STATE OF MINNESOTA Supreme Caurt : * Court Of Appeals Sharon Anderson, a.k. JUDGMENT Scarelia, et al., Appellants, JLe Q- 1292 § C8-84~242 ve. yava 1984 late Cour Case Number re TA 140 & TA 216 County of Ramsey, et al., 4 € COCKOWSKI, Clerk MoO) Eo number eto., : Dents Respondents. oe Pursuant to an order of Court heretofore duly made and entered in this cause it is determined and adjudged that the orders of the Court below, herein appealed from, to wit, of the Distract Court within and for the County of Ramsey be and the same hereby is affixmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil ropeniace Procedure 136,01, subd. 1(b) 2 | and that judgment be entered accordingly. A certified copy of the entry of judgment and the Court's decision is, horein transmitted and made part of the remittitur. Dated and signed: FOR THE CounT __ November 7, 1984 Atrast:_Wayne Tschimperle ace ee ed ere Gierk of the Appetate Courts By: GOD, Dopstynssiton Clore Form APL310STATE OF MINNESOTA Supreme Court % Court Of Appeals TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENT |, Wayne Tschimperle, Clerk of the Appellate Courts, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full and true copy of the Entry of Judgment in the cause therein entitled, as appears from the original record in my office; that | have carefully compared the within copy with said original and that the same is a correct transcript therefrom. Witness my signature at the State Capitol, in the City of St. Paul November 7, 1984 Dated Wayne Tschimperie Clerk ofthe Apoetate Courts By: Ea 2elab, /asotant ClorkSTATE OF MINNESOTA ~ DISYRILE icouns ipICTAL, DISTRICT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND J Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Bernice A. RECEIPT Peterson and Bernae A. Peterson, pisetiee Petitioners-Appellants vs. county of Ramsey, Tom Foley, in his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as an individual. COURT NO. TA 140 SUPREME GOURT NO. 82-1292 Received of J.E. Gockowski, Clerk of District Court, Ramsey County District, Paul, Minnesota, the above-entitled file and contents. to Join with Sup. Crt. No. #82-693 (attached exhibits) Pre-Trial Statement, attached exhibit 11, 12, 13, léa, 14b,Minnesota Tax : Exhibit 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 6, 6a, 7, 8 9, 10, 3, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgnent, Earl B. Gut Minn. Tax Court, dated 9-14-82 4, Pursuant Judgment Roll, dated 9-14-82 Court, St. Notice of Appeal to Minnesota Supreme Court and Governor Al Quie and Notice of Notion Court Form 2, tafson, Judge 5. Motion to Determine the Constitutionality of M.S. 273.11 Valuation of Property — MARKET VALUE, attached exhibit 6. Report, dated 9-1-82 on subject property #1 eee 7 E me D a oo ° B 9. Miscellaneous correspondence 10. Exhibit A - Criminal Register page. LL. Petitioners Exhibit # 7, House Lease 12, Petitioners Exhibits # 2, through 6, real estate property value conparison sheets, 13, a, 1, Petitioners Exhibit #1, Holiday Greeting , dated 1959, 15. Respond. Exhibit D, E, F, photographs of property at 1058 Summit, 309 Peliman Blvd. and 2194 Marshall, 16, Receipt for certiffed mail # 450942 and # 450937, and Green Return to Sender card from Post Office, JOHN MCCARTHY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT, STATE OF MINNESOTA Yi spl obetheey patep_/a-(0 -£ > TA 140 Pieeg oe ope Clerk oy. utySTATE OF MINWESOTA DISTRICT OURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Bernice A. RECEIPT Peterson and Bernae A. Peterson, BrermiG; bone tc 0) Petitioners-Appellants vs. County of Ramsey, Tom Foley, in his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as an individual. Received of J-E. Gockowski, Clerk of District Court, Ramsey County District Paul, Minnesota, the above-entitled file and contents. 1, Notice of Appeal to Minnesota Supreme Court and Governor Al Quie and Not to Join with Sup. Crt. No. #82-693 (attached exhibits) 2, Pre-Trial Statement, attached exhibie 11, 12, 13, 14a, 14b,Minnesota Tax Exhibit 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 9, 10, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment, Earl B. Gust Minn. Tax Court, dated 9-14-82. 4. Pursuant Judgment Roll, dated 9-14-82 5. Motion to Determine the Constitutionality of M.S. 273.11 Valuation of Proj MARKET VALUE, attached exhibit 7 6. Report, dated 9-1-82 on subject property #1 " 4 5 * tte eo noon ae ry 9. Miscellaneous correspondence 10. Exhibit A - Criminal Regtster page. 11, Petitioners Exhibit # 7, House Lease SUPREME COURT No. 82-1292 jourt, St. e of Motion out Form 2, afson, Judge erty — 12. Petitioners Exhibits #2, through 6, real estate property value comparison sheets, 13. Small note to Brent, 14, Petitioners Exhibit #1, Holiday Greeting , dated 1959, 15. Respond. Exhibit D, E, F, photographs of property at 1058 Summit, 309 Pell and 2194 Marshall, jman Blvd. 16. Receipt for certified mail # 450942 and # 450937, and Green Return to Sender card from Post Office. JOuN ¥CCARTEY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT, STATE OF MINNESOTA BY, DATED. foF T62-TH | } arrest urs at ED SEP 12 1984 Fi 14 984 are STATE OF MINNESOTA WAYNE TSCHIMPERLE scone IN SUPREME COURT. ba (03-82-1292, C8-84-241 Sharon Anderson, @ ka. ‘Sharon Anderson pro se Scarrella, et aby 1058 Summit Avenue Appellants, St Paul, MN 55105 vs. County of Ramsey, et aly Tom Foley ete, Ramsey County Attorney Janet R. Stenborg Respondents, Assistant County Attorney 200 Lowry Square St. Paul, MN 55102 Considered and decided by the court en bane without oral argument. ORDER Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, JT JS HEREBY ORDERED that the appellant Sharon Anderson's motion to consolidate be, and the same is, granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the Minnesota Tax Court, the Honorable Earl B, Gustafson, entered September 16, 1982 (3-82-1292), and the order of the Minnesota Tax Court, the Honorable John Knapp, dated February 1, 1984 (C8-84-241), be, and the same are, affirmed without opinion. See Minnesota Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, subd. 1(b). Dated: September 12, 1984 Ay THE COURT:STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of The Clerk Of the Appellate Courts State Capitol, St. Paul : Date: Octo! 3-82-1292 CX-83-716 c8-83-746 884-241 Sharon Anderson, a.k.a. Scarrella, et al., Appellants, er 31, 1984 Ot § count 3 COCKOWSIKI, Cork County of Ransoy, et al.» 7d Respondents. Please take notice that on this date the following order was entered in the above entitled| cause: ORDERED, thet the petition for reargument herein be and the same hereby is denied and stay vacated. ITIS FURTHER ORDERED, that no attorney's fees are alowed pursuant to Rule 140, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. Respectfully, Wayne Tschimperte Clerk of the Appellate CourtsSupreme = ® Court Of Appeals JUDGMENT Satba-z292 § co-98—-242 iva F vayg gag etopetnte counfoase numer € encKOWSK!, Clerk 2A M49 4 TA 226 Pursuant {9 an order of Caurt heretofore duly mada and entered in this cause it is determi that the oxdacs of the Court bafow, herein appealed pistraet Court within and for the County of Ramsay bo and th affizmed without opinion. Sea Minnesota Rules of Civil Appella’ 135.01, aubd. 12) and that judgment be entered accordingly. A certified copy of the entry of judgment and the. herein transmitted and made part of the rermitttur. Tua! Court Chse Number jed and adjudged foun, to wit, of the same haraby is $2 Procedure ‘ourt’s decision is ‘ Dated and signed: FOR THE CouRT__Novenbex 7, 1984 __aitest:_Waybe Tschimoerte_ : ‘aes Tra olne Appia Cours i By: TIED \ N Deputy/Assistant Clerk Form AP-910MINNESOTA ~ - eme Court * Court Of Appeals TRANSCRIPT OF JUDGMENT |, Wayne Tschimperle, Clerk of tha Appellate Courts, do hereby certify that the foregoing Is @ full and true copy of the Entry of Jucigment in the cause thorein entitled, a8 apcears from the original record in my office: that {have ‘fully compared the within copy with said original and that the same is a cosrect transcript therefrom. Witness ray signature at the State Capitol, in the City of St. Paul November 7, 1984 Wayne Tschimperle Cork of the Appstato Courts By.STATE OF MINNESOTA Office of The Clerk Of the Appellate Courts State Capitol, St. Paul a TAT ¢o LTABIG date: octove; 3-82-1292 FILED CX-83-716 ©8-83-746 NOV 9 | 1984 c8-84~-241 a ee lerk Sharon Anderson, a.k.&F Scarrella, et al., Appellants, vs. County of Ramsey, et al., etc., Respondents. 31, 1984 Please take notice that on this date the following order was entered in the above entitled cause: ORDERED, that the petition for reargument herein be and the same hereby is denied and s| IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no attorney's fees are allowed pursuant to Rule 140, Rules Procedure. Respecttully, fay vacated, f Civil Appellate Wayne Tschimperle Clerk of the Appellate CourtsState of Rinuesta SUPREME COURT Sharon Anderson, a.k.a. Scarrella, is Q et al, Novi 884 Appellant, vs. 82-1292 ~AA- Deputy County of Ramsey, et al, etc., Respondent RECEIVED, OF JOHN McCARTHY, CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT OF MINNESOTA, the following original files and exhibits in the above action Rasmey (TAX COURTXOUNTY DISTRICT COURT FILE WO. TA 140 AND EXHIBITS (see attached copy of District Court receipt) When original and copy of transcript is forwarded by the clerk of the trial court, the original poes to the Supreme Court library at the conclusion of the case Dated LLM y Clerk of Distritt Court I.E. Gockowski St. Paul, My 55102STATE OF MINNESOTA ~—>—* prsretct |court SPOTNT OF RANSEY SECOND JUDICTAL DISTRICT Sharon Anderson aka Scatrella, Bernice H RECEIPT ee es reer ra DISERICE COURT NO. TA 140 ad SUPREME GOURT NO. 82-1292 vs. County of Ransey, Tom Foley, in his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as an individual. Received of J.E, Gockowski, Clerk of District Court, Ramsey County District Court, St. Paul, Minnesota, the above-entitled file and contents. to Join with Sup. Crt. No. #82-693 (attached exhibits) Pre-Trial Statenent, attached exhibit 11, 12, 13, léa, 14b,Minnesote Tax Court Fora 2, Exbibit 1, 2, 3a, 3B, 3c, 5, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 9, 10, 3. Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment, Earl B. Gustafson, Judge Minn, Tax Court, dated 9-14-82. 4. Pursuant Judgment Roll, dated 9-14-82 5. Motion to Determine the Constitutionslity of M.S. 273.11 Valuation of Property’ MARKET VALUE, attached exhibit 6. Report, dated 9-1-82 on subject property #1 an n et wom sow 8 9. Miscellaneous correspondence 10. Exhibit A ~ Criminal Register page. Ll. Petitioners Exhibit # 7, House Lease 12. Petitioners Exhibits f 2, through 6, real estate property value comparisgn sheets, 13. 14. Petitioners Exhibit #1, Holiday Greeting , dated 1959, 15. Respond. Exhibit D, E, F, photographs of property at 1058 Summit, 309 Peliman Blvd. and 2194 Marshall, 16, Receipt for certified mail # 450942 and § 450937, and Green Retura to Sender card from Post Office. JOHN MCCARTHY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT, STATE OF MINNESOTA BY, DATED,STATE OF MINNESOTA™ + pIsTRIcT COURT + COUNTY OF RAMSEY > SECOND suptoraL, pistRict Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Bernice A. : ecerPr ee ae ee DISTRICT {OURT NO. 7A 140 S - SUPREME QOURT NO. 82-1292 County of Ramsey, Ton Foley, in his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as an individual. Received of J.E. Gockowski, Clerk of District Court, Ramsey County District Court, St. Paul, Minnesota, the above-entitled file and contents. Notice of Appeal to Minnesota Supreme Court and Governor Al Quie and Notice of Motion to Join with Sup. Crt. No. #82-693 (attached exhibits) Pre-Trial Statement, attached exhibit 11, 12, 13, lia, 14b,Minnesota Tax Court Form 2, Exhibit 1, 2, 3a, 3b, 3c, 5, 6, 6a, 7, 8, 9, 10, Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order for Judgment, Farl B. Gustafson, Judge Mina. Tax Court, dated 9-14-82. 4. Pursuant Judgment Roll, dated 9-14-82 5. Motion to Determine the Constitutionality of M.S. 273-11 Valuation of Property — MARKET VALUE, attached exhibit 6. Report, dated 9-1-82 on subject property #1 " ” . oy we a oo "om B 9. Miscellaneous correspondence 10. Exhibit A ~ Criminal Register page. LL, Petitioners Exhibit #7, House Lease 12. Petitioners Exhibits # 2, through 6, real estate property value conparisda sheets, 14. Petitioners Exhibit #1, Holiday Greeting , dated 1959, 15. Respond. Exhibit D, B, F, photographs of property at 1058 Summit, 309 Pellman Blvd, and 2194 Marshall, 16, Receipt for certified mail } 450942 and # 450937, and Green Return to Sender card from Post Office. JOHN MCCARTHY CLERK OF SUPREME COURT, STATE OF MINNESOTA BY, DATED,2194 Marshall, Desnoyer Park, 11 Blk 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA pistaicr fourT COUNTY OF RAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL) DISTRICT Ta-140, sub.35 STATE OP MINNESOTA IN TAX COURT IN THE MATTER OF: Petitioners claim of unreasonable, arbitrary, oppresive, unduly restrictive and unequitable assessments, on non- lawyers, taxpayers, voters, property owners, homestead, on the Tract of Land, described to wit? 1058 Summit= Lots 4&5, Blk 39, "Summit Rark add." 309 Pelham Blva., Desnoyer Pk, Sub."to Blvd.Lots 7,10, Blk.29. Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Bernice A. Peterson and Bernae A. Peterson, Petitioners-Appellants vs. County of Ramsey, Tom Foley, in his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as an individual. Respondents-Appellees. 10: ATTORNEY GENERAL, WARREN Spannaus, 515 Transportation Bldg., Tom sey County Attry, c/0 Jan Stenborg, 200 Lowry Sq. and Clerk of Minnesota Supreme Court, John McCarthy State Capitol, Tax Court clerk lawyer Brent Peterson sth Floor Space Center, ul Lafayette Rd. St. Paul, Mn. 55101 296-2806. Governbr Al Quie State Capitol, City 55155. Pro Se's are appealling ALL Orders and Decisions by the legislative arn of government known as Tax Court, "Judge" Earl B. Gustafson, atd. Sept 14, 1962, and received by Appellants on the 18th day of Sept.62. SAID APPEAL is based on the Minnesota Constitution Article III- Separation of Powers of Governuent, Article X-Taxaction, ist, 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, Amend XIII- involuntary servitude, M.S. 273.11 Valuation of Property, M.S.210A. 34,-"Corporatipns not to contribute” and M.S. 210.37-County Attry to inquire-Violatipns, and ALL Issues and Questions raised by Petitioners in this case, intluding the Tax-Court Judge Earl B. Gustafson, 928 Ashland St. P aul, Nn. 55105. qualifications and fitness to hold the Job of Tax Court Judge, in the Executive branch of government, and because he and other public, elect~ ed officials have failed to remove themselves from the proceedings, and have displayed TREASON upon our system of government, by fallure to PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the undersigned, Appellant's ieee oeMORO Ue Mosetl” entorce state/federal laws. Gustafson is repugnant he 1s |a member of the American and Minnesota Bar, contrary to Article III, he is openly campaigning for lawyer Fred Norton, who Petitioner Anderson was the reptlican opponent in 1980, displaying bias, political pre- Judice, Gustafson has circumvented petitioners Constitutional Rights, to Jury Trial, Equity proceeding, the hearing held Sept.9, 1982, was a@ SHAM, after lunch and at about 2:00 p.m. the county by their attry, Jan Stenborg issued about 30 (thirty) sheets of questionable evidence and the Judge would NOT GRANT A CONTINUENCE, and would only| give 10 minutes for review. Petitioner Anderson is formerly a licensed real-estate investor, Peterson is formerly a licensed insurance agent, they are mother and daughter and are more expert and qualified than eny-one else in the court-room including the alleged Judge Gustafson, who has cularily been given somthin of value or consideration on the market value and tax structure at his (3) story plus basement corner mansion, 928 Ash- land mkt. v. for £2486,789, while 4 blocks away 1058 Summit a 1 and 1/2 story dwelling mkt v. 82 $108,900, the pay 1981 taxes are even more inequitable. @etitioner Anderson comes to court as an IR Candidate for State Attorney General, to expose the County Attorney Foley and his side~ kick Poliski at 1068 Summit tol; on of M.S, 210A.21 ahd their "CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD", the voting taxpaying public at large, by failing to record the Certificates of Sales of real-estate, with the State Commissioner of Revenue, * * * other thing of value * * * giving the Tax-c§urt judge an under-assessed makt v., Contrary Art. X PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, lawyer Poliski at 1068 Summit, a (3) unit rental property, no certificate of occupancy, (2) houses away from Appellant Anderson the under-assessed mkt v. for 62 185,803 thous. comparable to the 1 and 1/2 story at 1058 Summit of $108 900, « Appellants submitted their MOTION TO DETERMINE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF M.S. 273.11 -MARKET VALUE, the court never considered, m@liciously, discriminately, over-looked and misapplied appellant's evidpnce Exhibits ithro 14b and ithro 9 the day of "Trial". Failed to apply Blacks and Ballentine's legal definition of mkt. vy. "WILLING BUYER OR $ELLOR" COMPLAINT OF VIOLATIOI Appellants allege that the Tax-court Judge Gustafson and Bansey County Attry Foley are guilty of a FELONY, M,877210A.21, by bribery, under-ass- esi for pecuniary in their own cial interests. A legis: re Ynvestigation aad reaoval fs ‘office 1s WARRANTED ee fe Dtd. Sept. 29, 1982 /s/aeSenate ante by wna oa i SEE Ate ease te noma io dare nd cone ete ‘SMrrenowlofaera sizes tor maletsance sr mecha o neon lot {Bea 2 Tanti lhe menaers aes wean SAH Cure ya to Pee ou Rees Sea pubes burg grunon bie OTe Seam tryin carying on Sree eee Po the posse ot S06) pola! oa 41WNeri tle (RRA ae Soh | CHAPTER NORTHSTARSTATE 43% \ trderegdig commences ha sane wpot Share. ‘20,2, No ba ana oe paseo» sarees SEC con mo nd tie ow tre seetmemneataw eae sections. mia Al Slt ease sae ot Smalae'9 tse tu Sana fhe Sed eT rlred Sisucta anda ras of tadtmre)octcion ‘Salon theconanan fit an ache rset a ort ts fare tani eden fe Cee oe a 8 80, 22m a of al us of EARS ee crane Rear. ESR seecs Gicesmencnnmemocss | aes ‘Seopec, mile wed "conned arc” remain fpepataies ay Nom boned SEC an "Cen agnor ae SS Somersee fieiame maces sees Colores emms ae Sad {Eu"Sun‘omng's cannon bocey sie'oy opectve houses on m gomg Yo tug om ose a aly hat LS ee Saree eee Se See EEN Statin icrevirte io tenecreeemnereenen eae SESE - Sale ween sur eit se SEamoe ; careers : a Emacciemnacora 2, STI oe Se ae eee Sees oes Sin cemueneinwersnes Seayec vere cima et 39 SESE! Stamens: : encopee atin Since ooatioe es Scuipeenaie tr caret Tes at Ene tans tae be ope f.B9 wake areca eae eaIe Smlnreavesecmcy nen Soe artic {fed other oficere x0 may e provided by iw Berh Roars Scone heen esas hems Piewtetenisatearcn "ge gece ees Einmmemecrtetecs ee ior Sibi Ee sont masa enwstitareta weapnctponmeneerst S540 te eh sea ro, Soeseamntceredtnrws ia watenanerransanarenn : See. crirremeanarrenne ES Gee neers taaieneece ns ragnton othe rere ta att ohn tnonanene San ele ‘SSioctectanaterinierseace ‘Eason wots enn satan bal Me aeded SEC" 30. Every ot anal be reported on ae SEE 2, Pesan of grat arg te Sree Me teens mores tee Lea ee mmeiee eee ere ee ee ee eon sr, eto SB SSSEe Sewer iia es EG, 1, tacn now ty atin eo He procoang t pon wae moran, por ie ee Sees EtplareD De Liarsd September 27, 1982 Mle, ElLLe, County Assessor Count Howse. St. Paul, (W 55102 Sun, a etal Hee; ie op tat ie amen aa Be rope ent Rikted heats 1b ‘ising fee fe aap feonly at pages FI, Bt, deoing Foe foot place dn} ae Via cndecpe pres wo A a8 ppisegins 190,800) Cx PA anenage aacling eyes $57.69; D. The median Di Sores riper 4 ae pet ae %* Th abject total age fb mbltipbind by the aorage od ee Iocrage 37 2» 1655 etientee sat - Jam aapesting that you send ma the aldscases Hat you have Ladd yout Fi propeaty (387 Pethom upg sana a 5 taj mead chasing de eset 80 MD 9/2 F baa 8STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT couRT COUNTY OF RAMSEY. 3] lor ‘TAX COURT 140 sub.35 IN THE MATTER OF PETITIONERS CLAIM OF UNEQUALL PROPERTY ASSESS- MENTS: 1058 Summit Lots 4&5 Blk 39, MOTION TO DI INE THE “Summit Pk add." 309 Pelham Blvd. