Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

God, No!: Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
God, No!: Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
God, No!: Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
Ebook285 pages4 hours

God, No!: Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

The New York Times bestselling reinterpretation of the Ten Commandments from the larger, louder half of the world-famous magic duo Penn & Teller.

A scathingly funny reinterpretation of the Ten Commandments from the larger, louder half of world-famous magic duo Penn and Teller reveals an atheist's experience in the world: from performing on the Vegas strip with Siegfried and Roy to children and fatherhood to his ongoing dialogue with proselytizers of the Christian Right and the joys of sex while scuba-diving, Penn has an outrageous sense of humor and a brilliantly entertaining opinion on, well, anything you care to think of.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateAug 16, 2011
ISBN9781451610383
God, No!: Signs You May Already Be an Atheist and Other Magical Tales
Author

Penn Jillette

Penn Jillette is a cultural phenomenon as a solo personality and as half of the world-famous Emmy Award­-winning magic duo Penn & Teller. His solo exposure is enormous: from Howard Stern to Glenn Beck to the Op-Ed pages of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Los Angeles Times. He has appeared on Dancing with the Stars, MTV Cribs, and Chelsea Lately and hosted the NBC game show Identity. As part of Penn & Teller, he has appeared more than twenty times on David Letterman, as well as on several other TV shows, from The Simpsons and Friends to Top Chef and The View. He cohosts the controversial series Penn & Teller: Bullshit!, which has been nominated for sixteen Emmy Awards. He is currently cohost of the Discovery Channel's Penn & Teller Tell a Lie and the author of God, No! and Presto.

Related to God, No!

Related ebooks

Humor & Satire For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for God, No!

Rating: 3.401554283937824 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

193 ratings20 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I was expecting a book-long tract about atheism, but Jillette focuses on the "Other Magical Tales" section of the subtitle to mostly deliver a fine if fairly standard celebrity memoir stuffed with chatty anecdotes and ranty essays about libertarianism, terrorism, and Richard Nixon in addition to some bits about atheism. I agreed with some stuff, disagreed with some stuff, and was entertained throughout by the generous heaping of foul language and the wonderfully obscene way he has of expressing his thoughts and sharing parts of his life.He admits to being an ass, and I probably wouldn't want to hang out with him in real life, but Jillette certainly is a person worth reading about.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Entertaining and thoughtful. Some of the stories were a bit long-winded, but other parts were very thoughtful and give you something to think about.

    The language is very coarse. I would not recommend this to someone who has even a mild problem with extremely rough language.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Despite its title, God No is less a book about atheism, and more a book about Penn Jillette. Overall, it’s a rambling, amusing, self-indulgent collection of celebrity encounters, only a few of which ever come around to the subject of atheism. Despite that, there are some seeds of insight to be found throughout, eventually growing together into a wild, untameable vine of free thought.

    At times rude and crude, it’s in his most outrageous, most blasphemous moments, that the most important points are made. Like any great magician, Penn is a master of the bait-and-switch. To put it another way, like any good parent, he’s a master of making the nastiest medicine palatable by hiding it in something sweet. Time and time again he shocks you with one blasphemous concept, and then slips in a bit of wisdom that you might have otherwise dismissed out-of-hand . . . but no longer find so hard to swallow.

    The problem, from a conceptual point of view, is that those sugar-coated messages are few and far between. The framing of the atheist Ten Commandments is artificial and loose, and I honestly can’t recall any specifics. There are no catchy phrases or memorable revisions here, just chapters of stories with a common theme. What could have been a clever concept, and could have really helped make a really strong point, is instead sacrificed for entertaining the converted. That’s not entirely a bad thing – alone, or with Teller at his side, Penn is always entertaining – but I would have liked something more structured.

    Is there an elephant in your bathtub right now? If you humbly answer "I don't know," then when asked if you believe there's an elephant in your bathtub right now, the answer would be no. Anything is possible, but there's no reason to believe it until there's some evidence. Once you're an atheist, anything is possible. You are leaving open the possibility of Jesus Christ as lord, and Thor, and invisible gremlins living in your toaster. It's all possible, but . . . I don't know. And until I know—until there's some evidence—I'm an atheist.

