Affidavit was part of the federal lawsuit filed by a former Austin Service Center employee Rudolfo Lizano. He sued IRS because of his retaliation.
Notice with all the bad behavior of IRS MGT in Austin, TX there are no charges from US Attorney's office or TIGTA. Enable much?
Affidavit was part of the federal lawsuit filed by a former Austin Service Center employee Rudolfo Lizano. He sued IRS because of his retaliation.
Notice with all the bad behavior of IRS MGT in Austin, TX there are no charges from US Attorney's office or TIGTA. Enable much?
Affidavit was part of the federal lawsuit filed by a former Austin Service Center employee Rudolfo Lizano. He sued IRS because of his retaliation.
Notice with all the bad behavior of IRS MGT in Austin, TX there are no charges from US Attorney's office or TIGTA. Enable much?
AFFIDAVIT STATE OF TEXAS TRAVIS COUNTY
I, Guadalupe Ramos, am a former, Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) Revenue Agent, GS-12. = worked in the Examination
Division in the District Office in Austin Texas when I
retired. I held this position since 1979 until my
retirement in January 2001.07 my enployee evaluation; I was
rated above average 4 plus iin a maximim scale of 5) from
1974 until my retirement in 2001. > also trained other IRS
employees, including Susan S@xgg@@B on =RS audit
classification procedures.
I have personal knowledge of IRS menagement's policy and
custom of discriminating, harassing and retaliating against
employees, such as Mr. Rodolfo -izzano, who legally engage
in whistle-blowing, EEO and Union activities. IRS
management labels these employees 25 “troublemakers” and
goes after them with a vengeance until they succeed in
firing the employee on some pre'ex: or the employee is no
longer able to endure the dis.c/visation, harassment
and retaliation and resigns :a disgust. I have gained this
knowledge from my own zun-ins w:ch IRS management for my
whistle-blowing, EEC and Un:en activities, as well as from
Personally helping many empiovaes over many years on the
same activities.
Based on my 20 years of exoar‘enze as a Revenue Agent, with
about most of them in the classificatior/selection of
returns for examination, I bel:eve that the audits on Mr.
Lizcano's income tax returns for the 1999 and 2000 tax
years were most likely initiavea ix retaliation for
Mr. Lizcano's whistle-blowing and EC activities rather
than tax compliance.
I make this statement based on the foliowing undisputed
facts I have personal knowledge of gained from my IRS
experience and my meetings and conversations with Mr.
Lizcano:
1. pre score 4ceoyderng te mx Lizerny, —
Mr. Lizcano was informed by Tax compliance Cfficer Edda A.
Fahlund that the DIF score y:. his 2999 income tax return
was "about 700". I have personally seen Mr, Lizcano's
1999 income tax return, cons:
ing of a Form 1040 and a
e return corld not have
cre. Even 2 the DIF score
RS has a second level of
single Schedule C. His siap
generated such a high DIF 5:
would have been about 700,Deponent’s signature
Sworn and subscribed before me on the 21th day of February
2004, to certify which witness my rand and seal of office.
lic in and for the State of Texas