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 4.3. Desnoyer Pk, sup. to Blvd. Lis 76 273.11 Valuation of i 10, Blk 29, 219% Marshall, Desnoyer = uw Pk, 11 Bl 49. MOnTON Sharon(Scarrells)Anderson, Bernice A. Peterson, Bernge A. 1 Peterson, Attorney's Pro Se, and owners, petitioners of the above | named real-estate situated in the State of Minnesota hereby moves | ‘the Court to declare M.S. 273.11,UNCONSTITUTIONAL because 16 is in | @irest violation of the 14th Amendment of the Federal Congtitution which reads as follows: “# © *No State shail make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of oitizens df the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of jlaw, nor deny to any person withib its jurisdiction thq equal protection of the laws.” Article X. seo. 1, of the Minnesota Constitution states: ** * *Taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of subjects, * * slevied and collected for public purpoi The apparant term MARKET VALUE, | i i | | | | applied tn M.S. 273.11, hae been unequally applied by the Ransey County Assessor, as petitioners are not willing buyers or sellors, and have been deprived of their | property rights, by an inflated, imaginery: assessed valugtion | Petitioners allege that they could not and would not purchase | | | | | their properties at the inflated assessed valuation, and that they are deprived or penalized for purchasing their properties jat the time of sale, that true reflected MARKET VLAUE is when properties were purchased, see attached Plack Dictionary, and Ballentine for legal definition of MARKET VALUE, ret NoCamme} case Sup. 19-50428, 50K6,50469, The sale of real-estate is inflationary as the inter- t rate fluctuates, plus the terms or market availabils' of financd ing. Therefore a denial of due process and equal treatéeft| and should, be striken from the laws. Dated Sept. 8,82. _ «i Lee2 Subd 1 shall not be a violation of this section for corportion selling products or services to the public to post on their public premised + messages which proshote pancipation in precinct caucuses, voter registration, a4 or elections, provided that such messages are not controlied by or operated“ | ~ i forthe advanage of any candidate, major pola! pany, © pola ‘Subd, 8 The total amount of any expenditure or contribution or any ‘one project permitted by subdivisions 5 and 7 which exceeds S100, together Sth ed pps nd he mes ad adres pro ing the contribution oF expendinees, shall be reported fo the seca of sate . led on a form provided by the secretary of state on the 1 dates_required. foc. political. committee -tndaw : eee Sesert eei eerie fetdoa fema Sng in eat ad at eet (1975 ¢ 284s 20) Wea soc at ee oul anagem orm (97562452 canoe : Wise 6639) ” 20A.36_ PROSECUTIONS; WHERE MADE. Violations of the . provisions of section 210A.34 may be prosecuted in the county where such Payment or contribution is made or services rendered or in any county Wherein such money has been paid or distributed. (1975 2845 36) - 2037 COUNTY ATTORNEY TO INQUIRE INTO VIOLATIONS;” PENALTIES. Ifthe county attorney of the county shall be notified by any clficer of other person of any violation of any of the provsions of sections 2108.01 to 210A.44, i shall be bis duty forthwith to diligently inquire ito the {feats of such violation, and if there be reasonable ground for instituting a *Proseeution, it shall be the duty of such county attorney to present the charge, with all the evidence which he ean procure, tthe grand jury of such county. any county attorney shall fil oF refuse to faithfully perform any duty imposed upon him by the provisions of 210A.01 to 210.44 he shall be guilty ‘of a misdemeanor. and, on conviction thereo, shall forteit his office. It shall be the duty of the county attorney, under the penalty of forfeiture of his office, to prosecute any and all persons guilly of any Violation of the prox Visions of sections 210A.01 to 210A.44, the penalty of whichis fine oF im- seca ys PROHIBITED, No person Se ‘or other thing of value, OF at pone by i runt moval from office, Any ciizen may employ an Torney to perform his duties under the pro- (QA.@d, and such attorney shall be recognized tas assoate coun inthe proceeding eee crvosecuton, action, or proceeding shall be dismissed without notice a roth abject oy such associate couse unl the reasons ofthe soe Stoney for uch dismissal Copeher with the objetons thereto of he Fearn cvanee, shall have been (ld in. writing, argued by counsel, and ~fg'Etnsidered by te cout, with such Listation ast the ine of ig suc Teavons and objections asthe court may impos. (i975 ¢ 2848 32) i: prisonment, or both, OF fe f Attorney, (0 assist the county att visions of sections 210.01 to ZI by the county attorney and the cour at sin ep net geri at a evmna ation Me he provi ‘of sections: 7 thon os pe comin o a ‘of representatives. t Ue sr sppiemetal MSE NOTES AND DECISIONS nc ple eit coumy ari ck esd cond ean nny en i a ee rae pn ee Ba "apes renee OP imation ge of ie com mony ‘of such viola Sh emeer ae : aig he was guilty of such Vera2 is “ ~ Metro litan Nev The Dispatch Thay Fletcher is cleared | of campaign charge By Linda Kohl Staff Writer A charge of unfair campaign actices fled against City tan Bob Feeney for 2 mer City Councilman C7 Mths nas" boe Toute be 2 “wi Foundation, an estan mnepin County attorney today. to a grand jury because there is, 5 ‘no evidence that Fletcher circu- Tated statements during the cam- “Spalgn tat he knew, were fase, said John Brink of the Hennepin ' County attorney's office. -The case was referred to Hennepin In his complaint, McMabon cited 14 statements made by PEL 9 E> _ pele 4 Fletcher in campaign literature made by Fletcher are “suscepti- that McMahon claimed were ble to differing interpretations, false or misleading. But in a let- Brink said today that his office ter to Foley, Brink said he found did not find any statements no evidence that Fletcher violat- violated campaign laws. ced any campaign laws, “T wasn’t worried,” Fle Public officials who sue for S30, today, of, the campaign “political libel” Bave to be able Charges. ‘I knew that once it ras beable flordoghiy investigated Ta be to prove actual malice Brink lst onfatinat ke raking te tate. !2ER876r8 Ba (0 ay fr tbe i nt ether knew it was false or made it In reckless disregard of Fletcher said he believes| the ‘charge was fled as a ‘in the closing days of the Eity election. McMahon, who now works for its falsity. Miller & Schroeder Mi vinta hat oo of 1 Hoop eeyatete Seas ea ae ature were docu ine, could not be cana Meas ree EL, Menaee, SEE, iment med Brink said. The state- Fietenee, wie ta toe ee ee ea Te eae Pate SEP repent hos en a ie Bs ead sont Sa Sora Hetaeeh ee cee so ead ees Cor. Cs aie 74nave em ite nf rE Aye tt rome 20e wo-10004RECEIVED. 7 JUN D+ 1976 IN TEE # ne usrn ‘SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES COURT, US OCTOBER TERM 1975 Moe Ge lias REV. SHARON L. SCARRELLA, REV, RICHARD W. BULLOCK, ALBERT BRISSON, and. all others situated similarly, - Plaintiffs, vs. MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AMD LOAN, RE. VAN HORN, as an individual, X.G. BOOTH, as an individual, and their agents, assigns, successors, representative, those acting in concert with them, and all others similarly situated, Defendants. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF RAMSEY ))*5 REV.SHARON Ly SCARRELLA,. being first duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That this affidavit is made pursuant to Title 26 C. Section 1kk. 2. That affiant, Attorney Pro Se, is one of the plain tiffs in the above class action in the U.S.D.C. Minnesota ‘lf Wo. b-75CIV.457- 3. The affiant is one of the parties who on April 26, 197hy brought a Civil Rights suit (3-7iMinn.98) against the| Minnesota State Bar Association and the American Bar Association among other defendants seeking five ($5,000,000.00)million dollars — seer4. That Chief Judge Burger is listed as a meabdr of the Minnesota State Bar Association, Bench and Bar of Minmeseta, official publication of the Minnesota State Bar Association, August, 197h P0175. 5. That it is affiant's strong belief that Chiaf Judge Burger is also a member of the American Bar Association. 6. That Judge Burger has a pre-determined prejudiced against the non-lawyer who does his own legal work, as incorporated in his statement in the American Bar Association Journal, 1975, Vol 61, phils "The ultimate function of the lawyer, to provi. lubricant for satisfactory disposition of cont and for the gradual change and evolution in tl as to avoid self-help or collective violence, be performed by our profession unless we enfo: standards we profe: a April, the versies law so a ‘the And in the next paragraph warns about the incompentent judges who don't meesure up. 7. Thet affiant was one of five non-lawyers who filed for the elective offic: of Judges of Minnesota Supreme Court and her name was removed by the state supreme court in a ghee hear= ing. This action was later filed in the U.S. Supreme Court File No. 7h-318. And it is believed that more than a casual p! relationship exist between Judge Burger and the members o Minnesota Supreme Court which would interfer with a judge: 8, That because of his unique professional re: with the members of the legal profession and the financi: in this state that he could not render a fair and impartd relative to this matter. 9. Thatyhe has been long involved in an effort ing a better image of lawyers. 10. Because of the above reasons, affiant beliewes that ro fessional the i impartiality donship interests decision f creat- She, as one of the plaintiffs and all others concerned, canhot receive a fair and impartial hearing and that this affida' vit 48IN THE wo. 76-1) PR? * ALBERT BRISSON, and all others situated similarly, z ‘plaintiffs, vs. '° MIDWEST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAR, “ig. BeBe VAN HORN, a8 on individual KG; BOOTH, o8'an individual UND ta76 ‘SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES PFE OF yp COTOBER TERM 1975 | PME cou 2 i Ug, * » assigns, successors, (against Sustice Fepresottatita ‘those’ acting ta.” larry A. Blackmun) Dysy concert th them, and all Schers : i similarly Sitvated, | bss woh, Defendants. | 1 Le: That this affidavit is made pursuant to Title 28 Co, Section 14h. Mhat affient, Attorney Pro Se, is one’ of the pi fy inthe, above class action in the U.S.D.C. Minnesota File PISCTVAST. = Whe affiant is one of the parties who on April 26, Civil Rights suit (3-74Ninn.98) against the esotake That Justice Blackmm is listed as a member of the Minnesota State Bar Association, Bench and Bar of Minnesota, official | publication of the Minnesota State Bar Association, August, 197hp.175- ae 5. That it is affiant's strong belief that Justice s Blackawn is also a member of the American Bar Association. 