You are on page 1of 4

Table 3.2.

10 Optimum weight comparison of steel MRFs using ELF procedure and Nonlinear Time History Analysis and Interior Penalty Function method as per IS: 8002007. Optimum weight obtained from ELF procedure(kg) Columns Roof(15) 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Beams Total Optimum weight obtained NTH Analysis(kg) Columns Beams Total

Floor No.

Difference (percentage)

Table 3.2.11 Optimum weight comparison of steel MRFs using ELF procedure and Nonlinear Time History Analysis and Interior Penalty Function method as per IS: 8002007. Optimum weight obtained from ELF procedure(kg) Columns Roof(12) 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Beams Total Optimum weight obtained NTH Analysis(kg) Columns Beams Total Difference (percentage)

Floor No.

Table 3.2.12 Optimum weight comparison of steel MRFs using ELF procedure and Nonlinear Time History Analysis and Interior Penalty Function method as per IS: 8002007. Floor No. Roof(9) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Table 3.2.13 Optimum weight comparison of steel MRFs using ELF procedure and Nonlinear Time History Analysis and Interior Penalty Function method as per IS: 8002007. Floor No. Roof(6) 5 4 3 2 Optimum weight obtained from ELF procedure(kg) Columns Beams Total Optimum weight obtained NTH Analysis(kg) Columns Beams Total Difference (percentage) Optimum weight obtained from ELF procedure(kg) Columns Beams Total Optimum weight obtained NTH Analysis(kg) Columns Beams Total Difference (percentage)

You might also like