Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Arlington Park: A Novel
Arlington Park: A Novel
Arlington Park: A Novel
Ebook277 pages5 hours

Arlington Park: A Novel

Rating: 3 out of 5 stars

3/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Arlington Park, a modern-day English suburb very much like its American counterparts, is a place devoted to the profitable ordinariness of life. Amidst its leafy avenues and comfortable houses, its residents live out the dubious accomplishments of civilization: material prosperity, personal freedom, and moral indifference. In Arlington Park, men work, women look after children, and people generally do what's expected of them. It's a world awash in contentment but empty of belief, and riven with strange anxieties. How are they to know right from wrong? How should they use their knowledge of other people's sufferings? What is the relationship of politics to their own domestic arrangements?

Set over the course of a single rainy day, the novel moves from one household to another, and through the passing hours conducts a deep examination of its characters' lives: of Juliet, enraged at the victory of men over women in family life; of Amanda, warding off thoughts of death with obsessive housework; of Solly, who confronts her own buried femininity in the person of her Italian lodger; of Maisie, despairing at the inevitability with which beauty is destroyed; and of Christine, whose troubled, hilarious spirit presides over Arlington Park and the way of life it represents.

Darkly comic, deeply affecting, and wise, Arlington Park is a page-turning imagining of the extraordinary inner nature of ordinary life, by one of Britain's most exciting young novelists.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateDec 26, 2007
ISBN9781429952026
Arlington Park: A Novel
Author

Rachel Cusk

Rachel Cusk read English at New College, Oxford. Her first novel Saving Agnes won the Whitbread First Novel Award in 1993. She reviews regularly for The Times and TLS.