6. That Justice Blackmun has a predetermined prajudiced * against the non-lawyer who does his ow legal work. 7. That affiant was one of five non-lawyers-who filed for the elective offices’ of judges of Minnesota Supreme Court and hie® name was removed by the state suprese court in a Kangaroo hearing. ‘This action was later filed in the U.S. Supreme Court File Wo.7h-318. ship exist between Justice Blackmun and the members of ‘the te Supreme Court which would interfer with a judge's impartiality. + -8_. That because of his unique professional relationship ie with the members of the legal profession and the financial interests . “dm the state of Minnesota, that he could not render a fair and sapere decision relative to this matter. 29+ Because of the above reasons, affiant believes that on fas ope of the plaintiffs and all others concerned cannot |receive ey, Pro Se‘m STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY TA- 140, sub.35 STATE OF MINNESOTA IN TAX COURT ‘ny, Sb < IN THE MATTER OF: We, o “Yi, So Petitioners claim of unreasonable, arbitrary, oppresive, 14 unduly restrictive and unequitable assessaents, on non~ ay lanyers, taxpayers, voters, property owners, homestead, w on the Tract of Land, described to witt_1058 Summjt- Mp, Lote 4&5, Blk 39, "Summit Park add." »—- 309 Pelham Blvd., Desnoyer Pk, sub to BlvdsLots,7,10, Blk. 29. i 2194 Marshall, Desnoyer Park, 11 Blk 49, Sharon Anderson aka Scarrella, Bernice A. Peterson and Bernae A. Peterson, Petitioners ve. County of Ramsey, Tom Foley, in his official capacity of Rawsey County Attorney and as gle an individual. T0: Attorney General, Warren Spannus, 515 Transportation B Tom Foley, Ramsey County Attry, o/o Jan Stenborg, 200 Lowry Sq’ and Police Chief Wa. NcCutchean 101 E. 10th St. St. Paul, Nn. 55102. PRE-TRIAL STATENENT TO: the above named defendants, public officials and offieets of the court, PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that on the 9th day of September, Thurs., 1982, at 10:00 a.m, at the State of Minnesota Tax Court, 5th fldor, Space Center 444 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, Mn. 55101 tel. no. 296-2806, a Pre-Trial will be held in the above entitled matter. LIST OP WITNESS'S 1. Mr. and Mrs. James B. Anderson - 1058 Summit Avd. 2. Bernice, Bernae A. Peterson ~ 309 Pelham Blvd. 3. Steve Wilhite - 2194 Marshall It 48 the intention of the petitioners to subpoena, NcGutchean, duces tecumn, on all properties, particularily 2194 Marshall, and to testify as a former Chair of Senate Tax Committee on Ma. Const. lrticle III and Article X, see attached petition ata. dNov.80. 5. Sharon (Scarrella) Anderson as IR Candidate for State Attorney General. | Hos INI unknown at this time. alee~ | abDITIONAL EVIDENCE Exhibits 1 thro 10, as in original petition, 11 - News Heldate Cand- idate for State Attry General - non-lawyer, 12 - Micro of county attrys McPeak's 1844 Portland, 13, Petition dtd. 4N to expel attry from lg & exec. depts - Article III (7) pg: law (2) pgs. 562 Nn. 221 NW /Reporter 24. In re candidacieg for Associate Justice. %/y- W7¥e Fo Mme J perk /ods CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS ity and v.80, titled + Uh case of Scarrella Article X, sec. 1 "The power of taxaction shall never be surrend- ered, suspended or contracted away 3 be uniform upon the same cli Bubjects and shall be levied and FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES. ‘Te is" of collected Article III, sec. 1. "The powers of government shall be divided into three distinct department; leg: islative, executive and judicial. NO PERSONS GR PERSON BELONGING TO OR CONSTITUTING ONE OF |THESE DEP ARTMENTS SHALL EXERCISE ANY OF THY MINNESOTA STATUTES INVOL\ $10.01 Homestead exemption for 2194 Marshall 273.11 Valuation of Property - Market Value 240.97 County Attry, Lovestigate election laws- priser 609.43 Misconduct of public officer or employeesub. ( pretense * * * intentionally * * injures anot = =EEE b bow concerning 2194 Marshall AGAIN. OTHER RELATED CASES POWEES * * Hy Marshall ) under See Ta-89, for 1981 pay 1980, Minnesota Supreme Crt. 82-693 U.S. Dist. Crt. 3-81-82/ Fanteipal Cri. 343783 Appeal CA-90 Ma. Sup. Crt. 82-693/47821 & 47832 & 48611, Bancoy Dist. Pi 454962. titled Scarrella vs. Brewer, concerning 448 Desnoy: titled Scarrella vs. Ryan and Third party defendant @urrin see Ex.(9) comparable of 649 Grand and 325 No. Wilder, (6) DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL AND NON-LAWYER JUDGE ‘The right of trial by jury as declared by the Minnesot| ton Article I, sec. 4, Trial by Jury * * shall remain INVII Ex. 1&2, would indicate Petitioners cannot receive a ff impartial Trial before a lawyer Judge, as Petitioner Scarre| Joined with others and sued the American and Minnesota Stat| 7h~Civ.98. Petitioner Scarrella Anderson has been denied thi right to hold office in the Judiciary, which Article X, sta are levied for PUBLIC PURPOSES, which would pay the Judicial of governnent's salsry and pensions. TAX COURT IS HELD IN AN EQUITY PROCEEDING, In 1918, the U.S Court re-affirmed that an improper transfer of a suit-law Joiner @ no. » 451899~ gal Clinic, its. bp Constitut- TE.+ * ir and la, Anderson, Bar, 3- elective es Taxes, Branch Supreme ide of court(jury trial), to the equity side (without Jury), was hpld to ner * Property. 609.48 Perjury, see Municipal ort file no.343783-Ora 3.19,violate the constitutional right to jury trial set forbh in the 7th Amend._EX PARTE SIMONS (1918) 247 U.S.231. STATEMENT OF FACTS Petitioners filed their pleadings with (10) Exhibits, and to date, NO RESPONSE OR COUNTER CLAIM, by the county, the denial of| homestead credit for 2194 Marshall is repugnant and contrary to othen properties, petitioners own, such as 4/8 Desnoyer, Ramsey Dist. Crt. nolt54962, in which Certificate of Title or Torrens, 1d 11-22100-280-22-1|, 1982 mkt. v. $45,604, HC credit given without recording deed. Petitioners ex. no12 is the Micro or city attorney Jane McPeak and her husband Harry NcPeak, county attry, (WHO PROSECUTED OR SIGNED WARRANTS FOR =o ANDERSON, TQ BE ss ICA TI OR “ ALLOWING OCCUPANCY OF CONDEMNED BUILDING") which 2194 Marshall has never been condemned and|case is pending Ma. Sup. Crt. 82-693, 1844 Portland -14 11-50720-02b~18-1, mkt v. for 1982 $57,233, with full HC of $650.00, tx pd. $553.46, while 2194 Marshall 1a 11-22100-110-49-8, mkt v. for 82 is $52,966.00, tx $1,587.96, The county attry has refused to homestead, petitioners, allege discrimination, harassament, for his and his employe¢s pecuniary, gain. In Petitioners own another (6) unit building 325 Wilder, 82 okt v. $68,112 tx pd. $2,697.66, this building is in current litiggtion, Ramsey Dist. File no. 451899, titled Scarrella vs. Ryan, tha Murrin Legal Clinic is representing Byan, see Ex. (9) another (6) unit plus clinicpplus another bldg. 14 07-71200-210~01-1 total mkt v.976,499 tx. $2,947, comparing the lawyers rental commerical bldg, INTRINSIC VALUE, with petitioners bldg. homestead at 1058 Summit mkt v. $108,900 tx. $2,103.12, and 309 Pelham Homestead mkt v. $96,909, tx. $1,926.50. III. It has become necessary to become a IR Candidate for State Attorney General to expose the alleged abuse of the Ramsey County Asspssor's, office and the Abstract Department, as Lawyer Robert Poliski, apparant y has failed to record with the State Revenue Department the Certificates of Value, upon which the Assessor bases's MARKET VALUE, see,|ex. (6)a, 41d 07-71200-030-39-7, 1068 Summit owner Robert Poliski Jr. this (3)unit mkt v. $85,803 tx non-HC $2,568.52, see Ex (14), 1979 Micro “ 1058 and 1068 Summit, Petitioners denand that the Assessor/frove bis unreasonable, 3 NO ATTEMPTS BY OPPOSITION (23 8/} and discriminatory assessments TO SETTLE. Dated Sept. 6.. STATE OF MINNESOTA } : FILING STATEN! COUNTY OF RAMSEY Mrs. SHARON (SCARRELLA) ANDERSON, 1058 Summit Ave. St}, Paul, Ma. tel. no. 297-8946, wife of James R. Anderson, a silver star,| marine veteran, both formerly licensed real-estate agents, civil rights| activist, today filed for the Elective office of ATTORNEY GENERAL, which the Const- itution provides: that the attorney general ts an officer of the EXECUTIVE department; te qualify es attorney| general a person must be a qualified voter, 1 Yrs. old, and elected by the people (Article| V, VII; M.3. Chapter 8). Term (4) years. Anderson, whose forte is real-estate and tex-reform, wifll by her candidacy, expose the circumventation of the Constitution ang State Laws, by the current incumbent, who Anderson alleges in 197%, Spknaus, and government intrusion destroyed the family unit, and have congistently, raised property taxes, failed to prosecute "White Collar Crine",| enforced legislation for pecuniary gain of the lawyers, at an expense to the voting taxpayer, creating hardship and tax burdens, for example, in July 1977, the Justices of the Peace (non-lawyers) was abolished, currently] with the high unemployment, in Ramsey County (law clerks) are paid $7.02,| while attending law school, failure of the County Attorney to comply with M.S. 2104.37, in a recent city election, with Spannus circunventing state law, again by his lack of enforcement in the public interest ana good), to enforce Federal Tax laws 501(c) (3), which states, Non- Pro: Corporation * * operated exclusively for religious charitable, * * (are tax exempt) as long als "no part of the net earnings of which inures td the benefit * * * or otherwise attempting to [influence legislation, * * does not attempt to partijcpate or intervene in any political campaign (Porn 1023) Anderson currently 1s in the Minnesota Supreme Court dnallenging the Attorney General lack of enforcement and prosecution, She aljleges he 4s contrary To Tax Laws in the new Minnesota Campaign Manual 1962, pg 4, Nos 82-1 Contributéns by corporations, M.S. 210A.34 "The law does not apply to