Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady
Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady
Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady
Ebook351 pages5 hours

Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

"I think people marry far too much; it is such a lottery, and for a poor woman--bodily and morally the husband's slave--a very doubtful happiness." -Queen Victoria to her recently married daughter Vicky

Headstrong, high-spirited, and already widowed, Isabella Walker became Mrs. Henry Robinson at age 31 in 1844. Her first husband had died suddenly, leaving his estate to a son from a previous marriage, so she inherited nothing. A successful civil engineer, Henry moved them, by then with two sons, to Edinburgh's elegant society in 1850. But Henry traveled often and was cold and remote when home, leaving Isabella to her fantasies.

No doubt thousands of Victorian women faced the same circumstances, but Isabella chose to record her innermost thoughts-and especially her infatuation with a married Dr. Edward Lane-in her diary. Over five years the entries mounted-passionate, sensual, suggestive. One fateful day in 1858 Henry chanced on the diary and, broaching its privacy, read Isabella's intimate entries. Aghast at his wife's perceived infidelity, Henry petitioned for divorce on the grounds of adultery. Until that year, divorce had been illegal in England, the marital bond being a cornerstone of English life. Their trial would be a cause celebre, threatening the foundations of Victorian society with the specter of "a new and disturbing figure: a middle class wife who was restless, unhappy, avid for arousal." Her diary, read in court, was as explosive as Flaubert's Madame Bovary, just published in France but considered too scandalous to be translated into English until the 1880s.

As she accomplished in her award-winning and bestselling The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher, Kate Summerscale brilliantly recreates the Victorian world, chronicling in exquisite and compelling detail the life of Isabella Robinson, wherein the longings of a frustrated wife collided with a society clinging to rigid ideas about sanity, the boundaries of privacy, the institution of marriage, and female sexuality.
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJun 19, 2012
ISBN9780802743688
Author

Kate Summerscale

Kate Summerscale is the author of the number one bestselling The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, winner of the Samuel Johnson Prize for Non-Fiction 2008, winner of the Galaxy British Book of the Year Award, a Richard & Judy Book Club pick and adapted into a major ITV drama. Her debut, The Queen of Whale Cay, won a Somerset Maugham award and was shortlisted for The Whitbread Biography Award. The Wicked Boy, published in 2016, won the Mystery Writers of America Edgar Award for Best Fact Crime. Her latest book, The Haunting of Alma Fielding, was shortlisted for the Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction. She lives in north London.

