Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
211002 211003 211004 211005 211006 211008 211009 211010 211011 211012 211013 211015 211016 211020 211021 211022
MR. SATCHIT HARSHA BHOGLE MR. SHYAM GOPAL BALAKRISHNAN MS. AMBIKA VADEHRA MS. KRITIKA VOHRA MR. GAVISH MALHOTRA MR. YASH VIJAYVARGIYA MR. SANCHIT GARG MS. SUMAN PRABHU MR. ARTHAD UTKRANT KURLEKAR MS. PARIKA SINGH MR. OM AGARWAL MS. DIKSHA D SANYAL MS. RISHIKA RANGARAJAN MR. ADITHYA RAMCHANDRAN IYER MR. SHOBHIT SINGH MS. NIVEDITA S UDUPA
Meaning of Interpretation and Construction Dynamic Theory (with case laws) Textualism Concept of Literal Rule Case Laws on Literal Rule Implication of Literal Rule Concept of Golden Rule, with background
15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov
Case Laws on Golden Rule Background of mischief rule, meaning of mischief Haydon's Case Smith v Hughes Background and reasons for Purposive Construction Difference between Mischief Rule and Liberal Construction Interpretation of Welfare Statutes
15th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov
17
211023
Statute must be read as a whole 19th Nov (With Cases) "Judge's responsibility is to interpret, 19th Nov not make laws"-Comment (With Cases) Implication of Purposive Rule (With 19th Nov Cases)
18
211024
Date:______________
Signature of evaluator:____________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
211026 211027 211029 211030 211031 211032 211033 211035 211036 211038 211039 211040 211041 211042 211043 211044 211046 211048 211049
MR. VIKRAM LAKSHMAN MR. AISHWARYA GIRIDHAR MR. HEMANTH R RAO MR. PRASHANTH K MUKUNDAN MS. TULIKA PAUL MR. AHAAN MOHAN MS. RISHIKA MAYUR LEKHADIA MS. POORVI SHAH MS. NIKITA KAPOOR MS. NUPUR MILIND PANDIT MR. SIDDHARTHA SRIVASTAVA MR. SAURABH KUMAR MR. VIKAS NARAIN MR. PRANJAL SINGH MS. ANKITA MANDAL MS. DISHARI SARKAR MR. ABHISHEK PRAKASH MS. ROMILA MANDAL MS. R SAHANA
SirSilk Ltd v Government of Andhra 21st Nov Pradesh Interpretation of Mandatory Provisions Interpretation of Directory Provisions Ejusdem Generis Noscitur a sociis Difference between Ejusdem Generis and Noscitur a sociis Preamble Heading Marginal Note Definition Proviso Explanation Illustrations Punctuation Schedule Dictionary 21st Nov 21st Nov 21st Nov 21st Nov 21st Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 25th Nov Signature of evaluator:____________
Date:______________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
211051 211052 211055 211056 211059 211060 211062 211064 211066 211067 211068 211069 211070 211071 211072 211073 211074 211075 211076
MS. RAKSHITA N MR. SAROJ KUMAR MR. ANUBHAV SINGH MS. MAHPARA JAVED RANA MR. TITUS JAMES MS. DEEPTHI BAVIRISETTY MR. RATNAVEL PANDIAN S MR. VISHNU TALLAPRAGADA MR. SIDHANT CHANDALIA MR. SIDHARTH DEB MR. PRATEEK GUPTA MS. ISHA NARAIN MR. SIDDHARTH NARSIPUR MS. RACHANA RAUTRAY MS. GAYATRI LOOMBA MS. S KAAVYA MR. ZUBIN DASH MR. AVINANDAN KUNDU MR. PRASHANT SREENIVASAN
Foreign Diction Parliamentary History Historical facts and surrounding circumstances Later social, economic and political development and scientific investigation Reference to textbooks Statute in pari material Constitutional debates Use of codifying and consolidating statutes Presumption (1-5) Presumption (6-10) Penal Statute Fiscal Statute Repealed laws under General Clauses Act Expiry of Statutes Statute affecting Jurisdiction of Court Presumption (11-15) Presumption (16-19)
25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov
Doctrine of Pith and Substance(With 28th Nov Cases) Doctrine of Occupied Field(With Cases) 28th Nov
Date:______________
Signature of evaluator:____________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75
211077 211078 211080 211081 211084 211085 211086 211087 211089 211090 211091 211092 211093 211094 211095 211096 211097 211098 211099