    In the end, once the stories fade, do any of the bits of wisdom that are there stick with you? As somebody who already agrees with much of what he has to say, and is regularly amused by his act, I don’t know . . . but, ironically (as Penn himself makes clear), that’s largely the point.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    So smart, so funny, so real. All agnostics should go pick up this book and be convinced. All fans of Penn Jillette should go pick up this book and be convinced and entertained. Everyone should read this book!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Penn is as "bugnutty" - his word - as they come. Also offensive, inappropriate and out and out hilarious. He's an atheist, and makes no bones of it. He's also a libertarian's libertarian and makes no apologies. This is not your book if you're easily offended on religion, sex, politics, personal liberties, Santa or frozen yogurt. There are no sacred cows in his world. He makes many valid points, and iswilling to acknowledge we all know next to nothing. He's just seemingly more open to that fact, nor does he really seem to care if you agree or not. Side splittingly funny, liberally doused with obscenity, sometimesquite touching, with blurbs from Dawkins, Trey Parker, Glenn Beck and Matt Stone. From half of the duo who bring you "Bullshit!" - Jillette's take on calling it, for real. Plus, the added bonus of his humor and his patent. His politics may not be your cup of tea, but hear the man out. You'll be glad. Just be careful who you spend time with after reading, you get so used to the f bomb it starts to invade your brain.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I'm already an atheist, so I knew Jillette would be preaching to the choir in my case. I agree with a lot of what he says here. He made me laugh and nod on every page. There were parts I read out loud, they were that good. I totally buy his arguments. The chapter on climate change (and more importantly, about how saying "I don't know" can be misinterpreted) was wonderful. The memoir-ish bits were interesting, and I really enjoyed his transparent, epic love for his family. The chapter about his sister is breathtakingly great. But Jillette goes out of his way to be a jerk, he uses the most emphatic curse words in ways designed to alienate- so much so that I was often taken out of the narrative flow to examine why, exactly, I was feeling so repelled. It's hard for me to rate a book I agree with, that's frequently funny, but that leaves me feeling like someone's prudish grandmother (did he have to call that perfectly nice woman those words? In THAT order?). 4 stars for content, 2 stars for ick factor (serious ick factor, involving a white hot blowdryer and... oh, nevermind), 4 stars for being utterly fearless.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This book wasn't what I was expecting from the title - It was more like a biography with bits about atheism. Definitely worth reading if you are a Penn & Teller fan (which I am) or want to get another atheist perspective (Dawkins can be very abrasive). I just wasn't expecting it to be as autobiographical as it is. I sometimes felt the swearing gets in the way of the story.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This is not a systematic work on atheism, a la Harris or Hitchens, but rather a collection of funny stories---hey, what did you expect?---illustrating common sense principles of morality, organized around what Penn describes as "one atheist's ten suggestions" in response to a challenge by Glenn Beck to come up with a list of an atheist Ten Commandments.The stories are very funny---a couple of them literally falling-out-of-my-chair hilarious---and along the way he does manage to make some interesting points about atheism. He distinguishes between the epistemological question addressed by agnosticism and the question about one's state of belief addressed by atheism, and concludes that if the answer to the former question is "I don't know," the only honest answer to the latter question is, "No, I don't believe in god." I think this is a legitimate distinction, but I would go further than Jillette's "soft" atheism (which leaves open the possibility that some evidence for a god could be discovered in the future) and argue for "hard" atheism, i.e., that one can be certain that there is no god. But that's neither here nor there.This book will make you think, and it will make you laugh even more. If there were a "preacher" for atheism, Penn Jillette should be it...I mean, c'mon, just look at him on the cover! And listening to him reading the audio version is great, too.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I like Penn Jillette. Possibly more than I really should. The guy's an opinionated loudmouth, and I'm not generally a fan of opinionated loudmouths, even when I agree with what they're saying (and I do agree with Penn on a lot of things, though by no means all of them). Heck, it may be especially true when I agree with them, since I think being an opinionated loudmouth is more often than not counterproductive if you want to bring people around to your way of thinking.But, somehow, Penn makes it work for him. It helps a lot that he's funny. It also helps that he's self-deprecating about his own obnoxiousness in a way that feels surprisingly genuine, cheerfully admitting that he's just some nut with a big mouth and there's no reason you should listen to him over anyone else and managing to give the impression that, far from wanting to browbeat people into submission or silence like most opinionated loudmouths, he'd be honestly delighted if you leapt into the argument and showed him that he was wrong about something. Even more than that, though, it's that he's just so full of