Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives
    Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives
    Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives
    Audiobook8 hours

    Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives

    Written by Michael Specter

    Narrated by Richard Poe

    3.5/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    New Yorker staff writer Michael Specter has twice won the Global Health Council's Excellence in Media Award, as well as the Science Journalism Award from the American Association for the Advancement of Science. In Denialism, he fervently argues that people are turning away from new technologies and engaging in a kind of magical thinking that is hindering scientific progress.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherRecorded Books, Inc.
    Release dateMar 26, 2010
    ISBN9781449815479
    Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Harms the Planet and Threatens Our Lives

    Related to Denialism

    Titles in the series (9)

    View More
    View More

    Related audiobooks

    Science & Mathematics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Michael Lewis: ‘We Were Incentivised To Have A Bad Pandemic Response’

      May 9, 2021

      An event as large and devastating as the Covid pandemic was always going to attract a rush of authors seeking to uncover the story behind the decade’s biggest story. Leading the pack – not for the first time – is Michael Lewis, the man with an unerri

      9 min read

    • Article

      The Problem With The Left's Attempts To Redefine Racism

      Aug 15, 2018

      People are making this so complicated. A couple of weeks ago, the New York Times editorial board hired a technology writer, Sarah Jeong. When it was revealed that she had tweeted barbs against white people, conservatives formed a Twitter mob to deman

      3 min read

    • Article

      ‘Woke Capitalism’ On The Rise – And Running Into Resistance

      Jun 10, 2022

      As a streaming service, Netflix sits at the nexus of Silicon Valley and Hollywood, two industries that lean left in politics and culture. Chief executive Reed Hastings is a prominent Democratic donor in California and nationally. In 2020, about 98% o

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Hit Book That Came From Mars: The Martian started as a self-published blog, and became a major motion picture.

      Jan 8, 2015

      The story of Andy Weir is a strange mix of fact and fiction. There’s the fairy tale success of his book, The Martian, which he self-published on his blog for free, intended for the few thousand fans he’d accumulated over years of hobby writing. Some

      10 min read

    • Article

      The Case Against Cannabis

      Jan 7, 2019

      Alex Berenson is probably best known as the author of the John Wells espionage thrillers, 11 of them so far, but until 2010 he was a reporter, including for 11 years at The New York Times, where his assignments ranged from the pharmaceutical industry

      5 min read

    • Article

      America Is Doing Just Fine

      Jul 10, 2023

      America Is Doing Just Fine
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Next Gluten

      Apr 24, 2017

      The Next Gluten
      12 min read

    • Article

      Why It's Harder To Change Culture Than Nature

      Mar 10, 2021

      One reason for our relentless "culture wars" and anxieties about "cancel culture" might be our misguided sense of what culture is — and how easily we can change it. We used to frame everything in terms of "nature versus nurture." Either something was

      3 min read

    • Article

      The 39 Best Health And Science Books To Read This Summer

      Jun 25, 2018

      Need a new book to dive into? Check out the great health, medicine, and science reads on STAT's annual summer book list.

      14 min read

    • Article

      The 23 Best Health And Science Books To Read This Summer

      Jun 21, 2019

      Need a new book to dive into? Check out the great health, medicine, and science reads on STAT's annual summer book list.

      10 min read

    • Article

      How To Spot Juck Science

      Oct 14, 2021

      How To Spot Juck Science
      4 min read

    • Article

      The Philosophy Of Anorexia

      Nov 6, 2017

      The Philosophy Of Anorexia
      5 min read

    • Article

      Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee

      Oct 28, 2022

      Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee
      2 min read

    • Article

      Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee

      Oct 29, 2022

      Dr. Siddhartha Mukherjee
      2 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Denialism

