Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

The Wives of Los Alamos
The Wives of Los Alamos
The Wives of Los Alamos
Ebook196 pages3 hours

The Wives of Los Alamos

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Finalist for the PEN/Robert W. Bingham Prize, a New York Times Book Review Editors' Choice, a Barnes & Noble Discover Great New Writers Selection, an Indies Choice Debut Pick, an Amazon Best Book of the Month, and winner of two New Mexico-Arizona Book Awards.

The “haunting . . . impressive” (NYTBR) National Bestseller-imagining the untold human history of the making of the atomic bomb.


They arrived in New Mexico ready for adventure, or at least resigned to it. But hope quickly turned to hardship as they were forced to adapt to a rugged military town where everything was a secret-including what their husbands were doing at the lab. Though they were strangers, they joined together-adapting to a landscape as fierce as it was absorbing, full of the banalities of everyday life and the drama of scientific discovery.

While the bomb was being invented, babies were born, friendships were forged, children grew up, and Los Alamos gradually transformed into a real community: one that was strained by the words they couldn't say out loud or in letters, and by the freedom they didn't have. But the end of the war would bring even bigger challenges, as the scientists and their families struggled with the burden of their contribution to the most destructive force in the history of mankind.

The Wives of Los Alamos is a testament to a remarkable group of real-life women and an exploration of a crucial, largely unconsidered aspect of one of the most monumental research projects in modern history.

Mountains and Plains bestseller list
Denver Post bestseller list
Mid-Atlantic bestseller list
LanguageEnglish
Release dateFeb 25, 2014
ISBN9781620405055
The Wives of Los Alamos
Author

TaraShea Nesbit

TaraShea Nesbit is the author of The Wives of Los Alamos, which was a national bestseller, a finalist for the PEN/Bingham Prize, and a New York Times Editors' Choice, among other accolades. Her writing has been featured in Granta, The Guardian, Fourth Genre, Salon and elsewhere. She is an associate professor in the creative writing program at Miami University and lives in southwestern Ohio with her family.