Read more from Rachel Cusk

Related authors

Related to Arlington Park

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Arlington Park

Rating: 2.9423076527472527 out of 5 stars
3/5

182 ratings22 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    The story of one day in the life of some suburban housewives in England, their thoughts on life in general and the choices they made that brought them to the place where they are maried and living in a suburb, taking care of kids and a house and shopping at the mall and having dinner parties. Excellent writing but more along the lines of the characters speaking in a stream of consciousness mode with no real plot or story development.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Oh, that's all we needed - another novel about middle-class women and their lives on some nice estate in the south-east whose lives we have great trouble empathising with. What a disappointment.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    This book was so incoherent and dull, with so many over-worked sentences that I couldn't finish it. It's really rare for me to give up on a book - and this one is only 240 pages long. I felt like the author had just discovered the suburban neurosis that was such a focus of feminist writings in the 70's.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Not much happens in this book; like a lot of the things I've been reading lately, it's mostly just "middle class women are vaguely dissatisfied with their lives now that they have children", but this is a pretty nice example of the type. It's well written, the characters seem well-rounded. I found this a relaxing read, despite the cringingly ignorant things some of the characters came out with.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Ugh I hated this novel. All the women seemed to hate their lives and their kids. If you hate your life so much, change it!!!!! Grrr...I was just horrified by this novel.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I can't decide if I love this book or hate it.But I couldn't put it down.While I found the premise of the book to be of interest, and found a lot of the writing to be insightful and quite beautiful, I could not bring myself to feel the pain these women were in such angst about.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Arlington Park by Rachel Cusk is certainly a beautifully written book. The sentences are beautifully crafted and descriptions so well done I definitely could picture the scenes, the people, and the area. However, the story itself is quite depressing. The reader views one day in the lives of several women living in Arlington Park, what appears to be an upscale suburb of London. These housewives are so dissatisfied with their lives that one wonders why they continue in this lifestyle. There is no instance of joy or happiness. Husbands are seen as too demanding and squashing the lives out of their wives. Children are seen simply as a nuisance, just one more thing that is holding these women back. No one seems to have a plan to make things better. As I said, it is beautifully written and easy to read. It just left me in a rather black mood.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Arlington Park features an assortment of women in a London suburb who are connected only by their chosen roles and their ambivalence about same. They all have kids and just about all seem to resent the lives they have chosen (some more passively than others) and the traps they have walked into. The book reminds me a bit of Nancy Friday's The Womens Room (except I read that about 25 years ago and could be remembering it wrong) where women suddenly wake up to the fact that they are limited by tradtional roles and they want out. Except the women in Arlington Park have had the benefit of the last 40 years of change and still decided to go "retro" as if being a suburban Mom now would be any more satisfying than it was in the 1950's. The book is frustrating for this reason; these women should know better. They have more or less drifted into a dull suburb when London beckons. Cusk packs a lot into a short book and her character development is surprisingly good given that each character gets about a chapter. Women reading this may recognize some of these characters in their own friends - from the self-centered, extroverted Christine who speaks her mind nomatter what, to the depressed Maisie who has figured out that modern life is going to destroy the planet and is not shy about expressing her anger to the piggy people in the big cars. My favorite chapter was about a couple with 3 kids and a fourth on the way who decide to bring in some extra cash renting a spare room to language students from a nearby school. Each tenant brings something different to the table and the mother can't help but compare her life to theirs, not always with satisfaction. It is a good vehicle for understanding that we don't really see ourselves clearly when we run with the herd because we don't distinguish ourselves from the group. I enjoyed the book and would recommend it to women of any age. P.S. By the way, I never read the other reviews until I write my own, and having just read them all I would have to agree the book was depressing overall. And there was way too much rain.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    The Boston Globe calls this book: "Hideously funny...a novel with a sense of rightness at it's core and a narrative intelligence so swift and piercing it can take your breath away." If I may borrow from the esteemed author of that quote and just take out the word FUNNY and add in DEPRESSING, then we may agree. The first quarter of the book had me wishing I had doubled up on my dose of anti-depressants. The rest of the book had me wishing I could just take some and cram them down the authors throat and have her lighten up a bit. The first chapter and the use of rain as a metaphor made me want to run and get my umbrella and beat someone with it. Throughout this book rain kept rearing its ugly head...it's England so one would imagine rain is to be expected and not used as this author did...like a battering ram to get her point across.The characters, well that's another story, they are fairly well written yet I had no sympathy for these crabby, cranky, mean annoying, whiny, air headed, depressed women. I saw no character growth, although would one expect any in a 24 hour time frame? *sigh* I would, or at least I would like to be able to empathize with at least one of them. I'm very glad that this was not a book that I paid for, since I would have to go back to the book store and demand my money back. I have this rule; books need to, at the very least entertain me and take me out of my own life for the duration. This book just made me wish that I was cleaning my toilets and not reading it. PS - I was very worried that I was going to be the only one that couldn't find something good/entertaining/redeeming in this novel, thank you other reviewers for not leaving my bum hanging out there all alone.Dianne
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Rachel Cusk has a wonderful way with metaphor and phrasing. Her writing is a joy to read. Arlington Park does a lovely job of peering below the surface of a handful of suburban women in the outskirts of London in a sympathetic but humorous way. I highly recommend.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Desperate Housewives invade uppity British Suburb. (ok, slightly tongue in cheek here) I think that Rachel is really talented and I definitely would not rule out reading other efforts by her.That being said...I didn't enjoy the book as much as I thought I would...during this particular time in our country (or world) it just all seems so trivial to get bogged down in. And depressing. I thought there was incredible character development...I certainly had insight into their thoughts...I just ceased wanting to KNOW their thoughts.Thanks again to LibraryThing for including me in the early reviewers program. Whether I enjoy the book or not, I am grateful for the opportunity.