Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Understand the features/characteristics of the revised SBM Assessment Tool Identify the four ACCESs Principles and the indicators in each principle Familiarize with the SBM level of practice, the rating scale and the scoring system
List at most three documents presented per dimension in the previous SBM Manual Recall the number of evidences needed per dimension and the computation made to identify the level of SBM practice in your school What actions did you make to advance the SBM level of practice in your school.
WHAT INSIGHTS HAVE WE GAINED FROM THE PREVIOUS SBM ASSESSMENT LEVEL OF PRACTICE
WHAT WENT WELL And WHAT ELSE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE TO BETTER ADVANCE SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE YESTERDAY ?
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Enabling
Inclusion
of major line item in the departments budget to support the installation of SBM at all level
Program Support Fund at the central region and division; and Grants at the school level.
Unrealistic targets and inappropriate strategies in the SIPs of many of the schools visited; Too much focus on the SIP templates, which is usually interpreted as a one-size-fits-all forms overlooking the unique condition of their schools, the pupils/students they are providing learning environment for, and the peculiar issues they are confronting;
There are more schools with School Report Cards (SRCs) than School Improvement Plans which reflects a disconnect of these two SBM processes. The SBM Assessment process was reduced to :bean counting that over-emphasizes the collection of prescribed documentation, the compliance to some of which may not be within the control of the schools and are not reflective of a functional system of good practices.
While DepEd reports that 100% of school heads in many divisions had been oriented on SBM, their practical understanding of the concept is not apparent
Realization of the value of SBM effectively carry out reforms in curriculum (K to 12); Need to strengthen SBM by assimilating the school to the system and way of life of the local community; Re-direct all efforts to support improvement of learning outcomes.
To better highlight the children/learner as the center of SBM practice; To encompass the diverse realities of learning contexts defined and uniquely occurring within specific geographic, social, cultural, economic, political and environmental make-up of the contemporary society;
To enhance commitment of education stakeholders at all levels to heir responsibilities and accountabilities in realizing the education outcomes for children To further promote shared governance between the school community;
To integrate accreditation into SBM for a seamless assessment of a school system; To improve the school systems capacity to be on track in achieving the EFA/Millennium Development Goals and sustain good performance.
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
Learner-centered
Process-focused
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
A. INTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS
School Head
Teachers
B. EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS
Learners Parents
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
0 No evidence
1 - Evidence indicates beginning structures mechanisms are in place to demonstrate ACCESS and
2 - Evidence indicates planned practices and procedures are fully implemented and aligned to ACCESS 3 - Evidence indicates practices and procedures satisfy quality standards
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
guided by the schools is evolved through the goal (VMG) is leadership of the school and the participation of some invited community
stakeholders.
2. The development
The community
plan (e.g.SIP) is
the school community to keep it responsive and relevant to emerging needs, challenges and opportunities. 3. The school is organized by a clear structure and work arrangements that promote shared leadership and governance and
The school defines the and the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.
The school and collaboratively define the structure and the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders.
Guided by an agreed organizational structure, the community stakeholders lead in defining the organizational structure and the roles and
responsibilities; school
provides technical and administrative support.
4. A leadership network
facilitates
communication between and among school and community leaders for informed decision-making and solving of school community wide
collaboratively
established and is continuously improved by the school community.
provides stakeholders
information for making decisions and solving learning and administrative problems.
learning problems.
5. A long term program is in operation that addresses the training and development needs of school and community leaders. Developing structures of the competency and development needs of leaders is conducted; Leaders undertake Leaders assume responsibility for their development. School community leaders working individually or in groups, coach and mentor one another to achieve their VMG. are in place and analysis training modes that are line, off-line, modular, group, or home-based)
result is used to develop and which do not a long term training and disrupt their regular development program. functions. Leaders monitor and evaluate
of all types of
learners in the school community
learning curves
assessed; appropriate programs with its support materials for each type of learner is developed.
address performance
discrepancies, benchmark best practices, coach low performers, mentor potential leaders, reward high achievement, and maintain environment that makes learning meaningful and enjoyable.
by continuous
improvement on learning outcomes and products of learning. Teachers as well as students performance is motivated by intrinsic rather than extrinsic rewards. The Schools differentiated program is frequently benchmarked by other schools.
technologies are
to develop a lasting curriculum.
benchmarked by other
schools. There is marked increase in number of projects
Localization
guidelines are agreed to by school community and teachers are properly oriented.
desired learning
outcomes, and directly improves community life. are replaced and innovative ones are developed.
Learning materials and Materials and approaches to reinforce strengths and address approaches are being used in school, in the family and in
develop the
methods and materials for
deficiencies are
developed and tested for applicability on school, family and
community to develop
critical, creative thinking and problem solving community of
thinking and
problem solving.
solving. Assessment
results are used as guide to develop materials.
community.
The monitoring system is accepted and regularly used for collective decision making.
community using
ensure the holistic growth and
feedback is shared
development of the
learners and the community. The system uses a tool A committee take care of the continuous that monitors the holistic development improvement of the tool. The monitoring tool has been improved to provide both
of learners.
quantitative and
qualitative data.
assessment results are results are shared with programs that are
continuously
reviewed and improved, and assessment results
community
stakeholders.
suited to community,
and customized to each learners context, results of which are
are contextualized
to the learner and local situation and the attainment of relevant life skills.
6. Learning managers
Stakeholders begin to
Learning environments,
and facilitators
(teachers, administrators and community members) nurture values and environments that are protective of all children and
demonstrate
behaviors consistent to the organizations vision, mission and goals.
activities aimed to
increase stakeholders awareness and commitment to fundamental rights of children and the basic principle of educating them.
principles in designing
learning materials
7. Methods and and communityfriendly, enjoyable, safe, inclusive, at developing selfdirected learners. Learners are equipped with
Practices tools and self-directed learners are highly observable in school, but not in the community.
