Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DAY 09
UNIT 2
DERIVATIONS IN
SENTENTIAL LOGIC
2
Basic Idea
We start with a few argument forms, which we presume are valid, and we use these to demonstrate that other argument forms are valid. We demonstrate that a given argument form is valid by deriving (deducing) its conclusion from its premises using a few fundamental modes of reasoning.
3
Example 1 (continued)
P
MP
; PQ
; QR
; RS
/S
Q
MP
R
MP
Example 2 (continued)
S
MT
; RS
; QR
; PQ
/ P
R
MT
Q
MT
S RS R T PT P Q Q
8
we can employ a combination of MP and MT to derive the conclusion from the premises.
Example 3 (continued)
S ; RS ; R T ; P T ; P Q /Q
MT
R
MP
T
MT
P
MP
Q
9
Pr Pr Pr Pr
DD
Example 2
S ; RS ; QR ; PQ ; / P
S RS QR PQ : P R Q P
Example 3
S ; RS ; RT ; PT ; PQ / Q
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) S RS R T PT P Q : Q R T P Q Pr Pr Pr Pr Pr DD 1,2, 3,7, 4,8, 5,9,
MT MP MT MP
14
Modus Tollendo Ponens (1)
Modus Tollendo Ponens (2)
15
Example 4
S ; RS ; RT ; PT ; PQ / Q
1. write all premises
(1) S
(2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) RS R T P T P Q : Q R T P Q
Pr
Pr Pr Pr Pr DD 1,2, 3,7, 4,8, 5,9,
MT MTP1 MTP2 MP
16
18
BUT
NOT an instance of MT
19
YES
these particular ten pennies are 1943 copper actually, in a very important sense, are worth (to collectors) they pennies, are not and the same in value!
$2,000,000
20
Examples of MTP(1)
(P&Q) (RS) (P&Q) RS P Q P Q
21
Examples of MTP(2)
(P&Q) (RS) (RS) P&Q P Q Q P
22