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I received a copy of Arlington Park by Rachel Cusk through LibraryThing’s Early Reviewer program, and am grateful I was given the chance to read and review this book.One of the blurbs on the back cover states, “Cusk’s frank acknowledgement of maternal ambivalence is rare and wonderful.” The quote is from a review in Entertainment Weekly. As the mother of two boys in elementary school, I can certainly relate to maternal ambivalence, and I found myself understanding and relating to some of the characters’ feelings, and a few of the situations depicted in the novel. But while parts of the book were enjoyable, the overall picture was disappointing. Each chapter focuses on a different mother living in the London suburb of Arlington Park. There is some interaction between some of these “main characters,” but not enough to help the novel cohere as it should.A couple of the main characters are central to two chapters, most to only one. The first mother introduced, Juliet Randall, ends her first chapter on page 42, and doesn’t appear again until page 158. The second mother, Amanda Clapp, is not seen again after her chapter ends. In the middle of the book, we meet Solly Kerr-Leigh, who is expecting her fourth child. We learn that she and her husband let out their spare room to foreign students; they’re on their third boarder, an Italian woman named Paola. Solly’s chapter was one of my favorites, yet when I got to the end of the book, I realized that she’d had no interaction with the other main characters, that her story was the most self-contained. I enjoyed it, but couldn’t understand why it was in the novel. All the other chapters present the women’s experiences over one rainy day in and around Arlington Park, while Solly’s includes scenes from several different days, and ends after the birth of her baby. It’s like a good short story stuck into the middle of a novel where it doesn’t belong.The mother I liked the least is the one with the most “page time,” in that she has a small role in one chapter, a larger role in another, and gets two chapters of her own. After finishing the chapter where Christine Lanham and two other moms go to the mall, I became disillusioned with the book and didn’t pick it up for a while. When they arrive at the mall, Maisie, newly relocated to Arlington Park from London, sees caravans of gypsies living off to the side of the mall. She says, “What a place to have to live. Right where people come to pick up their sofas.” Christine’s response to this is, “I don’t think they’re really doing any harm. … At least they’re out of the way here. I’m sure the police would move them if they caused any trouble.” Maisie replies, “They’re people.” Christine continues to prove herself the most self-absorbed of the main characters as the book goes on. She is given more dialogue than the other moms, and tends to have less tact. In her company, the book becomes tiresome. I would have preferred a more cohesive novel, and would have been glad to hear more about Solly, Juliet, or Maisie. But, as Christine is the main character of the last chapter, it was with relief that I finished the book and closed the pages.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Set in a moderatly wealthy London Suburs, the novel follows the day of a group of moms. They all feel somehow imprisoned in their life, they all are looking for a better way to be. They shop, the chat they drink coffee, but they don't seem able to help each other in this struggle for a more meaningful life.The husbands may be percieved as the enemies at times, but none of the women chose to rebel against that: the tension is high, but no relief solution is found. Motherhood itself is a critic condition: children are ourselves, children are our future, but children stop us and limit us in endless ways.It's not difficult to find a piece of yourself, if you are a woman, in the struggling ladies of Arlington Park. It's with relief, though, that in the end you are able to go back to your, as struggling but less meaningless, life.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    OK, this Author can write, and write beautifully, but why on earth should she chooses to write about these selfish, angry, and desperately unhappy housewives its beyond me. I had no sympathy or empathy for any of the characters in this novel, except perhaps for poor pregnant Solly - who only appears once and has no interaction with the other characters - maybe that's why I actually liked her - she did not stoop to their mean and vicious level. The way these women treat their husbands - geez! Juliet calls hers a murderer and Christine hisses at her husband " You're useless, you are". Nice - I'd sure like to come home to that everyday. I was hoping that the characters moods would pick up towards the end of their day - they all started out having a tough morning with children, work etc. I was hoping it would all come together for them and that they could resolve some of their maternal angst, but sadly this did not happen. What I like about being an early reviewer for LibraryThing is that I get a chance to read books that I would perhaps not normally pick up, so I appreciate the chance to have read it even though I really didn't like it much.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Very well written. I got some of the characters confused, but it didn't matter. The chapter in the park could be its own short story, it's so perfectly described.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Meh, nothing special.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This book is all about thirty-something women with kids, their various dissatisfactions, obsessions and innermost thoughts. Their relationships with their husbands, their children, and their female friends, and the awful way they treat eachother, intentionally or not.Nothing spectacular happens, it's all fairly mundane, but the author's skill is in teasing out the emotions underlying everyday life, and the fantastic dialogue she writes. Any one of the characters could be someone you know, and it's both witty and profound at the same time.My only criticism is that some of the comparisons she draws are a bit deep and overly obscure at times. Some sections I had to read over and over and still didn't grasp the point she was trying to make. Still, it made for highly intelligent reading, and with three words I had never even heard of within the first fifty pages, it improved my vocabulary too.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I started this book a couple times before it actually took. I never know whether it is me or the book that causes it to happen though. However, I am glad I read it when I did. This book looks into the suffocating, stagnant lives of several women in this upscale suburb of London. Being pregnant, looking at how I want to approach the transition to motherhood, and redefining my sense of self to include mother are all topics that have been on the forefront of my mind. This book provides a good reminder to make your own way and not resign yourself to letting the flow and expectations of other take you. I enjoyed this book although some would call it depressing. I thought it had some jewels of prose including the entire opening description of the book [The opening is actually worth reading just in the book store even if you don't buy or read the whole book]:-"He and Benedict talked, and Louisa and Juliet fed on the scraps of the men's conversation that fell to them."-"they were in their beds, already surrendered to tomorrow."I would recommend it only to certain individuals whose taste I knew well. I am not sure I would read it again, but was glad I read it once.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Looking at the ratings spread -- the entire gamut from 0.5 to 5.0 -- I would be tempted to call this a love-it-or-hate-it read, but ultimately I wonder if certain expectations are in play. Namely, that "women's fiction" should be filled with likable people and that domestic issues are inherently less serious than other issues. These women are handling existential questions, and I can't help but feel that if the author and characters were men the internal experiences detailed here would not be considered trivial. Makes me want to re-read Kate Chopin's -The Awakening-; I have a suspicion they would go together very well. Maybe, too, Wharton's -House of Mirth-.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Only made it about 80 pages into this one. Had heard great things about the writer and had high hopes (it started out well enough), but just felt dreary, repetitive, pointless, and bourgeois. Still, clearly a gifted writer though may need better subject matter and/or more interesting characters.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is more a series of interconnected short stories than a novel, which was a bit of a disappointment for me. This format means there's a tendency to not really develop each character or situation as well as might be done in a full-length work. Nonetheless, this is pretty good writing, I reckon. It's my first dose of Rachel Cusk and I will look for more of her work.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Beautifully written in parts but I felt the short story-like structure jumping from character to character didn't really work as well as a more longer-form narrative would have done. Although many of the characters do re-appear later in the book, I found that as some level of interest and character insight was being reached the chapter would come to a close and focus on someone different.