    3.5/5

    81 ratings12 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      This book was filled with knowledge I wasn't aware of. I will be buying this book I enjoyed it very much.
    • 3/5
      Overall, not a bad introduction to the problem on non-scientific and anti-scientific thinking. The author attempts to show the ways in which our current society, both left and right, is engaged in denying science based on personal preference or ideology, and how it is dangerous to do that. He addresses only a few issues, apparently deciding global warming and evolution have enough treatment in other works that they don't need comprehensive coverage here, and he's right. I don't have many complaints, except for one that is almost always a problem in books like this: the denialism evinced by the author about simple biology. He takes a lot of time to talk to scientists, but few biologists, and no ecologists (for some reason, everyone thinks they can talk about ecology without ever talking to any ecologists, and he is no exception). As a result, he sets up some straw men, particularly in the area of organic food, and manages to nicely demolish them, but makes a very poorly reasoned argument in the bigger picture because he ignores the branch of science most equipped to deal with the topic. And in matters of genetic engineering, he does a very nice job of substituting physics for biology, which is...incomprehensible. Physics is not biology, and if you are talking about biology, you should consider talking to biologists, and not just the geneticists who work for the big labs. In the end, some of his chapters end up sounding a great deal like the 19th century utopians and the 1950s home of the future folks, who got some things right, and a lot of things spectacularly wrong. Overall, a decent introduction to the topic, but a bit incomplete.
    • 2/5
      Meh. Nothing very new or interesting here
    • 4/5
      There are a lot of people who need to read this book. It's a great book of facts about a lot of issues some people have problems with, like vaccines and genetically modified food. The writing is solid, and I like how it ends with hope for the future of science.
    • 4/5
      Good survey of a few faddish denials, if temporal....written in 2009, Specter hits a couple of topics of the day and a few more bigger issues. Big pharma (not in favor), anti-vaccines (Jenny McCarthy, et al), organics and anti-oxidants - he skewers one of my favorite (and I admit a very unscientific bias in my term) quacks Dr. Andrew Weil - and genetics...climate science wasn't on the radar three years ago. Doesn't explain why...just that there are things pele deny and why they shouldn't. Still a good read though.
    • 3/5
      This book was well worth the read. Having read it from the library, I've just bought a copy to lend to a few acquaintances with whom I've had past discussions touching on topics here. I feel I've never been able to really convey what the problems with 'Denialism' are in our discussions/arguments (and, of course, I didn't have 280 pages to do it in.) I hope that an easily accessible book like this will help, in part, because it covers a range of issues: amongst my circle, at least, no one is all of anti-vaxxer/pill-popper/anti-GMO/anti-pesticide/etc. By addressing these side by side perhaps the parallels between what a reader might consider bunk and what the same reader might believe will be visible, helping them to reflect on their own beliefs.

      Here's hoping...

      I knocked one star off because I wish the book had kept focused on things that are right now, that we know about; the last few 10's of pages range off into future biotech. That is all important, true, but it distracts from the discussion about current issues. I think, for some people, it will interfere with considering the facts we know now. E.g. we *know* that vaccines are safe, for any real-world meaning of that word, and we know that have immense benefits *right now*. Following that (and other) arguments with a few chapters about future developments in genetic engineering or synthetic biology weakens all that; people who don't already support the positions in the book will be left with their uncertainties about future directions and outcomes of research, rather than with strong arguments about the certainties around current issues.