Related to The Wives of Los Alamos

Related ebooks

Literary Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Wives of Los Alamos

Rating: 3.6842105263157894 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

38 ratings31 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is, as the title suggests, the story of the wives of the scientists who were involved with the Manhattan Project during WWII. It is an angle of the story of the atomic bomb that I had never considered - that the spouses and families of the (mostly) men who were building the bomb, and who had moved to Los Alamos, NM, had no idea what was being made. I wound up really liking this book - more than I thought I would. There are readers who will be put off immediately by the POV, which is first person plural and I get that. It could get old and it does keep the reader from forming any attachments to the characters. But although there was certainly a lot of "we", there were also some recurring names so it was possible to get a suggestion of the individual. But, as Julie Otsuka did so well in The Buddha in the Attic, I found it to be a fitting way to tell the story of secrets and the loss of the individual for the sake of the community, and I think she pulled it off well.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    It seems that I have found myself reading different books, fiction and nonfiction, that involve some aspect of WWII and the atom bombs that were used in Japan. This novel of course deals with the wives of the men who had a major role in developing the atomic bomb. I didn't know much about the community of Los Alamos; this book inspired me to look up more information. I found images on the Internet that helped me picture where these women lived, and I learned how life there was for many who were there. The only thing that took some getting used to was the way the book was narrated; instead of narrated by a single person, it is narrated by all the wives as a whole. It's not something I had encountered before, and it was a little unsettling at first, but I came to like it. I can understand why the author chose to write it this way; it's a powerful part of the book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Easy reading historical fiction about the wives of the Manhattan Project scientists. As many reviewers mention, this story is told in first person plural. This did't annoy me at all, and I think added to the sense of a collective experience shared by the women. I work at a similar laboratory, so it was really fascinating to hear about the initial years of this type of place and work. However, I really feel the story was about women in the 1940s. Their particular experience being in a closed secretive place just exacerbated all the challenges of the era. I highly recommend this book and think it would be a good book for teens too.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This book was written in a bit of an unusual style; Very shortparagraphs always written in the collective "we". Then veryshort chapters.This allowed the many different stories of all the wives to beexplained from the arrival in Los Almos,N.M. in 1943 to their departurein the fall of 1945.These were the wives of the scientists who would develop theatomic bombs that were dropped on 2 cities in Japan thus endingWorld War two.A huge,mostly unknown story for the history books.While the series on the WGN focuses a lot on the men and theirwork developing the bomb this book delves deeply into the every daydeprivations and stresses these woman soldiered on with.A short,great read!
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is, as the title suggests, the story of the wives of the scientists who were involved with the Manhattan Project during WWII. It is an angle of the story of the atomic bomb that I had never considered - that the spouses and families of the (mostly) men who were building the bomb, and who had moved to Los Alamos, NM, had no idea what was being made. I wound up really liking this book - more than I thought I would. There are readers who will be put off immediately by the POV, which is first person plural and I get that. It could get old and it does keep the reader from forming any attachments to the characters. But although there was certainly a lot of "we", there were also some recurring names so it was possible to get a suggestion of the individual. But, as Julie Otsuka did so well in The Buddha in the Attic, I found it to be a fitting way to tell the story of secrets and the loss of the individual for the sake of the community, and I think she pulled it off well.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Read this after The Atomic Weight of Love for book club. Found the whole topic of Los Alamos and the Manhattan Project fascinating led to great discussion. The format of this book - many voices, contradictions, no character developed beyond surface, was disconcerting at times, but for me it just highlighted the complexity of the issues addressed.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is fictionalized treatment of wives who " arrived in New Mexico ready for adventure, or at least resigned to it. But hope quickly turned to hardship as they were forced to adapt to a rugged military town where everything was a secret-including what their husbands were doing at the lab."The author ponders "what life was like for their educated, newly married wives who followed their husbands to an unknown location in New Mexico".Having seen a photo entitled " The original wives of Los Alamos", I felt poised for discovery.I must admit the narration style (probably selected specifically) was annoying to me.Everything (with rare exception) was spoken in the collective plural "we".Yes, I did discover many trials and joys the wives endured.But, so much was condensed with both a specificity and a vagueness, that I didn't really get to know anyone.Yes, I was expecting a bit too much of a fictionalized account.The titles does include the plural (wives) and calls it a novel.In 2014 I read The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II.by Denise Kiernan.Granted it was non fiction, but I enjoyed exploring the town of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and the young women brought there unknowingly to help build the atomic bomb.Fiction vs non-fiction?... oh well, a dilemma...but I do enjoy both.----1940s....historical fiction....govt installation....WW2...atomic bomb
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Fascinating subject written from the PoV of "We" - all the wives of the Los Alamos scientists. Dragged out to New Mexico in the height of the Ozzie and Harriet era, not permitted to communicate with their families back home, upholding radio silence with their own husbands, living in a town comprised of heat, cold, and perpetual blowing dust is an amazing adventure for some and complete gateway to alcoholism and adultery for others. Using the pronoun "we" through the entire book gives the sense of unity and love between these isolated housewives/mothers. As the years pass, some begin to sense what's going on way out in the desert, while others prefer to bury their heads in the sand (okay, bad pun). After years of testing, and then the deployment of Fat Boy and Little Man in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, their peripheral yet critical roles in the nuclear planning, building, and deaths is revealed, evoking wonder and shame.The play "The Radium Girls" about the new Jersey factory workers who painted glowing dials on watches in the 1920s and 1930s before they realized (but after the company doctors knew) they were being poisoned, is a companion piece to this novel. There are small glints and gleams of Oppenheimer, Teller, and other famous scientists, but the primary focus is on women surviving together in a secret and alien landscape.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This is the story of the wives of the scientists developing the atomic bomb in Los Alamos, New Mexico. It is told in the first person plural, a point of view that I have never experienced in a book before, and it is a little disconcerting. Although somewhat interesting, I think I would have preferred an individual point of view which would have enabled the reader to feel more intimately involved.