    Need to take a break from reading books about white, middle class people too. Felt like their suburban lives was too much of an easy target here for Cusk, and didn't ever really reach the heights of her superlative Outline trilogy.

Book preview

Arlington Park - Rachel Cusk

All night the rain fell on Arlington Park.

The clouds came from the west: clouds like dark cathedrals, clouds like machines, clouds like black blossoms flowering in the arid starlit sky. They came over the English countryside, sunk in its muddled sleep. They came over the low, populous hills where scatterings of lights throbbed in the darkness. At midnight they reached the city, valiantly glittering in its shallow provincial basin. Unseen, they grew like a second city overhead, thickening, expanding, throwing up their savage monuments, their towers, their monstrous, unpeopled palaces of cloud.

In Arlington Park, people were sleeping. Here and there the houses showed an orange square of light. Cars crept along the deserted roads. A cat leapt from a wall, pouring itself down into the shadows. Silently the clouds filled the sky. The wind picked up. It faintly stirred the branches of the trees, and in the dark, empty park the swings moved back and forth a little. A handful of dried leaves shuffled on the pavement. Down in the city there were still people on the streets, but in Arlington Park they were in their beds, already surrendered to tomorrow. There was no one to see the rain coming, except a couple hurrying down the silent streets on their way back from an evening out.

I don’t like the look of that, said the man, peering up. That’s rain.

The woman gave an exasperated little laugh.

You’re the expert on everything tonight, aren’t you? she said.

They let themselves into their house. The orange light showed for an instant in their doorway and was extinguished again.