exuberance. He comes across as a guy who is completely in love with life and thinks people are great even while he's in the middle of a full-bore, no-holds-barred, profanity-filled rant, which is honestly pretty impressive. Even when he ought to be annoying, I just find him weirdly lovable.So, yes, I enjoyed this book. As the title suggests, there's a lot about religion (or, rather, against it) in this loose collection of essays, but he also talks about politics and showbiz and various other subjects, and shares a lot of personal stories. It is, at various points, hilarious, touching, goofy, dirty, and provocative, although whether it's provocative in a good way or a bad way probably depends a lot on the reader. I wouldn't recommend it to just anybody -- religious people will no doubt find it as offensive to their beliefs as it's meant to be -- but if you like Penn Jillette, there's a lot of him here to like.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    As an entertain, I like Penn Jillette. The talkative half of the comedy/magic act Penn and Teller, he's never been shy to talk about anything. Often, when he talks, he is still entertaining. When he presumes to talk about more intellectual subjects, particularly those he has little real knowledge about, he comes off as an annoying doofus.God No! presumes to be about Atheism, a subject I can identify with and something Penn and I have in common. However, the content is a mish-mash of pontificating on serious subjects and posting unrelated anecdotes about episodes in his life. The memoirs were more entertaining; I'm still scratching my head as to why he would devote a chapter displaying his ignorance about Global Warming (and confirming his ignorance telling us that a year after an ill-advised comment on the subject, he still didn't know anything). Penn is at his best talking about his family life. Almost in spite of his persona, he portrays himself as a very devoted family man, and in this he appears more like "one of us." He is most likable at these moments. I'd like to read more of these moments, of his other stories that punctuate the colorful career of a flamboyant entertainer. Penn name-drops some impressive icons in the area where he presumes to offer an opinion; among them, two of my favorites, Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens. He is not intellectually in the same class, however, and stylistically, dropping f-bombs every other word, he'll never match their eloquence. Just write a memoir Penn, and don't presume to instruct anyone in your personal doctrine. While I might agree with much of it, you are not a very good advocate.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I picked this book up at a library sale and thought it might be interesting to read some of Penn's comments on Atheism. To my surprise, the book is a series of stories about Penn's life, all tied very loosely to Atheism, making this book a very enjoyable read.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I like Penn a lot, even if I don't agree with him a lot of the time. Definitely a fun read, even if I cringed over him wanting to have sex with Ayn Rand. Ugh.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    Clever, intelligent....but I was bored, he just does not hold my attention as does Lewis Black.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I respect a lot of Penn's view points. And it was his unwavering commitment to reality that helped me finally take the plunge and admit I'm an atheist. Though my "conversion" was nowhere near as absurd as the lost faith ceremony he, his partner Teller and road crew share with a former Jew from a story Penn shares in the first chapter. The premise of the book is that Penn Jillette is an atheist, and if you're reading his book, you probably are, too. And while the stories collected within the book go from mildly dismissive of Christians and Jews to hilariously self derogatory. The framework of the 10 Commandments and "10 suggestions" is tiresome and only minimally relative to the stories that follow. A better title might be "Hilarious Shit That's Happened to Me in the Last 50 Years, And God Sucks".I gave it 3 stars because the stories, while often very funny, are a little too dismissive of any point of view of Libertarian atheism - if there is such a thing. If your only exposure to Penn Jillette is through the comedy/magic duo of Penn & Teller, this book may be disappointing, as Penn only references the act as a waypoint through the story. However, if you are familiar with the Showtime show Penn & Teller's Bullshit, this is a great companion piece.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I would recommend that both believers and non-believers check out Penn's book. I think it is funny and at times it was a little too much for me but overall I think he makes a solid case for "I don't know". It is a lot simpler to blindly believe in a dogma that you either grew up in or that you were lead into as it does not require critical thinking.I would say everyone could learn from this common sense book about how to think independently. I don't have to agree with Penn to like the book. I don't have to change my views to like the book. I think you will find it a quick and easy read and it will open debate with some of your friends...and debate and thought is a good thing.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Penn Jillette is a nut, really he says it several times throughout this book. Penn is outspoken and has non-traditional views. God no is a nice glimpse into those views all presented through stories of Penn's life. Penn is also not trying to convert anyone to atheism but instead points out many entertaining facts about faith, science, and god as well as a fun look into show business.

