You are on page 1of 42

STRATEGIC PLAN

Division of Apayao

EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT Social Factors Political Factors

Economic Factors
Environment Factors

Technological Factors

Land Area 5,113.11 Sq. Km. 3 Ancestral Domain with Certificates of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT)

Mineral Resources
Richly endowed with mineral resources (gold, copper, zinc, manganese and limestone) Forest Resources 356,440 hectares of various forest types

Crop Production Rice 104,701 MT harvested from 28,944 hectares Vegetables and Fruits 48,070 MT harvested from 25,000 hectares Road Networks Road networks connecting the different municipalities are under construction: (lower Apayao-Upper Apayao-Ilocos Norte)

Population: 112,636 (2012)


70 % belongs to the indigenous communities (NEDACAR) population density= 22.03 person per square kilometer 63% (69,907) belong to the poor and marginalized sector Annual per capita poverty threshold is Php 17,837.00 12,516 (11.12%) of the total population are under 5 years old 25,874 (23%) of the total population are within 5-14 years old bracket

Population
Population Growth Rate 2.07% (1990-2010) Birth Rate - 19.48 per 1000 population

Crude Death Rate - 2.99%


Maternal Mortality -1.60% Infant Mortality 10.27%

Literacy Rate
Basic Literacy 91% Functional Literacy 76%

INTERNAL ASSESSMENT

NUMBER OF SCHOOLS
Elementary 165 schools

164 Public -105 complete elementary -58 incomplete elementary 1 Private (with Permit to Operate)
Secondary 37 schools

32 Public (10 annexes) 5 Private (with Recognition)

Segmentation of Elementary Schools


PRIMARY Incomplete Complete ELEMENTARY Incomplete Complete

45

11

105

Number of Multi- grade Classes


School Year 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Number 153 163 162 163 186

Public Schools Enrolment for SY 2009-2010 to SY 20122013


Level SY 20092010 SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-2012 SY 2012-2013

Kindergarten

Elementary
Secondary

Total

1,876 18,632 6,241 26,749

1,456 19,036 6,712 27,204

2,359 18,749 6,947 28,055

2,785 18,300 7,154 28,239

Teacher-Learner Ratio

Level

Age

Population

Enrolment

Variance

Teacher/ Student : Ratio

Kinder Elementary

Secondary

5 6-11 12-15

2,360 14,987 9,959

2,247 15,155 4,799

113 -168 5160

1:16.89 1:29.61 1:31.57

Alternative Learning System (ALS)


No. of No. of ALS No. of potential Learners Mobile Coordinators Teachers Full Time Part Time A&E Elem A&E Sec Basic Literacy 8 2 5 426 174 125

Enrolment, Completers, Registrants and Test takers 2012


Enrolment Completers Registrants Test Takers

1379

1114

612

398

ALS A&E Passers for SY 2009-2011


Year 2009 2010 2011 Takers 273 214 493 Passers 12 33 79 Percentage 4.40 15.42 16.02

Learning Facilities (SY 2012-2013)


Classroom-Pupil/Student Ratio Elementary 1:30.69 Secondary 1:30.20

Number of Classrooms for Repair Major Minor

Elementary Secondary Elementary 265 46 163

Secondary 16

School Leadership
Elem. Schools Headed by: Teacher In-Charge (TICs) Head Teachers Principals Total No. of School 92 36 36 164

Secondary Schools Headed by: Teacher In-Charge (TICs) Head Teachers

No. of School 17 2

Principals Total

13 32

NO. OF PLANTILLA POSITIONS AT THE DIVISION OFFICE


Position

SDS ASDS Education Program Supervisor Public Schools District Supervisor Administrative Staff
Total

No. of Items 1 (vacant) 1 9

3 3
17

Net Enrolment Rate


100

90
80

70
Percentage

60

50
40

30
20

10

SY 2009-2010 SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-2012

Elementary 89.33 98.33 101.12

Secondary 43.57 47.35 48.18

Cohort Survival Rate


100
90 80 70
Percentage

60 50 40 30 20 10 0

SY 2009-2010 SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-2012

Elementary 60.42 62.94 62.54

Secondary 65.66 60.56 74.26

Failure Rate
16 14 12 10 Percentage 8 6 4 2 0

Elementary Secondary

SY 2009-2010 5.37 6.36

SY 2010-2011 6.26 12.28

SY 2011-2012 9.66 15.11

TRANSITION RATE (SY 2011-2012)

