Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 0 0 92
Vol . 42
No . 2
Feb .
2009
1 1,2
1 1
1. 7100382. 710072
100mm SHPB
20~100 s- 1
SHPB
139.05~240.15 s 65%
24%
100 mm SHPB
O347 TU528.572
BC07002
2007-10-12
Chung 6,7
42
25
100 mm
Split Hopkinson pressure bar, SHPB
SHPB
S HP B
100 mm SHPB
1.1
2
Fig. 2 Comparison between original and shaped
incident pulse
100 mm SHPB 1
3
Fig. 3 Typical waveforms from pulse shaped
experiments with H62 brass pulse shapers
(a)
Fig. 1
(b) --
1 100 mm SHPB
Apparatus of 100-mm-diameter SHPB
8,9
H62
1 mm 20 mm
22 mm 25 mm 27 mm 30 mm
1~1.6 2
3
1.2
SHPB 4
4 SHPB
s=ls /cscs
Fig. 4 Stress wave propagation in SHPB tests on
concrete specimen (s=ls /cswhere cs represents wave
velocity in specimen)
s s s
st= Eitrt1+tt2A
2As
t
-
t
r
1- tt 2c
st= i
ls
st=
d
0
E c A As
ls i
r t 1 2
10
2009
26
2.3
CFRC SHPB
100mm SHPB
S HP B
50 mm
P.O 42.5R
SHPB
4 5 CFRC
20~100 s -1 CFRC
2.8
2.1
FDN
CFRC fc,d
1 2
s 7 I
C50
I=fc,d /fc,s
1
Table 1 Physical and mechanical properties of
carbon fiber
mm
3
kg/m
GPa
1760
200
MPa
%
>3000
1.5
2
Table 2 Mix proportions of carbon fiber reinforced concrete
(kg/m3)
300
2.2
100
FDN
VCF
0.1%
0.2% 0.3%
1.76
3.52
5.28
s
=-1.212+1.477 lg s
IV
CF
=0
IV
CF
=0.1%
IV
CF =0.2%
IV
CF
=-0.904+1.281 lg s
3
=-0.988+1.388 lg s
=0.3%
=-0.244+1.012 lg s
I V CF CFRC
CFRC
2
28 d
3
CFRC
9.7%~12.1%
CFRC
CFRC
Table 3
SEA CFRC
CFRC
SEA= AEc
Asls
t - t+ - t+ dt
0
T CFRC
1 9
7 9
3
Quasi-static mechanical properties of carbon
fiber reinforced concrete
VCF%
fc,sMPa
fMPa
fMPa
st
61.6
7.8
4.73
0.1
63.2
8.2
4.27
12
0.2
60.7
7.5
4.16
Bracc
0.3
57.7
7.8
4.18
13
Janach
14
42
Table 4
VCF%
0.1
0.2
0.3
4 SHPB
Summary of SHPB tests on carbon fiber reinforced concrete specimens
ss-1
29.2
fc,dMPa
63.8
-3
10
p
5.77
39.9
65.9
51.0
78.1
73.4
93.1
max10-3
9.39
I
1.04
SEAJ/cm3
0.14
6.59
17.89
1.07
0.18
7.43
21.29
1.27
0.25
7.42
30.63
1.51
0.33
7.97
36.06
1.75
0.34
11.13
1.09
0.14
90.6
107.8
31.3
68.6
38.6
69.3
6.11
8.31
1.10
0.10
53.9
79.2
6.12
20.56
1.25
0.15
5.88
64.0
85.0
7.90
21.96
1.34
0.20
74.3
93.3
9.68
25.61
1.48
0.43
85.3
102.0
8.24
30.38
1.61
0.36
94.4
105.9
9.37
31.44
1.68
0.40
34.8
68.5
6.79
11.90
1.13
0.14
40.2
74.6
6.86
12.86
1.23
0.17
53.7
84.3
7.49
13.14
1.39
0.29
60.5
95.6
7.57
19.64
1.57
0.19
69.4
97.0
7.70
22.48
1.60
0.26
82.8
100.0
7.92
31.15
1.65
0.37
86.7
100.7
8.13
32.11
1.66
0.31
35.8
71.4
6.59
8.33
1.24
0.12
41.1
82.8
6.11
15.60
1.44
0.17
48.2
87.3
7.19
15.44
1.51
0.31
59.9
91.7
7.88
21.40
1.59
0.25
75.2
93.0
9.62
26.95
1.61
0.40
80.0
98.3
9.99
25.47
1.70
0.38
96.0
100.3
9.80
32.65
1.74
0.40
(a)VCF=0
(c)VCF=0.2%
Fig. 5
27
(b)VCF=0.1%
(d)VCF=0.3%
5 -
Stress-strain curves of concrete specimens reinforced with different volumetric fractions of carbon fiber
28
2009
(a)VCF=0
(b)VCF=0.1%
(c)VCF=0.2%
(d)VCF=0.3%
Fig. 6
6