    I found this book funny and entertaining but have to warn people that there is a lot of foul language and sexual content throughout the book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Penn is as "bugnutty" - his word - as they come. Also offensive, inappropriate and out and out hilarious. He's an atheist, and makes no bones of it. He's also a libertarian's libertarian and makes no apologies. This is not your book if you're easily offended on religion, sex, politics, personal liberties, Santa or frozen yogurt.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Finished this book in a day because I was so keen to see what the next story was going to be. This isn't a Dawkins-esque 300-page rant (although there is a little bit of ranting, about politics as well as religion), it's clear and well-worded criticism woven into some captivating anecdotes that are so engrossing I occasionally forgot I was reading a book framed around religion. The stories are mostly funny, sometimes sad, sometimes just plain weird and always intriguing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Penn is an interesting person, and this book really demonstrates that. It's mostly 229 pages of Penn ranting about what is wrong with this country. His chapter on the TSA is worth the price of the book alone.

    But, it's not all rant. His writing about the deaths of his parents and sister will bring tears to your eyes (in a good way). He comes across as a very sincere, thoughtful, honest, and genuine individual, and although I've never met him (other than his signing autographs after a show), I'm willing to believe he embodies all of those traits.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Horrible book! I know my God is real!

Book preview

God, No! - Penn Jillette

• INTRODUCTION •

The Humility of Loudmouth Know-it-all Asshole Atheists

You don’t have to be brave or a saint, a martyr, or even very smart to be an atheist. All you have to be able to say is I don’t know. I remember sitting in a room full of skeptics when I first heard Christopher Hitchens say, Atheists don’t have saints and we don’t have martyrs. I’m a little afraid to put that in quotes, because no matter how brilliantly I remember any Hitchens phrase, when I go back and check, what he said was better than I remember. He is better at speaking off the top of his head after a couple of drinks than I am at remembering his brilliance later while referencing notes.

I know nothing about drinking, but I know that Hitchens did drink, and when he made that comment he was sitting next to me on the dais with a drink in front of him. But the drink was irrelevant—I could never see that it made any difference to his abilities. My doctor’s brother (how’s that for a source?) said there is such a thing as state-dependent learning. This explains the brilliance of all the jazz cats on heroin and how Keith Richards could play even a specially tuned guitar while as fucked-up as . . . well, Keith Richards. They’re performing in the same state in which they practiced. Hank Williams was so fucked-up we don’t even know which of the United States he died in. Hank’s driver drove him across many state lines all night in his long white Cadillac and when they got to Oak Hill, West Virginia, Hank was dead. Hank’s genius might have been state-dependent, but his dying wasn’t even that.