Primary to Intermediate 94.69 Intermediate to Secondary

87.06

SIMPLE DROPOUT RATE SY 2011-2012


Elementary
Grade Level Grade I Grade II Grade III % of Dropout 0.39 0.18 0.30

Secondary
Year Level Year I Year II Year III % of Dropout 7.16 5.01 3.84

Grade IV
Grade V Grade VI Total

0.35
0.36 0.43 0.33

Year IV
Total

3.93
5.21

National Achievement Rate


75

65 55
45

Percentage

35 25
15

SY 2009-2010 SY 2010-2011 SY 2011-2012

Elementary 66.52 67.23 69.89

Secondary 45.53 48.22 50.81

NUTRITIONAL STATUS (SY 2012-2013)


Level Kinder Elementary Secondary Classification Severely Wasted Wasted 2.88 11.46 2.14 7.53 .71 4.89

SWOT

STRENGTHS 1. Increasing Participation Rate (Elem. & Sec) 2. Improving Achievement Rate (Elem & Sec.) 3. There is 1 school head ( Principal, Head Teacher) for every 8 teachers in the elementary 4. Teacher- Pupil /student Ratio is 1:29 (Elem.) and 1:28.8 (Sec) 5. Regular MOOE, SBM Grant and SBRMS are downloaded to schools 6. ADSUC is conducted on a quarterly basis and as the need arises 7. Division and School Plans were crafted 8. School Annexes in the Secondary have separate financial accounts 9. Some schools are recipients of Adopt a Child Trust Fund OPPORTUNITIES Provincial, Local Officials and the Congresswoman strongly support programs and projects of schools PTAs are active partners of schools Improving learning outcomes is included in the Physical Development and Framework Plan of the Provincial Government Provincial SEF is increasing 100,407 hectares is devoted to agriculture Forest land cover is 277,142 hectares Population Growth Rate is at 2.07 % which is close to National Average. 34% of the total population belong to 0-14 years old bracket.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9.

WEAKNESSES Low completion and cohort-survival rate (elem & sec) Low transition rate ( primary to intermediate and elementary to high school) High failure rate ( elem & sec) High school leaver rate (elem & sec) Prevalence of malnutrition 58 out of 164 schools are incomplete elementary schools 17 out of 32 secondary schools are headed by a Teacher InCharge Low passing rate in the ALS- A&E Inadequate Monitoring and Evaluation to schools Low percentage of liquidation

1. 2. 3.

4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

THREATS Difficult access to schools in remote barangays Inadequacy of transport system in remote barangays Inadequacy of communication system in remote barangays Vanishing indigenous culture and practices Annual per capita poverty threshold is PhP 17,837. Low functional Literacy Rate (76%) High Infant Mortality Rate 10.27%

STRATEGIC OPTIONS

(Strengths/ Weaknesses)
1. Improve accountability system of school heads on improving learning outcomes (SBM) Set school targets and forge performance contracts Revision/ refinement of the SIP based on school targets Conduct of Monitoring Evaluation and Plan Adjustment (financial & physical targets)

Intensify supervision and provision of technical assistance (more focus on the remote schools, MG classes, TIC manned schools) Conduct capability building

STRATEGIC OPTIONS (Strengths/ Weaknesses) 2. Improve delivery systems Provide technical assistance to schools to increase percentage of liquidation of cash advances

Increase number of schools implementing SSES, ESEP

Implement culture-responsive curriculum for IP learners


Increase number of schools implementing STVEP Install LRMDS

Develop school database for IP learners and recipients of 4Ps

STRATEGIC OPTIONS (Strengths/Opportunities)


1.

