Los Angeles Times

Editorial: Who gets to say what the rules mean?

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments about whether federal courts should be required to defer to the executive branch's interpretation of its own rules, if that interpretation is reasonable. This may sound like a technical, legalistic dispute - and it is - but the wrong decision could make it vastly harder for the federal government to protect the public.

If courts start to second-guess executive-branch

You're reading a preview, sign up to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times3 min read
Hyun-Jin Ryu Provides Enough For Dodgers To Slip By Bottom-dwelling Marlins
LOS ANGELES - There was no earthquake like the 7.1-magnitute temblor that rattled Dodger Stadium on July 5, no strange atmospheric conditions or precipitation that would affect pitcher Hyun-Jin Ryu's grip or footing on the mound. Still, something abo
Los Angeles Times4 min read
Editorial: We Went To The Moon
A decade before Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took their first steps on the lunar surface, a popular children's book was published with a title that sounded like a promise: "You Will Go to the Moon." The illustrations showed a young boy's trip in a
Los Angeles Times4 min readPolitics
Presidential Field: The 700 Club?
There is just about every shade of politics you can imagine represented by the people who run for president. There is Vermin Supreme, the perennial candidate who wears a boot for a hat and wants to give everyone free ponies. Or 89-year-old Mike Grave