For years it seemed Christopher Hitchens was always drunk, so he was calling up information in the same state (drunk) that he learned it (drunk). I did the Howard Stern radio show a lot in the late eighties. Many times I was on with Sam Kinison. I’ve never had a sip of alcohol or tried any recreational drug in my life, and I’d come in to the Stern show as rested as carny trash could be that early in the morning—focused and ready to work. Sam would come in fucked-up. Really fucked-up. Stern would kick off the show and Sam was always so good. I would be sweating into the mic, trying to get a clever word in here and there while in awe of how fast, insightful, profound, and motherfucking funny Sam was every second. Howard would keep us on for a long time, and at the end of the show I’d be exhausted, and Sam would just stagger out like he came in.

I used to wonder: if that was how he was in a fucked-up state, if he ever were sober, couldn’t he sweep the Nobel Prizes and throw in a Fields Medal?

You don’t have to be very smart, fast, or funny to be an atheist. You don’t have to be well educated. Being an atheist is simply saying I don’t know.

When I was a professional dishwasher, I worked with a man named Harold. Harold sent in lyrics and the little bit of money he saved up to song-poem companies that advertised in the back of the National Enquirer and Midnight. He’d pay a full week’s wages to have song sharks set his poems to music, record the songs, and try to sell them to make Harold rich. Part of the scam was to send the victim a copy of his song on a record. I now collect copies of those song-poem records. Nothing is labeled very well, and most of them are about Jesus or Nixon. I’ll never know if I’m listening to a song Harold cowrote with a rip-off artist, but when I listen, I feel like I’m in touch with him. Most of the song-poems are unlistenable, but the ones that are good are heartbreaking. They are all you want in art—the cynical blasé skill of out-of-work studio musicians sight-reading hastily scribbled sheet music while a competent but bitter vocalist sings unedited, pure, white light/white heat lyrics from the heart of someone who doesn’t know what the word cynical means. Beat that, Bruce Springsteen.

Harold was fat and ugly and sweaty. He didn’t have any brainpower or hair at all, and I looked up to him. I knew other people who were a zillion times smarter than Harold, but Harold managed to show up for work, get the pots and pans clean, and deal with all the smart-assed punks, hippies, drunks, and drug users who washed dishes briefly and badly at Famous Bill’s Restaurant in Greenfield, Massachusetts. Famous Bill’s contained the word famous because they’d gotten a good review of their lobster pie in a travel magazine in the fifties. I was a hippie punk who worked with Harold for one summer and then went on with my life with Penn & Teller. Harold knew a couple little jokes, and he knew how to be polite and get to the restaurant on time and back to his apartment after work to write songs. I never talked theology with Harold—I don’t know if he believed in god—but I heard him say I don’t know about a lot of things. His smile when he admitted he didn’t know was unapologetic, unless you were asking a question related to his job. If you were asking him if he liked Kerouac or Thailand, he would just say I don’t know as a simple statement of fact. He knew very well that he didn’t know.

I try to claim that I was friends with the genius Richard Feynman. He came to our show a few times and was very complimentary, and I had dinner with him a couple times, and we chatted on the phone several times. I’d call him to get quick tutoring on physics so I could pretend to read his books. No matter how much I want to brag, it’s overstating it to call him a friend. I would never have called him to help me move a couch. I did, however, call him once to ask how we could score some liquid nitrogen for a Letterman spot we wanted to do. He was the only physicist I knew at the time. He explained patiently that he didn’t know. He was a theoretical physicist and I needed a hands-on guy, but he’d try to find one for me. About a half hour later a physics teacher from a community college in Brooklyn called me and said, I don’t know what kind of practical joke this is, but a Nobel Prize–winning scientist just called me here at the community college, gave me this number, and told me to call Penn of Penn & Teller to help with a Letterman appearance.

I guess that’s close to a friend.

My friend Richard Feynman said I don’t know. I heard him say it several times. He said it just like Harold, a simple statement of fact. When Richard didn’t know, he often worked harder than anyone else to find out, but while he didn’t know, he said I don’t know.

I like to think I fit in somewhere between my friends Harold and Richard. I don’t know. I try to remember to say I don’t know just the way they both did, as a simple statement of fact. It doesn’t always work. It seems that with climate change we’re all supposed to know, but I’ll get to that later in the book.