      I could possibly knock off one more star because the book does cover things *so* rapidly, at a high level of detail. It could also have been written a bit more dispassionately. But, in this case anyway, those are just my own my tastes; this is an argumentative/persuasive pop-sci book, not a book written for scientists, policy wonks, etc. Hopefully this can get a few people thinking.
    • 3/5
      With this book I'm torn. I find that the author took great care in picking out his topics but in many circumstances failed to deliver the final message.Case in point is Vioxx...so was the company the denier or was it those that tarred and feathered the company the deniers? Was it pure greed on the pharmaceutical side or was it the tiny fraction of incidents that is the concern?There is also the political context here that seems to be out of alignment. Through out the book the author seems to imply that it is the conservatives that are the deniers (praising Obama numerous times in the book) even going so far as to call out "Orin Hatch, the Utah Republican" but ignoring the word "Democrat" when calling out Tom Harkin instead using "populist liberal" as a political tag. The book is full of the deniers being Democrats but not once does the author take up that as an issue.These topics are near and dear to my me since science is close to my heart and I hate seeing it bastardized by those that "once heard something" or that "read it online" rather than allowing science to run its due course.
    • 4/5
      Denialism, as author Michael Specter defines it, is "denial writ large -- when an entire segment of society, often struggling with the trauma of change, turns away from reality in favor of a more comfortable lie." He deals with several kinds of denialism in this book, mostly involving medicine in some form or another. The premiere example is the anti-vaccine movement, whose adherents cling firmly to the belief that a heartbreaking medical condition has a simple cause and thus a simple solution that can and will save a generation of children, just as soon as anti-vaccine crusaders win their fight against the bad guys. It's a very compelling thing to believe, especially if it's an issue in which you have a personal stake, but the problem is, it's just not true. Those who engage in denialism, though, are not easily swayed by scientific evidence, and often reject science entirely, especially when it's telling them things they don't want to hear. Science is dismissed as too impersonal, too authoritarian, too much to blame for everything that's wrong in the world. Specter, of course disagrees, arguing that what we need to solve the problems that face us, from disease to world hunger, is more scientific reasoning and scientific progress, not less, although we should always proceed with our eyes open to the dangers that go along with progress.I've seen some reviews of this book suggesting that Specter is basically preaching to the choir here, and there's probably some truth in that. Certainly if you're a die-hard believer in alternative medicine or the evils of biotechnology, you're not likely to be convinced by his arguments on those subjects, just upset by them. And those who merely tend to lean in that direction are unlikely to pick up a book whose subtitle seems to be calling them irrational and dangerous (something that strikes me as kind of an unfortunate marketing strategy). Probably most of the people reading this book already consider themselves scientifically-minded skeptics, and the last couple of chapters may appeal most to people who are particularly interested in learning about discoveries in the field of genetics and what's likely to come from them. But I do think there's an in-between audience that may find this book both interesting and useful, people who are not anti-science, but who simply don't know quite who to believe on these subjects, because they don't fully trust Big Pharma or agribusinesses or conventional medicine practices. If you feel that way, Specter gets where you're coming from, and he doesn't think you're entirely wrong. While he's extremely positive about science in general, he is anything but an uncritical rah-rah defender of unethical corporations or irresponsible research. In fact, he devotes most of the first chapter of the book to a case study of a pharmaceutical company that lived down to the very worst of public expectations, deliberately refusing to acknowledge the existence of dangerous side effects that almost certainly resulted in lost lives. But he goes on to use this as the starting point for a demonstration of how to separate baby from bathwater, put stories and statistics into a useful risk-vs-benefit perspective, and distinguish evidence from wishful thinking, an approach that he then carries through all the other topics in the book. So if you're feeling a little confused and uncertain, as so many people are, about questions like "Is it really safe to vaccinate my baby?", "How worried should I be about Frankenfoods?" or "Do I really need to take all the herbs and vitamins that this website I found recommends?", you could do a lot worse than this book as a place to start sorting through it all.
    • 3/5
      Overall, not a bad introduction to the problem on non-scientific and anti-scientific thinking. The author attempts to show the ways in which our current society, both left and right, is engaged in denying science based on personal preference or ideology, and how it is dangerous to do that. He addresses only a few issues, apparently deciding global warming and evolution have enough treatment in other works that they don't need comprehensive coverage here, and he's right. I don't have many complaints, except for one that is almost always a problem in books like this: the denialism evinced by the author about simple biology. He takes a lot of time to talk to scientists, but few biologists, and no ecologists (for some reason, everyone thinks they can talk about ecology without ever talking to any ecologists, and he is no exception). As a result, he sets up some straw men, particularly in the area of organic food, and manages to nicely demolish them, but makes a very poorly reasoned argument in the bigger picture because he ignores the branch of science most equipped to deal with the topic. And in matters of genetic engineering, he does a very nice job of substituting physics for biology, which is...incomprehensible. Physics is not biology, and if you are talking about biology, you should consider talking to biologists, and not just the geneticists who work for the big labs. In the end, some of his chapters end up sounding a great deal like the 19th century utopians and the 1950s home of the future folks, who got some things right, and a lot of things spectacularly wrong. Overall, a decent introduction to the topic, but a bit incomplete.
    • 4/5
      Michael Specter is one frustrated and fiery man. He's fed up with people's mistrust of science and affection for homey remedies. Take the latest raw milk craze, for example. Before pasteurization, milk was a major source of food-borne illness in the world. Now people are beginning to mistrust the wisdom of pasteurization, longing for the good old days when their milk came unsullied from the cow. There is no evidence of people being harmed my the pasteurization process, but there's plenty of evidence about the dangers of raw milk. That's just one example he uses to make his case: denying scientific progress harms the human race as a whole.His crusade against the anti-vaccination cult is particularly vehement. Humans have short memories. If we knew the terror of unrestrained cholera, tetanus, and even measles, we would think twice before refusing vaccines to our children.I found myself agreeing with most of Specter's. I fully agree, for example, that most of the natural homeopathic "remedies" that clutter health food stores and farmers markets across the Country are little more than 21st century snake-oil.With all that said, even though I agreed with most of the book, I didn't trust him. His passion comes off as arrogance all too often. Here's an analogy. I'm a preacher. 99% of the people in front of my every Sunday morning are believers. I could rant and rave about the importance of being "born again", but it would do not good to have every head nodding—I'd only be preaching to the choir (so to speak). Specter's preaching to the choir. He's given scientific-minded people fodder to help them feel superior to the brainless masses of humanity—but this sort of zealotry will do nothing to persuade those who desperately need to heed his message.
    • 3/5
      The book started off well, giving some excellent examples of denialism in action and then quickly descended into just a book about genetic science advancement with no more "denialism" examples after the first half of the book or so. That, combined with sweeping statements about how we have destroyed the atmosphere (I believe in global warming and also that recent warming is man-caused, but this was sensationalist rhetoric from someone writing about people denying science) left a bad taste. I had VERY high hopes for this book and they were dashed at the midpoint.
    • 4/5
      I enjoyed this quite a bit. It starts out as a bit of a cranky "Skeptical" book, thesort that I seek out, and yet tire of quickly. It refuses to settle into a rant, andbecomes much more by the end.At the beginning, it's about all of the dangers of alternativemedicine, the anti-vaccination cranks, and anti-genetically engineered foodtypes, and it's a quick and interesting overview.I know people who are not vaccinating their kids and it sends shivers upmy spine to think what could happen if this gets bigger. I know people whoempty their wallets on "natural" and "organic" food and don't think about thegreater implications for world hunger, and certainly have tons of people tellingme to "detoxify" by taking this or that organic supplement. This is a good book to arm yourself against the stupid. Beyond that, it ends up with a fascinatinglook at the frontiers of genetic science, and for that alone it is worthreading. Amazing technologies and advancements are just around thecorner, and this is a great primer about what is and what could be. Easily and professionally written, not too long, and enjoyable science journalism.