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Ended up liking this book a lot more than I expected to at first. The first person plural voice did annoy me all the way through, but it became easier to tolerate and I began to understand the author's choice to use this device. It would have been nice to have a little more exposition on the history so that some of the allusions to events that happened would have been clearer. Some one who has a better grasp of the history of this time would have a better grasp of the story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Interesting account of the wives of the scientists and their relocation and time in Los Alamos, NM, during the development of the atomic bomb. The author acknowledges the Los Alamos Historical Society as well as other credible references so she has researched the subject. What I didn't like was the voice of the narrative, kind of a plural collective if that is possible. I would have preferred a complete third person or even a fictional story first person. While literary in nature, it was informative and sobering. I would recommend it to someone interested in that historical period of time.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I learned a lot about the Manhattan Project from reading this book. The information is presented as the collective experience of scientists' wives who spent three years of their lives living in isolation, not really knowing what they or their husbands were doing there. The author's style will not appeal to everyone, but I got used to it and thought that it allowed her to present background on many people, without having to build a profile for every character in the novel.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    This book, about the women married to the Manhattan Project scientists, has helped define what a "novel" is for me. My bottom line is it must have characters, even if they are stereotypes and poorly developed. The Wives of Los Alamos is narrated in first-person plural, and while I can imagine that a gifted writer could use this technique and still develop complex characters, Nesbit does not.The narrative voice is a soulless collective, and the book reads like an essay that might have appeared in a women's liberation anthology in 1970. Much of the book concerns the powerless and sometimes petty lives of isolated housewives: really a reheating of Betty Friedan's Problem that Has No Name. Alas, a big element of that Problem is boredom, and while a gifted writer can write about boredom in a way that does not bore the reader, Nesbit does not.The book only caught my interest after the bomb dropped, and the narrative turned to bigger issues than housewifery and petty jealousies and cocktail parties. However, the collective voice was so steeped in moral ambiguity that it sounded namby-pamby in the face of the moral crisis that the atomic bomb presented.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Fascinating look at the women and children who moved to Los Alamos while their scientists/physicists husbands worked on the Atomic Bomb that ended WWII. I enjoyed the glimpse into the lives of these women who tried to live a normal life under very extraordinary circumstances.It took me a while to get used to the writing style. Everything is written as "we", with the we being the wives. So, "we didn't have enough water" or we supported our husbands, or we fought with them, or we just did our best to survive". None of the book was written in any other format so it took some getting used too. Still, it is a powerful story and I'm very glad I read it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The subject matter is interesting, but more strikingly the narrative device of using the second person plural works really well with the subject matter. It may have got tedious if it was longer, but it was a quick, tight and clever narrative. I wouldn't read this book for historical or factual information about the lives of the women at Los Alamos during WWII, but rather for a good fictional attempt to depict the feel of that time and place. A treat to read in one or two sittings if possible.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This novel reads like sociology, a bit like the Lynd's study of Middletown. It is told mainly in third person plural, which I can't remember another book doing, but it works well to tell the joint story of a group of woman plunked into a "camp" with very few amenities and who had no knowledge of what their husbands were doing all day and into the night. Having recently read another book about Los Alamos, 109 E Palace, I was primed to enjoy this further look at the lives of those who lived in the bubble that produced the atomic bomb.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I read this for my book discussion group. I have to say if it was for that reason I would not have got past the first 20 pages or so. I really didn't like the author's style of grouping all the women together and making it us or we for EVERYTHING. I have read some other things on Los Alamos and the Manhattan Project before from the men's perspective so was interested to see how it was from the women's. To be honest it was not that exciting. Which I think was the point. The women made the best of a difficult situation and tried to live as normal a life as they could under the circumstances.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    An interesting way to write the story/history of Los Alamos---trying to include all angles for every topic---what became all of the chapter headings. I had read another "novel" about the families in the past so although this was written in a totally different way, many of the basic facts I had read elsewhere. A 360 degree view was a complicated approach and I'm impressed that it worked as well as it did for Nesbit.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This novel is about the wives of scientists who were recruited to work on a new bomb design during World War II. It was written in a very odd and unique way. I think that you will either love it or hate it. I started out loving it, but about halfway through it turned to hate. Instead of telling a story, the author spoke of we "we were young, old, thin, fat, tall, short" which she used throughout the entire book. I would rather have read stories about real people, not lists of descriptions.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    ...shrouded in secrecyTold in the first person plural, this work holds in tension the distancing that reflects a time in history that was simply put, awful. The story of place and persons beyond the unleashing of the atom bomb that must always to some degree be shrouded. The story of the families and women at Los Alamos, is in many ways the story of their internment, shrouded in the unknowing. The women know nothing of what their husbands are doing, and the scientists know little about what they are unleashing. We now know the significance of the mention of red faces after tests, looking back as we are, after the fact.The day to day struggles of making do in a government run place, neither feast nor fowl, not scientists and not army, again emphasizes the degrees of separation, the shroud of silence that surrounds this community. Even the gossip is told at a distance. And that is the curious thing, how the writing style emphasizes the distance of the community, away in the desert, cloaked in secrecy.The things the women do know are the day to day struggles for food, housing, schooling, and being wives of the forties, wives during wartime struggling for normalcy,'In the day we wore gingham, at night we wore our prewar silk stockings, our prewar silk dresses.'These are wives separated from their communities trying to build a new one, trying to create lost support groups. The sense of community of women supporting women is strong.The contrast between themselves and the women scientists is interesting. The women feel that they don't have the freedom of those female scientists. But then neither do they have the same pressure.Perhaps the last chapter is the most telling and most terrible of all. The few lines about the Bikini Islands and it's people demonstrates uncaring government agencies at their worst.A thought provoking treatise about a terrible moment in time, the ramifications of which, for the world at large have been uncountable, as a new age was ushered in.A NetGalley ARC