One attack I’ve heard theists make against atheists is, So, you atheists think you know everything? You think you’re smart enough to know everything? You think science can figure out everything? There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt . . . That quote is from my good friend Mr. Straw Man, but it’s an idea we hear all the time: atheists are arrogant and don’t think they need god, because they’ve got it all figured out. I think people who make that accusation are confusing style with content. I’m a loud, aggressive, strident, outspoken atheist, and I’m an asshole—but what I’m claiming is not in any way arrogant. It couldn’t be more humble. It’s just I don’t know.

I don’t know how the world was created. I don’t know how humans got here. There are lots of good guesses, and we keep testing those guesses trying to find where they’re wrong. Science has helped a lot, but we don’t know. And maybe we never will. I mean, we, all of us, the people alive right now, will certainly never know, but it seems almost as likely that no humans will ever know. How could we? We will keep getting closer, we will keep knowing more and more. I guess string theory might explain some things, but I don’t know. I don’t understand jack shit about string theory. Evolution explains a lot. I think I get a little bit about that. Evolution really does seem to make a zillion pieces fall into place. It’s the answer to a lot of questions that, before Darwin, had to be answered with I don’t know. The theory of evolution keeps, you know, evolving—it keeps changing. Now, we do know a lot, but the number of I don’t knows is still infinite. Aren’t there a few different kinds of infinity? I don’t fucking know. I sure can’t picture infinity. What does it mean to go on forever? I don’t know. That’s how Harold’s coworker Penn, the dishwasher, would say it—a simple statement of fact: I don’t know.

Where is the humility in being a theist? There is none. What would it mean for me to believe in god? It would mean that I know. Not just that I might happen to know about Kerouac, Thailand, liquid nitrogen, and vector calculus identities, but that I know that there is an omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent power in the universe that I can’t prove to you, but that I know because I have faith. I know because I say I know. I can feel it. I would maybe have faith that this force in the universe is for good. Maybe it’s tied in with love. Maybe I know that this force in the universe will give everlasting life and cares very much where I stick my fucking cock. Maybe I would know that there is a supreme power in the universe and that supreme power cares about me. Not everyone who believes in god believes all of those things. But it doesn’t matter—whatever they say god is, they’re saying they know. There is no humility. They believe because they say they believe. Some people who believe in god distort the meaning to the point where . . . well, even I could say I believe in god. Some will tell you God is love and then defy you not to believe in love. But, if X = Y, why have a fucking X? Just keep it at Y. Why call love god? Why not call love . . . love? Beauty is god. Okay. If you change what the word means, you can get me to say I believe in it. Say God is bacon or God is tits and I’ll love and praise god, but you’re just changing the word, not the idea. Some think that god will answer prayers. They think that their prayer can influence the behavior of an omnipotent, omniscient power. How do you figure that? How come it’s rare to see people on TV saying that god made them lose the stupid ball game or killed that baby in the house fire? How come every time someone says that god told them to kill their whole family, the religious people say right away that the faithful murderer was crazy? You never see religious people saying I wonder if that murder was a miracle. I wonder if god is speaking to us directly again.

Maybe they really don’t believe this shit either.

I could scream at the altar of a church, with a crucifix stuck deep up my asshole, that I fuck Jesus Christ hard through the hand holes and cream on his crown of thorns, and I will never hit the level of blasphemy that’s required for someone to pray to god for their family’s pet dog to return home. The idea that someone can claim that they know there’s a god because they feel it, because they trust a book that they were raised with, because they had an epiphany, and then ask this god to change its mind about its plan for the universe is arrogant. Once you say you have the answer to everything, but you can’t prove it to anyone else, I don’t think you can accuse anyone else of being arrogant. I think you are the king of kings of the arrogant assholes.

And I don’t know doesn’t mean There might be a god. That’s the different kind of I don’t know, that’s not Harold and Richard’s honest, humble I don’t know. Being an atheist means you don’t believe in god. When someone asks if god exists and you humbly say I don’t know, you’ve answered the question honestly. Once you’ve answered I don’t know to the existence of a god, the answer to whether you believe in god pretty much has to be no. That doesn’t mean you’re saying it’s impossible for there to be a god, or that we couldn’t have evidence of a god in the future. It just means that right now you don’t know. And if you don’t know, you can’t believe. Believing cannot rise out of I don’t know.

