You are on page 1of 1

BLD202 Assessment Rubric

Task HD (High Distinction) 90% 100% 80% - 89% DN (Distinction) 70% - 79% CR (Credit) 60% - 69% PP (Pass) 50% - 59% NN (Fail) 0% - 49%

Workshop Presentations Marks = 20

Highly skilful discussion of all theoretical concepts with excellent examples used. Presentation very adaptive to the audience with excellent choice of medium.

Skilful discussion of all theoretical concepts with excellent examples used. Presentation very adaptive to the audience with good choice of medium.

Sound discussion of all theoretical concepts with strong examples used. Presentation quite adaptive to the audience with good choice of medium.

Good discussion of most theoretical concepts with good examples used. Presentation quite adaptive to the audience with good choice of medium.

Reasonable discussion of some the theoretical concepts, but too few examples used. Presentation needs to be more adaptive and engaging.

Limited discussion of the theoretical concepts, too few examples used. Presentation needs to be more adaptive and engaging.

Pre-Test Grade based on score out of 20 multiple-choice questions. Marks = 20 Workshop Game Marks = 20 Individual grading will be determined by rankings within each game. The top 20% will receive 85%, the next 20% will receive 75%, the next 20% will receive 65%, the next 20% will receive 55% and the bottom 20% will receive 45%. The top ranked team (or teams if there is a tie) will receive a bonus of 15% (so 100%). The game will be played four times, and each students final grade will equal the average of their four games.
P R E S 1 P R E S

Value Creation Challenge Marks = 40

2 S T R A T E G Y P L S

Comprehensive overview of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used. Comprehensive evaluation and selfassessment of all nominated key performance indicators. Comprehensive effort made to create and capture value, and to react immediately to feedback. Comprehensive reflective selfassessment of all nominated key learning indicators.

Excellent overview of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used. Excellent evaluation and self-assessment of all nominated key performance indicators.

Sound discussion of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used.

Good discussion of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used.

Limited discussion of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used.

Poor discussion of the anticipated value creation, target audience and forms of social media to be used.

Sound evaluation and self-assessment of all nominated key performance indicators.

Good evaluation and self-assessment of all or most nominated key performance indicators.

Limited evaluation and self-assessment of the nominated key performance indicators.

Poor evaluation and self-assessment of the nominated key performance indicators.

Excellent effort made to create and capture value, and to react immediately to feedback.

Sound effort made to create and capture value, and to react adequately to feedback.

Good effort made to create and capture value, and to react adequately to feedback.

Limited effort made to create and capture value, and to react adequately to feedback.

Poor effort made to create and capture value, and to react adequately to feedback.

Excellent reflective selfassessment of all nominated key learning indicators.

Sound reflective selfassessment of most nominated key learning indicators.

Good reflective selfassessment of nominated key learning indicators.

Limited reflective selfassessment of nominated key learning indicators.

Poor reflective selfassessment of nominated key learning indicators.

You might also like