non-profit corporations" Supreme Court, "; Therefore her campaign will be to lobby against an APPEALS COURT, and to have relief for all citizens (non-lawyers) of 1/3 of property and income taxes reduced as 1/3 of the government is denied to non-lawyer Taxpeyers-Hee Re PETITION * # # # TO: Minnesota State Governor Al Quie, and Minnesota State Lieutenant Govemor Lou Wangberg, and Officers of the Minnesota State Senates President of the Senate Edward J. Gearty, and Senate Majority Leader Nicholas D, Coleman, and Assistant Majority Leader Marv Hansen, and Senate Ninerity Leader Robert 0. Ashbach, and Ascistant Minority Leaders: Carl A. Jensen, Howard As Knutson, Robe and Each and every nenber of the Minnesota State Senate, and Qftieers of the Mannogota House of Representatives: speaker ef the House Fred C, Norton, and Majority Leader Irv Anderson, and Assistant Majority Leaders: Linda Berglin, George Mann, Robert Vs Gordon 0, Voss, and Minority Leader Rodney Ns Searle, and Assistant Minority Leaders: Bob Anderson, Douglas W. Carlson, Bruce Jobn T, Rese, and Each. and every menber of the Hinnesata State House of Representatit ‘This Petition 4s served upn each af you in your officiel capacity as| constitutional officers of the Minnesota State Gevernment and as set £ Minnesota State Constitution (4.5.C.) aa follows: Article V. EXECUTIVE DEPARTIENT. Section 1, Executive officers. ™ ‘tive department consists of a governor, Lieutenant governor, secretary of auditor, treasurer and attorney general, ¥ # * 44" Arte V, Secs 64 Oat for executive Dept. substantially the sane as below. (4,S.C.) Article IV. LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT. Sec. 8. Oath of offic "Bach member and officer of the legislature before entering upon his dutie take an oath or affirmation te support the Constitution of the United Stat constitution of this state, and to discharge faithfully the duties of his the best of his judgment and ability.” And pursuant to your aaths of office and your duty to protect and enfaree the Minnesota State Constitution as the foundation of car form of goverment, to the Federal Constitution, and it requires all gcverment officials net take an oath to support it, bat also, to obey St an the suprene law of the Your attention is directed to Article III of the Minnesota State Con vhich states as fellavs: Article III, DISTRIBUTION OF THE POWERS OF OOVERNMENT, Seetion 1. of powers. "The prwere af government shall be divided inte three distinct nents: legislative, executive and judicial, No person er persons belor constituting one of these departments shali exercise any of the powers pi belonging to either of the others except in the instances expressly provid this conatitution.! ‘The Minnesota state oupreme-court has decided, "In the Matter of the of Sharon L. Scarrella, Richard W, Bullock, David Botlich, Frank D, Blot Michael Paul Mullin for Associate Justice of the Minnesota Suprene Ceurt." ae“Petition to expel -attye-fr log. -& exec. depts. page| purposes of constitutional provision fixing qualification for judges of the Supreme Court means to be adnitted cr entitled to be admitted to practice as an atterney at law in state, # *# and # * # candidates who were not admitted nor entitled to be ainitted to practice lar in state were not eligible for office of Associate Justice of state Suprene Court." The Minn, suprems court again said in 197: et "learned in the law' as used in constitutional requirenent thet a district judge must be a person learned in the law means that in order to hold a judicial prsition a person mst be admitted to practice law and in good standing." Sylvestire v. State, 1973, 298 Minn, 12, 2h W.W.24 658, Mn re Candidacy of Daly', (1972) 200 NeWe2d 913, 29h Minn. 351, at po 362, the Minn. supreme court said: "It thus seems clear that a disbarred attomey is no more qualified to hold the office of justice of the supreme cpurt or judge of the @istrict court than any other lay person. By his disbament he is reduced to the status of a layman, The tem ‘leamed in the law’ which prescribes the qualifica~ tions for these judicial positions, clearly prevents a layman fron filing for or holding the office; and 1 must therefore follow that a disbarred attorndy is in no better position to file for the office, or to hold it if he is elected, any other layman." This case and 'In re Searrella, et al.' (above), both cades were initiated by the judges on the state suprene court and the state suprene [court was Tepresented by the Minn. Attorney General Warren Spannaus (a lawyer) when the cases were heard before the state supreme court and beth cases are cited at p. 177 of Vole 2, Minnesota Statutes Annotated (M.Set+) published by West Publishing Co, (1976) which is the lawyers! special set of Minnesota state Law books. The Minnesota state suprene court has decided that ALL Minnesota LAWYERS and ONLY Minnesota LAWYERS are nenbers of the judicial department of the Minjesota state government and ONLY LAWYERS aro eligible to file for end hold elective consti- tational offices in the judicial department and all other citizens are NOT eligivle to file for or hold elective judicial offices. Then it follows according to Article III of the Minnesota State Constitution that NO LAWYSR can file for or hold any elective office in the state executive or legislative department. And when a lewyer holds an office in the executive or legislative deparunents he is violating Article TIT of the Minnesota State Constitution, The following is a partial list of some lawyers who are presently folding elective offices in the executive or legislative departments of the Minngsota State governnent, and also, sone of the state judges . “34S, ftttorney who have held elective offices in the legislature while also toing lawyers, according $o "The Minnesota Legislative Manual" (MIM) for the dates indicated: —EeE eee Warren Spannaus, Attorney General, MLM 1979-80, ps 266, 9U of Minn. Law school (JoDs 1963); elected 1970, 197h, 1978." Sen. Jack (John T,) Davies, MIM 1961-62, p.0, lawyer", MLM 1979~80,|p.18h, Dist. 60, "Elected 1958, 1962, 1966, 1970, 1972, 1976." Sen. Neil Dieterich, Mimw 1979-20, 'p, 188, "Dist 62, Attorney, elected to the House (1972,197h), Elected 1976," Sen. Edward J, Gearty, WLM 1979-80, psl72, "Dist, Sh, Lawyer, elected to the House (1762, 1964, 1966, 1968), Elected: 1970, 1972, 1976. aoe noes He Humphrey III, MiM* 1979-80, p. ‘152, “Dist. ll, Attorney,| Elected Son. Cari 'A. Jensen, MIM 1979-80, pe 120, *Diat 28, Lengrar, porver in| the.tiouge 42514a); Mected UA, Wit, 191, LTR _ iPetition to expel attys fr Leg. & execs depts. = page 36 Sen, John Keefe, MIG 1979-60, p. Ill, "Dist. Lo, Lawyer, elected to the House fn" (1986, 1968, 1970); Exected: 1972, 1976." Seu, Franklin Jo knol1, Mite 1977-73, pe 186, "Diste 61, attorney, elected State Representative in 1973, re-clected 197i. Elected: 1976," Son, Howard A. Knuton, MI 1979-80, ps 170, "Dist. $3, Lawyer, elected to the Houre (1966, 1968, 19703; Elected 1972, 1976. Sen. William P. Luther, Mitt 1979-60, pe 15), "Dist 15, Attorney, elected to the House (19h); Elcetod: 29764" Sen, Ron lelof?, HIN* 1979-80, pe 190, "Dist. 63, Attomey, elected to the House Gs7h); Erected: 1976." Sen, Gerry Sikorski, HLM 1979-80, p. 166, "Dist. S1, Attorney, elected: 1976." Sen. Robert J. Tennessen, MIM* 1975~76, p. 186, "Dist. 56, Attorney," ‘1979= 8, "Dist. 56, Elected 1970, 1972, 1976."(p. 176). Reps Janes Re Casserly, MU 1979-60, p. 177, "Dist. S6A, Attornoy, Elegted: 1972, 975, 1378." : erry Dennsey, MN* 1979-80, p» 12L, "Dist, 285, Mttomey, Elected: 1978." Reps Bob “Llingsen, ML 1979-80, pe 155, "Dist. L583, Atturney, Electuts 1976,1978." Rep, Ray Wi, Faricy, MIM 1979-80, p. 191, "Dist. 634, Attarney, Elected{ 1970, 1972, W97iy 1996, 19754" Rep. Charles %,’Halberg, MIMM 1979-80, p, 171, "Dist. 53B, Attorney, Eigoted: 1978." Bebe Tas, dada, MUG 2975-60, pe Ils, Hoist. Lbs, attorney, Hlected: "1972, 197, 976, 1978." 2222+ Bay enpe, MU 1979-80, ps 17, "Diste 534, Avtomney, Hecteds 1972, 29Thy 976, 1978.9 Reps Fred C. Norton, JIM 1973-7h, pe 97, "Dist. 65A, Lawyer," 1GMNI9T9-E0, pel95, "Elected 1966, 1968, i970, 1972, 197h, 197, 1978." Rep, Bill Pejereon, MIM% 1979-80, p. 11, "Dist. 383, Lawyer, Elected: 1978." Reps Elliot ©, Rothenberg, uit 1979-80, p, 1h7, "Dist. LB, Attorney, Eleoted:1978." Rep, Harry Sicben, Jre, MLM 1975-80, p. 169, WDist. 528, Abtomoy, Elogted: 1970, 1972, 17h, 1976, 1978.4 1iap» Vike" Skeben, MMH 1979-80, py 167, "Dhst, 518, attomey, Hlected: 1972, 297, 76, 1978." Justices on the state supreme court who have held elective offices in the legislature while being lawyerss Chief Justice Rabert Sheran, MLM 1979-80, p. 362, Minnesota House of| Representa tives (1947 and 1949 session); Mile 197, pe 02. "Lawyer", Justice W. Fs Rogosheske, MLM 1979-80, 'p. 263, “hinnesota House of Representatives (1943-49)"5 MLN 1943,"p. 70, "Lawyer". _ Justice C, Donald Petersnn, Mutt 1979-80, pe 363, "Minnesota ifouse of Representa tives (1959-63);" MIM 1959-60, pe 76, “anyer"y Justice Lawrence R, Yetka, MIM* 1979-80, ps 36, "Minnesota House of Hepresenta= tives (1951-61); MMe 1959-40, p. 88, "attorney. District court judges who have held elective offices in the legislature while being lawyers: Dist. Judge John M. “itagerald, New Prague, MIM 1979-60, p. 367, mesota House of Representatives (1957-63)"; Mime 1961-62, p. 83, tAttorney®, Dist. Judge Lawrence L. Tenertz, Se Ste Paul, MUM 1979-80, p. 368, Minnesota ‘Legislator (1939 and 1941)"; Mime 1939, pe Shi, "Attorney at Lava! Rist. Judge Pavlak, So. St, Paul, MIM* 1979-80, p. 368, "Minnesota House of epresentatives (1965=74)"; MIMs 1965-66, ps 58, "Lawyer", Dist. Judge Harold *, Schultz, Sts Paul, MINH 1979-60, p. 368, Minnesota Senate (290-62)"; Mid 1951, De ugh, Abtormey=at—Lawe! Diste Judge Hareld Kalina, Mpla., MIN* 1979-60, p. 371, "Minnesota Senate (1955= T2)"s Mitte 1955, pe YO, Lawyer. Dist, Judge John", Lindstoan, Willnar, MH 1975-805. p. 37hy "mendes Mmnecota House of “Wprecentattven (1972-76)"s MIME 1I73~Thy po 9by Mhetamney ee :Petition to expet attys fr Leg. & Exec. depts. page bi Washington County Judge Heward R. Albertson, MLM 1971-72, Pe 64, "Stata Representa~ tive, Attomey, elected to Rouse 1960, re-elected 1962, 1964, 1966, 1968 and 1970." ‘Anoka County dudge