On Arlington Rise, where the streetlamps made a tunnel of hard light and the road began its descent down into the city, the wind lifted stray pieces of litter and whirled them around. Further down, the black sky sagged over the darkened shop-fronts. An irascible gust made the signs rattle against the windows. From here the city could be seen, spread out below in the half-splendour of night. A brown haze stood above it. In its heaped centre, cranes and office blocks and the tiny floodlit spires of the cathedral stood out in the dark against the haze. Red and yellow lights moved in little repeating patterns as though they were the lights of an intricate mechanism. All around it, where the suburbs extended to the north and the east, brilliant fields of light undulated over the blackened landscape.

In the centre of the city the pubs and restaurants were closed, but people were queuing outside the nightclubs. When the rain started to fall, a few of the girls shrieked and held their handbags over their heads. The boys laughed uneasily. They hunched their shoulders and put their hands in their pockets. The drops fell from the fathomless darkness and came glittering into the orange light. They fell on the awning of the Luna nightclub and twisted in the beams of the streetlamps. They fell into the melancholy, stained fountain in the square, where men in T-shirts sat with cans of lager and hooded boys made graceful circles in the dark on their skateboards. There were people milling in doorways, shrieking girls in stilettos, boys with sculpted hair, middle-aged men furtively carrying things in plastic bags. A woman in a tight raincoat tick-tacked hurriedly along the pavement, talking into her mobile phone. One of the men by the fountain took off his T-shirt and rubbed his startled chest in the rain while the others cheered. The traffic moved slowly through the spray. A group of men in a passing car blared their horn at the queuing girls and shouted out the windows as they went by.

The rain fell on the tortuous medieval streets and the grimy Victorian streets and on the big bombed streets where shopping centres had been built. It fell on the hospital and the old theatre and the new multiplex cinema. It fell on multistorey car parks and office blocks. It fell on fast-food restaurants and pubs with Union Jacks in the windows. It fell on newly built blocks of flats whose windows were still in their plastic wrappers and whose foundations stood in mud, and it fell on their hoardings. Along the river, commercial buildings—insurance buildings and banks—stood one after another, geometric-shaped, and the rain fell in their empty, geometric-shaped plazas. On the black river, under the bridge, swans sheltered from the dark drops amidst the floating rubbish. All along the rain-blackened High Street people were waiting at bus stops: people from desolate parts of the city, from Weston or Hartford, where the rain fell on boarded-up shops and houses and the concrete walkways of insomniac estates. They crowded into the bus shelters, a man with a giant sheaf of dreadlocks, a man with an enormous suitcase, an old lady neatly parcelled into a tweed coat, a couple in tracksuits who kissed and kissed beneath the plastic roof where the rain beat down, so that when the bus came in a great dark arc of water the old lady had to tap the boy on the shoulder and tell them to get on.

The bus went through the rain up Firley Way, which passed from the centre all the way through the suburbs to the retail park, where rain fell on featureless warehouses and superstores and tumbled down in sheets over their empty car parks. It fell on the roofs of darkened garage forecourts. It fell on car showrooms and builders’ merchants. It battered the plastic verandas where supermarket trolleys clung together in long, chattering rows. It fell on the business park, and on the shrubs adorning its desolate roundabout. It fell on the black, submissive fields from which the new places were unrepentantly carved. Over Merrywood shopping mall the rain fell hard on the giant neo-classical roof, so that water streamed down its indifferent façade.


On Arlington Rise the rain was running downhill in the gutters. Below, a kind of vapour hung over the city, muffling the red and yellow lights. The sounds of car horns and a siren rose up the hill from the glittering, steaming heap of the city.

