Audiobook7 hours
The Return of Dr. Fu-Manchu
Written by Sax Rohmer
Narrated by John Bolen
Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
()
About this audiobook
Originally published as a series of short stories in Colliers Weekly, this action-packed sequel to The Insidious Dr. Fu-Manchu features a number of fiendish doings, including kidnappings, snake murders, albino peacocks, killer apes, quicksand, a haunted house, rat torture, and more. Fu-Manchu summons a poisonous cat, fiery hands of death, and a mummy to hunt down the Reverend Eltham and obtain the coveted name of a secret agent in China. Fu-Manchu's nemeses Neyland Smith and Dr. Petrie are witness to the tortures of the wire jacket and Six Gates of Joyful Wisdom and narrowly escape death on the moors of West England. And the return of the beautiful Karamaneh raises the question of whether her intent is to aid the nefarious doctor or Smith and Petrie. Can the relentless and cruel Fu-Manchu be stopped?
Author
Sax Rohmer
Sax Rohmer (1883–1959) was a pioneering and prolific author of crime fiction, best known for his series of novels featuring the archetypal evil genius Dr. Fu-Manchu.
Related to The Return of Dr. Fu-Manchu
Related audiobooks
Lestrade and the Kiss of Horus Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpace Tug Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Martian Odyssey Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tarzan and the Golden Lion - Tarzan Series, Book 9 (Unabridged) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Beasts of Tarzan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Tailor's Son: An Oakenfall Chronicle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Two Destinies Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Reluctant Assassin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Adventures of Philip Marlowe - Volume 5: The Heart of Gold & The Hard Way Out Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStorm Over Warlock Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Ivory God Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSole Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Red Arrows in the Night Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Armageddon 2419 AD: Booktrack Edition Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Golden Scorpion Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/53 Science Fiction Stories by Gerald Vance Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5One Dead Hen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quest of the Sacred Slipper Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Impatient Dissidents - A New Sherlock Holmes Mystery, Episode 23 (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Return of Dr. Fu-Manchu Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreatures of the Abyss Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Symphony Under Siege Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Outspan: Tales of South Africa Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5B. J. Harrison Reads Ayesha, The Return of She Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBadge of Infamy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBaker Street Irregulars 2: The Game is Afoot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Oakdale Affair: Partial Sequel to The Mucker Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Suspense: Death Went Along For the Ride Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDegrees of Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Classics For You
Gone With The Wind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Yellow Wallpaper Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5To Kill a Mockingbird Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Pride and Prejudice: Classic Tales Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Iliad: A New Translation by Caroline Alexander Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Legend of Sleepy Hollow: Classic Tales Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Gatsby Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Crucible Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Sherlock Holmes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Name of the Rose Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Fountainhead Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master and Margarita Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers in the Attic: 40th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Perks of Being a Wallflower Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Series of Unfortunate Events #1 Multi-Voice, A: The Bad Beginning Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Frankenstein Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/520,000 Leagues Under the Sea: Classic Tales Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sense and Sensibility Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Picture of Dorian Gray: Classic Tales Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Tale of Two Cities Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Separate Peace Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince: Machiavelli Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Around the World in 80 Days: Classic Tales Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Atlas Shrugged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Thousand Ships: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Tree Grows in Brooklyn Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5War & Peace - Volume I Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Return of Dr. Fu-Manchu
Rating: 3.485915563380282 out of 5 stars
3.5/5
71 ratings19 reviews
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Absolutely unreadable. But I know I enjoyed these when I was in high school.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I wasn't sure what to expect when I downloaded this free Kindle book to read. Set in early 1900's England, this story introduces Nayland Smith (an adventurer recently returned from the Orient), Dr. Petrie (who plays Watson to Smith's Holmes, and is a bit of a namby-pamby IMO), the beautiful dusky Arabic princess Kâramanèh (held as a slave by Fu Manchu... without any visible negative effects of course) and of course, Dr. Fu Manchu, the MOST evil, MOST intelligent, the MOST everything, to ever come out of the Orient. Repeated running from residence to residence, location to location, just misses and encounters with Fu Manchu where he somehow diabolically escapes... it's all great fun... if you like that sort of thing. 3 1/2 stars and hopeful for future installments...