Engage LGU and stakeholders to improve access to schools Include DEDP and SIPs in the Physical Framework Plan of the province and municipality Increase pledges for Public-Private Partnerships Generate community counterparts for SBM Grants, SBRMS and other school-initiated projects Expand Adopt A School Program through School Mo Taranan Ko

1. 2. 3. 4.

5.
6.

STRATEGIC OPTIONS ( Weaknesses and Threats) Increase enrolment and percentage of passing in the ALS A&E (Elementary and Secondary) Increase number of schools implementing alternative delivery mode Increase number of complete elementary schools Reconfigure clustering of schools for better supervision of TIC manned schools Intensify M&E and Supervision to school annexes, multi-grade classes and remote schools Expand Vita Meal Feeding Program and Gulayan sa Paaralan to improve nutritional status

VISION

DepEd-Division of Apayao is an educational institution that produces learners who reach their full potentials in a secure and happy learning environment.

MISSION DepEd-Division of Apayao, in collaboration with stakeholders, is committed to provide quality basic education services to learners for them to become high performing, self-reliant and morally upright.

We realize this by continuously developing our key competencies on instruction, assessment, instructional leadership, human resource development, research and development and monitoring and evaluation.

OBJECTIVES
KEY RESULT AREAS AND PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

REACH
Objective Key Result Area (ELEMENTARY) a. Gross Enrolment Rate 2012-2013Performance indicator TARGET 2014 To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode 124.01 2015 123.47 2016 122.93

b. Net enrolment rate 2012-2013c. Cohort Survival rate 2012-2013d. Completion rate 2010-2011e. Drop-out rate 2012-2013 f. School Leaver Rate g. Transition Rate f. Failure Rate

100
74.66 73.40 0 4.86 97.35 4.82

100
80.72 78.97 0 2.42 98.68 2.40

100
86.76 82.52 0 0 100 0

REACH
Objective Key Result Area (SECONDARY) a. Gross Enrolment Rate 2012-2013 Performance Indicator TARGET 2014 To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode 92.77 2015 104.28 2016 115.79

b. Net enrolment rate 2012-2013


c. Cohort Survival rate 2012-2013 d. Completion rate 2010-2011 e. Drop-out rate 2012-2013 f. School Leaver Rate g. Transition Rate f. Failure Rate

70.76
79.08 71.75 2.61 4.98 93.54 7.55

82.05
81.49 73.64 1.31 2.49 96.78 3.77

93.34
83.91 75.53 0 0 100 0

REACH
Objective Key Result Area (ALTERNATIVE LEARNING SYSTEM) A. Accreditation and Equivalency (Elementary and Secondary) Performance indicator TARGET 2014 2015 2016

To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode

1. Increased no. of enrolment

1650

2150

2725

B. Increased no. of passers who are mainstreamed in secondary schools

25

45

80

REACH
Objective Key Result Area (ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY MODE) A. No. of schools implementing 1. E-Impact 2. Open High School Program 3 2 5 2 8 2 Performance indicator TARGET 2014 To provide access to all Iyapayao learners through both formal, informal and alternative delivery mode 2015 2016

RESPONSIVENESS
Objective 2. To provide opportunity to all kinds of learners to develop their full potentials Key Result Area Performance Indicators 2014 2015 2016

a. Increased number of Schools implementing inclusive education


b. Increased number of schools implementing SSES c. Increased number of schools implementing ESEP d. Increased number of schools implementing STVEP 3 8

16

32

RATINGS
Objective 3. To attain mastery of competencies Key Result Areas (Elementary) Increased Mean Percentage Score (MPS) Increased percentage of Kindergarten pupils who achieve at 75% proficiency in the ECCD Checklist; Decreased number of learners whose reading level is under frustration Increased percentage of schools who attain positive satisfaction in surveys Performance Indicator 71.93 85 72.95 90 75 100

2,424

1,939

1,551

75

82

95

RATINGS
Objective 3. To attain mastery of competencies Key Result Areas (Secondary) Increased Mean Percentage Score (MPS) Increased percentage of passing in the A & E (Elem & Sec) Increased percentage of schools who attain positive satisfaction in surveys Performance Indicator

62.32 25

68.66 38

75 50

75

85

95

You might also like