Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kinard 1
5/5
4/5
6/29
13/29
23/29
2/29
23/29
3/29
11/29
0/29
0/5
0/5
0/29
0/29
3/29
2/29
0/29
1/29
0/29
1/29
In the analysis of student learning for the whole group, the chart indicates that in each of the five lessons taught, a majority of the students met the learning goal for that particular lesson with the exception of math. The fifth lesson showed the highest success ratio out of the five lessons taught. At the end of this ELA lesson, 100% of the students present met the lesson objective. Most of the students had prior experience with this concept before I taught the lesson and as part of the lesson, we collectively practiced what the student would be doing independently during the post assessment activity. The lesson with the least amount of students to meet the lesson goal was the math lesson. The reason for this is that the lesson was performed was with the lowest guided math small group. The academic abilities of these students are way below grade level. The students who most often did not meet the learning goals of the lessons are the students that are below level in math and reading.
Kinard 2
Students
ELA Sequencing During Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Absent Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Participated Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Post Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y
Anna Kate Benjamin Caelan Charlie Chloe Daisy Dallas Deiovion Demya Desarae EJ Franklin Ivy JaSerie Javeon Jacob Jalen Jared Kaleb Lake Lawrence Maddison Mariah Nicole Sam Sophia Tekyjah Traveion Trey
N N
N N
N/A
Participated N/A N/A N/A Participated N/A N/A N/A Participated N/A N/A N/A N/A Participated N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Kinard 3
II. Individuals
After observing and analyzing the low, middle, and high performing students, it is obvious that all of these students are very different learners. Each of these students performs at different ability levels which directly affects my teaching strategies. The variety of learning styles and ability levels in the class requires accommodations and adjustments to be made. Planning instruction to benefit the high to the low students benefits all students because they fall somewhere in between. Charlie, my high achieving student, is an exceptional student. He is enthusiastic about school and he loves to learn. Attendance wise, he is rarely absent or late. Charlie performs at an above average level across the curriculum. He reads at a second-grade reading level which benefits him in all subject areas. Charlie does well during lessons. He is well behaved, attentive, and actively participates in discussions and lesson activities. Along with working proficiently, Charlie also works quickly. During instruction, I try to keep him engaged in learning through higher-order thinking questions and additional learning activities. Jacob, my middle achieving student, is where he should be academically as a first year kindergartener. He enjoys the learning and the socialization of school. He is bright and thinks about things in a unique way. One can never be sure what will come out of his mouth or how he will take the information given to him. Demya, my low achieving student, does not perform well at school. She is often absent or comes late to school. She has severe behavior problems and is often sent out of the classroom for these behavioral issues. If she is in class, she is always sitting at her isolated desk because she is not able to interact with the other students properly. She lacks understand and comprehension of even the most basic information. It is difficult for her to stay still and pay attention especially as the school day progresses. I have witness some academic progression during my time in the classroom with Demya.
Kinard 4
Kinard 5
Kinard 6
Kinard 7
Kinard 8