-

20-

,
, ,
:

:
,

: ,
,
,
, , 1:

,
:
-
:
, 1940- ,
,
, , ,

,
: ,
:
1960- .,
,
* 12.02.2012
1 , 6 , . 5 / , , .,
, 1974, 372:

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

1.

51

 :
. ,
,
,
2:

. . -
, :
.
. .
. ,
: ,
.
: ,

: ,

3:
. -
:
,
,
:

.
,

, . 1943
, .
:
4
. .
:

,

5
2 , , ., , 1987, 4:
3 , . . ,
. , 1999, 173-177:
/ , .,
.2004, 99-107:
4 , , , 2007, 31:
5 , , , 1997, 51:

52

6 , 6 , . 6 ., 1974, 301:
7 :
8 , , 438-439:
9 . 5, 389:
10 :
11 , , 31:

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

.
. 1945 .
:
. ,

. :



. 6, .

7:
. . .
:
, .
, .
:
.
[] []
[] ( )
, 8,
. :
. .

, .
-

.
, 9:
. .

:
.
,
. ,
10: .
.
... 11:
. 1959-
.

53


(symbolisme objectif)12:
,
,

, (, ,
, , ):

: ,

:
.
:
. ,

:

13 ,
. ,
,
:
1960-


,
, , ...14:
.
,
15:
.

: .
, .
: . ,
. .
, , : ,
100-200 , - :
( - ..)

,
12 , . , 2, , 1959, 21:
13 , 6 , . 5, 144:
14 , 268:
15 , 407:

54

 ,
,
,
18:

16:

.
17:
: .
,
: ,
.

. -
:
: ,


,
:

.
, ,
, , , ( )
20:
.
,

,
21:
. . .
16 , , 84 :
17 , , , 2004, 183:
18 , 6 , . 6 12:
19 , , , 1984, 203:
20 , 6 , . 6, 425:
21 , , 184:

,

...19:

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

. ,
, .

55


:
. (
- ..) ,
:
( ) 22:
.
, - (
) - () - . ,
( ) -
, - -:
,
23
- -
- - , ,
, :
, ,
- : ,
- :
. -.

, :
, ,
:
, - ,

: , - -
,
, , 24:
. ,
-
:
. ,
,
, . :
,
,
25:

. ,
22 , , , 1991, 57:
23 , 6 , . 5, 397:
24 , . . , 177:
25 , . / ,
, 2004, 33:

56

: : - 28:
.

, :
. -
.

- 29:
. .
:
.
2005 . 1600

, . ,
26 , 4 , . 3 / , .,
, 1975, 55:
27 , 6 , . 5, 61:
28 , , 6 , . 6, 110:
29 , , , 1978, 117:

-
:
, ,
,
:
, ,

,
:
,
.

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

2.

: .
26 .

,
. ,

. .
: , , 27:

57

 ,
:

:
,
.



-

30:
,
. ,
,
:
,
, ,
,
: :
.

, . ,

31:

, .
,
:
,
:
,
,
32:
. , .
: . ,
: ,
30 , , , 2005, 51: - - ..:
31 , 59:
32 , 41:

58

 . .

:
, .
:
,
: ,
,
. ,

.




33 , 6 , . 5, 130:
34 , , 126:

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

34:

,
, 33:
.
: ,

, :
,
:
. .
,
. ,

( . ( ) .
, . .
):
,
. :
, ,
: .
. .
,
.

59

 35:
. .
:
,
:
, ,
, :
,
.
- , ,

,
36:


.


,
- .

37:
, -. .
,
-.
- 38:
. . ,
, /
, ,
, ,
39:
20-
: ,
:
35 , , . 1960-1990, , ., 2006, 429:
36 , 6 , . 1, ., 1972, 322 :
37 , , 28:
38 , 6 , . 6, 17:
39 , , , 1987, 104:

60

,
: .

, ,
, .
:


, ,
. . .
:
:

Comparative Analysis of the Characteristic of 20th century Epic Writings

Knarik A. Abrahamian
Our article is dedicated to the creative and theoretical relationship that exists between Eastern Armenian poet Paruyr Sevak and Western Armenian poet Zareh Khrakhouni.
Its interesting, that in the 1960s two separate cultural environments formed independent literary movements. The Eastern Armenian literary scene, influenced by P. Sevak, was characterized as non-poetic poetry, while Z. Khrakhounis poetry established objective symbolism within Western Armenian literature.
Its not a superfluous observation to say that recognition between the two poets was
not mutual. The Western Armenian poet from Istanbul knew Eastern Armenian poet P.
Sevak very well. The same cannot be said about P. Sevak, who never mentioned Z.
Khrakhouni in his poems, articles or letters. This fact comes to show that regularity
between two artists can be seen in the development of literature, but not as a subjective
influence.
Comparing methods in literature is vital to understanding inter-literary history that
fate separated to two sections. The comparative work between two cultural systems
gives us a chance to see their history through one lens.

PARUYR SEVAK ZAREH KHRAKHUNI

() , 1 (37) -, 2012

Summary

61