Is there an elephant in your bathtub right now? If you humbly answer I don’t know, then when asked if you believe there’s an elephant in your bathtub right now, the answer would be no. Anything is possible, but there’s no reason to believe it until there’s some evidence. Once you’re an atheist, anything is possible. You are leaving open the possibility of Jesus Christ as lord, and Thor, and invisible gremlins living in your toaster. It’s all possible, but . . . I don’t know. And until I know—until there’s some evidence—I’m an atheist.

What could be humbler than that? You don’t have to be smart or well educated, you just need to be humble. And if you’re a libertarian atheist, there can be no commandments. There can be no edicts. It’s all down to the individual. No one knows what’s best for other people. I don’t even know what’s best for myself.

I was asked by Glenn Beck to entertain the idea of an atheist Ten Commandments. It was his rhetorical exercise to try to force the incorrect point that the biblical Ten Commandments were just common sense. Even though my heroes Hitchens and George Carlin have taken a pass at the Ten Commandments, I wanted to do my own. I wanted to see how many of the ideas that many people think are handed down from god really make sense to someone who says I don’t know.

Borscht Belt comics and a lot of web pages have used the gag The Ten Suggestions. All joking aside, that seems like the right feeling. This book is just some thoughts from someone who doesn’t know. I’ve tried to throw in a couple of funny stories, and there’s a lot of rambling. Some of the stories have nothing to do with atheism directly, but they will give you a feel for how one goofy atheist lives his life in turn-of-the-century America. If you’re still claiming that you’re religious, you can compare and contrast. I think you’ll find that I’m just like you, if you’re the kind of guy or gal who’s dropped his or her cock into a blow-dryer. Try to remember, when it all comes down, I just don’t know.

But . . . god? No! There is no fucking god!

The Bible’s First Commandment

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

The greatest thing about provable reality is that by definition reality is shared. Every argument is really an agreement—an agreement that there is a reality that can be shared, judged, and discussed. To argue over whether the speed of light is constant or Batman could beat up the Lone Ranger is to share the parameters. God is solipsistic; reality is shared.

ONE ATHEIST’S FIRST SUGGESTION

The highest ideals are human intelligence,

creativity, and love. Respect these above all.

Siegfried, Roy, Montecore, Penn, and Leather Pants

I loved the Siegfried and Roy show at the Mirage in Las Vegas, Nevada. I just loved it. It made me cry. It filled my heart with joy. It made me proud to be in show business. The magic in the show sucked. I don’t like seeing animals onstage. I couldn’t follow the plot of the show. The Michael Jackson song written for the show was bombastic, saccharine, and plain nonsense. I didn’t care about the staging, choreography, costumes, or lighting.

I liked nothing about the Siegfried and Roy show—but I loved all of it. I loved it with all my heart. I saw it several times, and every time it inspired me and filled me with a rage to live. Bob Dylan said, Art is the perpetual motion of illusion. The highest purpose of art is to inspire. What else can you do? What else can you do for anyone but inspire them?

Siegfried and Roy always inspired me. They showed me how pure and simple art could be. Their show had a zillion dancers and big stupid props. Their show was dripping with over-the-top hype and empty glitz, and had more honesty, purity, and bravery than all the alternative folk lo-fi acts at all the non-Starbucks coffee shops in the state of Washington put together. I’ve quoted, since I was a child, Lenny Bruce saying the purpose of art is to stand naked onstage. I can’t find that quote by Lenny in any books, records, or transcripts. I think I made it up. So . . .

The purpose of art is to stand naked onstage.