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The Wives of Los Alamos by TaraShea Nesbit is one of the most interesting reads of the year for me. Nesbit uses a distinct, unusual writing style to capture the community of women who, as a whole, were uprooted from their homes and lives and moved to the desert to live in a community that thrives on secrets and gossip. The story in this book is set during WWII and examines the lives of the academics who, for whatever physical reason, did not qualify to enlist and instead were used for their brainpower to develop a secret project after the bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese.Read the rest of this review at The Lost Entwife on Feb. 25, 2014.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I could not get past the author's style of writing: first person plural. It is a very subjective choice, and it made the beginning intriguing. Unfortunately, it quickly got old, at least for me, and I found myself wondering when she was going to switch to a more personal narrative. As I continued reading, I realized that that change wasn't going to happen, and I resigned myself to what I found an increasingly irritating style. Los Alamos has been written about in numerous non-fiction books and memoirs. This focus is interesting since it's historic fiction and is told as seen through the eyes of the women, both wives of scientists and women scientists themselves. It focuses more on the community and people's daily life with very little written about the actual work of creating and testing the atomic bomb. The required subterfuge was certainly a real strain on the incidentally affected spouses and their families, and this is also brought out well in the story. These were some of the things that kept me reading even when I wanted to quit.Unfortunately, I am a reader who really enjoys strong character development, and this book does not produce that. I suspect that some people will enjoy this different style as evidenced by some of the high ratings. If you are interested in a rather impersonal and multifaceted view of the families who lived at Los Alamos during the research and development of the A-bomb, then you may find this book to be a good choice. It also will please those who want a quick and informative read that doesn't delve deeply into any one individual perspective. The Wives of Los Alamos: A Novel, presents a highly unique and unusual look at a much written about group of people and their experience.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I really liked this one. An unusual point of view, told from the plural we', the group of wives became distinct and sympathetic characters, their plight and their husbands equally multifaceted and intriguing. I put it on the re-read shelf.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I love to learn when i read. Nesbit is no James Michener but she does take us back to a different era and stop time for a short while. And you learn about the unheard of lives of women, who, in doing their duty, helped change the world. Three stars= 3.5.We all know what an atomic bomb is, we know scientists built it, but do you ever think of those brilliant minds as belonging to regular guys? with wives and kids? I did not. I had this fantasized image of a lab with men in white coats and test tubes bubbling etc etc.Back in the day women got married, raised the kids and went and did whatever the husband needed. Such is the case in this book. Hush yer mouths, say nothing and pack up we are heading out.....west to be exact.While the men labored in cement buildings the women had to create homes, make do with what little they were given and all the while be told nothing and understand.....nothing. Such was life in the desert of New Mexico in the 40s. One aspect i grew to love was that the book was not written from the perspective of one woman. It was written as if from a community of women....from the east coast, who came from overseas married to soldiers, women with humble backgrounds ,women with exquisite educations! One voice. All the women.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I received a free copy this Kindle book from NetGalley in return for an honest, unbiased review. I finished reading the book some weeks back but procrastinated on writing a review. I just don't like having to write a bad review. Even though this novel had some good points, on the whole the style of writing was such a turn off that I found it difficult to read past the first chapter. The following is the review I posted on NetGalley and Amazon.com. I was very excited to see this book come out and could hardly wait to read it. I have read a lot about the Manhattan Project as well as the scientists and military officers involved. There is only a dearth of information about their wives, children, and the living conditions at Los Alamos so this book sounded. The book is written in first person plural. Throughout the book, the characters are referenced as “we” or “some of us”. Although some may find this entertaining, it began to wear very thin with me before I completed the first chapter. To say I was disappointed in this book would be an understatement. The book does provide a fairly good overview of life in Los Alamos but next to nothing about specific individuals. Unfortunately, this along with the execution left me cold.I am sure there were a considerable number of very nice women who did their best to cope with all of the challenges living at Los Alamos threw at them as well as the war rationing. Grouped together with one voice, the wives came across as self-centered, arrogant, catty, and petty. The book made these wives sound like the kind of women you hope you don’t end up working with, living next door to, or belonging to the same organization with. In other words, these wives came across as the type of women who give women a bad name. The wives complained that “those women” who were considered favorites had a bath tub while all they had was a stall shower lined with zinc. The wives begrudged the other women being able to soak in a tub. They complained about the WAC’s having both shower stalls and bath tubs. The wives complained that the WACs who assigned housing and maid service had favorites who received better, larger housing and more frequent maid service. They “did not like taking orders from girls in khaki”. They complained about the limited water supply, the quality of food in the commissary, and the WACs who worked there being rude. They complained that some got to go into town more frequently. They held parties and gossiped about the other wives and their husbands co-workers. They expressed jealousy over what others had or other husband’s positions. The wives were asked to work and some tried it but found it to be too much of a hassle for too little money so stopped. Nothing seemed good enough for these women and a large part of the book seemed like a “pity party”. As I read through the first few pages, I kept hoping that TaraShea Nesbit would change voice and start telling the story of some of the wives individually. This never happened so as it was, the book ended up just glossing over the lives of these women and provided even less information about the children. I became very annoyed with her choice of voice by the time I finished the first chapter. I was afraid that I might end up throwing my Kindle across the room if I continued to read it. Outside of the use of first person plural narrative, the book is generally well written. I am sure Ms. Nesbit put a lot of effort into writing this book. I just wish she had chosen a different narrative technique to tell her story. The narrative annoyed me so much that if was all I could do to finish reading it. If I hadn’t felt an obligation to read the book and provide a review, I doubt that I would have read more than the first few pages. It is obvious the book was well researched and that Ms. Nesbit has a talent for writing. I am; therefore, sadden to have to write a less than glowing review. Unfortunately, I just didn’t like the writing style Ms. Nesbit used. I am sorry to say that I could not recommend this book. I would not be surprised if many of those who pick this book up without any knowledge of how it is written will end up putting it down in disgust after only a few pages.