The Making of the President 1960
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
Theodore H. White
Theodore H. White (1915–1986) was an American political journalist, historian,and novelist, best known for the Making of the President series: his accounts of the1960, 1964, 1968, and 1972 presidential elections, all of which are being reissued withnew forewords by Harper Perennial Political Classics. His other books include ThunderOut of China, America in Search of Itself, and In Search of History: A Personal Adventure.
Read more from Theodore H. White
The Making of the President 1960 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the President, 1968 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the President, 1972 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the President, 1964 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Making of the President 1960
Related ebooks
1960: LBJ vs. JFK vs. Nixon: The Epic Campaign that Forged Three Presidencies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5President Carter: The White House Years Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Unfinished Odyssey of Robert Kennedy: A Biography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51948: Harry Truman's Improbable Victory and the Year that Transformed America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Watergate: A New History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Last Campaign: Robert F. Kennedy and 82 Days That Inspired America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nixon Volume II: The Triumph of a Politician 1962-1972 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Invisible Bridge: The Fall of Nixon and the Rise of Reagan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Road to Camelot: Inside JFK's Five-Year Campaign Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Shadow: Five Presidents And The Legacy Of Watergate Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nixon's Secrets: The Rise, Fall, and Untold Truth about the President, Watergate, and the Pardon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Richard Nixon and the Quest for a New Majority Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Portrait of a President Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Politics of Upheaval: The Age of Roosevelt, 1935–1936 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMr. Speaker!: The Life and Times of Thomas B. Reed The Man Who Broke the Filibuster Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mayday: Eisenhower, Khrushchev, and the U-2 Affair Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5To Rescue the Republic: Ulysses S. Grant, the Fragile Union, and the Crisis of 1876 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5We the Presidents: How American Presidents Shaped the Last Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAccidental Presidents: Eight Men Who Changed America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5President Kennedy: Profile of Power Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nixon Volume III: Ruin and Recovery 1973-1990 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5President Reagan: The Triumph of Imagination Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5President Nixon: Alone in the White House Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5After the White House: Former Presidents as Private Citizens Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5His Very Best: Jimmy Carter, a Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Kennedy Half-Century: The Presidency, Assassination, and Lasting Legacy of John F. Kennedy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5All the President's Men Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Kennedy & Nixon: The Rivalry that Shaped Postwar America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Politics For You
The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Humanity Archive: Recovering the Soul of Black History from a Whitewashed American Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Essential Chomsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for The Making of the President 1960
175 ratings15 reviews
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I love political books- I rate Richard Ben Cramer's "What it Takes..." as my favourite ever book in fact. This however was an utterly tedious read.Although it covers an exciting election, and it does give you a somewhat new perspective on Nixon/JFK and the challenges they faced before and after their nomination, it is done in a painfully unreadable way. For example entire lists of names are hurled at the reader, with a brief explanation of each person's role. These become impossible to recall- and yet paragraph after paragraph are filled with these names and their minor duties. No personalities, just duties- and even these are described in a way which is difficult to understand. Another example is the final chapter, which is as irrelevant as it is dull.When I saw that a book about each election from 1960 to 1972 had been written by the same author I was excited, and was looking forward to reading every book. Now however I am certain I will not be picking up another book by this author.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5It is fascinating to read an "in-the-moment" account of history, as opposed to a historical look back at history. This really gave me a great sense of the issues of the day and the sense of driven energy JFK used, not to mention a good bit of family connections and money, to win the 1960 Presidential race. It also was interesting to see how when the chips were down, Kennedy acted without regard to politics, calling Coretta Scott King at a crucial moment in the campaign. Nixon, in contrast, refused to comment because that was the politically astute play, in his mind. Nixon considered the political outcome, rather than the morality of his action, or inaction. In that sense, JFK earned the right to be President.