Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture No. 3
Dr. Warakorn Mairaing
Associate Professor
Soil Settlement
Settlement
Soil
(Consolidation)
(Consolidation)
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Soil Settlement
o o +
Then
vo vo v
Or
H o H o S
Soil Settlement
Types of settlement
Parameter Involved
- Stress increase
Cc - Compressibility Index
E - Modulus of Elasticity
Ho - Soil Depth
- Poison Ration
Ho - Soil Depth
Cv - Coeff of Consolidatiion
Se
Allowable settlement
Se + Sc > Sa
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Sc
T - Time Factors
D - Drainage Path
Soil Settlement
Soil Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Soil Settlement
Soil Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Soil Settlement
(P or )
o
vo
- Overburden stress ( vo )
vo =
dz = i zi
When
---(1)
i =1
= total depth
Soil Settlement
- Induced stress
Based on elastic theory of soil mass
in Boussinesg (1985) Newmarks etc.
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
1.
Point load
2.
Line load
3.
4.
Strip load
5.
6.
Soil Settlement
Fv = 0
qs Ao = v Ai
Ao
v
=
qs ( Ao + A)
---(2)
Soil Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Soil Settlement
Soil Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Soil Settlement
Elastic Settlement
Settlement
Elastic
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Elastic Settlement
E.Sattlement distribution
Total elastic settlement (Se) Large Loading area.
Se = zi = E zi Zi
When z
Ez
z
v
E
=
=
=
=
=
---(3)
Elastic Settlement
1
z ( x + y )
Ei
---(4)
Where
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
z
x, y
= poison ratio
Elastic Settlement
1. Applications
- Foundation on sand layer subjected to load and unload cycle.
Ex. Oil tank, Silo
- Foundation on organic soil
- Elastic or untrained settlement of clay.
2. Problems
- Calenlation of z, x, y for layered soil
- Estimation of Ei and i
- Interaction between foundation soil stiffness
Ex. Rigid footing v.s. flexible foothing
Elastic Settlement
Relationship
Soil Types
Remarks
Schmertmann
(1970)
Es = 766 N kN / m2
Sand
Webb (1969)
Sand
Clayey sand
Begemann
(1974)
Used in Creece
Trofimenkov
(1984)
Sand
U.S.S.R. practice
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
10
Elastic Settlement
Youngs modulus, Es
Type of Soil
MN/m2
Poissons ration, s
1b/in.2
Loose sand
10.35-24.15
1,500-3,500
0.20-0.40
17.25-27.60
2,500-4,000
0.25-0.40
Dense sand
34.50-55.20
5,000-8,000
0.30-0.45
Silty sand
10.35-17.25
1,500-2,000
0.20-0.40
69.00-172.50
10,000-25,000
0.15-0.35
2.07-5.18
300-750
5.18-10.35
750-1 , 500
10.35-24.15
1,500-3,500
0.20-0.50
Elastic Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
11
Consolidation of
of Clay
Clay
Consolidation
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Consolidation of Clay
Consolidation of Clay
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
12
Consolidation of Clay
1.
2.
1.
2.
3.
4.
(, )
5.
Consolidation of Clay
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
13
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
14
Consolidation of Clay
Soil Sedimentation
Sedimentation and
and
Soil
Self weight
weight Consolidation
Consolidation
Self
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
15
Consolidation of Clay
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
16
Consolidation of Clay
is
varied
and
av
are
varied = f(e)
Second stage, On next flooding season, very soft clay is overlain by next
layer of sediment. Soil at points X is continued to settle as normally
consolidated soil (N.C.)
When
vm vo or
vm
OCR 1
vo
Third stage, If the top layer of soil is eroded by river current or dry out by
dissication, then soil at point x is considered at over consolidated soil
(O.C.)
When
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
17
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
18
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
19
Cc Cv
Cc
0.30 1.30
0.06 1.65
0.07 0.15
0.23 0.27
0.08 0.25
0.04 0.19
0.182
-
Cv
(x10 m2/day)
2 - 40
5.6 11.0
15
-3
References
AIT (1981)
Premchit (1981)
Nguyen (1999)
AIT (1981)
Premchit (1981)
Nguyen (1999)
AIT (1981)
1.
2
3.
4. (Preloading) Sand
drain P.V.D.
5. (Stage
loading)
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
20
Terzaghi (1925) 1 D
(Homogeneous)
2.
(100% Saturation)
3.
4.
5.
6.
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
mv =
av
1+ e
21
log v
e
cc
Vol.
e
av =
H2O
wq v
de
e
=
v
d v
= Coeff of Compressibility
mv =
av
1
de
= Coeff of Compressibility
=
(1 + eo ) d v (1 + eo )
Cc =
de
e
=
d log v log v
SOLID
= Compressibility Index
h 2
h 2
h 2
1 s
e
+ ky 2 + kz 2 =
e + s
x 2
y
z
1 + e t
t
---(1)
For Saturated Soil and vertical flow (1-D), the equation (1) reduced to
kz
h 2
1 e
=
z 2 1 + e t
---(2)
de
,
d v
or =
e
v
dev
,
d v
or
or =
ev
v
When
Results of confined compression test plotted
as void ratio versus stress on natural scale.