Read more from Kate Summerscale

Related to Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace

Related ebooks

European History For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace

Rating: 3.6666666666666665 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

24 ratings24 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Review from Badelynge.In Kate Summerscale's previous book The Suspicions of Mr Whicher the author demonstrated that if you are going to try marketing what was essentially an extended essay you could do worse than find a subject that included a notorious Victorian murder, family secrets and a celebrated Scotland Yard Detective. It was a massive bestseller. If you expected Summerscale to choose another such mystery, perhaps another murder and another dashing detective then you might be a little disappointed that this time the focus is on one of the most notable of the early divorce trials of the 1850s. Henry Robinson is a middle class businessman who discovers his wife's secret diary, the contents of which form the basis of his legal attempts to divorce her. The case hinges on whether the illicit affair detailed within the pages is truth or some elaborate fiction. Also on trial is the professional and personal reputation of the object of Mrs Robinson's obsession, Edward Lane, respected by the great and the good as a brilliant practitioner of hydrotherapy working from his clinic/spa at Moor Park. The verdict is less important, to the reader at least, than the study of a period of history focusing on social aspects like the law, marriage, health, class, family, sex, the psyche, morality, science and religion. Lane and Mrs Robinson have a large and eclectic circle of contacts and friends that reach deep into British literary circles and the Victorian scientific intelligentsia; Darwin is one of Lane's patients and George Combe, a proponent of phrenology, is a frequent correspondent of them both. Sumerscale melds the different sources into the essay with care and the proper focus for the themes explored. The tone is certainly engaging and never dry. As a slice of social history the book works very well. It might be the case that some people might be more inclined to read the diaries in question and make their own mind up without Summerscales commentary but as a fuller snapshot of the times Mrs Robinson's disgrace would be my choice. Divorce case aside the book also celebrates the early history of diaries, their place in the British home and like the crux of the trial, the line between factual journal and their place among fiction as entertainment.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I read this right after reading Mr. Briggs Hat, another non fiction book that relates events that occurred in Victorian England. While Mr. Briggs Hat told the story of the first railway carriage murder, Mrs. Robinson's ruminated on what it meant to be a woman and the state of marriage in Victorian England. As you can imagine we have come a long way. Interestingly both novels referenced Wilkie Collins A woman in White. It must be quite the hallmark book of the times.In Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace we are introduced to Isabella Robinson. She is a young widow with a small son when she marries Henry Robinson. At first she has high hopes for the marriage but most like most men Henry is grumpy and hard to please. He also takes all of her money and I think he cheats on her too. Although Isabella does her best to be a good wife and mother her thoughts turn towards a handsome family friend Dr. Edward Lane. Since she doesn't have to pick up his dirty underwear off of the floor and listen to his bitchin' and moaning he seems attractive to her, probably more so than if she had to actually live with him. She puts her scandalous thoughts about him into a diary. Whether the things she writes about in the diary actually occurred or were just in her imagining is up for some debate. Whatever the case, she and Dr. Lane will go on to deny every word. One day Isabella becomes very ill and while she is out of it her sneaky husband goes through her things and reads the diary. It is enough to bring Isabella to court on charges of adultery and he takes her sons away and files for divorce.Although Isabella came off as stupid and vapid some times, my sympathies definitely lay with her although she could have picked someone better to objectify than a married man with small children. Too many innocent people were hurt by her flirtations. Her choice of love interest seemed to be rectified in later life. Henry was portrayed as a real miserable piece of work and Dr. Lane alternated between oblivious and flirtatious. I felt sorry for his family but he seems to have known the score where Isabella was concerned. In addition to the story of Isabella and Henry there was some further padding with discussions of the Victorian notion of women and sexuality. All in all it was a good look into the Victorian family. As long as a woman was able to keep her unhappiness suppressed as well as her sexual desires everything was hunky dory. If she dared to try to take control of her life she was thought to be insane. This book made me feel sorry for Isabella who would have been better suited to find happiness if she had lived today.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Where I got the book: e-ARC from NetGalley.I'm sort of hovering between 4 and 5 stars for this one, but I'm settling for 4 because it took me a little while to get into this book. Summerscale's deadpan reporting voice has the happy effect that the author disappears from the narrative leaving the characters to speak for themselves, but this also means you have to get to know the characters before you can get engaged so the first 50 pages can be tough. I had the same problem with The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher.This is the true story of Isabella Robinson, a frustrated mother and wife with, evidently, too much time on her hands. Her husband is a controlling bully in true Victorian paterfamilias style, often absent from the home and, one suspects, from the marital bed. So Isabella's eyes rove...and so does her pen, in the form of a diary in which she recounts her obsessions with various men of her acquaintance. When one of her attempts at conquest appears to succeed, Isabella tells all to Dear Diary...and husband Henry finds out. He drags Isabella and her supposed lover into the newly formed Divorce Court, and the diary becomes the centerpiece of a well-publicized scandal.Oh, those Victorians! This book is a treasury of Victorian naughtiness and prudery hand in hand, as Summerscale unearths skeletons in more than one closet. Charles Darwin makes a few appearances, as does George Eliot and dear old Dickens. If you're a student of the era you'll find many delights, including a slew of eccentric Victorian names (Sir Cresswell Cresswell, anyone?) There is also some thoughtful reflection on, and elucidation of, the position of a middle-class wife in a society where double standards were an everyday experience. Recommended.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace is one of those books which puts me right dead center, making it very difficult to review. So I'm going to split this review into two parts and leave it up to you to decide if this is a book that's up your alley.Story: The story here is fantastic. It's a lesson in feminism, a look at the issues and trials facing a bored housewife in a time where that is what a respectable lady was. Think Madame Bovary - but this time written by a woman and in such a way that tidbits of her diary are cropping up everywhere, allowing the reader to live in this sort of omnipresent place.The story is strong enough that it almost (ALMOST) overcomes what bothered me most about the book. I wanted to know everything there was to know about Mrs. Robinson. I wanted to know just how she fell in love, or lust, why she felt about her second-born the way she did, and many other secrets that get revealed through the course of the book. Those questions were enough to propel me through the book.Telling: This is where the book fell massively short for me - and I think had I not been a student recently, and preparing to be one again this fall, it would not have been quite so noticeable to me. That said, this entire novel read like a research paper - complete with quotes (although lacking citations). The telling was so dry and so researched-sounding, that it made me think I was reading an incredibly long presentation paper on the life of a Victorian woman.So, there's my two-sided review. I don't want to reveal to much in this review, because like I said earlier, Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace has an amazing story to tell.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Isabella Robinson was a housewife in the mid-19th century. Her husband moved her and their family to Edinburgh, where she met Edward Lane, a doctor who specialized in hydrotherapy (Charles Darwin was one of his patients and supporters later on). Although Dr. Lane was married, Isabella began spending a lot of time with him. She began keeping a diary, detailing her friendship/relationship (real or imagined) with him. When Isabella fell ill, her husband found her diary and began divorce proceedings against her. The diaries were nearly pornographic in nature (the women in the courtroom had to be cleared out before the diaries were read) and indicate a woman who was caught up in her emotions as well as had a strong sex drive.These are the broad strokes of a fascinating incident—almost a blip in history, but related to so many other, bigger events. In the 1850s, a new Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes was created in order to expedite the process of divorce and make it cheaper and therefore more accessible to more people. Prior to the new law, Henry Robinson, as a middle-class businessman, would probably not have been able to afford a divorce.Isabella was interested in phrenology; her analyst had discovered that a part of her skull indicated that she had a strong sex drive—and important part of her case. The third social event that had relevance to Isabella’s case was the huge growth in diary-writing in the middle of the 19th century—as well as the rise of the diary-format novel. Isabella Robinson wrote poetry as well; could she have allowed her imagination to get away with her in the pages of her diary? “In the loneliness of her marriage, ‘what was my resource?’ she asked. ‘What my consolation? Solitude & my pen. Here I lived in a world of my own, one that scarcely any one ever entered. I felt that in my own study, at least, I was a ruler; & tall I wrote was my own.’” (p. 167). Imagine how Isabella must have felt, then, to have her diaries disseminated and read by many.From this book, we don’t get to see much of Isabella herself. It’s hard to get a clear picture of her in her own words because the originals of her diaries are lost. All that’s left are the 9000 words or so that were reprinted in the newspapers. I wish that the author had included more of the diaries, though, instead of quoting outside sources, such as contemporary novels, so much. While contemporary fiction serves to illustrate the mores of a society as a whole, I felt that the author relied on them too much in this book as filler. Because the diaries are so sparse, the reader has to read between the lines about what was really going on. I judged Isabella to be quite hysterical, imaginative, selfish, narcissistic, a bad judge of character, ruled by her own emotions, narrow-minded, and stubborn. So she doesn’t come across well at all, which made it hard to really empathize with her.What’s also unclear is Edward Lane’s frame of mind (though one can imagine). Isabella Robinson also came on to her sons’ two tutors, both men much younger than she was. It’s not said explicitly, but her behavior towards them was presumably very embarrassing—although Isabella was totally blind to the fact. She was also very blind to Dr. Lane’s attitude towards her; at times he tried to pull away from her. But it’s a sad underlying message that although Dr. Lane spent a lot of time trying to preserve his own professional and personal reputation, neither he—or Henry Robinson—tried to help Isabella when the time came for it. My view is that Isabella got everything she deserved, but I think that this fact illustrates the way that people viewed reputations in Victorian society. What this book also illustrates is Victorian attitudes towards sex. Mrs. Robinson’s case hinged on the defense of insanity (uterine disease), which brought on sexual delusions.In all, I enjoyed this book; it seemed a little bit short, though, more of a case study as opposed to being full-book-length. But I think it’s an interesting view into a little-known historical incident that had so many connections and connotations to Victorian social history.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    True story of one of the first divorces in England. A few to many characters in the beginning (I had to make a chart.) Did not realize it was a true story when I started, was more interested when I found out it was. Good reader.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I enjoyed Kate Summerscale's earlier book 'The Suspicions of Mr Whicher'. She consolidates her reputation for me with this absorbing account of a Victorian lady's fall from respectable affluence to disgrace as a result not so much of her sexual appetite but her obsession with writing about it in a diary which could easily be found by her monstrous husband; and inevitably was.Summerscale tends to her prose like a diligent gardener; it is well-kempt and unfussy, attractive without being showy, and provides something new of interest at every turn. Nor does she leave her tools on the lawn as so many historian-gardeners do - the details of her extensive research are kept neatly in the notes section at the back so as not to interrupt the flow of the story.While Isabella Robinson's emotions and psychology form the core of interest, there is plenty of rewarding diversion along the way. We learn a good deal of the ways, habits and foibles of mid Victorian upper-middle class society, which confirms so much of what we may have discovered in the fictional worlds of E M Forster and others. The status of women as 'chattels' to their husbands becomes starkly apparent in the way Isabella is economically 'stripped' by her husband. (I'm sure most readers will have shared my longing for Henry to have his come-uppance, but I won't spoil things for new readers by revealing whether or not this happens.) The later chapters of the book are fascinating too for their treatment of the changing legal system in England, and the consequences of decisions made in court.As with 'Mr Whicher' Kate Summerscale turns the trick of making us think of these real-life subjects as characters in a novel, and in so doing takes us through all the emotions, identifications, lows and highs that we would normally expect in fiction. The paradox is that they become more real and immediate as a consequence than they might have seemed had the author supplied a drier historical account. This narrative technique certainly works for me and, judging by the popularity of Summerscale's books, for many other readers too.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The thing I love about Summerscale's books is that she gets out of the way and lets the story she's telling do all the work. You have to know a little bit about what she's talking about - this is a poor introduction to gender in Victorian England - but once you do, she just brings all the little pieces of it out into the light and lets you look at it and draw your own conclusions.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Fascinating read! Quite an interesting look into the life of a Victorian Lady. Not necessarily an idyllic vision but certainly more accurate than most fictional accounts of the time.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Summerscale overwhelms this book with details that have absolutely nothing to do with the actual story. Famous people of the day and their flatulence problems etc. Research is commendable to a certain point. Overdone and it starts to feel like maybe the author just can't tell a story. Gave up halfway through, just too boring.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In Mrs Robinson's Disgrace Kate Summerscale brings us another account of intrigue and betrayal in Victorian England; no murder this time but plenty of adultery, divorce and madness.The background to this account is the change in the rules surrounding divorce which occurred in 1858. Before this new law the divorce process itself was far too expensive for anyone other than the very rich upper classes to be able to afford - a marriage could only be dissolved by an Act of Parliament. With the new 1858 law the process was simplified and became affordable for the middle-class. A new court was set up to dissolve marriages, The Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes although proving the grounds for a divorce was still difficult. A man had to prove his wife had been guilty of adultery, a woman had to prove her husband had been guilty of two matrimonial offences: she had to prove he had been unfaithful and that he was also guilty of desertion, cruelty or sexual misdeeds such as bigamy, incest, bestiality, rape or sodomy.One of the first cases to be heard by the new court was the case of Henry and Isabella Robinson. Henry Robinson was petitioning for divorce on the grounds of his wife's adultery. His proof: her diary. In the book Summerscale describes the diary as 'detailed, sensual, alternately anguished and euphoric, more godless and abandoned than anything in contemporary English fiction' but the use of someone's diary as evidence against them was an unprecedented one. What the court had to decide was whether her diaries contained a true account of the events that took place or whether they were the deluded writings of an unstable mind.The first half of the book covers the period leading up to the trial and Summerscale attempts to piece together what happened between Isabella Robinson and Edward Lane, the man with whom she was accused of having an affair, as well as to paint a picture of Isabella's unhappy marriage using extracts from her diary. The second half of the book covers the trial itself and the arguments used by the prosecution and defence lawyers as well as the final verdict. The parts I found most interesting were the side matters Summerscale had to explain so that the trial and its proceedings made sense. Victorian views on sex and sexuality for both men and women, insanity, women's health and the science of phrenology all made for some fascinating reading. I also enjoyed the sections where Summerscale touches on the potential influence of this trial in the contemporary literature of the period: both in novels that feature diaries by authors such as Wilkie Collins to the portrayal of dissatisfied wives in the sensation novels of the 1860s.I really enjoyed this and found it very helpful in understanding the background to novels published in the years following this case but I'm not sure whether this book might come across as a bit dry to someone who's not already interested in the period.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Summerscale definitely has the knack of making nonfiction readable for all, not dry as so many are.Once again I am so glad that I did not live back than, woman had absolutely no rights of their own and Mrs. Robinson's husband was not a very nice man at all. The Victorian legal system, the books that the system tried to suppress, how little upper class woman had to do if they wanted to challenge their minds, their complete dependance on the males in their lives are all highlighted in this very interesting book. Her diary being read in public and used by her husband in a divorce action was such an invasion of privacy, I felt so very sorry for this poor woman who stood to lose everything including her children. Will appeal to those fascinated by Victorian society, woman;s rights and the legal system.