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fascinating in that it was written in 1961, antipicating 4 more years of Kennedy. Otherwise perfectly prescient, cognizant and detailed. Dragged at the end with too much flourish.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5One of the monumental contributions of a "journalist" in the days when that word referred to the professionals who reported the actual news.This report offers perspective and context, but is essentially a facts-only unbiased report on the election of 1960 between Nixon and Kennedy. There are inserts -- "Only one other nation in modern history has ever tried to elect its leader directly by mass, free, popular vote. This was the Weimar Republic of Germany, which modeled its unitary vote of national leader on American practice. Out of its experiment with the system it got Hitler." [12] {Cf. Note to Patriots: We know that fascist thugs were able to take over the most civilized educated prosperous nation on the planet. They did it by bullying, pretending to love the Homeland, and by telling lies. Is there a Party today that ignites the anger and fear of white men?}Some of the facts are obviously not "eyewitnessed", but they are largely corroborated and confirmed from eyewitness sources. For example, on election night "Eisenhower was angry that evening,..upset by Nixon's behavior throughout the campaign, bitter against Kennedy." [16]The IBM programs, with data from every state fed into computers to make advance projections, as late as midnite were predicting a Nixon victory. No certainty. First reports from Texas, when Laredo reported for Kennedy, it was obvious that Mexican-americans of South Texas were delivering for the Democrats with such force that the Republicans in Dallas and Houston could be matched. [23] {Texas will be blue within 4 years}Nixon did not have the grace to concede his defeat. [29] ..."the twisted barely controlled sorrow of Mrs. Nixon" [29]. I have corroborated this myself. {It has since emerged that Nixon was not only criminal, but gay. Nixon traveled without his wife, and the "friendship" with Bebe Rebozo included being in bed together.}[73, noting the bachelor home where Nixon's campaign for VP in 1958 began.]This election clearly "stirred every nerve end of the American political system, and that system would never be the same". The author does not skip past details concerning the actual, named, persons involved in this transmogrification.The numbers: On November 8, 1960, 68,832,818 Americans voted. About 4 million were active Party participants. Of these, less than a thousand had any idea of what was being done a year earlier by the one who would be their candidate. And less than 50 may have been involved in that activity."Truman, one of the greatest Presidents on the grand scale of world history". [50]The South sends approximately 1/4 of the delegates to the DNC. "Now that the Democrats have captured the liberal imagination of the nation, it is forgotten howmuch of the architecture of America's liberal society was drafted by the Republicans." [71] This liberality led to the most prosperous period of our history and saved us from centuries of slavery and of plutocracy."The Republican Party depends for support on the executive class of the great corporations as intimately as does the liberal wing of the Democrats on support from labor-union leadership." [86]"These corporation executives are not generally backward forces; by and large, they are far more enlightened than the regulars they finance...and force the regulars to support the liberal citizen wing." [86]"No measurable group in American life...has made so remarkable a stride in education and development over the past decade as the Negro." [279]The author documents the malice the press held for Nixon, and its roots in the fact that they hated being lied to.[329] "This was the greatest food-producing civilization in history, and Iowa, in the summer of 1960, had planted more acres of corn than ever before...".[332]The author missed many details, such as the fact that Bebe had the adjoining room on hotels in which Nixon was staying "alone". [343]The Index pin-points the people involved. What strikes one is the high quality of Americans involved in politics. Although Nixon was running things on the GOP side, and in the subsequent eventually winning campaign, he brought in a different set of operatives. See the change as Lee Atwater and his trainees, began taking over -- the trickster academy in which Ralph Reed, Grover Norquist, Frank Luntz, and Karl Rove got their first taste of national politics. What strikes one is the dramatic shift in the GOP from a party with a liberal wing so clearly apparent in 1960, to a party with only a Right Wing.The author concludes, from studying the text of the speeches as well as the video, that Kennedy won the first debate largely because Kennedy appeared to be the equal statesman to Nixon, and that what Nixon had been saying about him all along was obviously a lie. [346] He was not a communist, immature, and inexperienced!Nixon based his campaign on "home talk" and civic values. But he had no home. His room was in a hotel. [381] {The subsequent unraveling of Nixon's usurpation of legitimacy was yet to come.}
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A great political story . I look forward to the later elections too.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Every American election summons the individual voter to weigh the past against the future.
Last Tuesday my wife worked half the day and came home. We then walked the two blocks or so to vote. Early voting allows one to go to the polls weeks in advance yet there is something uplifting about going out on Election Day. Walking back, I rattled off my list of those I voted for which failed to find victory. That was likely just nerves.