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    very good !!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    The book begins with a series of queries about what might have happened to these inhabitants of Los Alamos before they abandoned their prior homes to follow their husbands to an unknown place. They had no idea what to expect and the author makes the reader aware of what questions or feelings they might have had at that time. The possible scenarios that caused these women to leave their homes and follow their husbands to unknown destinations is presented with many options, with humor and also a lightness that pervades the entire book, although their journey was of the utmost importance and was of a very serious nature.The style of the author, using what has been described as first person plural, is off-putting to some, but I don’t think the author could have accomplished as much as she did with traditional prose. Using short sentences, which came in quick bursts, she opened a window up onto an unreal desert scene where each of the different kinds of people came with their families, or alone, in the service of their country. She was able to accurately describe an incredible, unusual experience that once took place in a remote, undeveloped area of New Mexico. It was a different time and the women of Los Alamos, as was the custom, simply followed their husbands, asked few questions, and continued to perform their household duties and to assume the responsibility of raising the family, even in this secret, isolated place. Forbidden to reveal where they were or to tell what their husbands were working on to their friends and family, they somehow created a thriving community and survived from 1943 until sometime after the war’s end. Although they were not privy to the secret experiments or goings-on, they surmised some information on their own as they gossiped among themselves.Using a pattern of staccato thoughts, coming from the collective “I”, the author has managed to illustrate exactly what occurred in Los Alamos from the basic emotions of each inhabitant to the intellectual desert the wives occupied as they witnessed the veritable cornucopia of opportunity for their men. Every nuance of their relationships is exposed in these seemingly random thoughts occurring on each page.It is a very quick read as the story jumps along, literally. Each paragraph imparted a message which almost jutted across the page too fast to capture. The effect of this very serious research with world changing implications, wore on each family, man, woman and child, in different ways and they each handled it in their own individual way. They had been traumatically cut off from all prior relationships and had to create new avenues of release. Until they abandoned their new community, at war’s end, to return to their former lives, they did not realize how much all of the relationships they had made there, meant to them. They became family to each other for lack of family of their own and they weathered every storm that came their way, most often, with grace and patience, although there were the moments of pettiness that often erupts in very close quarters. This was a good read.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    At first the book was a little strange to me because the author wrote it as a group. and used “we”. An example is “we came from New York, or we came from Nebraska or we came from Hamburg”, or “we wanted new stoves, or we wanted to go shopping, or we wanted to be able to spend more time with our husbands”. After a while I got used to that syle of writing and it didn’t bother me.The book, while maybe not exactly as it happened, was a great story, a quick read, and one I really enjoyed. I can’t imagine what it was actually like for the men, women, and kids living at Los Alamos. Being cut mostly cut off from the rest of the world for 3 years couldn’t have been easy. I think the hardest part for me would have been not knowing the reason for them being there. Everything was such a secret and that would have bothered me a lot.I loved reading about the friendships that developed between the women, and was glad to know they did have dances etc. to make their time there a little easier. Once the project was over, I imagine everyone had mixed feelings about leaving. On one hand they had to be happy to be “free” again, but on the other hand they were probably very sad to leave the people they had come to depend on during their stay at Los Alamos. Also, I wonder how many of the women, men and children had a hard time coming to grips with the reality of what their stay there meant.Overall this was a very good read and I learned a lot since I’d never really heard anything about what it was like for those who lived there. I think this is a book anyone could enjoy, if you can get past the collective “we” narration.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    “Some of us thought we saved half a million lives. Some of us thought we, our husbands, were murderers, that we had helped light a fuse that would destroy the world.” p 198In 1943, following the attack on Pearl Harbor, the North American government established a hidden enclave in Los Alamos, New Mexico, drafting the nation’s best scientists, engineers and chemists into service. The men (and a handful of women) were tasked to work on a secret enterprise, requiring them to uproot their wives and children with little notice and move to the South West, forbidden to reveal any information about their new position or location to employers, colleagues, friends, or even family.While the technicians toiled away in laboratories and offices, their wives and children struggled to adapt to their new environment, making homes in flimsy pre-fab’s without bathtubs or electric stoves, shopping for wilting vegetables and sour milk, surrounded by barbed wire and armed guards. The wives of Los Alamos created a community with dancing and book clubs and cocktail parties, cared for their children and sent letters home, heavily redacted by the censors. They remained largely ignorant of the work their husband’s were doing until the day the atom bomb was dropped on Japan.Nesbit reveals the stories of the wives of Los Alamos using the first person plural narrative (we, us). It is an unusual style and did take me a little time to adjust to, but I came to appreciate the way in which it emphasised the unique community and the wives shared experiences, despite their individual differences. The narrative feels authentic and convincing I expect that Nesbit relied on genuine research to ensure the accuracy of the details.I really enjoyed this unique book. The Wives of Los Alamos is a fascinating novel giving the reader a glimpse into one of the world’s most pivotal events – the development and use of the Atom Bomb, from a perspective rarely considered by history. I’d like to read more about the women’s experiences of Los Alamos.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This book was a different read altogether. It was written in the first person plural, which is just hard to get by… The story was interesting but clipped along at such a broken pace I finished it just to make sure I knew how it ended. I'm sure this book will be appreciated by many others, just didn't do anything for me.