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    As I’ve come to expect from Kate Summerscale (author of the acclaimed The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher), Mrs. Roginson’s Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady, is an engaging work of nonfiction that delves into the most private moments of family life. Summerscale investigates the 1850s divorce case brought by Henry Robinson, a middle-class businessman, against his wife Isabella in the earliest years of the newly constituted Divorce Court in London. At that time, “[m]arriage was the subject of much contemporary debate.” The only piece of evidence in the divorce case is Isabella’s diary, which records her side of a love affair with a family friend. As an intelligent woman trapped in a repressive marriage, Isabella used her diary “to understand her alienated, conflicting self from the outside in, to get inside her own head and under her own skin.” During the trial, every private word in Isabella’s diary is dissected and analyzed. I won’t reveal the ultimate verdict, but the reader is struck by the power of Isabella’s words along with the suffocating effect of her society. Summerscale’s informed account of this historical episode draws extensively form the court record as well as the context of the times without becoming overly pedantic. Mrs. Robinson’s Disgrace is as much an enlightening analysis of Victorian views of marriage and sex as it is an account of a particular case of probable adultery. Recommended for those readers who enjoy narrative nonfiction.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Suspicions of Mr Whicher was such a fantastic book, that writing the follow-up was always going to be hard. Kate Summerscale has more or less pulled this off with her story of a scandalous Victorian divorce case.She did nearly lose me though, I'm not a fan of Madame Bovary so when, in the first part of the book, she compares Isabella Robinson to Emma Bovary I had to force myself to continue to read, and I'm glad that I did as the Isabella Robinson revealed by her diaries is a fascinatingly complex creature and far more interesting than Emma Bovary.For the divorce court, the question at the heart of the case is whether or not Mrs Robinson was unfaithful to her husband with Edward Lane. For me as a reader this question is almost irrelevant as the Summerscale uses her story to explore the hypocrisies of mid-Victorian society, how Isabella was put on public trial, while the courts ignored the evidence of her husband’s adultery and how the press reported the case, branding her journal ‘freakish’. But the saddest thing is probably Isabella’s own reaction to the reading of her diary. Strictly under English law her husband hadn’t done anything wrong, Isabella’s papers, no matter how personal, were his property, so he had the right to read them, and to use what he found within those pages in the case. But her reaction to the unauthorised reading and publication of her diaries is very modern, when she writes of their using ‘curious, unchivalrous, ignoble hands’.As with the murder case in The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, this divorce case captured the public imagination and inspired writers of popular fiction,the scene in The Woman in White where Count Fosco reads the ill Marian's diary is probably the most directly inspired.Fascinating.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace is a compelling read for those who are interested in women's rights throughout history, and those who enjoy studying the inner lives of others.Isabella Walker was a young widow with a child when she married Henry Robinson in 1844. Too late she realized that Henry was a cold husband, who often traveled and left her and the children alone. She began a friendship with a neighboring family, and became infatuated with the married Dr. Lane.She chose to record her feelings for Dr. Lane, and other men, in her journal. Her husband eventually found the journal and took her to divorce court for adultery. Divorce was not very common at the time, and Mrs. Robinson's diary caused quite a sensation in the newspapers. But what would the court decide? Was her journal based on fact or based on her vivid imagination? My only complaint was that in a few places I found it a bit dry, when the author was discussing historical details. The parts about Isabella, however, I found fascinating.Mrs. Robinson was an intelligent woman with excellent writing ability, who was ahead of her time in many ways. It is intriguing to read her story and see just how far society has come since her time.(I received this book through Amazon's Vine Program.)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Author: Kate Summerscale Published By: Walker & company Age Recommend: Adult Reviewed By: Arlena Dean Raven Rating: 4 Blog Review For: GMTA Review: "Mrs. Robertson's Disgrace" by Kate Summerscale was a very interesting read. There was a lot of Victorian history that this author used in her story to make it really unique in more ways than one. Truly Isabella Robinson was a really interesting person that kept you wanting to know just what she was going to write in that diary of hers. Kate was a middle class wife that was very lonely woman and having a husband like Henry Robinson who was cold to her only could lead Isabella to do what she did best and that was to write her fantasies in her private diary. Were these fantasies real? Henry was from the Edinburgh's society and worked and traveled away from home. It was very interested how the author was able to bring in the character Dr. Edward Lane who Isabella was infatuated with. This had been going on for five years....(this comes from her dairy). What is to be made of this? Well, Henry finds this diary with all on its intimates of Kates' sexual interests and petitions the court for a divorce for reasons of adultery. This trial was very interesting in itself. ...for you will just have to read this great novel to see out it turns out. Be prepared for a long and detailed read ...sometimes I got a little lost and had to back up a bit, but in the end this novel was a read that proved to be quite interesting especially due to the fact that divorce had been illegal in England at this time. Plus the main fact was that Mrs. Robinson's diary was read in open court. WoW! I will not let you know the outcome but it was interesting to find out just how all of this comes out. It is really worth the read. It will keep you turning the page to see what is going out next. If you are into Victorian history setting back in 1850's you will love this novel "Mrs. Robertson's Disgrace" and I would recommend this for a good read.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    ‘Mrs. Robinson’s Disgrace: The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady’ by Kate Summerscale is a beautifully written piece of literature reminiscent of, I’m sure many of the women in Victorian London during the nineteenth century; a time when women had little rights and the men controlled most aspects of their lives. Isabella Robinson is a married woman who finds herself wishing for a far different life, one with love. These desires lead her to compose her daily thoughts and musings in a private diary. What she writes was never intended for any other eyes to read but when her Husband finds and reads the intimate entries, he charges her with infidelity and petitions the courts for a divorce on the grounds of adultery; her diary on display for all to see. Whether or not her love affair was real or just the vivid imaginings of an unhappy women, longing for love and romance is yours to discover. An engrossing read well worth your time. Enjoy! Thank you Goodreads for this advanced copy!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    In Mrs Robinson's Disgrace, Kate Summerscale explores a high profile 19th-century court case, just after England passed laws permitting married couples to divorce. Isabella Robinson's husband Henry brought the case against her, using her diary as the chief source of evidence. But how reliable was her account? By 21st-century standards, she was the victim -- her crime being that of seeking companionship and sexual satisfaction not possible in her loveless marriage. But the laws and culture stigmatized women who expressed desires, and the public was shocked by her wanton behavior.This specific divorce case was an interesting way to shed light on one aspect of women's rights in the Victorian era, and it also described how divorce laws evolved during the time it was working its way through the courts. The book lacked the suspense of Summerscale's previous book, The Suspicions of Mr Whicher, which read much like a true crime novel. As a result, Mrs Robinson's Disgrace was not quite as captivating, but still a passably interesting way to learn about this period in history.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A well-researched microhistorical take on a particular divorce case in Victorian England, featuring Isabella Robinson and her salacious diary. Summerscale uses the case study to excellent effect, and the book is very readable and interesting as it delves into not only the specific case, but also the English ways of divorce, diary-writing, hydrotherapy, &c.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I found this a little hard to get through at times but it was still interesting to read about one of the first women in England to be sued for divorce.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    this was an interesting revelation of victorian attitudes to women and sex but it was slow(226 pages) and boring. i don't think i'm a fan of Summerscale(except of her name.) i found mr. whiter slow going too. she seems to take forever getting to her point.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is a book about repression and control in English Victorian society. Like its central character it is dull and lacks liveliness. There is little insight here.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Well researched and detailed study of British double standards in marriage and divorce
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Fascinating read! Quite an interesting look into the life of a Victorian Lady. Not necessarily an idyllic vision but certainly more accurate than most fictional accounts of the time.