—Penn Jillette

Too bad it’s a quote from an asshole and not a genius, but it’s still true. Lenny Bruce, playing a strip club before he made it, once came out onstage wearing nothing but a bow tie and a pair of shoes. He stood onstage and pissed in a knothole in the floor to protest the danger of that stage knothole to the strippers in high heels. Teller and I used to strip naked onstage to prove there was nothing up our sleeves. But Lenny Bruce, Penn Jillette, and Teller were never as naked onstage as Siegfried Fischbacher and Roy Horn. Siegfried and Roy would walk onstage to huge applause (beefed up by prerecorded applause over the loudspeakers) in their goofy, sparkly, rhinestone-skin coats and leather pants with codpieces. Their hair would be perfectly frosted and layered and they’d be wearing almost as much makeup as Bill Maher. They looked out at their audience, and we could all see deep into their hearts. They were completely naked onstage. So naked you could see into their past: the twelve-year-olds in Germany standing in front of their mirrors, maybe each with his cock and balls tucked between his legs hiding, arms up in the air like the pope, smiling big toothy smiles, hearing this applause in their heads. It was all pretend when they were children, and as adults it was all real. So painfully, embarrassingly, proudly, honestly, purely real. The tricks didn’t matter, the animals didn’t matter, the shithouse rat–crazy King of Pop grunting about mystical gardens, violets, devotions, and hallucinations didn’t matter. Nothing mattered but the raw, desperate purity in the eyes of Siegfried and Roy looking out at the crowd. They wanted to be onstage so much—too much—that I was proud to be just an extra in their fantasy. I applauded, screamed, and cried my eyes out. I loved Siegfried and Roy onstage.

I also loved Siegfried and Roy backstage.

When P & T went to see S & R, we went backstage. If you go backstage at the Penn & Teller Theater, it’s not glamorous. We’ve got very plain dressing rooms. We each have our desk and computer—those are the centerpiece of each room—and we’re usually typing right up until we go on. I have music playing and a left-wing or right-wing television news station with no sound on. I read the closed captions when I look up from my computer. Teller is forced to hear my shuffled 650 gigs of nut music through the shared beige wall. Teller has a poster up for the production of Macbeth he directed and some paintings by his mom and dad. I have a big poster of D. A. Pennebaker’s Bob Dylan documentary Don’t Look Back, some Ayn Rand handwritten pages from Atlas Shrugged, an eight-by-ten of Raymond Burr and the rest of the cast of Perry Mason, some Tiny Tim pictures, and artwork by and pictures of my children.

Our greenroom is the Monkey Room. It’s a jungle-themed room with smoking monkeys and a small fridge with Blenheim really spicy ginger ale. There are a few pictures on the wall of us with people like Madonna, Warhol, Steve Martin, Run-DMC, Iggy Pop, and David Allan Coe. Most of the decorating was done by the TV show While You Were Out. If not for that TV show, our greenroom wouldn’t even be green, it would be hotel beige with an off-white acoustic-tile ceiling. The fluorescent light fixtures show shadows of dead roaches. The Rio All-Suite Hotel and Casino is very clean, so they’re probably made of rubber and put there by Teller. I won’t give him the satisfaction of asking.

Backstage at Siegfried and Roy was real showbiz. It was as pure as their walking onstage. Roy had a huge jungle-themed bedroom. We have pictures of monkeys backstage; Roy had real live wild animals in cages all around the room. He needed a live ocelot, a snake, and a few birds in his bedroom so he could commune with them before the show. We surf porn on our computers. Roy meditates with endangered species. Everything was opulent, that golden-toilet, Dubai kind of opulent, that poor-no-more Elvis opulent. S & R didn’t greet us backstage barefoot in jeans and T-shirts like P & T, wolfing down after-show room service on TV trays; they came out in yak-hair dressing gowns. Teller and I don’t even shower after the show, we just throw our street clothes on over the sweat. S & R were showered, their hair was blow-dried, they smelled pretty, and they were wearing makeup. They were wearing makeup backstage after the show and after showers. Penn & Teller don’t even wear makeup onstage. S & R looked better backstage after their show than P & T looked onstage at the Emmys. They are fucking superstars; we are fucking pigs.

Teller and I sat at

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1