Spencer J. Sokolewski, MIM 1971-72, ps 77, "State Representa- tive, Lawyer, elected to house 1970. Vege Attorney for the District of Minnesota Thomas Ke Berg, MUt¥ 1977-78, ps 177, “State Representative, Dist. 56B, Attorney, elected 1970, 72, Thy 760" ‘tthe Hannesota' Legislative Manual", compiled by the Secretary of State and published by The State of Minnesota at St. Paule The United States Suprene Court has spake out on the "Doctrine of Searation of Powers! in the Federal Constitution upon which all state constitutions are based. "the Constitution, in distributing the powers of goverment, creates threq distinct and separate departnents ~ the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. This separation is not merely a matter of convenience or of governmental nechaniat.e Its object is basic and vital, Springer v. Government of Philippine Islands, 277 U.S. 169, LBS. ct. L80, 72 Led. SLS; nanely, to preclude a comingling of these essentially different powers of goverment in the sane hands. * * % it fellows, asp logical corellary, equally important, that each department should be kept completely independ= ent of the others * * but in the sense that the acts of each shall never be cone trolled by or subjected, directly or indirectly, to, the coercive influence of either of the other departments." O'Donoghue v. United States, (1933), at 743, 53 Se Ob. THO, 269 U.S. S16. ‘The judges on the state supreme court have unlinited power over all btate lawyers beeause the supreme court controls all members and employees of the judicial Genartnent, including all lawyers and lawyer=judges, ty the admission and licensing of lawyers to practice law, and the discipline, punishment and disbament bf any Jawyor = all done in secret trials. By virtue of this control over the livelyhoed of a1 lawyers the judges on the state suprene and other courts can control and exert undue influence on any and all layers in the state legislature and pxecutéve departments and this is a violation of Article III of the State Constitutipn (the doctrin of separation of powers, above). The Minnesota state judges & Atty Cen. yearly salaries: Supreme Court Chier Associate District County Attol Justice Justices dudges Judges Genefal. 1971-72 $35,000 $32,500 $29,000 $24,000 $30, 1973-7 40,000 36,000 32,000 25 ,000 36, 1975-76 40,000 36,000 32,000 27,500 36,300 1977-78 52,000 49 000 10,000 40,000 19,500 1978-80 56,000 52,500 45,060 45,000 52,400 8 yr. increase$21,000 $20,000, $16,000 $21,000 ‘$21,/ (608) (Gag) (65%) (8s) (198) B11 state judges retire at one-half (1/2) of their yearly salary, paid by the tax-payers of this state. aged real aad Minnesota Statutes (N.S.) 6094125 CORRUPTLY INFLUENCING LEGISLATOR. | "Whoever uy menace, deception, concealment of facts, or other corrupt means, attempts to influence the vote or other performance of duty of any member of the legisjature or person elected thereto may be sentenced to imprisoment for not more than five years or payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or both." {Petition to expeh attys fr Leg. & execs depts. page 5. (4.8.0.) Article IV, LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT, Sec. 5, Restriction 4n holding office. Nc senator or representative shall hold any other office under the author= ity of ‘the United States or the state of Minnesota, except that of Postnadter or of notary public, If elected or appointed te another office, a logisiator miy resign fron the legislature by tendering his resignation to the governor.” (W.S.C,) Article IV, LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT. Sec. 7. Rules of government. "Bach house may determine the rules of ite proceedings, sit upon its om adjourment, punish its menbers for disorderly behavior, and with the concurrence of tuo-thirds expel a members but na nenber shall be expelled a second tine for the sang offense. (%.56) 609648 PERJURY. Subd. 1, Acta constituting. “Whoever makes a false naterial statement which he does not believe to be true in any of the following onsne is guilty of penjuny and may be sentenced a2 provided in mibdiviaion lis (2) “In ay writing which is required or authorized ty law to be unde! or affirmation: Subd. lt, Sentence, Whoever violates this section may be sentenced Bs follows: (2) In all other cases, to imprisonment for not more than three years of to pay~ nent of a fine ef not more than $3,000, or both! a ath (M.Se) 358.11 OATHS, WHERE FILED. Except as otherwise provided uy law, the cath required to be taken and subscribed by any person shall be filed as fpllows: (1) Ig that of an officer of the state, whether elective or appointive, with the secretary of state." (4654) 609413 MISCONDUCT OF PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE. "A public officer or employee who does any of the following, for which no other sentence 1s specific= ally provided ty law, may be sentenced to improsorment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of net more then $1,000, or both: (2) In his capacity as such officer or employee, does an act which hq knevs is in excess of his lawful authority or which he knows he is forbidden by lew to do in his official capacity: (3) Under pretense or color of official authority intentionally and unlawfully injures another in his person, property, or rights} or (k) In his capacity as such officer or employee, makes a return, certificate, official report, or other Like document which to his knowledge is false in any naterial respect." (4.S.) Goeth PUBLIC OFFICES ILLEGALLY ASSU WG; NON-SURREWDER, “Whoever: intentionally and without lawful right thereto, exercises a fuction of a public office or * * + may be sentenced to imprisontent for not more than one yebr or to Peynent of a fine of not nore than $1,000, or both" (M.S-) 609el5 PUBLIC OFFICER; UNAUTHORIZED COMPENSATION. Whoever ip a public officer * * # and under color of his office #** * intentionally asks, retolves or agrees to receive a fee or other compensation in excess of that allowed by law or where no such fee or compensation is allowed, is guilty of a misdemeanor,! (MsS~) 6096455 PERMITTING FALSE CAINS AGATNST COVERIMENT. "A publig officer 4% # sho # %¥ allows, * * * any claim or demand made upon the state # + % which he knove is false or fraudulent in whole or in part, may be sentenced to imprison= nent for not noze than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $5,000, or bothPetition to expel atts fr Leg. & Exec, Depts. page (M.S.) 609.465 PRESENTING FALSE CLAIMS TO FUBLIC OFFICER OR BODY. “Wheever, with intent to defraud, presents a claim or demand, which to his knowledge is false in whole or in part, for audit, allowance or payment to a public officer’ or bedy authorized to make guch audit, allowance or payment is guilty of an attempt to commit theft of public funds and may be sentenced accordingly." (4.S.) 609.75 IMPERSONATING OFFICER. "whoever falsely impersonates a * * * public official with intent to mislead another inte believing that he is! such officer or official is guilty of a nisdeneancr (4.8.) 609,52 THEFT, Subd, 2. Actes constituting theft. actually (G}_ Getains for ninsel? oF another the possession, custody or title to. prop erty of a third person by intentionally decoiving hin with a false repret which 4s known to be false, made with intent to defraud, and which does person to whom it is made. Subd, 3s Sentence, Whoever comits theft nay be sentenced as f (1) To imprisonment for not more than ten years or to paynent of| not more than $10,000, or both, if the value of the property or services exceeds $2,5003 or + % 4M ‘The Minn, state supreme court has ruled that all lawyers are "Leai law", therefore, they can't use ignorance of the lew as an excuses The lawyers now require in the AFFIDAVIT OF CANDIDACY (copy att: person te a lawyer before filing for an elective office in the judicial according to Article III of the Minn, State Constitution and the Equal 1} Clause of the lth Amendment of the Federal Constitution - that a perecn| be a menber of the judicial or other department of the gevernnent when fi jentation jefraud the Lows: ‘a fine of stolen in the ) that a jept., then reatnent shall NOT ling for an office in the legislature or executive departments of the state government. ie, the citizenstaxpayers of this state will not tolerate being ri the lawyers and lawyer-judges who violate the Kinnescta State Constitutl they wish. In order to correct this deplorable situation, the lawyers judges who have violated the Minnesota State Constitution MUST be remo and tried by jury before NON-lawyer judges who can inpose long jail ser state prison for those convicted, so that the Liayer will once again res Minnesota State Constitution. “ dncft by whenever Lawyer= from office bnoes in the ject the (M.8.C.) Article VIII, IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVAL FROM OFFICE, Sectton 1, Impeachnent powers. "The héuse of representatives has the sole power off ‘through a concurrence of a majority of all its members. ALL impeachnent tried by the senate, When sitting for that purpose, senators shall be uf affirmation to do justice according to law and evidence. No person victed without the concurrence of two-thirds of the senators present. Sec. 2, Officers subject to impaachnents grounds; judgnent. The gi retary of state, treasurer, auditer, attorney general and the judges of and district courts may be impeached for corrupt conduct in office er fol misdenoanors; but Judgnent shall not extend further than to renoval. fran| Gisqualification to hold and enjoy any office of honor, trust or profit ‘Tre party convicted shall also be subject to indictment, trial, judgnent! nent according to Law. Sec. 3. Suspension. No officer shall exercise the duties of his he has been impeached and before his acquittal. impeachment shall be yn oath oF be cone nor, Seom he suprene crimes and office and in this state, and punish ffioe afterPetition to expel attys fr Leg. & Exec. Depts. page 7. Sec, le Service of impeachnent papers, No person shall be tried on ment before he has been served with a copy thereof at least 20 days previ day set for trial. jeach= to the Sec. 5, Removal of inferior officers. The legislature of this state my provide for the removal of inferior officers for malfeasance or nonfeasande i1 