Book preview

Mrs. Robinson's Disgrace - Kate Summerscale

Mrs. Robinson’s Disgrace

The Private Diary of a Victorian Lady

In France in the late 1850s, Gustave Flaubert was prosecuted for corrupting public morals with Madame Bovary – a novel considered ‘too repulsive’ for publication in Britain. In England, the 1857 Matrimonial Causes Act made divorce for the first time a civil matter, affordable to the middle classes. And the godless ideas Charles Darwin was formulating about natural selection, published to accusations of heresy in 1859, would further undermine the religious and moral tenets of Victorian England.

The story of Isabella Robinson’s fall from grace unfolds against this backdrop of dangerously shifting social mores, in which cherished ideas about marriage and female sexuality were coming increasingly under threat. For a society dealing with such radical notions by clinging ever more tightly to its traditional values, Mrs Robinson’s diary and the lawless ideas about love expressed in it were nothing short of scandal.

A compelling story of romance and fidelity, insanity, fantasy and the boundaries of privacy, Mrs Robinson’s Disgrace brings brilliantly to life a complex, frustrated Victorian wife, longing for passion and learning, companionship and love in an unsettled world which – as yet – made no allowance for her.

In memory of my grandmothers, Nelle and Doris,

and my great-aunt Phyllis

The wife sat thoughtfully turning over

A book inscribed with the school-girl’s name;

A tear – one tear – fell hot on the cover

She quickly closed when her husband came.

He came, and he went away – it was nothing –

With cold calm words on either side;

But, just at the sound of the room-door shutting,

A dreadful door in her soul stood wide.

Love, she had read of in sweet romances, –

Love that could sorrow, but never fail,

Built her own palace of noble fancies,

All the wide world a fairy tale.

Bleak and bitter, utterly doleful,

Spreads to this woman her map of life;

Hour after hour she looks in her soul, full

Of deep dismay and turbulent strife.

Face in both hands, she knelt on the carpet;

The black cloud loosen’d, the storm-rain fell:

Oh! Life has so much to wilder and warp it, –

One poor heart’s day what poet could tell?

‘A Wife’ by ‘A’ [William Allingham],

in Once a Week, 7 January 1860

Contents

Prologue

BOOK I: THIS SECRET FRIEND

1 HERE I MAY GAZE AND DREAM

2 POOR DEAR DODDY

3 THE SILENT SPIDER

4 MY IMAGINATION HEATED AS THOUGH WITH REALITIES

5 AND I KNEW THAT I WAS WATCHED

6 THE FUTURE HORRIBLE

BOOK II: OUT FLEW THE WEB

7 IMPURE PROCEEDINGS

8 I HAVE LOST EVERY THING

9 BURN THAT BOOK, AND BE HAPPY!

10 AN INSANE TENDERNESS

11 A GREAT DITCH OF POISON

12 THE VERDICT

13 IN DREAMS THAT CANNOT BE LAID

CODA: DO YOU ALSO PAUSE TO PITY?

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

FAMILY TREES

LIST OF LAWYERS IN THE ROBINSON DIVORCE TRIAL

SELECT BIBLIOGRAPHY

NOTES

A NOTE ON THE AUTHOR

BY THE SAME AUTHOR

Prologue

In London in the summer of 1858, a court of law began to grant divorces to the English middle classes. Until then, a marriage could be dissolved only by an individual Act of Parliament, at a cost prohibitive to almost all of the population. The new Court of Divorce and Matrimonial Causes was able to sever the marital bond far more cheaply and quickly. To win a divorce was still difficult – a man had to prove that his wife had committed adultery, a woman that her husband was guilty of two matrimonial offences – but the petitioners came in their hundreds, bringing their stories of betrayal and strife, of brutish men and, especially, of wanton women.

The judges were presented with a singular case on Monday 14 June, a month after they had heard their first divorce suit. Henry Oliver Robinson, a civil engineer, was petitioning for the dissolution of his marriage on the grounds that his wife, Isabella, had committed adultery, and he submitted as evidence a diary in her hand. Over the five days of the trial, thousands of Isabella Robinson’s secret words were read out to the court, and the newspapers printed almost every one. Her journal was detailed, sensual, alternately anguished and euphoric, more godless and abandoned than anything in contemporary English fiction. In spirit, it resembled Gustave Flaubert’s Madame Bovary, which had been published in France in 1857 after a notorious obscenity trial, but was considered too scandalous to be translated into English until the 1880s. The diary, like Flaubert’s novel, portrayed a new and disturbing figure: a middle-class wife who was restless, unhappy, avid for arousal. To the astonishment of those who read the extracts in the press, Mrs Robinson seemed to have invited, and lovingly documented, her own disgrace.

BOOK I

THIS SECRET FRIEND

‘Why have I gone back to this secret friend of my wretchedest and wickedest hours? Because I am more friendless than ever; because I am more lonely than ever, though my husband is sitting writing in the next room to me. My misery is a woman’s misery, and it will speak – here, rather than nowhere; to my second self, in this book, if I have no one else to hear me’

From Wilkie Collins’s Armadale (1866)

1

HERE I MAY GAZE AND DREAM

Edinburgh, 1850–52

In the evening of 15 November 1850, a mild Friday night, Isabella Robinson set out for a party near her house in Edinburgh. Her carriage bumped across the wide cobbled avenues of the Georgian New Town and drew up in a circle of grand sandstone houses lit by street lamps. She descended from the cab and mounted the steps to 8 Royal Circus, its huge door glowing with brass and topped with a bright rectangle of glass. This was the residence of Lady Drysdale, a rich and well-connected widow to whom Isabella and her husband had been commended when they moved to Edinburgh that autumn.