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I remember finding this in a box of musty old paperbacks when I was a kid, and reading it and being completely perplexed and intrigued. It's so wrong on so many levels. Yet, you've got Dr. Petrie prescribing whiskey and soda like it was going out of style. I've got to give some love to a group of characters whose idea of "hurry, we must catch Dr. Fu-Manchu" means that they have to drink their whiskey and soda quickly.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Meh. Bad in the ways I was expecting (overwrought racism, prose, etc.), but I just couldn't find myself caring about the plot (which was awfully episodic). Plot was acceptably outlined. Got some reasonably ridiculous quotes from it. I'd like to see a version that's sympathetic to the title character.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Well, okay, this is...it's entertaining, okay? I had fun. It's a pretty shameless Sherlock Holmes ripoff, with a doctor sidekick narrating an adventure in which the protagonist is his brilliant detectiveish friend. Moriarty is Asianified, but comes with the same breathless, constant hyperbolic descriptions: "The most brilliant criminal mind to have existed in generations!"
The problem with hyperbole is that you kinda have to back it up. Conan Doyle is great at this. There's this fine line you want to walk: you want to leave the reader unable, usually, to solve the mystery, but when you do the big reveal at the end you want the reader not to feel cheated. I have to think, "I didn't get that - but I could have. I almost did. It makes sense." Conan Doyle pioneered that, as far as I know. (Don't bring up Dupin! Holmes owes that guy, but not for this. Poe sucked at this. "Murders at the Rue Morgue" spoiler: "The fucking orangutan did it" is not a good reveal.)
On the other hand, there's a less-discussed, dirtier trick that can be effective: the obvious, shitty reveal that you totally guessed 50 pages ago. You think you don't like that, but actually you sortof do, for the same reason you enjoy easy crossword puzzles or yelling out Jeopardy answers: because it makes you feel smart. You may not come away with the utmost respect for the author...but you may buy his next book anyway, because it's nice to feel smart. I'm convinced that some authors do this on purpose. It's a bit of a craven, lazy strategy, but whatever works I guess.
So...Fu Manchu sometimes pulls off some neat tricks. The explanation for the corpses with mutilated hands was pretty fun, and there's a terrific scene near the end involving mushrooms. And for all I know the old trapdoor trick was invented by Fu Manchu. (Good question, actually.) But still...most of the time, you can guess what's happened way before Nayland Smith does, which makes it hard to respect him as a genius, which therefore makes it hard to respect the insidious Chinaman who's constantly outsmarting him.
And speaking of Chinamen, have you heard that this book is SUPER CRAZY RACIST? Well, you heard right! It is hilariously, horribly racist, in that adorable old-timey racist way: "Unless you have been in their clutches, you can never imagine the depths of cruelty to which a Chinaman is capable of stooping." You just want to pinch racism's cheek when it comes like that.
This is pulp fiction at its pulpiest. Narrow escapes, beautiful exotic women, diabolical traps, madmen, gaping plot holes...Sure, man. I dug it. - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Episodic and moderately entertaining yarn (or yarns) pitting Edwardian British Government agent Nayland Smith and his cohort, friend and narrator, Dr. Petrie, against the master criminal "yellow peril personified" Dr. Fu Manchu. Fu Manchu himself is the most interesting character, and his varied and ingenious ways of facilitating murder in inaccessible locales and locked rooms the most entertaining tropes. It was also amusing to read a thriller actually written in this era (circa 1913) depicting a world now so often treated in steampunk fare.