Failure forms of carbon fiber reinforced concrete specimens
7
Fig. 7 Dynamic compressive strength vs. average strain
rate for carbon fiber reinforced concrete specimens with
line-fitting to 0, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% CFRC specimens
8
Fig. 8 Semi-logarithmic plot of dynamic strength increase
factor vs. average strain rate for carbon fiber reinforced
concrete specimens with line-fitting to 0, 0.1%, 0.2% and
0.3% CFRC specimens
SHPB
0.1% 0.2% 0.3% CFRC
9
Fig. 9 Specific energy absorption vs. average strain rate for
carbon fiber reinforced concrete specimens with line-fitting
to 0, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.3% CFRC specimens
10
CFRC
42
29
CFRC
32.3% 100 s -1
16.5%
10
S HP B
20~100 s
-1
0.3% CFRC 20 s
-1
(a)
Fig. 10
(b)
10
Comparison of dynamic properties between plain concrete and concrete reinforced with different volumetric
fractions of carbon fiber
(a)
11
Fig. 11 Strain rate histories of concrete reinforced with different volumetric fractions of carbon fiber
2009
30
139.05~240.15 s
52%~81% 65%
11%~43% 24%
.
202
283-286 (Liu
J. 2002
Lijuan, Xu Lianghua, Wang Guanglin. Study of application
11 SHPB
286in Chinese
11
2 .
139.05~240.15 s
52%~81% 65%
11%~43% 24%
SHPB
205
85-88Li Kezhi,
J. 2006
carbon fiber reinforced cement composites J. Materials
Report, 2006, 205: 85-88in Chinese
3 .
J. 2003
63
253-256Wang Chengqi,
Wu Keru. Study on the mechanical properties of carbon
fiber and steel fiber concrete J. Journal of Building
Materials, 2003, 63: 253-256in Chinese
4 .
J. 200412
100 mm SHPB
1
41 -48 Zhou Mei, Liu Haiqin, Cao Qikun, et al.
CFRC SHPB
1 CFRC
9.7%~12.1%
2 CFRC
3
20~100 s-1
0.3% CFRC 20 s -1
32.3% 100 s -1
16.5%
4 CFRC SHPB
Chinese
5 .
J. :2006
345
739 -744 Ke Kaizhan, Zhou Ruizhong. Compressive
mechanics properties of carbon fiber RPC J. Journal of
Fuzhou University:Natural Science, 2006, 345: 739-744
in Chinese
6 Chung D D L. Carbon fiber reinforced concreteR//
Strategic Highway Research Program, National Research
Council, Washington, DC, 1992
7 Shi Z Q, Chung D D L. Carbon fiber-reinforced concrete
for traffic monitoring and weighing in motion J. Cement
and Concrete Research, 1999, 29: 435-439
8 Frew D J, Forrestal M J, Chen W. Pulse shaping techniques
for testing brittle materials with a split Hopkinson pressure
barJ. Experimental Mechanics, 2002, 421: 93-106
( 38 )
2009
38
D. : , 2007
23 Robotnov Y N. Creep rupture C// Applied Mechanics,
2005, 38 9
1427 Li Jie,Wu Jianying.
Elastoplastic damage constitutive model for concrete
,1996
26 , , .
6-14in Chinese
1957 -
1966-
( 30 )
9
.
J. 200418 3
231-236Zhao
Xijin, Lu Fangyun, Wang Wu, et al. The experimental and
12 .
J. 2002
171
23-27Wang D R, Hu S
3: 231-236in Chinese
concrete
under
impact.
Journal
of
Experimental
771: 263-267
11 .
M. 2005Yu Tongxi,
1982-
1963-
(1980-)
1978-