MS. ANUSHKA SHETTY MR. BHIMAVARAPU MOULI ARAVIND MS. NARMADA SINGH RANA MR. KARTHIK JP MR. JIGME NORBU BHUTIA MR. SAURABH MISHRA MS. RAKTIMA ROY MS. MANISHA SHARMA MS. SADHVI SOOD MR. AMBUJ GUPTA MR. SIDHARTH KAUSHIK MS. SANDRA SUSAN MATHEW MS. MANSI PREMAL JHAVERI MS. STUTI BHATNAGAR MR. RAGHUNATH SESHADRI MS. ANANYA KULKARNI MR. ASHUTOSH PRIYADARSHI SHUKLA MS. NAMRATA MUKHERJEE MS. C AKHILESHWARI REDDY
B.Shah v. Presiding Officer Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab Meaning of Interpretation and Construction Dynamic Theory (with case laws) Textualism Concept of Literal Rule Case Laws on Literal Rule Implication of Literal Rule Concept of Golden Rule, with background Case Laws on Golden Rule Background of mischief rule, meaning of mischief Haydon's Case Smith v Hughes Background and reasons for Purposive Construction Difference between Mischief Rule and Liberal Construction Interpretation of Welfare Statutes
15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 15th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov 19th Nov
Statute must be read as a whole (With Cases) "Judge's responsibility is to interpret, 19th Nov not make laws"-Comment (With Cases) 19th Nov
Date:______________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94
211100 211101 211102 211103 211104 211105 211106 211107 211108 211109 211110 211111 211112 211114 211115 211116 211117 211118 211120
MS. SANIKA SUNIL GOKHALE MR. CHITWAN DEEP SINGH MS. ANAMIKA GODE MR. UTKARSH SONI MR. ANKIT CHAVAN MR. VARTUL MS. ARITRI ROY CHOWDHURY MR. PUNEET RATHSHARMA MS. ASMITA ROY MR. ABIN FRANCIS MS. SHREYASHI RAY MR. AMAN GUPTA MS. APOORVA SUNDAR MR. UDIT MISRA MS. ASHI GUPTA MS. ISHANI DASH MS. NEETI SUNIL BHATT MS. MEENAKSHI RAMESH KURPAD MR. SHIVAM BHARDWAJ
SirSilk Ltd v Government of Andhra Pradesh 21st Nov Interpretation of Mandatory Provisions 21st Nov
Interpretation of Directory Provisions 21st Nov Ejusdem Generis Noscitur a sociis Difference between Ejusdem Generis and Noscitur a sociis Preamble Heading Marginal Note Definition Proviso Explanation Illustrations Punctuation Schedule 21st Nov 21st Nov 21st Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov 22nd Nov Signature of evaluator:____________
Date:______________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113
211121 211122 211123 211124 211125 211127 211128 211129 211130 211132 211134 211135 211136 211137 211047 210072 210083 210088 210092
MR. ANIRUDH VOHRA MR. KABIR KESSAR MANCHANDA MS. SOHINI CHATTERJEE MR. SREYAN CHATTERJEE MS. ULKA BHATTACHARYYA MR. ASHISH DAHARIYA MR. ASHISH SINGH MR. SHASHANK KUMAR MS. SOUMALYA SAHA MR. KABIR VERMA MR. ADITYA SHIT MS. ANNAPURNA SHAW MS. TARUNYA SHANKAR MR. ISHAN SHIVAKUMAR MR. ABHAY NANDA Mr. Somak Mukherjee Mr. Tsewang Phuntsog Yogma MR. ADVAIT MALVIYA Mr. Devaang Agarwalla
Dictionary Foreign Diction Parliamentary History Historical facts and surrounding circumstances Later social, economic and political development and scientific investigation Reference to textbooks Statute in pari material Constitutional debates Use of codifying and consolidating statutes Presumption (1-5) Presumption (6-10) Penal Statute Fiscal Statute Repealed laws under General Clauses Act Expiry of Statutes Statute affecting Jurisdiction of Court Presumption (11-15) Presumption (16-19)
25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 25th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov 26th Nov
Date:______________
Semester : 5th
I.D. NO.
Name of Student
Presentation Topic
Date
Ms. Saheli Das Mr. Krishanu Roy Ms. Divya Sampath Mr. Nikhil Sawlani Mr. Naman Nanda Mr. Haribaksh Thakur Ms. Sweta Gope Ms. Tejeswini G.S.
Doctrine of Occupied Field(With Cases) B.Shah v. Presiding Officer Rattan Lal v. State of Punjab Doctrine of Stare Decisis
Bengal Immunity Company v. State of Bihar 28th Nov Doctrine Need for Delegated Legislation 28th Nov 28th Nov
Date:______________
Signature of evaluator:____________