Case 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ Document 176-5 Filed 06/10/13 Page 1 of 3

EXHIBIT E

Case 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ Document 176-5 Filed 06/10/13 Page 2 of 3

June 10, 2013

William F. Abrams King & Spalding LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Re: Skyhook Wireless, Inc. v. Google Inc. Civil Action No. 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ

Dear Bill: We are in receipt of your letter to me dated June 6, 2013 and have considered it carefully. The points you make are claim construction and infringement arguments with which we disagree. Those disagreements do not justify the Rule 11 motion that you say you intend to file. Such a motion would be without merit and inappropriate. Skyhook reserves all rights should Google proceed with filing its threatened motion. Very truly yours, /s/ Steven S. Cherensky Steven S. Cherensky

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

T 650-802-6000

F 650-802-6001

tensegritylawgroup.com

Case 1:10-cv-11571-RWZ Document 176-5 Filed 06/10/13 Page 3 of 3

555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 360

Redwood Shores, CA 94065

T 650-802-6000

F 650-802-6001

tensegritylawgroup.com