Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form (IPCR)

I_____________________ ______of the ____________________________ of ________________________________ commit to (Name of SUC) (Name of Campus/College/Office) deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated measures for period __________________ to __________, 20 ____.

Ratee: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ Received by: Date Approved By: Date

Campus/ College Dean

NITA V. MORALLO, Ph, D. SUC President III

OUTPUT CORE FUNCTIONS:

SUCCESS INDICATORS (TargetS*Measures) 1. Teaching Teaching Effectiveness 2. 3. Preparation of Syllabi No. of syllabi prepared and submitted (Qn) Completeness of the syllabus Timeliness of submission of syllabi (T) Preparation & Utilization of Instructional materials No. of instructional materials prepared & utilized (Qn) Instructional materials copyrighted (Ql) Instructional Materials Prepared on Time (T) 4. Sponsored instruction related activities such as symposium, seminars, training, workshop, debate No. of Activities Conducted (Qn) 5. Preparation of Documents for Accreditation No. of Areas/Programs (Qn) % of documents prepared (QL) 6. Submission of Reports No. of Reports prepared (Qn) Timeliness of reports (Ql)

TARGETS

QL

RATING QN T

REMARKS Ave

MFO1 : HIGHER EDUCATION SERVICES

MFO2 : ADVANCED EDUCATION SERVICES

OUTPUT CORE FUNCTIONS: MFO3 : RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

SUCCESS INDICATORS (TargetS*Measures) No. of research studies completed (Qn) No. of research projects completed in the last 3 years (QL) No. of research output published in a recognized journal or submitted for patenting or patented (QL) No. of research projects completed within the original projects timeframe(T) No. of person trained weighted by the length of training (Q1) Percentage of trainees who rete the training course as good or better % of client who rates the advisory services as good or better % of request for training responded to within 3 days of request (T1) % of request for technical advice that are responded to within 3 days of request (T2) % of person who received training advisory services who rate timeliness as good or better

TARGETS

QL

RATING QN T

REMARKS Ave

MFO4 : EXTENSION AND SERVICES

ALLIED FUNCTIONS:

Final Average Rating Comments and Recommendations for Development Purpose Discussed with: Date Assessed by: I certify that I discussed my performance with the employee Campus / College Dean Date Final Rating by: Date

Faculty

NITA V. MORALLO, Ph, D. SUC President III