Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 Introduction
Performance appraisal, also known as employee appraisal, is a
method by which the job performance of an employee is evaluated
(generally in terms of quality, quantity, cost and time).
Performance appraisal is a part of career development and is linked
to other human resources functions.
1
Performance evaluation unlike job evaluation stresses the
individual in the job rather than the job itself1.
There are as many definitions of performance appraisals as there
are authors. In some sources performance appraisal and
performance evaluation are regarded as synonymous. The
following definitions can be given, performance appraisal;
2
1.3 Parties in Performance appraisal
The employee is obviously the subject being evaluated and the
question arises; who does performance evaluation? According to
Burges (1989:250); the employer’s superior, subordinates, peers,
the employee, other individuals or a combination of these subjects
can do performance evaluation. Groups and assessment centers are
also responsible according to him.
3
1.5 Problems in performance appraisal
Every human resource function has its problems and performance
appraisal is not an exception. Many performance problems can be
avoided by designing performance appraisal systems. An effective
performance appraisal system lets people know what is expected of
them, how well they are meeting those expectations and what they
can do to improve on their weaknesses4.Two major problems can
be noted, subjectivity and political issues.
1.5.1 SUBJECTIVITY
1. Rater characteristics –characteristics of the rater exert a subtle
and often indirect influence on performance appraisals .Younger
and less experienced managers, who may have received low
evaluations themselves tend to rate others strictly than older more
experienced managers do.
2. Leniency- A common and often intentional rating error, occurs
when a manager rates all employees in a group higher than they
deserve, for any of a number of reasons. Reasons are usually
unprofessional, may be; avoiding conflict, giving employees a
morale boost, creating a good record for the group or making one
self feel good.
4
Luis R.Gomez, Mejia-David B.Balkin, Robert L.Cardy (1998): Managing Human Resources; Prentice
Hall.
4
3. Halo effect-As in interviewing, the halo effect occurs in rating
where the rater allows his/her knowledge of an employee’s
performance one dimension to colour the rating of all dimensions.
4. Central tendency- Central tendency is a rating error that occurs
when a manager gives an average rating to all employees, even
when their performance varies. Manager with broad spans of
management and little opportunity to observe behaviour are likely
to play it safe by rating most of their subordinates in the middle of
the scale rather than high or low.
1.5.2 POLITICAL ISSUES
Office politics decides who gets what raise, promotion or
demotion5.Thus performance appraisals will always a political
bearing in organizational politics which determines who go where,
who gets what and how much goes where for example R400 000 is
for T&D this year.
1.6 The link between performance appraisal and other human
resources management functions
1.6.1 Appraisal and Human resources planning
Human resource planning is used to estimate future human
resources management needs by analyzing current job occupation,
turnover, transfers, promotions (as well as the related skill levels)
and retirements (Haasbroek et al 2008:275).Because the managers
5
Don Hellriegel, John W Slocum, Jr (1992): Management 6th Edition; Edison-Wesley Company
5
and supervisors must take decisions concerning promotions,
demotions, transfers and lay-offs. Past performance appraisals
normally help to determine which employee is most deserving of a
promotion or other desirable job changes6.Gomez-Meja et al
(2001:226) as cited in Swanepoel et al (2003:813) writes that,
“performance information can be categorized under two main
headings of administrative and developmental processes”.
Administrative purposes concern the use of performance data as a
basis for personnel decision making, including human resources
planning, for example compiling skills inventories, obtaining
information regarding positions to be created, and developing
succession plans7. Thus through performance evaluation
organizations can use that feedback whether it is positive or
undesirable to plan for future personnel needs. For example which
employees will need training or which skills is the organization
lacking so as to determine if external recruitment is a solution.
6
Performance evaluation can be used to increase and to promote an
individual as well as to improve employee performance. An
effective performance evaluation will also improve employee
motivation. (Burgess-1989:250).Thus when conducting
performance appraisal for promotion purposes subjectivity
(leniency, halo error, central tendency) should be avoided so that
any outcome of the appraisals will be perceived as fair by all
employees who will be expecting promotion.