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Ev =
v
vo
e
1+ e
then
mv =
av
1+ e
22
e = av v
Substitute
---(3)
kz
---(4)
u
1
= he +
(uss + ue )
r
r
he = elevation head =
f ( z ),
---(5)
he
2 he
=0
= constanst
z
z 2
2 h 1 2ue
=
z 2 r z 2
From (5)
---(6)
Substitute 6 into 4
kz (1 + eo ) 2ue v
= 2 =
r av
z
t
---(7)
cv =
k z (1 + eo )
kz
or
r ao
r mv
When
cv
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
2ue v
=
z 2
t
v = v ( e + ss )
2ue ue v
=
z 2
t
t
---(8)
Then equation (8) can be writen as
---(9)
23
cv
2u u
=
z 2 t
---(10)
Solution form
= F ( z ) G (t )
---(11)
u
G (t )
= F (z )
= F (z ) G(t )
t
t
---(12)
2
2
and u = F ( z ) G (t ) = F ( z ) G (t )
---(13)
cv F ( z ) G (t ) = F ( z ) G(t )
F (z ) 1 G(t )
=
F ( z ) Cv G (t )
---(14)
Eq(14) term z
Eq(14) term t
= -B2
F (z ) = B 2 F (z )
---(15)
A, A2 = Constants.
---(16)
(14)
G(t ) = B 2 Cv G (t )
---(17)
Cv t
---(18)
A3 = Constants.
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
24
Cv t
---(19)
A4 = A1 A3
Cv t
---(20)
A5 = A2 A3
t=0
u = ui
---(1.1)
z=0
u=0
---(2.1)
z = 2H
u=0
---(2.3)
2. Boundary Condition
at any time
where
Double Drainage
Cv t
A4 = 0
Cv t
B=
n
2H
---(21)
(21), A4 = 0 (20)
n =
= An sin
n =1
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Tv =
n 2 2 Tv
n z
e
2H
---(22)
Cv t
= non dimensional time factor
H2
25
ui = An. sin
n =1
nz
2H
---(23)
An =
2H
ui sin
nz
dz
2H
---(24)
(22) (24)
1
u=
n =1 H
2H
ui sin
n 2 2 Tv
nz
nz
dz sin
e
2H
2H
---(25)
2H
u0 sin
u=
n =1
2u
nz
dz = 0 (1 Cos n )
2H
n
---(26)
n 2 2 Tv
2u0
nz
(
1 cos n )sin
e
2H
n
---(27)
(1-cos n) 0 n = 2, 4, 6
(27) n = 2m+1 m = 0, 1, 2 or n = 1, 3, 5
u=
m=0
( 2 m +1) 2 2 Tv
(2m + 1)z e
2u0
(1 cos (2m + 1) ) sin
(2m + 1)
2H
M = (2m + 1)
u=
m=0
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
---(28)
2u0
mz ( m 2 Tv )
sin
e
m
H
---(29)
26
ui u
ui
---(30)
Average % Consolidation
1
H
U av = t
1 Ht
Ht
ui dz u dz
0
Ht 0
1 Ht
ui dz
Ht 0
---(31)
1.0
0.8
Tv = 0.05
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.1
1.5
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.5
0
0
0.2
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
uz
un
27
Relationship between degree of consolidation and time factor for uniform load
applied to the soil
U - Average % Consolidation
20
40
60
80
100
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
T-Time Factor
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
28
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
29
Fig. E27.1-2
Fig. E27.1-1
Z=1
UZ = 0.95
Fig. E27.1-3
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
30
Settlement due
due to
to long
long
Settlement
Construction Time
Time
Construction
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Settlementdue
dueto
tolong
longConstruction
ConstructionTime
Time
Settlement
Loading
Actual
Construction
Loading
qf
tc
Construction Time
t
S 0tc = S in t = i K ti
2
---(1)
ti =
kti =
Time (ti)
S >tc = S in t = ti c
2
---(2)
tc = Construction time
Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Instant Loading.
31
Example 27.5
Given. Soil profile and loading of Fig. E27.11 with the load increased linearly during 1 Yr.
Find Time-Settlement relationship.
Solution. See Fig
Sample computations :
t = 3 mo. From curve for instantaneous
loading, settlement at 0.15 mo is 0.4 ft. Onequarter of the load is in place.
Settlement = 0.4(0.25) = 0.1 ft
z
) (Steady State) 2
) y
/
1 S e
t 1 + e0 b
Saturation raito
void ration
eo
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
32
2. Flownet A,B,C D
3. 20
u = B 3 + A (1 - 3 )
B = 1.0
A = 0.80
.
. Stress-Path A B TSP ESP
Normally Consolidation Clay
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
33
4. A Triaxial CTUC-Test 3
. Effective Confinening pressure
. Stress-path Saturated
Consolidation Shearing 1
. Triaxial Test Normally Consolidation Over
consolidated.