Book preview

The Wives of Los Alamos - TaraShea Nesbit

1943

West

OVER THE BLACK Sea, the Mediterranean, the Pacific, the Arctic, the Atlantic; in sewers, in trenches, on the ocean, in the sky: there was a war going on. Sometimes it seemed far away, barely happening, but then a mother or a wife placed a gold star in her living room window—her brother, her husband, her son, our neighbor—and the war became personal.

IT WAS MARCH, gas was rationed; therefore the streets were quiet. We heard a car pull up in the driveway. We wiped our hands on our apron and placed the apron on the dishes. The doorbell rang and a young man, just slightly older than our husbands, about thirty-five, stood on our porch in a porkpie hat and asked whether the professor was home. His eyes were the color of stillness—something between a pale body of water and the fog that emerges above it. Although dinner was almost ready our house was chilly—we could not turn on the gas heater—and we invited him in but felt embarrassed by the cold. Our husbands came downstairs and they shook hands. This man was tall, but his shoulders stooped as if he had spent his life trying to appear smaller than he was in order to make others comfortable.

HE ASKED OUR husbands about their research at the university, we asked him to stay for dinner; he declined but said to our husbands, I’ve got a proposal, and together they walked down the hallway to our husband’s office, and the door closed behind them.

WHEN THEY CAME out an hour later our husbands were flushed and smiling. They shook the man’s hand, smiled, and walked him out.

OUR HUSBANDS JOINED us in the kitchen and said, We are going to the desert, and we had no choice except to say Oh my! as if this sounded like great fun. Where? we asked, and no one answered. If we were the ones to see the man to the door—the future Director of our future unknown location—on the front porch he said to us, I think you will like life up there. We asked, Where is up there exactly? He hesitated and said, My two loves are physics and the desert. My wife is my mistress, and winked at us. We watched him walk down the sidewalk two blocks and turn the corner.