performance of their duties.” ‘THEREFORE, we petition Governor Quie, and/or Lt. Governor Wangberg, and Officers of the Minnesota State Senate, and Each and every menber of the Hinnesota State Senate, and Officers of the Minnesota State House of Representatives, and Each and every menber of the Minnesota State House of Representatives: ‘To convene a special session of the Minnesota State Legislature for the pose of considering and acting on the following: a.) Expelling from the legislature all. nenbers who were lawyers at the of filing or thereafter, for violating Article IIT of the State Constitutions in the pure tine be) Expelling from the legislature all other nenbers who were at the time of filing or thereafter menbers or employees of the executive departnent of the government for violation of Article III of the State Constitution. state c+) Inpeachment and trial of Attorney General Warren Spannaus and all judges who have violated the state constitution and statutes. d.) To create a State Constitutional Court or other ageny composed folely of Now-lawyers to control, license, try and punish by fines and jail sentences all Judicial officers and other state officers who violate the state constitution, Well as, the Minnesota statutes, and to collect all money with interest uncon: ‘tionally paid to former individuals of the state governnent. Respectfully submitted: \y a8 Stitue 4 Nova /o/ _Rews Dick Bullock dsf Po Sharon snderson REV. DICK BULLOCK TT SRARON” ANDERSON Church of the Living Faith Gharch of Justice Reform Box 62 1058 Sumit Avenue Circle Pines, Minnesota SOL, Sts Paul, Kinnesota $5105 Candidate Congress 8th District Candidate Syate Re 6 American Party Party, (oe /s/ _Fev. Don Lende oO ‘REV. DOM LENDS eae 4 Ohureh of Truth 25200 Confort Drive West Ae Forest Lake, Minnesota 55025 Candidate State Cenate Dist. 19 dmerican Party itt 5Atn ra Canateaoien of sharon L. SCAR: TRELLA at al, for Atroctate Justloe oprene Cort of Minwonit Aue ns, Original proceeding in which order 10 show cause wan directed to Secretary of State in order to determing eligitilty of certain candidates for judicial office. The Supreme Court held that names of five in- dividuals who had filed with Secretary of State to le candidates for office of Assa- ciate Justice of State Supreme Court mut Tee omitted from halls to he used at pric mary and general clection sehere indivils- als were not admitted or entitled to be ad- mitted 10 practice as attorneys at fw in the state and that filing fee must he re- ‘tured to each af the individuals concerned since fi Otis, Todd, Maclaugh Scott, Ju took 10 part in consideration oF decision of cate. 1 dagen ome “Learned in the law” for purposes of ‘constitutional provision fixing. qualification for judges of the Supreme Court means 10 tne admitted of entitled 10 he admitted 10 (practice a8 an attorney at law in state. MSA. § 23.38, subd. 1 2. dataon ome CCanatilates who were not admitted nor entitled to be admitted to practice law, 19 state were not cligile for afficeof Asio- inte Justice of State Supreme Court. 1 JA. § 210.3, nbd, 991 NORTH WESTERN REPORTER, 24 SERIES ‘of eandivacy with Sceretary of State for stice of Aswciate Justice of State Sa remy Cart were improperly accepted. AK subd 1, Stabs hy the Cort ‘uf state, and all persons acting under bit iretion and control, including but not limited to all county auditers of the State ‘Minnesota, to refrain from placing the wes of Sharon 1. Searrlla, Richard W. lock, avid Dotlich, Franke D. Bilotta, ‘at Michael Paul Mullin on the ballots for the primary election to be held September MW, 1474, and the general clection to be held November §, 1974, as candidates. for the office uf astaciate justice of the S preme Court of the Slate of Minnesota. Ordered that said names be omitted from the ballots. Warren R. Spannass, attorney eneral, Peter W. Sipking, solicitor ener al, and Thomas Ul. Jensen, special assistant attorney general, appeared for and on be: half of the State of Minnesota, No ap- pearance was made for or on behalf of the ‘andidates, Proof of personal service of the order to show cause issued by this ‘court on July 19, 1976, upon each of the candidates has heen filed with the clerk of this court. ‘The matter was heard and con- sider-d ts Che” Justice Robert J. Sheran, Assoviais insties Walter F, Rogorheste, ©. Dowraki Peterson, and Fallon Kelly, and Chief Justice Oscar R. Knutson (Ret.) and Associate Juntice William DP. Murphy (Ret). Associate Justices James C. Otis, Job J. Todd, tarry Hl. MacLaughlin, Lawrence R, Vetka, and George M. Scott, candidates for the office of associate jus- tice of the Minnesota Supreme Court in the 1974 election, took no part in the con- suleration oF decision of this case. Richard Bullock, pre se. David Lottie, pro #6.STATE y. MATTHEWS Minn, 563 ‘ena 2) N28 Bot / ing, Sol, Gen., Thomas Jenacn, Spec. Ai ‘Auty. Gen, St. Paul, for respondent. PER CURIAM. This is proceeding under Minas 203.8, subd. 1, to determine the eligi of five individuals to have theie names ap- pear on the ballots for the primary and -eneral elections to be held September 10, 1974, and November 5, 1974, as candidates ; for the office of associate justice of the ; Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Although each of the persons named 4s candidates filed with the secretary of state | an affidavit of candidacy stating, “lam learned in the law as defined by * 7 * Jaw * * 9" (Italics supplied), none has been or is entitled to be admitted to Practice as am attorney at lw in this state, 11,21 The case is controlled by In re Candidacy of Daly, 294 Mina. ASI, 200 N. (W.24 913, certiorari slenied, sh nom. Daly vy. McCarthy, 409 US. 141, 98 S.Ct. 5% ‘3H LEA24 491 (1972), ‘There it is held thae to be “learned in the law” within the meaning of Minn.Const. att. 6, § 7, Fait the qualifications fur jeayes of the preme court, menus ta Ie aunt or enki Hed 10 be admitted to practice ax an attr ney at Taw in the State of Minnewats. It follows that Sharon {.. Searrells, Kichatl W. Hulloek, David Dotlich, Frank D, oy ‘ott, and Michael Paul Maltin, sone of is admitted o entitled 10 be admk- 10 practice aw in the state of Mi must be omitted from the ballots 10 aad at the primary election to be heli! an September! 0, 1974, and the senern) let: tn to be held on November §, 1974, (3) eis fer real tha ia 4 these filings were improperly rt the filing fee of each of the indivwtaats a fected should be returned. Amendment of. the form of affidayit 10 he subscribed iy persone serking. judicial office, apecttyioge that 10 be “learn mitted w practice in the courts of che State of Mimesota as a lawyer, shoub ‘make resort to the eourts in eases so cl ly contraled ly precedent as this one wn: necessary. OTIS, TODD, Macl-AUGHLIN, YE KA and SCOTT, If, tok wo part @ the consideration oF decinion of this ease, |mannan, were | | oe eo | EES, on SJ |B ser es, =] GS me ae ee a eat oa =| |e eS... 4 4G L. con eur eogielé lok bate : ee u : i MINNESOTA TAX COURT FORM 2 (PURSUANT TO M.S. 278.02, THIS PETITION WILL INCLUDE (3) PARC TAX COURT — REGULAR DIVISION — Petition for Reduction of Assessed Valuatidn Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 278, ATTORNEY GENERAL WILL BE SERVED AS PEYITIONERS WILL CHALLENGE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF M.S. Valuation of Property - Valu STATE OF MINNESOTA 273.11 at COUNTY oF __BAMSEY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT er=st~tr—“‘CUCOCO Fite a0 A> 7 ¥Ol_ RAMSEY, TOM FOLEY, tn his official Respondent. COUNTY OF __3 capacity of Haasey Couaty Attorney and as individual. PETITION Minn, Sup. Crt. 47841-47832-486. Your Petitioner(s) represent(s) und show to the Court: Other related cases U.S. Dist 3 454962- 451899 - KsoKo4 Ram Dist. 455632- 4o8ks7 1A-89 TL That your Petitioner(s) iM (have) an interest as‘a fee owners) of that tract of lind situated in the County of _BAMSEY _—____ and State of Minnesota, described as follows, to wit: (attach a copy of the contested notice or tax statement) 4282 okt |v. (1) = 1058 Summit Ave. Summit Park Addit Lots 4 and 5 block 39-Est.$108,940 tax Levied $2,689.12 less HC 650.00, sp. assm. $64.00 [Total due 2,4 (2) ~ 309 Pelham Blvd. Desnoyer Park, subj to Blvd fol Lots 7,10 B1K29 96,999 Tax levied $2,336.94 HC 650.00 sp.assm. 239.56 Total tax due 1,92615: (3) 2194 Marsball ——- Desnoyer Park, 11 Blk 49 $52,946 Tax levied $1,587.96 DENIED HC DISCRIMINATELY SEE Ta-89 | Tx aue1,58 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, Pursuant to M.S. 278.03, PAYMENT OF PORTION OF TAX, that this 19th day of May, 1982, 10 ten days notice to the County Audi: and Attorney, petition 13 hereby made to the court for permission td continue prosecution of this petition without payment bqcause: PARCEL (1) ist half will be paid on or before May 31, 1982 PARCEL (2) Petitioners address the court as servere financiql hardship, unemployment, and medical disability of the Peterson soetrh r PARCEL (3) Serve undue hardship, as government intrusion saying 2194 Ma is condemned, without proceedings, contrary to Mijnn. Const. Article I sec. 2, and 13, ret 3-81-82, U.S. Dist, Crt, Ramsey Dist. Crt. 455632, appeal Mina. Slup. Crt. = refer to TA-69. Denial of omestead Credit to wilhite’s see si (4), letter by housing John Betz. Taxes's and asdessements le are unreasonalble, arbitrary, caprecious, and pursyant to statute denies equal protection and violates the principles of, Ny, /eq TiREISCR SAE STAR He ASRS REASS RLON, Res WHEREFORE, your Potitioner(s) pray(s) this we Sth geek claim reducing said assessment. DA’ ADDRESS and 1058 Summit St. Pa Phone 309 Pelham Blvd. 297-8946 - 6lh-6238 TACHED EXHIBITS ee EE Prejudice ata.23 apr. 197e a (2) artidavit of Prejudice ata. May 19th, 1981, both April 19th, 1982 INSTRUCTIONS TO TAXPAYERS {2}o asbace TOE StQRHeRWON PURSUANT TO MINNESOTS STS EUTES 27 (4)- Letter dtd. qUTES, May 18th, 1962 ordemsmp Punt hineeg ee sta. 1 the Rear Dison ofthe Tex Court sl have usin any case deal wah property aluadon or sesiment Se ee eee ee eee2 oe Ob abll Pudl eben be 8 Tharp hei ede brett SERVICE ,STATE OF MIKNESOTA DISTHICT COURT COUNTY OF RAMSEY cTiY OF ST. PAUL mo 722 mo. 7L2 THE SAME TITLE 2) SEPARATE A SOTA, OR CITY OF ST. PAUL, Plaintiff, JUDICIAL DISTRI! Ronald 2 Stephen 1. Sorel David E oF Bdvard 5 archie L. Gin, sold Human Segell Je den t «Lynch Harold are employed at the Ramsey County Court houl innesota, 55101, e, St. Paul, PLEASE TAKE NOTECH, that Sharon L. Se Abtorney Pro Se, the ebove named Defendant in thee criminal cusses etebes end belicy that the above named judges are biased and prejudiced| against her ur further she believes thet she cannot in eny way receive a fair and impartial trial from them becuse she was a member of|a group of nd the Aneric- citizens nescta S| Ser Association smong others in a federal class action teesuse: nizations had conspired to and has violeted the f}deral civil and the legel action was STATS OF } counry oF Rasa jtorney Fro La ave. sul, ifinnesota, $51Lip emg ple SoC 3D . i, STATE OF MINNESOTA ee Judicial District Fas COUNTY OF RAMSEY Pile no., av. Sharon i. Scarrella, aka Sharan L, Anderson, aka Bev. Anderson, aka firs. csaes BR. Anderson Plaintirs, vs. State of Yinnesota, Couaty of Eansey agiiast all Gaasey County City of St. Paul, ot al pal and Dist: Judgss/ exception Charles Finn. Defendant. 