Practices, tools, and self-directed learners in the homes and in the community.
There is continuous information, sharing of among the schools, home and community for the development of self-directed learners
resources are learner materials for developing materials for developing exchange of
are beginning to emerge expertise and materials
essential knowledge,
skills, and values to assume responsibility and accountability for their own learning.
The program so
The program is
mainstreamed but continuously improved to make relevant to emergent demands.
designed and developed collaboratively to produce learners who implemented and are responsible and accountable for their learning. monitored by teachers and parents to ensure that it produces desired learners.
person/s and
collective body/ies are clearly defined
There is an active party that initiates clarification of the roles and responsibilities in education delivery.
The stakeholders are engaged in clarifying and defining their specific roles and responsibilities.
2.
Achievement of goals a collaboratively developed performance accountability system; gaps are addressed through appropriate action.
3.
The accountability community and is to ensure that management structures and mechanisms are responsive to the merging learning needs and demands of the community.
School community stakeholders continuously and collaboratively review and enhance accountability systems processes mechanisms and tools.
system is owned by the accountability assessment continuously enhanced components, including to the stakeholders.
information
collection and validation techniques and
accountability
assessment framework with basic components, including
appropriate
accountability assessment system.
accountability
systems; processes, mechanisms and tool.
processes are
inclusive and collaboratively developed and agreed upon.
implementation
guidelines
the community.
Assessment results and lessons learned serve as basis for
stakeholders.
adjustments and
requirements for technical assistance.
feedback, technical
assistance, recognition and plan adjustment.
ORIENTATION-WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF SBM ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND TOOL (APAT) IN ASSESSING SCHOOL'S SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE AND PASBE ACCREDITATION PROCESS
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCE
Resources are collectively and judiciously mobilized and managed with
transparency, effectiveness, and efficiency.
1. Regular resource Stakeholders are Resource inventory is Resource inventories
inventory is
collaboratively undertaken by learning managers,
characterized by
regularity, increased participation of stakeholders, and
are systematically
developed and stakeholders are engaged in a
learning
facilitators, and community stakeholders as basis for resource allocation and mobilization.
resource allocation
and mobilization
communicated to the
community as the basis for resource allocation and mobilization
collaborative process
to make decisions on resource allocation and mobilization.
Stakeholders are
invited to participate in the development of an educational plan in
Stakeholders are
regularly engaged in the planning and resource
Stakeholders
collaborate to ensure timely and need based planning and resource
is accessible and
inclusive, continuously engage
resource
programming, and in the implementation of the educational plan.
programming, and in
the implementation of the education plan.
programming and
support continuous implementation of the education plan.
stakeholders and
support implementation of community education plans.
3. In place is a communitymanagement
Stakeholders support
development of
resource management system.
developed,
periodically adjusted, and constituentfocused resource
ensure judicious,
appropriate, and effective use of resources.
management system.
Stakeholders are invited to participate in the development and implementation of monitoring, evaluation, on resource management.
collaboratively
developed and implemented by the learning managers, facilitators, and community stakeholders. 5. There is a system that manages the which strengthen
developed system of
and reporting for resource management.
An established system of partnership is managed and sustained by the stakeholders for continuous improvement of resource management.
and sustain
partnerships for improving resource management.
improving resource
management is evident
0 No evidence 1 Evidence indicates early or preliminary stages of implementation 2 Evidence indicates planned practices and procedures are fully implemented 3 Evidence indicates practices and procedure satisfy quality standards
60% based on improvement of learning outcomes; 40% according to the validated practices using DOD
.5-1.4
The resulting levels are described as follows: Level I: BEGINNING Establishing and developing structures and mechanism with acceptable level and extent of community participation and impact on learning outcomes. Level II: DEVELOPING Introducing and sustaining continuous improvement process that integrates wider community participation and improve significantly performance and learning outcomes. Level III: ADVANCED (ACCREDITED) Ensuring the production of intended outputs/outcomes and meeting all standards of a system fully integrated in the local community and is self-renewing and self-sustaining.
Thematic Area
Performance Indicators
Enrolment Increase SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase % of Inc.
Computation
Results
Access (45%)
___ x 0.45
Efficiency (25%)
% of Dec.
SY 2010-11:
SY 2011-12 Ave. % of decrease Completion Rate (CR): SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: % of Inc.
Baseline: 7.06 1 Marginal: At least 25% decrease 2 Average: At least 50% decrease 3 High: has 0 DR Baseline: 75% 1 - Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase Baseline: 76% 1 - Marginal: At least 5% increase 2 Average: At least 7% increase 3 High: At least 10% increase
___ x 0.25
SY 2011-12
Ave. % of Increase Cohort Survival Rate (CSR): SY 2009-10: SY 2010-11: SY 2011-12 Ave. % of Increase % of Inc.
Quality (30%)
___ x 0.25
SY 2011-12
Ave. % of Increase
Interpretation
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Good Better Best
SBM Practices
Weight
Results
Interpretation
Legend:
Numerical Rating Scale 0.50 1.49 1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00 Description Good Better Best
100%
2.59
Description
0.50 1.49
1.50 2.49 2.50 3.00
Developing
Maturing Advanced
Never get tired giving your best. In the journey towards doing good deeds, theres no finish line and no age limit. Go ahead. Be Gods model of goodness and love. Be always of service to others and be a blessing to everyone. A Text Message