The Atlantic

How Individual Actions Affect Economic Inequality

Thinking micro about a problem that’s macro
Source: Matt Cardy / Getty

Writing last year, the New York University sociologist Guillermina Jasso used two words to describe economic inequality in America: “high” and “increasing.”

The most common proposals for turning those descriptors around are big-picture government policies—things like hiking the minimum wage or raising tax rates for the highest earners. But in a paper last year, Jasso, who has been publishing academic work on inequality for four decades, sought a scientific answer to the question of what individuals living in unequal societies can do to mitigate the problem themselves (aside from voting for politicians with similar intentions).

Jasso’s method was to think through what kinds of concrete actions would reduce inequality as it’s measured by various mathematical formulas. As such,or , but rather proposes some basic principles for assessing how one’s actions might, however marginally, affect the inequality of a given society.

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from The Atlantic

The Atlantic3 min readPolitics
How American Women Are Amplifying Their Political Power
“I am not interested in building the capacity of people who are in office that want to take away my health care.”
The Atlantic2 min readPolitics
Chris Christie’s Debate Tips
Few Americans know what it’s like to stand on stage for a nationally televised presidential debate. And the few who do have strong partisan biases. With both of those things in mind, I listened Monday as Chris Christie, the former New Jersey governor
The Atlantic2 min readPsychology
A Rational Case for Following Your Emotions
In the popular American imagination, emotion and rationality are often mutually exclusive. One is erratic, unpredictable, and often a liability; the other, cool, collected, and absent obvious feeling. And even though research suggests that people exp