Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
Unavailable
Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
Unavailable
Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn
Ebook346 pages4 hours

Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars

2.5/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this ebook

What can come of a scientific engagement with postmodern philosophy? Some scientists have claimed that the social sciences and humanities have nothing to contribute, except perhaps peripherally, to their research. Dorothea E. Olkowski shows that the historic link between science and philosophy, mathematics itself, plays a fundamental role in the development of the worldviews that drive both fields. Focusing on language, its expression of worldview and usage, she develops a phenomenological account of human thought and action to explicate the role of philosophy in the sciences. Olkowski proposes a model of phenomenology, both scientific and philosophical, that helps make sense of reality and composes an ethics for dealing with unpredictability in our world.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 23, 2012
ISBN9780253001146
Unavailable
Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn

Read more from Dorothea E. Olkowski

Related to Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn

Related ebooks

Philosophy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Postmodern Philosophy and the Scientific Turn

Rating: 2.5 out of 5 stars
2.5/5

8 ratings1 review

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    If science and postmodernism are to be reconciled (and I think they can be), then it's going to have to come from someone equally proficient on both sides of the aisle. And while it's clear that Olkowski really understands Deleuze, sadly, her treatment of thermodynamics, formal logic, and mathematics are too beholden to Deleuzian equivocation, wordplay, and spurious sociological inferences to add anything of interest to the science wars.

    [Also, because Olkowski gets this wrong a half-dozen times (p. 69, 105, etc), material implication is not the same as causality. Seriously, it bugs the hell out of me when people make grand metaphysical and scientific claims based on a misunderstanding of basic first-order logic.]