OR IT DID not happen like that at all. One day, after we read books to our children, after we folded their blankets back, kissed them, tried to hurry along their sleep, we came downstairs to find our husbands smoking a pipe in their wingback chair, the orange one, an ugly thing we did not like, and we heard them ask us, How’d you like to live in the Southwest? and we plopped down on the couch, and we bounced the seat cushions, just as our children did, which annoyed us, although, when we did it, we found it exceedingly enjoyable. We were European women born in Southampton and Hamburg, Western women born in California and Montana, East Coast women born in Connecticut and New York, Midwestern women born in Nebraska and Ohio, or Southern women from Mississippi or Texas, and no matter who we were we wanted nothing to do with starting all over again, and so we paused, we exhaled, and we asked, What part of the Southwest?

OUR HUSBANDS MUTTERED, I don’t know. And we thought that was strange.

OR ONE WINTER day our husbands came home with burns on their right arms and told us their bosses said they needed to go west to recuperate. Out west there would be work, they said, though they could not give any more specifics about where out west.

WE HAD DEGREES from Mount Holyoke, as our grand-mothers did, or from a junior college, as our fathers insisted. We had doctorates from Yale; we had coursework from MIT and Cornell: we were certain we could discover for ourselves just where we would be moving. What did we know about the Southwest? A new dam, Hoover, that could, perhaps, power a grand experiment in the desert. To this and other conjectures we asked our husbands to nod Yes or No. You won’t be telling, we said. But no matter how seductively or how kindly we asked Where? and placed a hand on their chest, our husbands would not say, even if they did know, which we suspected they did.

A FEW OF US had experienced secrecy already. Our husbands were professors at Columbia or the University of Chicago and just that past month the Physics Lab was renamed the Metallurgical Lab, though no one in the lab, especially our husbands, were metallurgists, or did any kind of metal extracting. The college hired armed guards to be posted inside the doors of the Metallurgical Lab, and in the last weeks even the wives were no longer permitted to enter.

OUR HUSBANDS SAID, I’ll go on ahead, or, We’ll all go together, or, I can’t say when I will arrive but you should get on the train and set up house now. We suggested our husbands take a job in Canada instead. They declined the suggestion. And if they told us we were going to the Southwest, perhaps saying, We are going away and that’s the end of the discussion, we went to the university library and found the only three travel books about the Southwest. And the card in the back pocket of the New Mexico book had the names of our husbands’ colleagues who disappeared weeks before to some strange wilderness, people had said. We knew then that New Mexico was probably where we were going, too. We felt we had partially solved the mystery.

IF OUR HUSBANDS told us, We are going away and that’s the end of the discussion, we knew not to ask another thing, and we kept our partially solved mysteries to ourselves.

THOSE OF US with husbands who were going to have manager in their titles got to know, immediately, the general location of our future home. Our husbands informed us we were going to Site Y, outside Santa Fe. We wrote a list of things we wanted to know about our new town for our husbands to ask them about—we did not know who they and them were. We typed: How are the schools? Is there a hospital? Is there adequate help? What size are the windows? How is the weather?

REPLIES CAME BACK from our husbands over dinner as they passed the Brussels sprouts. They told us, Rest assured, your children will receive the finest education. And, The hospital will take care of all your needs. And, You will be provided with excellent cleaning and childcare help. The roads can get muddy—bring your rubbers! We raised our eyebrows. It sounded funny, official, and suspect, but we said, That sounds nice. We were not told that the school, the homes, and the hospital had not yet been built.

A WEEK BEFORE we left, a gentleman came to the door, showed us a badge, and said, Do you mind if I ask you a few questions? Over iced tea and stale sugar cookies we were quizzed about our presence at a Marxist Pedagogy meeting in 1940, or we were asked why we were on the list of members of the League of Women Shoppers, and didn’t we know that that organization was a Communist front? We were only a year out of Russia and was it true we had been captains in the Russian Army? Was it true we taught English classes for the Communist Party worker’s school in Youngstown, Ohio?

IT WAS LIKELY our husbands were questioned as well, though many were less interested in discussing the interrogation. We told the short man with the inscrutable expressions that we wanted nothing to do with the Communist Party, that we were never involved, or that we weren’t involved anymore. We said we had only been associated with them because of a previous love affair, and we did not see the point anymore, or we had become disillusioned after Pearl Harbor. We were asked to name our affiliates, and we said it was difficult to recall the people we knew then, that our memory was fuzzy on the dates and locations. We said this even if our memory was not fuzzy. We did not want to get anyone in trouble. Judging by his scowling face, this man did not like these answers. However, he went away, and no one else came to see us, and so it seemed we were still leaving for the wilderness.