Elizabeth Drysdale was a renowned hostess, vivacious, generous and strong-willed, and her soirées attracted inventive, progressive types: novelists such as Charles Dickens, who had attended one of the Drysdales’ parties in 1841; physicians such as the obstetrician and pioneer anaesthetist James Young Simpson; publishers such as Robert Chambers, the founder of Chambers’s Edinburgh Journal; and a crowd of artists, essayists, naturalists, antiquaries and actresses. Though Edinburgh was past its glory days as the hub of the Scottish Enlightenment, it still boasted an energetic intellectual and social scene.

A servant let Isabella in to the building. Within the hallway, gas flamed in a chandelier, throwing its light on to the stone floor and the polished iron and wood of the banister bending up the staircase. The guests took off their outdoor clothes – bonnets, muffs and mantles, top hats and coats – and proceeded up the stairs. The ladies wore low-cut dresses of glinting silk and satin, with smooth bodices pulled tight over lined, boned corsets. Their skirts were lifted on petticoats, layered with flounces, trimmed with ribbons and ruffles and braid. Their hair was parted in the centre and drawn back over the ears into coiled buns sprigged with feathers or lace. They wore jewels at their throats and wrists, silk boots or satin slippers on their feet. The gentlemen followed them in tailcoats, waistcoats, neckties and pleated shirt fronts, narrow trousers and shining shoes.

Isabella came to the party eager for company. Her husband, Henry, was often away on business, and even when he was home she felt lonely. He was an ‘uncongenial partner’, she wrote in her diary: ‘uneducated, narrow-minded, harsh-tempered, selfish, proud’. While she yearned to talk about literature and politics, to write poetry, learn languages and read the latest essays on science and philosophy, he was ‘a man who had only a commercial life’.

In the high, airy reception rooms on the first floor, Isabella was introduced to Lady Drysdale and to the young couple who shared her house: her daughter Mary and her son-in-law Edward Lane. The twenty-seven-year-old Mr Lane was a lawyer, born in Canada and educated in Edinburgh, who was now training for a new career in medicine. Isabella was enchanted by him. He was ‘handsome, lively and good-humoured’, she told her diary; he was ‘fascinating’. She chastised herself later, as she had done many times before, for being so susceptible to a man’s charms. But a wish had taken hold of her, and she was to find it hard to shake.

In the same month that she met Edward Lane, Isabella took a trip to the North Sea coast and sat on the beach meditating on her many flaws. A well-born Englishwoman of thirty-seven, she had, by her own account, already failed in every role that a Victorian lady was expected to fulfil. She listed her deficiencies in her diary: ‘my errors of youth, my provocations to my brothers and my sisters, my headstrong conduct to my governess, my disobedience and want of duty to my parents, my want of steady principle in life, the mode of my marriage and my conduct during that marriage, my partial and often violent conduct to my children, my giddy behaviour as a widow, my second marriage and all that had followed it’. She had been guilty, she said, of ‘impatience under trials, wandering affections, want of self-denial and resolute persistence in well-doing; as a parent, as a daughter, as a sister, as a wife, as a pupil, as a friend, as a mistress’.

She then quoted a verse by Robert Burns:

Thou know’st that thou has made me

With passions wild and strong;

And listening to their witching voice

Has often led me wrong.

Some of Isabella’s ruthless catalogue of her faults can be mapped on to the recorded facts of her life. She was born in Bloomsbury, London, on 27 February 1813, and christened Isabella Hamilton Walker at St Pancras Church that May. Her father, Charles, was the second son of a former Accountant General to George III; her mother, Bridget, was the eldest daughter of a Cumbrian coal-mining heiress and a Whig MP. When Isabella was a baby her father bought an estate in the Shropshire village of Ashford Carbonel, near the English border with Wales. It was there, in a red-brick manor house by the River Teme, that she grew up, defying her elders and annoying her siblings.

Isabella’s mother later portrayed their home, Ashford Court, as an idyll for children: there was ‘a large pretty Garden’, she told a grandchild, ‘plenty of green Fields & pleasant walks & a long River, & a Boat upon it’, as well as ‘young Lambs & Cows & Sheep & big Horses, & little Horses; & Dogs & Cats & Kittens’. The house was set in 230 acres of meadows, pastures, paddocks, hop fields and orchards. A lawn sloped down to the banks of the river, with a view of hills crested with trees. Isabella’s father, the local squire and a Justice of the Peace, owned all of the land in the village, and he gradually bought and leased further acres, of which he farmed a hundred and rented out the rest.

Isabella and her seven siblings were looked after by a nurse and then by a governess, in whose care the four sisters remained while the four brothers were sent away to boarding school. A governess typically taught modern languages, arithmetic and literature to her charges, but her main task was to turn out accomplished young ladies, proficient in dancing, piano-playing, singing and drawing. Isabella, the eldest of the girls, felt limited by this training. From her earliest years, she later recalled, she was ‘an independent & constant thinker’.

In August 1837, a few weeks after Queen Victoria’s accession to the British throne, Isabella became the first of the Walker girls to marry. The ceremony took place in St Mary’s Church, half a mile up the hill from her house. Isabella was twenty-four and her bridegroom, Edward Collins Dansey, was a widowed Royal Navy lieutenant of forty-three. Her disparaging reference to the ‘mode’ of her marriage suggested that it was not a love match; she later said that she had married on impulse, propelled by ‘headstrong passion’. It was none the less a mutually advantageous union. Edward Dansey was from an ancient local family, the former lords of the manor in which Isabella’s father had purchased his estate. He brought £6,000 to the marriage, which Isabella almost matched with £5,000 settled upon her by her father. This capital would have yielded a comfortable income of about £900 a year.