As to the "politically incorrect" aspect, I will only observe that these stories were written on the heels of the Boxer Rebellion and opium wars. What can we make of the paranoia about the Yellow Race seeking to dominate the White Race if not the imperialists suppressed guilt projected outward onto to imagined mastermind of evil? - Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5I thought I would give a Fu Manchu audiobook a go after finding the Christopher Lee films reasonably entertaining. Was it originally written in weekly episodes for a pulp magazine? That's what it appears to be - there is no real objective or conclusion to the novel, it is just a collection of chase, capture, escape ... Harrison, the reader, has a pleasant voice, but there was nothing about the tale to grab the attention. Give me Bulldog Drummond, any day!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Imagine a person, tall, lean and feline, high-shouldered, with a brow like Shakespeare and a face like Satan, a close-shaven skull, and long, magnetic eyes of the true cat-green.The Insidious Dr. Fu-Manchu has all the weaknesses of the typical pulp stories of its era. It perpetuates racial and gender stereotypes, it relies too much on melodrama, and it overuses hyperbole. And yet, with all that, it still manages to entertain.The two protagonists, Petrie and Nayland Smith, are out to save the world from the evil genius Dr. Fu-Manchu. Try as they might to stop him, Fu-Manchu always stays one step ahead, moving from one shady hideout to the next, unleashing horrible dangers upon helpless victims. Fortunately, the two heroes have the help of the alluring Karamaneh, woman of mystery.Fans of the old pulp magazines like Doc Savage, The Shadow or Weird Tales will find much to enjoy in The Insidious Dr. Fu-Manchu. Readers with more modern tastes may find it offensive and hard to stomach.As for me, despite its flaws, I loved its energy, its exotic flavor, and the way Rohmer brings the evil Fu-Manchu to life.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5An enjoyable romp, although less a coherent storyline than a series of adventurous episodes. You need to leave your political correctness and non-racist sensibilities behind to read it comfortably, but if you can do that and accept that the political views and racist language were signs of the time it was written in rather than any unusually bigoted viewpoint of the author then you can enjoy the adventure. Speaking personally, and as someone who had read quite a bit of late 1800s - early 1900s fiction, I find these insights into the general mindset of the period fascinating and fiction, where such attitudes are simply an accepted part of the prose, brings this much more to life than any academic work ever could. Written today it would be offensive, but taken in the context of its time it is simply the way it was, and all the more interesting for it. It becomes a social history lesson without any intention of being so. While this first Dr Fu Manchu novel does not, in my opinion, reach the heights gained by such authors as H Rider Haggard, H G Wells, Rudyard Kipling, Arthur Conan Doyle or early Edgar Rice Burroughs (all of whom wrote in that period at the end of the 19th Century and/or the beginning of the 20th) it is nevertheless a fun adventurous romp rushing from one dangerous situation to the next. Forget your 21st Century sensibilities and enjoy.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A good story, though a trifle hard to read at times, do to the overt racism against the "yellow menace". Setting that aside, Dr. Fun Manchu is one heck of a villain - cunning, smart, and slippery as heck! Nayland Smith and Dr. Petrie, along with Inspector Weymouth try hard to best him, but to no avail. I liked all the characters, along with the potential love interest Karamaneh, but the Dr. stands tall among them! He is their intellectual superior, and an expert in poisons, drugs, fungi, and bacilli, with the ability to come and go as he pleases! The story, and the style, remind me of Bram Stoker's Dracula, and the adversarial nature of the characters is reminiscent of another doctor, Sherlock Holmes. Still, the racist nature of the narrative does give me pause as to how I feel overall about the book. I leave it to you to decide for yourself!