A little further up, around a bend in the road, the vista disappeared. The darkness deepened. The buildings grew more graceful and the pavements more orderly. As the road ascended to Arlington Park the big, brash shops down below were succeeded by florists and antique shops: the off-licences became wine merchants, the fast-food chains became bistros. To either side tree-lined roads began to appear. In the rain these roads had the resilient atmosphere of ancient places. Their large houses stood impassively in the dark, set back amidst their dripping trees. Between them, a last, panoramic glimpse of the city could be seen below: of its eternal red and yellow lights, its pulsing mechanism, its streets always crawling with indiscriminate life. It was a startling view, though not a reassuring one. It was too mercilessly dramatic: with its unrelenting activity it lacked the sense of intermission, the proper stops and pauses of time. The story of life required its stops and its pauses, its days and nights. It didn’t make sense otherwise. But to look at that view you’d think that a human life was meaningless. You’d think that a day meant nothing at all.

The rain fell on Arlington Park, fell on its empty avenues and its well-pruned hedges, on its schools and its churches, on its trees and its gardens. It fell on its Victorian terraces with their darkened windows, on its rows of bay-fronted houses, on its Georgian properties behind their gates, on its maze of tidy streets where the little two-storey houses were painted pretty colours. It fell joyously over the dark, deserted sward of the park, over its neat paths and bushes. It beat down, washing the pavements, sluicing along the drains, drumming on the bonnets of the parked cars. All night it fell, until with a new intensity, just before dawn, it emptied a roaring cascade of water over the houses so that the rain was flung against the darkened windows.

In their sleep they heard it, people lying in their beds: the thunderous noise of the water. It penetrated their dreams, a sound like the sound of uproarious applause. It was as if a great audience were applauding. Louder and louder it grew, this strange, unsettling sound. It filled the night: it rattled the windows and made people turn beneath their covers and children cry in their sleep. It made them feel somehow observed, as if a dark audience had assembled outside and were looking in through the windows, clapping their hands.

Juliet Randall parted her hair before the mirror and there it was: a thing like a cockroach, three inches long and two across, embedded in her scalp, waving its legs triumphantly. She showed it to her husband. Look, she said, look! She bent her head forward, still holding aside her hair. Benedict looked. Oh, how it itched! How revolting it was, how unbearably revolting! Was there no way of getting it out? Her husband didn’t seem to think so. He was evidently glad the thing hadn’t decided to make its nest in his hair. Do something! Juliet shrieked, or tried to, but it was one of those dreams where you tried to say something and then suddenly found you couldn’t. She struggled in the shroud of sleep. Then, with a great effort, she tore it from her and opened her eyes.

What a horrible dream—horrible! Juliet clutched her head and frantically searched her hair. The cockroach both was and wasn’t there. She was full of its presence and yet she couldn’t touch it; she could only feel it, the hideous stirring of its legs, the crawling feeling of infestation. Oh, the way it had greedily moved its legs! And the terrible knowledge that there was no way of getting it out, that she would have to endure it for ever! The daylight began to break down that knowledge a little. She felt a measure of relief, and then another. But the thing, the insect, was still real to her, more real than the unharmed patch of scalp her fingers went over and over. Where had it gone? What was it, to remain so real to her? It almost infuriated her in its non-existence: it was maddening, almost, to be tormented by something that wasn’t there.

It wasn’t there! She acknowledged that it wasn’t. Steadily the sense of it diminished. All she could think of now was that Benedict hadn’t helped her. He had pitied her, but he had accepted her fate. He had accepted her future, as the host of a giant cockroach. He was glad it hadn’t happened to him. She looked into the deep innards of the dream and searched them again for their information. The moment she had parted her hair and showed him: that was when she realised. She had realised the true significance of a fact that was well known to her. She knew it, and yet it seemed that only in that moment did she finally understand its significance. Only then did she see what it meant, that she and Benedict were separate.

The house was silent, except for the steady sound of rain at the window and the submerged roar of the traffic on Arlington Rise. It was early, yet already the streets were awake, subversively going about their business in the dawn. What were people up to at this hour? What illicit advantage were they pursuing in their cars, going to and fro along Arlington Rise? The room stood muffled in tentative, crêpey light. Juliet scratched the place where the cockroach had been. Benedict was asleep. She drew away from the lump of him, moving further to the other side of the bed. Upstairs, above their heads, the children were still silent in their room. She listened to the sound of the rain. During the night—earlier, before the cockroach—she had woken and heard the thunderous water in the dark. It had made a sound like the sound of applause. She didn’t know why, but it had made her afraid: she had felt a fear of something it was too late to prevent, something that had already occurred. It was as if she could have gone and stood at the window and seen it standing there in the garden in the rainy dark, completed.