After their wedding the couple moved to the nearby market town of Ludlow, where Isabella gave birth to a son, Alfred Hamilton Dansey, in February 1841. Early in the nineteenth century, Ludlow ‘had balls in the assembly rooms’, Henry James reported. ‘It had Mrs Siddons to plays; it had Catalini to sing. Miss Burney’s and Miss Austen’s heroines might easily have had their first love affairs there.’ The Danseys’ house – built in 1625 and re-fronted with eight Venetian windows in the mid-eighteenth century – was next to a ballroom in Broad Street, a picturesque road that careered down to the River Teme. Isabella and her new family were installed at the heart of Shropshire society.

In December 1841, though, Edward Dansey suddenly went mad. Isabella’s mother told a relative that ‘Poor Mr Dansey’ had become ‘perfectly deranged’ and ‘required constant restraint & incessant vigilance’. She reported that Isabella’s eighteen-year-old brother Frederick had gone to stay in the Danseys’ house in Ludlow ‘in order to attend to the poor sufferer & to console his sister under this most painful of all trials’. Five months later Dansey died of ‘a diseased brain’, aged forty-seven.

Edward Dansey had already settled money on Alfred, but everything he owned upon his death passed to his son by his first marriage, Celestin, a young lieutenant with the Royal Bombay Fusiliers. Isabella inherited nothing. She probably returned with her baby to Ashford Court.

Isabella lived as a widow for two years before she was introduced to Henry Oliver Robinson, an Irish Protestant six years her senior. The couple may have met through Henry’s sister Sarah, whose husband was a solicitor and alderman in Hereford, twenty miles south of Ludlow. Henry came from a family of itinerant and entrepreneurial manufacturers. As a young man in Londonderry, the city of his birth, he had run a brewery and distillery that produced 8,000 gallons of spirits a year, and he was now in business building boats and sugar mills with a brother in London. Henry had since 1841 been an associate of the Institute of Civil Engineers, a body that regulated a relatively new, fast-growing profession; by 1850, there were about 900 engineers in Britain.

Isabella twice refused Henry’s proposals of marriage, but when he asked for a third time she accepted: ‘I suffered my scruples & dislike to be talked away by others,’ she later explained in a letter, ‘& with my eyes almost open I walked into the bonds of a dreaded wedlock like one fated.’ As a thirty-one-year-old widow with a child, she was not in a position to be picky. This marriage would at least offer her the chance to travel beyond the bounds of her corner of the country, to see new places and meet new people.

After a wedding in Hereford on 29 February 1844, Henry and Isabella moved to London, where their first child, Charles Otway, was born in a house in Camden Town just under a year later. He was christened Charles after Isabella’s father, but there seems to have been no precedent for the name Otway in either of his parents’ families. Isabella may have chosen it in tribute to the popular Restoration dramatist Thomas Otway, who wrote plays – dubbed ‘she-tragedies’ – about virtuous and afflicted ladies. Her pet name for this second and favourite son was Doatie, and she doted upon him.

Soon after Otway’s birth the family moved to Blackheath Park, an expensive new estate just outside London. Their house was two miles south of Greenwich, from which a ferry regularly made the crossing to the Robinson iron works on the north bank of the Thames. Henry and his brother Albert designed and built steam-powered ships and sugar-cane mills at Millwall, amid the scrub and marsh lining the river east of the city. They turned out sheet metal, engines and parts in their manufactory, and employed several hundred men to construct boats and mills on site. In one project, which brought in £100,000, Albert designed five craft for the River Ganges, which were built and dismantled at Millwall, shipped to Calcutta (a four-month journey), and reassembled there under his supervision. In 1848 the Robinson brothers bought the iron yard for just £12,000 (it had been purchased for £50,000 more than a decade earlier). Their younger brother Richard joined the business, as did the pioneering naval architect and engineer John Scott Russell. The company, now known as Robinson & Russell, launched a dozen sea-going ships over the next three years, the first of them the Taman, an iron packet commissioned by the Russian government to ply the Black Sea from Odessa to Circassia. On the day of the Taman’s launch in November 1848, a large crowd gathered, many in steamboats and rowing boats, to watch the ship edge down the ramp, slowly at first, and then with a final, fast swoop into the river.

Henry’s marriage to Isabella had secured him money as well as status. Just before their wedding, Isabella’s father had settled £5,000 upon her ‘for her sole and separate use’, as he had done on her first marriage; this was a common means of circumventing the law that gave a man rights over all his wife’s property. The interest from this fund – about £430 a year – was paid by the trustees (her father and her brother Frederick) into an account in her name at the banking house of Gosling & Co. in Fleet Street, London. Almost immediately after the marriage, though, Henry suggested that Isabella sign all her cheques and hand them over to him; he would then cash them as he saw fit, to pay for their domestic and personal expenses. Isabella assented. Henry was ‘a person of very imperious temper’, she explained later, and ‘to prevent as far as possible any difference from arising’ between them, she was willing to let him have his way. Henry gave Isabella cash to pay the tradesmen’s bills and the wages of their female servants, as well as to buy household goods and clothes for herself and the children. He supplied her with some pocket money, and instructed her on how to keep accounts. The Robinson family’s expenditure was about £1,000 a year, which placed it in the richest one per cent of the population and in the higher echelons of the upper middle classes.

Henry’s appropriations of Isabella’s money did not stop there, she said. When her father died at the end of 1847, leaving her an additional £1,000, Henry immediately withdrew the whole amount with one of the blank cheques that Isabella had signed, and invested it in his own name in London & North Western Railway stock. Though he arranged for the interest to be paid into Isabella’s account – to which he in any case had sole access – he kept the capital. Isabella claimed that Henry also tried to suppress the surname of his stepson, Alfred Dansey, in order to make himself the heir to his legacy, and annexed £2,000 of the boy’s settled property. In the face of Henry’s greed, Isabella said, she was ‘irresolute’: ‘chafing; yet still passive’. ‘With every knowledge that my partner was mean & grasping,’ she wrote, ‘I made no stand against his encroachments, but suffered him to take from me one thing after another.’

In February 1849, Isabella gave birth to her third and last child, Alexander Stanley. At the time of his birth she was staying in a terrace in the seaside resort of Brighton, Sussex, two hours from London by the fastest train. She had probably taken lodgings there for the sake of her health. That year she tipped into a deep depression of spirits, accompanied by severe headaches and menstrual problems, and Dr Joseph Kidd in Blackheath identified her ailments as signs of ‘uterine disease’. Henry was away on business in North America for six months in 1849. Isabella began to keep a diary: a friend in loneliness and in sickness, a companion and confidant.

