Search for new Vendor (Lack of options)Only one alternative matching requirment (Lack of reliability)Their software was not

yet moved to production Mainframe with heavy system support and operational experties requirement Limited ability to support office automation Loss of intial payment to Amr and consultant To late to start from scrath (Delay in project) The entire testing cycle will have to be repeated. Independant Offsite Escrow Win-Win situation for both parties Easier to maintain version of the code Better Privacy Better Accuracy Better Security Copy the code (Strict NO) Unethical Even if Agrico wins the lawsuit thier relations with AMR will spoil forever The s/w(Highly Specialize) was complex and modification by independant in house Agrico devloper would be impossible If they loose the law,future modification to s/w with respect to requirementw wo uld be difficult Bad publicity and reputational damage Why Agrico is advocating for source code Version Control Risk Mangement Portfolio of $500 million at stake Potential threat of being locked into existing system with no modification. Solution to other clinets were signifincantly different from Agrico's Funational Requirement Why AMR was not willing to give the source code Proprierty Product (Intellectual property) Possibility of source code theft Possible loss on revenues from the modification of the code