8
Edward E.Lawler,111(1981):Pay &Organization development,Pge-129
7
Employee performance appraisals are especially appropriate for
identifying individual training and educational needs. After all,an
appraisal is intended to determine how well an individual is
performing his or her job. Deficiencies stemming from the lack of
individual knowledge or skill are appropriately used to identify
traditional training needs; proficiencies are traditionally used to
plan employee educational activities leading to promotion or other
future career moves for individuals9.Carell et al (2001:265) writes
that the results of appraisals influence decisions about the training
and development (T&D) of employees. To him below average
evaluations may signal areas of employee behaviour that may be
strengthened through on- and away- from-the-job training. Of
course, it is arguable that not all performance deficiencies may be
overcome by T & D.lt is therefore the role of managers and
supervisors to distinguish problems resulting from the lack of a
critical skill or ability from those caused by low morale or some
form of job dissatisfaction.
8
should only be taken as the last resort after all other efforts have
failed because they are costly to an organization as a severance
package has to be prepared for each dismissed employee. The
appraisal can establish that there is a serious performance gap
between the desired and current performance. Corrective measures
to make up for the performance gap should be instituted and this
may include some form of training (on or off-the-job).lf
performance has failed to match the required job performances,
another job less challenging should be given to the employee after
which failure to execute may call for the dismissal of an employee.
Pge-275
9
employees will help to determine the effectiveness of our
recruitment, selection and placement processes. However negative
feedback from the appraisals should not only be attributed to
recruitment, selection and placement processes as there are great
chances that other factors such as poor motivation and vague job
tasks may also lead to unsatisfactory results.
10
Question 2
2.1 Introduction
11
Unfair dismissal of an employee constitutes unfair labour
practices. This contrasts with the provision section 23 of the
Constitution of Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996
which provides that, “everyone has a right to fair labour
practices”11.
11
section 23 of the Constitution of Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996
12
‘incapacity’ refers to the employees’ inability to perform their work
adequately since it is the opposite of capacity.
Incapacity includes incapacity due to ill-health and poor work
performance12.
2.3 Considerations
lf an employee is not capable of doing the work because he lacks
skills, knowledge or ability and, therefore does not meet the
required standards, he can be dismissed for poor work
performance.
12
JV du Plessis, MA Fouche, MN Van Wyk: A practical guide to labour law 5th Edition; Butterworths,
Durban,pge
13
2.3.2 Dismissal for incapacity after expiry of probation period.
The employee may be dismissed for incapacity after a hearing if
shown to be incapable of performing the work for which he was
employed to the standards required. It is not reasonable to expect
of an employer to return the services of an employee who process
incapable of performing the job of which he/she was hired
principles of logic and equity dictate that the employer attempts to
final alternatives to dismissal by and instance offering an often less
demanding post in which she is capable of performing if a situation
such post be available, even if this would mean a demotion from
her incumbent post. (www.roylaw.co.za).
14
(i) the employee was aware could be reasonably be expected to
be aware of required
standard;
(ii) the employee was given a fair opportunity to meet the
required performance
standard; and
(iii) dismissal was an appropriate sanction not meeting the
required performance
standard13
13
Section 9 of the Code of Good practice
15
accommodate disability, or, where this is not possible; the
extent to which employee’s
duties might be adapted; and
(iii) the availability of any suitable alternative work14
14
11 of the Code of Good Practice
16
employee, James White who was a Numsa member purportedly on
the basis of incapacity. Lear demoted White from quality inspector
to line feeder ‘operator’ after an enquiry found him guilty of poor
work performance after he had approved a fault headrest. Prior to
demotion, the employer became aware that he was an epileptic.
17
In conclusion, the onus lies with the employee to prove that in fact
he was dismissed and was an employee at the time of dismissal
while the employer has the obligation to attest that the employee
was fairly dismissed. Probationary employees are treated less
strictly than senior employees. Besides probationary workers,
employees can be dismissed for incapacity on poor work
performance and based on ill-health. Dismissals need to follow a
fair procedure thus substantive and procedural fairness otherwise
the employer may end up entangled in costly legal battles which
are not easy to win. Also organizations need to observe all the
legislations dealing with dismissal to ensure uniform standards.
18