Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
2.5/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
What can come of a scientific engagement with postmodern philosophy? Some scientists have claimed that the social sciences and humanities have nothing to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Dorothea E. Olkowski shows that the historic link between science and philosophy, mathematics itself, plays a fundamental role in the development of the worldviews that drive both fields. Focusing on language, its expression of worldview and usage, she develops a phenomenological account of human thought and action to explicate the role of philosophy in the sciences. Olkowski proposes a model of phenomenology, both scientific and philosophical, that helps make sense of reality and composes an ethics for dealing with unpredictability in our world.
Read more from Dorothea E. Olkowski
Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Deleuze, Bergson, Merleau-Ponty: The Logic and Pragmatics of Creation, Affective Life, and Perception Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
Related ebooks
Meaning, Mind, and Action: Philosophical Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeet Your Sexual Mind: The Interaction Betwen Instinct and Intellect and Its Impact on Human Behavior Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Anthropos Today: Reflections on Modern Equipment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJ. M. Coetzee and Ethics: Philosophical Perspectives on Literature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCulture and Cognition: The Boundaries of Literary and Scientific Inquiry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEthical Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science and Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reason, Culture, Religion: The Metaphysics of World Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Preface to Logic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The World Philosophy Made: From Plato to the Digital Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nature and Future of Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Philosophy Is For Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Certainty of Uncertainty: Dialogues Introducing Constructivism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReexamining Love of Wisdom: Philosophical Desire from Socrates to Nietzsche Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYorick's World: Science and the Knowing Subject Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIdealization and the Aims of Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Intellectual Adventure of Ancient Man: An Essay of Speculative Thought in the Ancient Near East Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why the Mind Is Not a Computer: A Pocket Lexicon of Neuromythology Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Learning Logic: Critical Thinking With Intuitive Notation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Adler's Philosophical Dictionary: 125 Key Terms for the Philosopher's Lexicon Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Aesthetic Science: Representing Nature in the Royal Society of London, 1650-1720 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOntology or the Theory of Being Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Analytic and Linguistic Trends Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Introduction to Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Scandal of Continuity in Middle East Anthropology: Form, Duration, Difference Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeet Your Mind Volume 1: The Interactions Between Instincts and Intellect and Its Impact on Human Behavior Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy of Science: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Denial of Death Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Plato and a Platypus Walk Into a Bar...: Understanding Philosophy Through Jokes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5History of Western Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bhagavad Gita (in English): The Authentic English Translation for Accurate and Unbiased Understanding Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
8 ratings1 review
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5If science and postmodernism are to be reconciled (and I think they can be), then it's going to have to come from someone equally proficient on both sides of the aisle. And while it's clear that Olkowski really understands Deleuze, sadly, her treatment of thermodynamics, formal logic, and mathematics are too beholden to Deleuzian equivocation, wordplay, and spurious sociological inferences to add anything of interest to the science wars.
[Also, because Olkowski gets this wrong a half-dozen times (p. 69, 105, etc), material implication is not the same as causality. Seriously, it bugs the hell out of me when people make grand metaphysical and scientific claims based on a misunderstanding of basic first-order logic.]