5.
. Self weight consolidation
. Time Factor (Tv)
. Strain Contours
. SHANSEP Theory
. Consolidation Boundary Condition
Consolidation of
of
Consolidation
Two-Layer Soil
Soil
Two-Layer
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
34
Consolidation of
of Two-Layer
Two-Layer Soil
Soil
Consolidation
To estimate the degree of consolidation of two-layer soil, we can pre-analysis
solution (Figure 27.9), or FEM or Approximate method.
- Approximate method
Ex.
On Figure 27.6,
if
k =
1
k
10
T1
= 0.05
10
Cv t k t
=
H 2 rw mv H 2
If H1 = H2 and t1 = t2
T = f(k)
T1 k1
k
= T2 = 2 T1
T2 k 2
k1
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
35
Consolidation
Consolidation
Consolidation
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
36
Consolidation
Cv
P1(%)
Cv ( field )
Cv (lab )
OCR
40-50
3.0-6.0
70
Natamon (1984)
- (. 2+890)
40-50
1.0-2.0
80
Udomrek (1985)
- (. 24)
40-80
1.0-2.0
7-14
(2528)
- (. 30)
50-80
1.0-2.0
10-20
(2528)
- (. 52)
40-70
1.5-2.5
(2528)
Discrepancy between
between Prediction
Prediction
Discrepancy
and Field
Field Observation
Observation
and
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
37
--
Discrepancybetween
between Prediction
Predictionand
andField
FieldObservation
Observation
Discrepancy
Rates of settlement or consolidation are usually different between
laboratory and field from the following reasons.
1. Partial settlement occur during construction period
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
38
Case I
Initial Excess Pore Pressure
U av =
Known A.
Case II
Known B.
U av I A1 U av II A2
A1 A2
1.
2.
Simplifiedn (Assuneed)
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
1.
2.
39
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
40
Consolidation Settlement
Settlement
Consolidation
Calculation
Calculation
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
41
Consolidation Settlement
Settlement Calculation
Calculation
Consolidation
Concepts
1. Based on Terzaghis Consolidation Theory.
2. Assume 1-D, homogeneous soil layer.
3. Low strain settlement eo = const.
4. Linear relationship between e-log p Curve.
5. Saturated soil layer
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
42
7
3
1.0 x 1.0 .
Sta.
Depth (m)
Cv
P'm
Unit
Weight
Cc
Cs
Cr
e0
Mv
cm2 / kg
(cm / s)
From
To
(cm2/s)
(ksc)
(t / m3 )
KD
49.50
50.00
2.62E-04
19.50
2.088
0.1970
0.0684
0.0398
0.6251
1.00E-03
2.63E-10
KD
188.50
189.00
3.46E-04
37.00
2.162
0.1703
0.0345
0.0640
0.4541
9.82E-04
3.39E-10
KE
99.00
99.50
5.72E-05
27.00
2.147
0.1975
0.0389
0.0240
0.6051
1.21E-03
6.92E-11
KE
179.50
180.00
1.67E-04
33.50
2.255
0.1694
0.0451
0.0437
0.3673
7.97E-04
1.33E-10
KE
266.00
266.50
1.15E-04
50.00
2.166
0.2159
0.0586
0.0511
0.4132
7.41E-04
8.49E-11
KE
366.50
367.00
9.66E-05
62.00
2.262
0.1893
0.0413
0.0432
0.3284
5.48E-04
5.30E-11
KE
367.00
367.50
1.41E-04
55.85
2.272
0.1628
0.0413
0.0483
0.3032
5.66E-04
8.00E-11
KE
440.00
440.50
6.08E-04
72.25
2.325
0.1285
0.2779
4.45E-04
2.71E-10
KE
566.50
567.00
8.71E-05
104.00
2.267
0.2225
0.3422
3.82E-04
3.33E-11
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
0.0387
0.0440
43
Cc 0-20
E-Log P' Curve at Depth 0-20 m.
2.20
20-15.1 m.
2.10
21-10.8 m.
2.00
21-14.5 m.
1.90
21-17.4 m.
1.80
22-14.8 m.
1.70
22-17.8 m.
1.60
23-10.8 m.
1.50
1.40
23-16 m.
1.30
23-18.5 m.
1.20
24-19.7 m.
1.10
1.00
0.90
0.80
0.70
0.60
0.50
0.40
1
10
Pressure (t/m2)
100
1000
---(1)
e
1 +e 0
P + P
e = co . log o
Po
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
S=
P + P
H
co . log o
1 + e0
Po
---(2)
---(3)
44
when
Po Pm Then
use
Equation(3)
Po < Pm Then
S = S oc + S NC
---(4)
S=
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
Po Po P
P P
H
C s log o
He0
Po
---(5)
45
Steps for
for
Steps
Calculation
Calculation
of
of
Consolidati
Consolidati
on
on
Settlement
Settlement
Dr.Warakorn Mairaing
46