Professional Documents
Culture Documents
When one looks into the history of education, one can It is very common now to walk into a classroom and see are learning, sharing information, and questioning the is not an easy task. There is a lot of planning and monitoring that the teacher does so that such a
see that there has been a significant shift in instruction. Before the 1970s teaching was very teacher centered. giving and presenting information to the student. Yet, That is that it was predominately based on the teacher after looking into the value of having students learn for
several students talking at once about the content they teacher about the material. However, getting to this point
themselves, educators have moved to a student centered classroom. In other words, teachers must not simply be knowledge providers but also guides to the learning process. (Kock, 2004, p 142) From partner work to
common practices teachers use in their lesson planning is one better that the other. In this, document we will explore both the pros and cons of each practice.
who are doing most of the work during class. It is safe to say that education has shifted from a teacher-centered classroom to a student-centered classroom.
Independent Work
Pros predictions, valid inferences, generalizations o It allows time to practice skills like making Pros
Cooperative Learning
o Integrates students with disabilities into the o Students can develop relationships across o Gives students who usually do not voice gender, racial and ethnic backgrounds. participate in class discussion to have a general education classroom
o Teachers can give individual feedback o Allows students to work at their achievement level
o Teachers can identify students immediately if they are having a problem Cons
o Students practice voicing their opinion; it o There is less room for error if all students are checking each others work betters their communication skills
o Assignments are sometimes busy work; they are not meaningful achievement level o Assignments do not match the students o Directions are sometimes not clear different times
o Students finish independent work at o Students can lie about being done in order to have more time to work on it at home.
Cooperative Learning
Cons o Allowing students to pick their own groups can lead to segregation among students in terms of gender, race, and ethnicity. group members
feels uncomfortable with one or more students in the group and thus doesnt want to work with the group the task is uninteresting or boring or unchallenging.
Bored studentstudent who thinks because he or she finds it too easy Intellectual snobhigh achieving
o There can be unequal participation of The freeloaderthe student who does nothing in the group work The smart onethe student who is considered the smartest gets the or automatically becomes the spokesperson. hardest part, does the whole thing,
student who thinks his peers are less competent and thus doesnt want to work with them. This student often or she gets a good grade.
ends up doing all the work so that he o Lack of accomplishment of assignment due to poor planning
who often fails to understand a task, thus, the student either withdrawals from participation or engages in off task behavior. Unrecognizeda low achieving never listened to
student whose input and ideas are Despondent studenthigh or low achieving student who dislikes or
complete other activities such as grading, writing giving seatwork a bad name. The seatwork that When doing group work, teachers, especially first year teachers, assume that just because they are doing group work, it will automatically be fun and that the students would be excited to work together. Also teachers assume that no extra rules/guidelines will be necessary for the students to know how to work together. Assuming all these is very dangerous. Students, if they arent use to what to do in a group activity. Thus, a discussion a teacher does assume all of this and doesnt safe to say the activity will be a failure. working with other students in class, will not know of class expectations for group work is needed. If prepare themselves and their students, then it is
Know the purpose of the activity Know which kind of group work you want to implement o Helping permitted
Assign assignment/tasks that are meaningful, useful, relevant to students Know the purpose of the assignment Match assignments to students achievement levels Not only give written and oral directions but also make sure they are clear. Go over them with the class.
Monitor both behavior and comprehension during independent work time Plan assignment or activity for students who finish assignment early. For those who dont finish on time, decide what will be there options.
there is little or no division of labor; Decide the group size o 4-5 people per group are recommended Decide on group composition o When making groups think about the gender, cultural background, race, composition. Be patient Start with small group work at the beginning of the year. This is especially useful for first year teachers. Assign specific tasks for each activity, this way all students are held accountable for their participation and work. training ethnicity, achievement level, and social skill
class and at home. Will one be worth more than the other? Also the independent work that is done in class varies in time and difficulty. For instance, there is independent work done in class during a the independent work done at the end of class
lesson, is that going to be valued less or more than that counts as homework? Regardless of the type whether or not if we are going to grade and if so, how are we going to grade.
Teach students to cooperate by providing skills Monitor groups and intervene only when necessary.
self, peer, and teacher. This way the students are work but instead for their participation.
aware that they are not just being graded for their
Examples of Rubrics
http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubri cs/secondaryteamworkrubric.html cs/primaryteamworkrubric.pdf byrne/website/Resources/Rubric/Peer%20and% 20Self-Evaluation%20Rubric.htm http://mountain.sd41.bc.ca/dept/social_studies/ http://www2.uwstout.edu/content/profdev/rubri
and work will not be as simple. Teachers will need to create a method for grading and holding all the students accountable for their work. One way is to have a self-assessment rubric. This work they have done. In addition, this will give the teacher an opportunity to see what each student did in the assignment. It is important to note that what goes on the rubric is all up to the teacher Another way to grade is to have a peerassessment rubric. This is where the students grade each of the members of their work and state what they did in the project. Once again, this rubric is up to the teachers discretion.
work for students to do on their work but in class, (Weinstein, Novodvorsky, 2011, 254) In addition, when implementing seatwork into a lesson one needs to realize that seatwork is not synonymous with silence. Depending on the task and teacher, students should be allowed to help one another teachers need to understand that independent lessons one should ask themselves, is this home? What is its purpose? out during independent work. Most importantly, work is not meant to be busy work. When creating something the students can do on their own at
failure. However, cooperative learning offers a unique environment to learn because it brings together. The most important thing about students from all backgrounds and academic levels cooperative learning is the planning process. One needs to carefully consider the students needs, everything can go as smoothly as possible. the academic content, and time constrains so that
Conclusion
In conclusion, is independent work or cooperative learning better than the other? The answer is no, neither teaching method is better than the other. Both teaching methods can be successful as long as the assignment has a purpose, is well thought out, and is properly executed. However, it is them. important to understand the challenges they both have and not to assume anything when planning
References
Weinstein, C.S. , & Novodvorsky, I. (2011). Middle and secondary classroom management: Lessons from research and practice. New York: McGraw Hill. Urban, Hal. (2008). Lessons from the Classroom: 20 Things Good Teachers Do. [Redwood City, Calif.]: Great Lessons Press. http://gsi.berkeley.edu/teachingguide/sections/groupwor k.html http://www.brighthubeducation.com/teaching-methodstips/19619-advantages-of-group-work-in-theclassroom/ http://www.hrea.org/pubs/smallgroups.html