Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Professor: Office: Office Hours: Email: Teresa Cook 110G McMicken Tuesday & Thursday 8:30 9:30 a.m. and by appointment teresa.f.cook@uc.edu
Required Textbook
Smith, Herb J. and Kim Haimes-Korn. Portfolios for Technical and Professional Communicators. Pearson. 2007. ISBN-13: 978-0-13-170458-9 * Additional required reading will be made available through our Blackboard course page.
Course Description
This course focuses on answering your likely questions about what can you do with an English degree? Well also aim to create a working definition of rhetoric and, through theory and practice, draw connections between what were learning, and what we do as writers.
Learning Outcomes
understand rhetoric as a discipline (theories and practices) understand professional writing as a discipline (theories and practices) explain the relationship between rhetoric and professional writing define major concepts that are the foundation of both rhetoric and professional writing create documents and projects that apply principles of rhetoric and professional writing have a framework for subsequent classes in the RPW track And if you're not in the track, then this course will expose you to some principles and practices you can use anytime you're asked to write or communicate something. This course is required for RPW majors under semesters, and it can also be used as a general English elective.
1 of 4
Attendance
Due to in-class lectures, activities, and critiques, attendance is critical for success. You are encouraged to attend EVERY class. Attendance also includes being on time. Tardiness (more than five minutes late) will result in the loss of participation points. Any absence will result in the loss of any participation points that day (quiz, critique, etc.). Remember, it is your responsibility to contact me as soon as possible should you have to miss class to make arrangements for anything due that day. After four absences, you will be asked to drop the course.
Academic Misconduct
Please review the Universitys description of Academic Misconduct (http://www.uc.edu/conduct/Academic_Integrity.html). If any student is caught plagiarizing on any assignment at any stage (homework, draft, peer review, final), s/he will receive an F for the assignment and, possibly, the course. If in doubt, ASK ME!
Revisions
Students who complete an assignment in full and on time, but who struggle with the assignment, receiving a C- or below (72 or lower), may make one revision. The student must meet with me to discuss the revision and must turn in the original graded version and the revised version together, within one week of receiving the original graded version. Possible revision of up to one full letter grade is possible. Try for that A the first time around you will not be able to revise up to an A.
2 of 4
Assignments
Assignment 1: What is Rhetoric (Ongoing) Assignment 2: Definition Handout Assignment 3: Midterm Exam Assignment 4: Document Analysis Assignment 5: InfoGraphic Assignment 6: e-Portfolio Participation (Attendance, Discussion, Critiques)
Grade Distribution
50 points 100 points 200 points 150 points 150 points 250 points 100 points
3 of 4
Below 60 (F): A supervisor would start looking for someone to replace you. In particular, the work fails to address the tasks of the assignment, is so underdeveloped as to demonstrate incompetence, and is mechanically and grammatically incomprehensible.
Class Critiques
For most assignments, two students will post their drafted assignment to Blackboard Discussion Board for the entire class to access, typically by Monday at 5pm of the week of review (follow the syllabus; some class critiques are on different days). The entire class will print and critique each of the samples, and then in-class, the student volunteer(s) will open the draft, and lead the class in a critique of the work. ALL students must participate at least once in review (although students may volunteer more than once). Please print and mark-up each draft, to be given to the student after his/her class critique. Volunteers still have to review the other class critiques for that week.
4 of 4