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A surprisingly good, albeit politically incorrect, read. Quite fun and a quick read. Petrie and Smith made worthy opponents to the evil Fu Manchu. Written in 1913, many aspects of this book seemed ahead of its time. I thoroughly enjoyed it.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I read this "yellow menace" novel when I was a kid and was enthralled by Rohmer's depiction of evil personified.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One of the proto-types of modern thrillers with a character that set the model for countless stock super-villains. It's a tightly-wound rush of a narrative written with all the subtlety of a jackhammer. Its shocking racism is off-putting, though comically hyperbolic, but the book still has value for its fantasy-like imagery and as the source-code for a broad range of genre literature.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5To quote Barzun and Taylor:The Doctor's adventures may entertain once, partly because of well-contrived suspense, partly because of one's enjoyment of one's own folly in believing what one is told, for example the presence on Wimbledon Common of a menagerie of lethal creatures kept by htis sinister Chinese.And that's not all! Fungal spores that germinate instantly and are immediately lethal; a drug that drives a man mad with one injection; a drug that mimics death. Fortunately, for every drug there is an antidote. The Doctor is "the greatest fungologist the world has known." Madly racist, and entertainingly nutty.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Wikipedia calls this a novel, but it's more like a collection of episodes with a similar theme. It doesn't have the depth and character development of a novel.I remember the basic idea from the Fu Manchu films on TV in the 1970s. The story is very similar, and it gets repetitive after a while.Naylan Smith doesn't seem the sharpest tool in the box. Lots of nervous energy (always pulling his earlobe, pacing the floor or smacking his fist into his hand), but not much analysis of the situation. He tends to rush in without thinking, and is invariably outwitted by the "evil genious".An easy read, but no great depth, and the repetitiveness gets stale after a while.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A thinly veiled Sherlock Holmes knock-off combined with a large dose of Yellow Peril. The spectre of individually published stories linked together into a single volume also strikes again, rendering the entire thing heavily episodic in nature.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Read more out of academic interest than in expectation of enjoyment, which is just as well. The racism is obviously horrible, but it's not even as if Sax Rohmer's prejudice is an unfortunate trait of an otherwise good writer (in the strictly craftsman sense of the term); that would be a poor excuse but one that could at least be made for, say, Ian Fleming or Hergé. Rohmer's plotting is weak to the point of absurdity (a castle falls down for no other reason than dramatic effect), his characters and incidents pale imitations of much better ones (his Nayland Smith is one of the many Holmes imitators who stuffed the magazine pages of the time), and the structure abysmal (these were first published as short stories and knitted together for collected publication).He's got a certain talent for capturing a scary mise en scène, and individual exciting incidents went on to inspire much better writers: Fleming among them, and Alan Moore has done some interesting stuff with Rohmer's characters. But there's no pretending these are timeless works that deserve to be remembered alongside Arthur Conan Doyle. Poor in so many more ways than just plain prejudice.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5M brother rather despised Nayland Smith and preferred Fu Manchu, who was, at least on occasion, more honorable than his enemies. On the whole, I tend to prefer some of Rohmer's other stories to the Fu mancu books, but there is no denying that Dr. Fu is as ,much a classic contribution to pulp literature as Dracula or Tarzan: the incarnation of the Yellow Peril.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Return of Fu Manchu was to my surprise, pure pulp fiction. That would be a marvelous find, or a terrible disappointment, depending on your taste. The horribly evil and utterly brilliant Fu Manchu is out to conquer the world and gain dominion for the corrupt, sinister, inscrutable Chinese. The only thing standing in his way is Nayland Smith, who as Burmese Commissioner is the epitome of a British colonial officer – a proto James Bond -- and his trusty sidekick, Dr. Petrie. Imagine Holmes and Watson with a bit more brawn and a bit less brain.The novel was written in 1916, just five years after the Boxer Rebellion in China had been crushed. That rebellion is mentioned only once as an aside, but it’s clear that the fear of destruction at the hands of millions of “devilish” Chinese colors the story. Fu Manchu is the type of villain that is delightful to despise. He steals every scene he’s in (and some he is not) and is simply great stuff, if you can manage to overlook the blatant and absurd racism. To say the plot is breathless would be a serious understatement. Every twist is prefaced by phrases such as “Many strange and terrible memories are mine, memories stranger and more terrible than those of the average man; but this thing which now moved slowly down upon us through the gloom of that impenetrable place, was (if the term be understood) almost absurdly terrible.” The turns of the story are easy to predict, perhaps because the book was written before such narrative surprises had become commonplace. Ugly jingoism and chilling clichés aside, The Return of Fu Manchu is a great escapist jaunt.