‘I know not where to turn for help,’ she told her diary, ‘and a dull load of dejection and nameless oppression weighs down my very soul. I have no sympathy, no love, for I do not deserve it. My darling boys are the only ray of comfort I possess.’ Though she sometimes behaved badly towards her sons – striking them in anger, favouring Doatie over the others – her love for them rescued her from the darkest moods. She said that she shared with them a bond ‘of no common strength’.

Isabella, like many nineteenth-century women, used her journal as a place in which to confess her weakness, her sadness and her sins. In its pages she audited her behaviour and her thoughts; she grappled with her errors and tried to plot out a path to virtue. Yet by channelling her strong and unruly feelings into this book, Isabella also created a record and a memory of those feelings. She found herself telling a story, a serial in daily parts, in which she was the wronged and desperate heroine.

The Robinsons chose to move to Edinburgh after Henry’s return from America because the city was renowned for its liberal and moderately priced schools. Here, their boys could be well educated without having to board away from home. Henry rented a six-storey granite house for his family at 11 Moray Place, at a cost of about £150 a year. Moray Place was the most lavish development in the New Town, a twelve-sided circus of houses built on tilting ground; just to the north, the land sheered down to the Water of Leith, through pleasure gardens planted with rhododendrons and hazel. The heavy grandeur of Moray Place was not to all tastes. ‘It has been objected,’ noted Black’s Guide Through Edinburgh in 1851, ‘that the simplicity of style and massiveness of structure which particularly distinguish these buildings, impart an aspect of solemnity and gloom repugnant to the character of domestic architecture.’ The Robinsons kept four servants: a manservant, a cook, a maid and a nurse.

Inside 11 Moray Place, a broad staircase led to the reception rooms on the first floor and to the bedrooms above. The living rooms were wide, deep and panelled, with large windows that afforded views of a round, green park to the front of the house and a triangular garden to the back. At the top of the stairwell, a stucco frieze adorned a domed skylight: some of the cherubs in the frieze cavorted among the stylised foliage; others perched primly on the leaves, reading books.

A narrower staircase continued up to the children’s rooms on the top floor. From the back windows of her sons’ bedrooms, Isabella could see the roof of 8 Royal Circus, and past it the tower of St Stephen’s, the church in which three years earlier Edward Lane had married Lady Drysdale’s daughter Mary.

Isabella became a frequent visitor to the Lanes and Drysdales’ home. Their house lay a quarter of a mile northeast of her own, a journey of a few minutes on foot or by carriage. She was invited to the family’s parties – on one evening in Isabella’s first year in the city Lady Drysdale held a huge children’s party, on another a ‘strawberry feast’ – and she became acquainted with others in their circle: successful lady novelists such as Susan Stirling and influential thinkers such as the phrenologist George Combe. Lady Drysdale was ‘a great patroness of everything scientific and literary’, according to Charles Piazzi Smyth, the Astronomer Royal for Scotland. Another friend, the art critic Elizabeth Rigby, described her as ‘unique in my estimation in the act of diffusing happiness … I never met with so warm-hearted and unselfish a woman.’ Lady Drysdale was a keen philanthropist who loved to take the dispossessed into her fold – Italian revolutionaries, Polish refugees, and now Isabella, an exile from her own marriage.

Isabella had never loved her husband; by the time they moved to Edinburgh, she despised him. A photograph of Henry in this period conforms to her description of him as narrow and haughty; he sits stiff and upright in a jacket, waistcoat, shirt and cravat, clutching a silver-topped cane in his right hand; he is skinny-chested, tight-waisted, a sure-looking man with a long nose in a long face. Isabella said that she tried not to pry into Henry’s private life, but by now she had discovered that he had a mistress and two illegitimate daughters. She had come to believe that he had married her only for her money.

Within months, Isabella was visiting the Lanes and the Drysdales almost every day. She talked to Edward Lane about poetry and philosophy, debating new ideas and encouraging him to write essays for publication. Henry, by contrast, had no interest in literature, Isabella complained in a letter to a friend; he was quite unable ‘to parse & interpret any line of poetry I might have quoted – either of my own or other people’s!’. She used to invite the Lanes’ eldest boy, Arthur, to play with her sons, especially after Mary Lane gave birth to a second child, William, early in 1851. Edward, in turn, often invited Isabella and her sons to accompany him and Arthur on drives to the coast – ‘Atty’ was a delicate boy, and Edward tried to strengthen him with regular rides to the sea in a phaeton, a fast, open carriage with a springy body and four high wheels. By the beach at Granton, a few miles north-west of the city, Isabella and Edward sat discussing poetry while they watched the children play on the rocks and sand.

In the grey afternoon of Sunday 14 March 1852, Isabella took a turn through the New Town on foot. The three-year-old Stanley probably stayed home with the nursemaid, an Irishwoman called Eliza Power, but Otway and Alfred, aged seven and eleven, accompanied their mother. The group climbed the hill from Moray Place and carried on over the summit and down to Princes Street, a wide avenue on the southern edge of the New Town. A terrace of houses ran along one side of the street. The facing pavement was reined in only by an iron railing, beyond which lay a steep drop and a far view over the dip of the ravine to the blackened tenements of the Old Town on the hill beyond: ‘the city, dimly visible, lay before us’, wrote Isabella in her diary, ‘spires, monuments, streets, the port of Leith, the Frith, and in the front ground small unventilated dwellings, and houses of ten-storeys high’.

Isabella was gazing across a gulf from rich to poor, from the sparse, clear streets of modern Edinburgh to the busy, vertical slums of the old. The area between the New and Old towns had been drained and levelled at the beginning of the century, and in 1842 a railway line had been laid into the gorge. Though a few shops had set up along Princes Street, there was a lonely luxury to the thoroughfares along which Isabella walked with her sons. On a Sunday, the area was desolate. The shops were shut up and the blinds of the houses drawn. Isabella wished that she could enter the secret warren across the tracks. ‘Oh, thought I,

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1