PBLEvidenced- based
Medicine; EBM
4.
92
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1. DOPS
2.
3.
1.Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Case selection and treatment planning. InPathways of the
Pulp 9th ed, PA, USA, Mosby, Elsevier, pp. 86-91, 2006.
2.Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Preparation for treatment. InPathways of the Pulp 9th ed,
PA, USA, Mosby, Elsevier, pp. 97-135, 2006.
3.Stephen C, Hargreaves KM. Periradicular surgery. InPathways of the Pulp 9th ed, PA,
USA, Mosby, Elsevier, pp. 97-135, 2006.
93
94
1. 35
2.
(1) Probing
25
Probing depth B
Recession(B)
Masticatory mucosa
Mobility
Furcation involvement
26
223
222
000
01-1
332
0-2-1
4
333
00-1
4
(2)
14 mm
(3)
3. 99-01-2099-02-20
4. X#25#27
2526
2mm
95
2mm(biological width)
4 mm
(1) CEJ~bone crest
#25
26
441
444
442
444
(2) 2mm
(3)
5.
(1)
(2)
(3)
6.
96
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
1.
2.
97
Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry Fifth Edition Edited by Jan Linde chapter
3
1
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
98
3
-
1
1.
2. (DOPS)
3.
99
1. 54
2.
3.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
100
3
-
1
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3. (altered-cast)
1.
2.
3. (DOPS)Task-specificGeneral performance
Task-specificX/
General performance
4.
101
1.
2.
3. (behavior guidance)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
102
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2. (clamp)
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3. DOPS
4.
103
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. (behavior guidance)
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
104
1.
2.
3.
4.
1. (behavior guidance)
2.
3. X
4.
1.
2.
3. DOPS
4.
105
1. 20
2.
(1)
a.
b. 2mm
c.
d. straight profileNasolabial angle < 90o
(2)
106
b. -1mm-1mm-0.5mm-0.5mm
c. Overjet : 5 mmOverbite: 2.5 mm
d. Boltons ratio3-3:80%6-6: 91.3%
e.
f.
(3) X
a.
b.
(4) X
107
a. 1.5mm
3
1
3.
(1) Class I Average
(2)Bimaxillary dentoalveolar protrusion
4.
(1)
(2)overjetoverbite
(3)
(4)
5.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)(Gingivoplasty)
6.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
108
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
109
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
1.
2. CSR
3.
a.
b.
1. 30
2. -
3.
a. 86X--
(
Porcelain Onlay )
b. 813
1.
2.
1.
2.
111
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
1.
2.
3. (DOPS)Task-specificGeneral performance
Task-specific
General performance
4.
112
1.
2.SCI
113
1.
2.
3. X
4.
1.
2.
3. X
4.
5.
6.
1.
2.
3.
4.
114
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3. Radio-opaque
4. Radio-lucent
5.
1. mini-CEX
2.
3.
4.
1.Contrell D. et al. What is effective supervision and how does it happen? A critical incident
study. Medical Education 2002;36:1042-1049
2.Jane JL, Gottlieb RP. Structured Clinical Observations: A Method to Teach Skills with
Limited Time and Financial Support. Pediatrics 2000;105(4):973-977
3.Stowe CD, Gardner SF. Real-time standardized participant grading of an objective
structured clinical examination. Am J Pharm Educ.2005;69(3):Article 41.
4.Rohlin M., P.N. Hirschmann et al. Global Trends in Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
Education. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Patho Oral Radiol & Endo 1995; 80(5):517-26
5.(2005),
115
116
1. 50
2. 3646
3.
X:
1.
51
2.4838
3.15472647
4.36
5.18 281636
53
1.483818
28473626151636
2.481847
55
382836
57-512
512
1.1636
2.2615
3.
117
1.15
512-518
1.26
2.
3.
520-525
26
524-79
712
2615
35-37
1.
2.
3.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
118
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
1.STDS
2.CSR
a.
b.
119
3.
1.SCI
120