The indistinct light proceeded with its modest inventory of their room. There was the brown wardrobe and the inelegant chest of drawers; there was the ladder-backed chair with two rungs missing, the framed map of Venice, the chipped gilt mirror with its opaque oval of glass, all having survived the darkness unaltered. At the window the sagging curtains began to show their ancient folds and formations. Beside her, on the floor, her clothes lay in a heap: she had stepped out of them where she stood the night before. They had got back late and she had shed them, uncaring, and got straight into bed.

What an evening they’d had! It was the sort of evening that left a bitter taste in the mouth, that sat on your chest in the morning with its feeling of shame. It was an evening, in a sense, to which the cockroach had been the conclusion—the cockroach and the realisation that she and Benedict were not joined but separate. She couldn’t even summon up a clear sense of outrage about it: she had drunk too much, and the feeling of shame sat on her chest. The bitterness lay in her veins like lead. Apparently, she had been slightly obnoxious. Benedict had told her so on the walk home. She, Juliet, aged thirty-six, mother of two, a teacher at Arlington Park High School for Girls—a person regarded in her youth as somewhat exceptional, a scholarship student and at one time Head Girl—had been slightly obnoxious to their hosts, the Milfords: Matthew Milford, the vilely wealthy owner of an office supplies company in Cheltenham, and his horse-faced, attenuated, raddled wife, Louisa.

She thought of their house, into whose kitchen alone the whole of the Randalls’ shoddy establishment in Guthrie Road would comfortably have fitted. What had they done to deserve such a house? Where was the justice in that? She recalled that Matthew Milford had spoken harshly to her. The lord of the manor had spoken harshly from amidst his spoils, from his unjust throne, to Juliet, his guest. And Benedict called her obnoxious!

What was it he’d said? What was it Matthew had said, sitting there at the table like a lord, a bull, a red, angry bull blowing air through his nostrils? You want to be careful. He’d told her she wanted to be careful. His head was so bald the candlelight had made it shine like a shield. You want to be careful, he’d said, with the emphasis on you. He had spoken to Juliet not as if he’d invited her to his house but as if he’d employed her to be there. It was as if he’d employed her as a guest and was giving her a caution. That was how a man like that made you feel: as if your right to exist derived from his authority. He looked at her, a woman of thirty-six with a job and a house and a husband and two children of her own, and he decided whether or not she should be allowed to exist.

Beside her Benedict sat up.

Right, he said, ruffling his thin, downy hair with his fingers.

Today it annoyed her, the way Benedict came to life in the mornings: as though life were a river he had rested beside, before climbing back into his one-man canoe and paddling off upstream. Benedict had not defended her from that man Matthew Milford, any more than he had removed the cockroach from her scalp.

You were on the sauce last night, he observed.

He got out of bed and went to the window. Juliet still lay there with her head on the pillow and her hair spread around her in a fan.

We all were, she said.

Not me.

Everyone except you, then.

Benedict was naked. In clothes he looked very slightly effeminate, but naked he did not. His freckled chest had a burly, bunched-up look. Benedict’s nakedness had an extrovert quality, like that of people in nudist colonies.

Incredible house, he said, parting the folds of the curtain a little with one finger and then letting them fall back again.

Ridiculous, Juliet said.

Ye-es, I suppose it was, in a way.

It was, Juliet asseverated. How can people who are so idiotic be so successful?

I thought you thought it was ridiculous.

It was! All those hunting prints—and the antlers in the loo! Who do they think they are—the aristocracy? All he does is sell photocopiers to secretaries in offices!

Benedict tutted.

It’s true, Juliet said bitterly. She was determined to exonerate herself. I hate the way men like that think they’re important. They expect you to defer to them, just because they run a business! What’s so important about a business? It’s just selling things for your own personal profit. It’s just greed, dressed up as usefulness.