Theodore White leaves the reader with a different sort of anxiety. The election process remains such an experiment, so prone to caprice and misunderstanding. It was difficult to not frame the 2016 election in the terms revealed. Instead I found pleasure in measuring the temperament of Nixon and Johnson, leaving the Kennedy cool for another day. 1960 was the campaign where the candidates pushed hard for the primaries to give mandate ahead of the convention. Such is a remarkable process. the idea that Kennedy's Catholic faith was an issue strikes me as almost quaint. The concluding chapter fleshes out the opening days in Camelot, though the spectre of Asia that White sniffs is from Laos -- not Vietnam.
There is always a tendency to look ahead, to imagine omens for the future. That is likely a reckless pursuit. I did appreciate White on race which features prominently, perhaps at the expense of foreign policy.
The book is concerned with the quotidian drudgery of the presidential candidate. There is much to appreciate. I am not sure much has changed in the interim despite advances in technology. - Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5White comes across as incredibly naive, and lacking any perspective whatsoever. I can't take his reporting seriously.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Awesome
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Subtitle: A Narrative History of American Politics in Action.About a year before the November 1960 election, Theodore H White began studying the likely candidates. He focused on a handful of men with aspirations and/or apparent qualifications: Humphrey, Kennedy, Stevenson, Johnson, Nixon, Rockefeller. He travelled from state to state reporting on the primaries or state caucuses / conventions. (In that era, there were only sixteen states that held primaries!) He attended the Democratic and Republican national conventions. And he closely followed the candidates as they campaigned for the presidency. I was fascinated to learn some of this history, and the first-hand look at the “political machines” that produced these two candidates, and ultimately President John F Kennedy. I also found this a surprisingly nostalgic book … It was published in 1961, shortly after Kennedy’s inauguration, so there is no hint of what is to come in November 1963. It’s somewhat dated – the process is different more than half a century later. And yet, there is something timeless about this story. Serious issues of race, the economy, potential for nuclear war, etc still plague our country. Good men and women still struggle to find solutions. My face-to-face book club had a fascinating and spirited discussion of this work.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Having read the latest Robert Caro tome about LBJ, I decided to re-read this book, which I last read in 1976 as part of my research for a graduate paper about Barry Goldwater's use of media in the 1964 campaign. I’d forgotten not just the facts of the battle (one-sided though it was) but also what a great writer Theodore White was and his in-depth knowledge of the national political scene. How the ultra-right Goldwater was selected as the Republican nominee (based on who well his supporters were organized before the convention, not on electability) was reminiscent of a more recent election cycle. I guess some lessons need to be repeated. This book was great reading about both Johnson and Goldwater’s campaign, but so much more. Where is Theodore White now that we need him to explain what's going on in Washington?
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ah, that politics were so accessible today. A fine work of the subtleties of political struggle.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5I read this still exulting in the magnificent victory of JFK in 1960 and this book enabled me to relive that glorious political year.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5With this book, Theodore H. White invented a new genre: the blow-by-blow campaign chronicle told by someone who had access to, but was not part of, the candidates' staffs. At the time, it was an exciting concept, and readers felt that they were looking into the smoke-filled rooms, watching political titans in combat. Half a century on, we know that White missed a great deal, particularly about the character of his central figure, John F. Kennedy. He saw the intellectual acrobatics and veneer of high culture - and missed the prostitutes, risky medications, deals with sleazy power brokers and (certainly in the decisive West Virginia primary, very likely on the national election day) outright vote fraud.Overall, The Making of the President, 1960 is a charming book that fits its subject into a naive template. Its innocence makes for pleasant reading, but it shouldn't be confused with history.
- Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5This book is filled with detail and covers all aspects of the 1964 political landscape. Although this book does provide information and is true to its title, I foudn the book to be a tedious and boring read which is why I only gave it two stars. I think you would really need to be interested in the 1964 election to enjoy this book.In all honesty, I never even finished it. That's how much I didn't enjoy it.
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This first up close, and personal, view of a presidential campaign was quickly imitated but never equaled or surpassed, even when White went on to cover and write future campaigns. Evocative reading about a time long past. Be warned: The Kennedy charm, before we all recognized it, worked on White too.