Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Unit / Module Assessment Lecturer Student Name Date Handed Over Initial Submission Date Student to Tick if Attempte d Criteria Met? Grading Opportunity Initially On Resubmission P2.1 P2.2 P2.3 P2.4 P3.1 P3.2 P3.4 P4.3 M1 M2 M3 D1 D2 Date Due Re-Submission Date BTEC HND in QS and BE Tendering & Estimating Assignment 2 Understand, analyse and apply method of pricing and technique of estimating Ms. Indra M. Rajapakse ID QS/...//___
Assessor Feedback
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator
Important Information for Students The criteria each task relates to are shown against that task where possible. Please note that plagiarism is treated as a serious offence and therefore the work you produce must be individual (Please refer to Student Handbook on Plagiarism & Cheating). All sources of information must be referenced using Harvard referencing where a reference list/Bibliography should be included at the end of the assignment. Please note that the submission date given for this assignment is the final date that you can hand over the assignment. A one week grace period maybe extended with prior approval from the Program Manager Undergraduate. However, note that submissions handed in one week late will be graded lower (Please refer to the Student Handbook on Assessments - Late Submissions & Penalties). Assignments returned to students for re-working must be re-submitted within 10 days (Please refer to Student Handbook on Assignments Re-submission). Failure to re-submit the previously marked assignment with the re-submitted assignment will mean that results cannot be released for the respective unit. Please read, follow and reference both the contents of the unit outline and the grading criteria of the assignment before completing this assignment.
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator
Plagiarism: While research and discussion are an essential part of an assignment, the deliberate copying of someone elses work or unacknowledged copying from printed or electronic sources is NOT permitted. You may be subject to disciplinary procedure if you do this. You should sign this sheet to show that you comply with these regulations. Students Signature: .. Students Comments: .... Date: .
Signature :
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator
P2.3
P2.4
ii. iii.
Note: Assumption that of the prices of material, labour and overhead mark up to be attached in logical and professional manner. P3.1 P3.2 P3.4 P4.3 Explain how the bills of quantities used to build up commercial estimates. Describe the critical factors which might affect the profit margin in a construction organization. Describe the critical factors which might affect the overhead cost, in a construction organization. Analyse the selecting forms of contact for variety of construction.
The document shall be word-processed or neatly hand written on one side of A4 papers and neatly present as a bound document.
Merit Grade:
Tendering & Estimating Assignment 2 International College of Business and Technology
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator
Relevant theories and techniques Appropriate knowledge in preparing rates/estimates. Assignment must be a have been applied communication with relevant areas A range of methods have been and process of Tendering and applied. Estimating. Complex information/data has been synthesized and processed
appropriate learning methods have been applied M3 Present and communicate findings The and Student must discuss relevant concepts by displaying their approach has been used knowledge for pricing and build up Coherent and logical development of unit rates.. principles/ concepts for the intended audience A range of methods of presentation has been used. Communication has taken place in familiar and unfamiliar situations appropriate structure
Distinction Grade: Distinction grade is achieved by meeting all following grade descriptors.
Tendering & Estimating Assignment 2 International College of Business and Technology
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator
D 1 Use critical reflection to evaluate own work and justify valid conclusions.
Conclusions have been arrived at through synthesis Critically reflect your own work and illustrate The validity of results has been evaluated using with supplementary information which may defined criteria. required in your Self-criticism of approach has taken place. answers.. Realistic improvements have been proposed against defined characteristics for success.
been Describe your answers using demonstrated. different type of Substantial activities, projects or investigations estimates. Autonomy / Independence have have been carried out. Activities have been managed. .The unforeseen has been accommodated. The importance of interdependence has been recognized and achieved.
Ideas have been generated and decisions taken Self evaluation has taken place Convergent and lateral thinking have been applied Problems have been solved Innovation and creative thought have been applied Receptiveness to new ideas is evident Effective thinking has taken place in unfamiliar contexts
Lecturer Indra M.Rajapakse Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Chartered Builder, Dip. Arbitrator