SOME OF OUR husbands left first. We watched them disappear into train terminals, through the doors of unmarked black sedans, down airport runways, and we were left behind, overwhelmed. We called our friends from the phone booth and they met us at the train station or at our house with a loaf of bread, or a chicken casserole and a flask. We wondered aloud how we would ever survive without our friends to comfort us. We wanted to tell them everything we knew and everything we worried about—how scared we were and how excited. We wanted to ask their advice about what to bring to the Southwest—dresses, shoes, lotions—but we could not.

ON OUR LAST day we went to see Oklahoma! on Broadway or For Whom the Bell Tolls at the Mayan Theatre and we ate at the Italian restaurant, Luciano’s, that we had always wanted to try. We returned our library books, we picked up a copy of the family medical records, we took a long walk alone and asked ourselves why we had not done this sooner. We saw, for what seemed like the first time, the things we liked about the city we were leaving—whispering to the other wives at the community swimming pool, seeing women our mothers’ ages leaning in close to one another at the teahouse. And though we never actually went to the teahouse we found ourselves smiling every time we walked by it. We thought we would be joyful saying good-bye to the unfriendly pharmacist, Mr. Williams, but that was not true.

WE TOOK THE car to the shop to get the oil changed. We dropped off our children’s old bike tires, our worn-out bathing cap, and a bucket of nails our husbands left in the garage at the Junior League’s Metal and Rubber Drive. We bought a few more war bonds. Some of us had been smart enough to ask about gas and electric, and on our last day we bought an electric toaster, because we were told that where we were going would not have natural gas. We went to the ration office and handed a sealed envelope to the woman at the counter, as our husbands had instructed. She read the letter inside, gave us a curious look, and provided us with enough gas rations to get our car to the other side of the country.

WE WENT TO Barbara’s and got a manicure; we requested a bright cherry red, even though we knew it would chip by the end of the day. We sewed curtains for rooms we had never seen, hoping the colors would look right and the dimensions would be correct. We packed the linens and not the piano, and we were secretly happy to realize our children would not be able to continue lessons where we were going—we were told there was no piano teacher—which meant we would no longer have to hear them practicing Chopsticks over and over again.

OR WE WERE appalled our children would not have the necessary experience of piano at a young age and though we did not think we made good teachers—we were too soft, or we were too impatient—once we arrived and unpacked our dishes, we volunteered to teach piano in the lodge, which was also the movie theater, the gymnasium, and the community mess hall. Several children would learn to play Bach after dinner.

WE LIED AND told our children we were packing because we would be spending August with their grandparents in Denver or Duluth. Or we said we did not know where we were going, which was the truth, but our children, who did not trust that adults went places without knowing where they were going, thought we were lying. Or we told them it was an adventure and they would find out when we got there.

THE MOVERS CAME and out went our sofa, our books, and our cutlery. As they loaded boxes, our neighbors drove past, slowed down, doubled back, and asked, Where you headed?, and, Why didn’t you tell us? We would have thrown you a party, and, You’ve been great neighbors. You’ll be missed. We said, Vacation, or, Change of scenery, or, Jim’s work. Our neighbors did not believe us, though they smiled as if they did.

WE BOARDED TRAINS in Philadelphia, or in Chicago, with GIs all looking identical in their dog tags, their black-rimmed glasses, their gosling-short hair. Perhaps it was unpatriotic, but we were annoyed at the GIs who ate before us and delayed our dinners until ten o’clock, and who therefore made our children less manageable. Though we were only twenty-five, we were tired, and we were with our children, who reminded us of what we were tethered to, children who were bored for hours and who pinched and kicked one another. When our children whined, He hit me! She started it! after eight hours on the train we ran out of ways to keep them occupied, and instead we finally just stared out the window as if we were noticing the beige nuances of tan landscapes, which we were not. By the time we arrived we had seen so many mountains they had lost any sense of the majestic.

OR, LESS FREQUENTLY, our husbands went with us. They drove us in red Studebakers, in green Oldsmobiles, our backseats filled with clothes, books, children, and the family cat, Roscoe, who meowed for hours. We stopped along the way to visit our parents, who asked repeatedly where we were going, and whom we could not tell.

OUR FATHERS POUNDED their fists on the table, said, You think we are Nazi spies? Tell us! Our mothers said, Be careful.

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1