You are on page 1of 3

Lesson 2: The Trial Lesson: You be the judge Objective: Use information learned in the unit to examine stereotyping

and peer pressure Content Standards Reading - RL.7.6 Analyze how an author develops and contrasts the points of view of different characters or narrators in text Speaking and Listening - SL.7.1 Engage effectively in range of collaborative discussions (oneto-one, in groups, and teacher-led) with diverse partners on grade 7 topics, texts, and issues, building on others ideas and expressing own clearly Technology Standards 1. Creativity and Innovation -b. create original works as a means of personal or group expression 2. Communication and Collaboration -a. Interact, collaborate, and publish with peers, experts, or others employing in a variety of digital environments and media 4. Critical thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision Making -b. Plan and manage activities to develop a solution or complete a project

Materials: Book, The Outsiders Computers iPad Internet Apps Notability Inspiration Maps Keynote iMovie Instructional Directions: *This week class will read Chapters 5 & 6 Day 1 1. Students will be divided into groups of four following the reading Chapter 5.

2. There will be 6 groups of four, pair the groups off so one group uses evidence from the story to prove the characters are guilty and the other group will prove his innocence. 3. Students will work together looking through the chapters of the events that occurred prior to the end of chapter taking notes of events they read about that will help their case. They will be using the app notability https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/notability/id360593530 to jot down notes as they read. 4. Each group must use evidence such as certain stereotypes that will help their case. They must also use what they know from previous chapters to make their case; such as past events between the two groups. Use the examples such as the way the Socs treated the Greasers or the things they had said to them as evidence. Remind students to find specific quotes from the story to prove their case. Day 2 1. Organize the notes from Notability into an Inspiration Map https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/inspiration-maps/id510173686 which will put all the notes in logical order to present a case 2. Look for images on the Internet such as a Google search that can be used in the Keynote presentation to help the case Day 3 1. Each group will create a Keynote presentation http://www.apple.com/mac/keynote/ that consists of all evidence and events that will help them convince the jurors (rest of the class) of the characters guilt or innocence 2. Each group needs to make sure they have provided enough evidence to prove their case. Using at least five slides and at least 10 pieces of evidence 3. Each group needs to ensure there are at least three pictures included in the presentation. The pictures could be evidence like the knife or pictures of socs and greasers Day 4 1. The paired up groups will each have a turn to present their Keynote presentation to the rest of the class 2. The rest of the class will then be the jurors and decide based on the cases presented whether the characters were guilty or innocent. They will need to write a short response as to why they chose the particular verdict after each paired group presentation. They can change their decision after each group depending on how well each group presented the evidence. Day 5 1. Instruct students they will use iMovie https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/imovie/id377298193 to complete a digital journal of themselves as if they were Ponyboy 2. They are going to create a journal depicting how they would feel if they were hiding out in the church with Johnny 3. Be as descriptive as possible use detail 4. Include a fitting background as well as music that matches the mood of the video.

Assessment: The Trial


Category Content/Facts 4 Facts were accurate to all the events in the story. Classroom time was used to work on the project. Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group. Tries to keep people working well together. Keynote consists of 5 or more slides of accurate evidence supporting their case. 3 Facts were accurate to 90% of the events in the story. Classroom time was used to work on the project 90% of the time. Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group 90& of the time. Does not cause "waves" in the group. Keynote presentation consists of at least 4 slides of accurate evidence supporting their case. Keynote presentation consists of at least 2 pictures pertaining to evidence for their case. Responds to 2 other group presentations and their decision on the verdict and gives at least three reasons why they decided on the verdict. 2 Facts were accurate to 80% of the events in the story. Classroom time was used to work on the project 80% of the time. Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group 80% of the time but sometimes are not a good team member. Keynote presentation consists of at least 3 slides of accurate evidence supporting their case. Keynote presentation consists of at least 1 picture pertaining to evidence for their case. Responds to one other group presentations and their decision on the verdict and gives at least three reasons why they decided on the verdict. 1 Facts were accurate to 70% of the events in the story. Classroom time was used to work on the project 70% of the time. Listens to, shares with, and supports the efforts of others in the group 70% of the time but is often not a good team member. Keynote presentation consists of at least 2 slides of accurate evidence supporting their case. Keynote presentation does not consist of any pictures pertaining to evidence for their case. No response to other group presentations.

Time Use

Collaboration with Peers

Presentation/Slides

Presentation/Pictures

Response to other presentations

Keynote presentation consists of 3 or more pictures pertaining to evidence for their case. Responds to all other group presentations and their decision on the verdict and gives at least three reasons why they decided on the verdict.

You might also like