Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Objectives
Understand not all web pages are created equal Explain 4 methods used to determine the validity and reliability of web pages Evaluate the validity and reliability of web pages
http://zapatopi.net/treeoctopus/
1. Purpose
.com = ($$)
Common commercial sites
.gov = (political)
Political in nature
.net = (Microsoft)
Software framework ran by Microsoft and used by programmers to create custom Web 2.0 tools
.edu = (Educational)
Reserved for postsecondary educational institutions
.org = (Non-Profit)
Once reserved for nonprofit organizations Anybody allowed to register a .org
uk/.us/.fr = (Country)
Country in which a web site is registered
Purpose (Cont.)
Inform
Built on facts, links and support for information presented
Entertain
Not meant to be used to support research
Convince
Relies on opinions supported by bias to sway you to believe the authors point of view
Deceive
Purposely try to imply incorrect information is the truth/fact.
Inform http://www.genderandaids.org/in dex.php Entertain http://www.guitarshredshow.com/ main.html Convince http://www.madeinusa.org/nav.cg i?info/whybuy Deceive http://www.martinlutherking.org/
2. Author
Background Check
Good Example:
Check site documents and http://www.mankato-mn.gov/ external sources to learn about the author
Bad Example:
http://descy.50megs.com/mank ato/mankato.html
3. Content
Fact or Opinion
Is the information cited? Look at the sentence structure: I feel, I think statements mean opinion
Accuracy
Are there spelling and/or grammatical mistakes?
Bias
Does the web site examine 1side, 2-sides or all sides of the topic?
Support
Is there a bibliography, editors or links to support the provided information?
Advertising
Who is being allowed to advertise?
Contradictions
Is the information contradictory to what you have already researched?
4. Recognition
Have other organizations recognized this site as being safe/accurate/reliable?
Exit Assignment
MrDiehm.weebly.com/blog.html