Benedict withdrew to the bathroom. Juliet lay and listened to the rain, and the muffled sound of the traffic going through it.

Who is he to go around telling people to be careful? she called. He should be careful himself. People might decide to stop using photocopiers. I hope they do decide to stop using them, she added, though there was no reply.

She scratched the place where the cockroach had been.

How dared he! she resumed when Benedict returned.

Who?

"Matthew Milford, last night. Women your age can start to sound strident, she mimicked. Who does he think he is?"

I don’t suppose he meant any harm, Benedict said vaguely. It was probably nothing to do with you.

That wasn’t what you said last night.

Wasn’t it?

You said it was my fault. You said I’d been obnoxious.

She saw he had forgotten that he’d even said it. In fact, he wasn’t really attending to her at all. He was thinking about the coming day. He was thinking about school, where his ravenous classes awaited him. Last year his classes had attained exam results unheard of in the annals of the comprehensive’s grim history. It had made the front page of the Arlington Gazette, the miracle of Benedict’s results. Boys with knives and shaved heads, boys who were more than slightly obnoxious, boys with drug problems and drink problems, commended for their essays on Shakespeare’s late plays! It was extraordinary. Juliet’s classes got results that were entirely in line with the high school’s reputation. But at Benedict’s school the boys were searched for weapons before they were allowed on the premises. Benedict’s results were extraordinary.

Juliet never thought about school until the moment she walked through its wrought-iron gates. It was Benedict who thought, in order to be extraordinary. He ran off their joint life as if it were a generator fuelled by Juliet, and then he separated himself and thought.

He unhooked his dressing gown from the back of the door, put it on, and with a rueful expression returned to the bathroom.

Bloody photocopiers! she exclaimed to the empty room.

She lay and looked at the ceiling. She could hear movements from the children’s room above her head. In a minute she would have to get up and deal with them. Benedict wouldn’t go. It was Juliet who did everything. Everything! She would put them in their uniforms and take them out into the rain. Then she recalled that it was Friday, the last Friday of the month, the day Benedict collected the children from school.


Juliet and Benedict did not know the Milfords well. Louisa Milford always seemed very fractured and busy and distrait, as though she had some difficult secret, some difficult burden at home she was unable to tell you about. It might have been her husband, it was hard to tell: he ran his own business and was hardly ever seen. They lived in one of the Georgian houses on the park, in Parry’s Place to be exact, which Juliet was told—she liked to pretend not to know that sort of thing—was the most expensive address in Arlington Park.

Though they did not know them well, Louisa’s invitation—"supper in the kitchen at Parry’s Place, just us, totally informal"—did imply knowledge of a kind: Louisa’s knowledge of the Randalls as a level at which an invitation could be pitched. Juliet and Benedict walked, and once across the park began to pass grand houses, standing behind Bath-stone walls and closed gates. By night they had the monolithic appearance of temples, rearing up from the shadowy mass of grass and trees, their façades fabulous with a particular kind of amber light. It was strange, to be amidst this little aristocracy of houses. In Guthrie Road, as elsewhere in Arlington Park, the solid, bourgeois, profitable ordinariness of life was generally ascendant. But here things existed at a pitch of striking ostentation. It was hard to know exactly what it signified. Juliet felt at one minute that she and Benedict might be eaten, or enslaved; and at the next that some form of reward awaited them. It was exciting, in a way.

But then, glimpsing the armoured forms of the big, expensive cars crouched among the shadows in driveways all along the park, she had a sort of oceanic sense of malevolence, of a great, diffuse evil silently undulating all around them in the darkness. In the Milfords’ own driveway an enormous glittering Mercedes crouched on the gravel on giant, ogreish tyres. Its tinted windows seemed to cast on everything their shuttered, annihilating gaze. Juliet had felt a force of pure aggression emanating from its metal surfaces. It was the car of an assassin, a killer. Louisa Milford opened the panelled front door and looked at the Randalls rather blankly. Was she a killer? Juliet wasn’t

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1