70: JUDGE AND/oR REFEREE _CA¢fivudge Zawara D. Mulelly and all Muaieipal ana Distrtet Court Judges 7 exception Charles Pian. AND TO THE ABOVE NAMED COURT: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that the above named Attorney Pro Se, states and believes thatJhe cannot receive ja fair and impartial trial of the issues of law and/or fact before [the above named judge or referee. Peterson vs, Bartels, 284 Minn. 463, 170 Maw. (2nd) 572 citing that an Affidavit of Prejudice could be Submitted after the beginning of a trial. and request that these tar cases be transferred to the Executive Branch of Government, pursuant to M.S. 271.01, and that in accordance with the Minnesota Constitution article VI, sec. 1'and 5, and that an uabias, tial, nou-lawyer judge be assigned to these o: This affidavit 1s submitted in goca faith and not for the pursoses of delay, but Petitioner,Affiant, na3 o72 bofore on the Municipal and District Bench/ etédnsi bas been illegally incarcerated by tunic! to real-estate bas never been tried. Juage Plunkett crested 2 horrenduc tazchis < Petitoner when Midvest Federal Porelosed on 105 who sits on the Board of Judictel Staadaréa, ig a municipal court jurisdiction, runnias 2 again without trying title to real-estate, contra: Examples Minnesota Suprece Crt. file no. 47821,47832,48611, and Matter of Foreclosure Sale at 1058 Summit file no. 408457, Ransey District Court, Plunkett in effect denying the above naned Petitioner hdr Federal, Civil’and Constitutional rights, he refused to rule on constituttonality of 4.8, 580.06, on January 8, 1876, Petitioner verily believes Yecau of his relaticaship with his Brother Richard Plunket:, forter Adnictic Conaissiouer and Banker, T believe in Roczester, he of any of tHese /udges pecsuce of their optop mlin-s omy) d=) att Fake i. Re St a oyi tot (et ! a LST HALF STUB 1982 sw > MAKE CHEOKG PAYABLE TO | DISECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION } [a7 71200 050) 39/6 oe STUB MUST fF Mutiute SHARON L SCARRELLA & WILLIAM O PETERSON ACCOMPANY CHURCH OF JUSTICE REFORM 1038 SUMMIT AVE ~ ST PAUL HN 55195 ENT 1058 SUMMIT AVE “ Do hot Fuld, sta YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX PAYABLE IN 4 989 pause} county. mis STATE COPY SSCRIPTION | SUMMIT PARK AQOITION | LOTS 4 AND 539; SHARON L SCARRELLA & | i : HILLIAM 0 PETERSON boo i CHURCH OF JUSTICE REFORM | VALUE INFORMATION 1058 SUMMIT AVE | [ew wemoveresrs | ST PAUL HN 55405) | aeruerse ox i 408,900 es 2 25,632 29589012 The Spee Passe, ts amount on ine 11 24595096 anes © ana aise on sora 650.09 ee 3. Fil 9 tnis amount on ‘ine 9 . seca 29669012) siyesoTa DEPARTMENT OF REVENL Neeo a Farm Wi-1PA” Read Ina ack of this form te nsec oa et ee day ‘ot apply forte propery axes. i44 22100; 104/29 , BERNAE A PETERSON 309 PELHAM BLVD ST PAUL MINN 303 PELHAM ALVO { sehedule 3 Nga a Form M-1PR? Read the Sack of this form, | DESNOYER: PARK | | suad To BLO THE FOL LOTS a ft | VACUE INFORMATION ‘ew mapROVEMENTS. assesseo “AWE | seea09 | 2 TAX SUMMARY: ee eee TANES LEVIED 29336.94 ELIGIBLE FOR a AEFUND? To find out It you're alge for | cesteneons 650.00 ‘one or both of these refunds. E Bases seers eee os rox setencnenrs Ty686.9% ee soa speras scessvens 239.56 cut FORM tPA using ne Noun onmted below : = FOTAL FAK paraaLs 1,926.50 suv the apount on in 2425569852 Taig PART OF THE TAX STATEMENT een meen Gables TO CLAIM PROPERTY TAX REFUNDS FROM 2 eitia ene amount a ee 4 Aen MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. | DETACH PAY STUB BEFORE YOU FILE Lain,4 $ pi pec ecb tain bene Ast HALF STUB 1982 Paks ie YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT / o TLe8 | nccounr wuwaen | PROPERTY DBMTCATION | MAKE GHECKS PAYABLE TO Gee fst ear [mance DIRECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION = ] q ‘DEPARTMENT GF PROPERTY TAXATION 3 1 |2ztog| 210) 49 [a sofogarncuse 2 Tan SS ENTER st. paut fumnesora ssi 5 ae @ SHARON L SCARRELLA STUB MUST ‘B 1058 SUMMIT AVE ACCOMPANY & St aut srw PAYMENT zo batoun 1,587.96 2 i TO AVOID PENALTY PAY ON OR [ TROPERTY ORES BEFORE JUNE 1.1982 Ss oa Tora 2 2194 MARSHALL AVE % eee 793.98 STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX PAYABLE IN 4 O82 pansey county, MINN stag! Tan OF OWNEA A TawPavEm STATE COPY 11 [2200 |tz0oa | bes _| DESNOVER PARK [SHARON L SCARRELLA : 14056 SUMMIT AVE ~ [31 Pau mEMn 55105 iL NEDRNATION | | [New waemovements| | | Shiite | | gzages a | detest ae —— - | TAX SUMMARY: 2134 maRsHauL Ave ' ELIGIBLE FOR A REFUND? ?? | eee peda Te ting ut youre eight fo 00 fone or both of these refunds, ‘The Minnesota Property Tax Refund eal and | ‘The Special Property Tax Refund | AOD Srecia, assessments hil out FORM W-1PR using the amounts printed below: | TOTAL TAX PAYABLE 1. Filta this amount on jine 11 SO 15502606 Use THIS PART OF TI 2, Fill in this amount on line 13. and also on line 2, schedule 3 +80/ 0 cLamm paOPERTY 3, Fill in this amount on tine 1 sscheaule 3 14555496 Need a Form M-1PR? Read the back of this form. MINNESOTA DEPART} DETACH PAY STUB ‘ina box i checked, you cee dtinquent tases and may ‘ot np fore propery ex oun erat 49555. 32.00 1,587.96 ie TAX STATEMENT ‘Ax REFUNDS FRC? ENT OF REVENUE BEFORE YOU FILESpon, 7 2 Seems] [wane onecns rapaots 10 ,z SST SA ear ECTOR PROPERTY TAXATION een jeer SE oe carder ATO ef 11/2299! 110) 49 [6 ‘coum = a RTRRETER sy salt nwesprasice = pony 4 @ SHARON L SCARZELLA STUB MUST 1B 05s SUMMIT AVE ' ACCOMRANY + & ST PAUL MINN 35105 a si ct ee NOID PENALTY PAY ON OR ie GT OOS BEFORE NOVEMBER 1. O8E j2 I ee } » { % 2t94 MARSHALL AVE fe eter 793698 8 . YOUR CANCELLED CHECK IS YOUR RECEIPT STATEMENT OF PROPERTY TAX PAYABLE IN 932 aausey couNTY, MINN TAXPAYER'S COPY SER ETAT feist {ear [Pence cHooL] LOAN sx] ea] 1 eae fee fezaoo|i10 [xa eos || Sg ase sper oesonenon Te oF GanEH Gn TanPaveR : | DESNove! SHARON L SCARPELLA [.058 SUMMIT AVE ST PAUL MINN 35105 | (PARK This eropariy descr pligh May Nol 6e 8 Tal eGa desctiption use ony 4 tax ursoses, VALUE (NFORMRTION, | {| a { nT aS f | (2294 MAPSHALL AVE f 52,966 14,831 ee ELIGIBLE FOR A REFUND? >? To find out if youre ang fone 2t both af these rat i SO5e47 393.53 ‘The Minnesota Property Tax Refund coja\ Provarty Tax Retuna till out FORM M-1PR using the amounts printed below: | CREDITS MiCH REDUCE YOURTAA, | 1. FUL in this amount on iine 11 1,502.06 2, Bill In this amount on line 19 j fang aise on ine 2, sehecule 3 sao! H 3 amount on tine 1 cme eg, {2 TAXAPTERCREDITS 1] 14585.95 ae 14555 696 |:1 specint assessuents : SPRNCIRAL 32.03vil 3-81-82: Rev. Sharon L. Anderson, et al v. State of Minnes| “Sudge Magnuson 11/16/81 ProceeoiNas CERTIFIED COPY OF DOCKET ENTRIES (LODGED) 2-281 | 1 | COMPLAINT - summons {issued ASSIGNED TO JUDGE MACLAUGHLIN per Civil Tights #547 2-3-81 |2 | ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION (actaugiilin-J) ASSTGNED TO JUDGE YORPHY por Civil Rights #548 NOTICE 70 couseL 2-11-81} 4 ORDER OF DISQUALIFICATION (Murphy-J; 2-10-81) ASSIGNED TO JUDGE RENNER per Civil Rights #554 5 |Nortce to couse. Mailed entire Clerk's file along with certified copy of docket ent Clerk's Office under new civil action number 3-81-82. REASSIGNED TO JUDGE RENNER 2-11-81 2-24-81, SUMMONS returned served 2-20-81 2-26-81 MOTION AND MOTION for order requiring Pltffs. to make a more defi pursuant to Rule 12(e) which statenent shall conform to Rule 8(e) being simple, concise and direct and to Rule 8(a)(1) with regard plain statement of claims showing that pleader is entitled to rel: March 17, 1981 10 A.M. or as soon as before Cudd, U. S. Mag, Minn 2427-81 17, 1981 10 A.M, or as soon as before Magistrate Cudd Room 530 Mi 32-81 DEFTS* DEFINITE STATENENT Noticed for hearing before Cudd, U. S. Mag. 17, 1981 10 A.M.or @s soon as. 3-25-81 | 10 | PLTFFS' MOTION AND COUNTERMOTION ANSWER FOR Order requiring defts. Federal Freedom of Information Act to provide Pltffs with copies condemnation proceedings, tax assessed and homestaed credits, all ings and incarcerations of Pitffs concerning building located at of alleged tax delinquencies, and revenue paid since 1975. 1981 10 A.M. or as soon as before Magistrate Cudd, Minneapolis. 3-30-81 11 | MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS: to Dismiss: (cud U. S. Mag.) Under advisement. Hearing on State of Mi 11-16-81] 12] ORDER FOR RE-ASSIGNMENT OF ACTION TO JUDGE MAGNUSON NOTICE TO COUNSEL ries to St. Paul DEFTS City of St. Paul, Frank Staffenson, John Betz and George McMahon's NOTICE OF lite statenent, with regard to {to being short anc Jef. Noticed for neapolis. COUNTY OF RAMSEY AND LOU McKENNA'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MDTION FOR MORE mneapolis March Pursuant to the (f all complaint, (criminal proceed- 94 Marshall, copi Noticad for March 23, Innesota's Motion i hy DIVISION OF HOUSING & BUTLDING coDE vaoncnal ( rouse ine ae 445 Court House Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 298-5644 Date of Insj pection: Shien. Date Tesueds Sina Gs Date Mailed By Wren ms eee =laa owThe Dispai ch . Aesday, June 23, 1981/18 : . oa Police fail Seer hte me to arrest | Beta ses intruder anit te Anerson regu at house nt ake se se, ergy the man and the coupie to the city attorney's office to work out By George Beran their differences, Staff Writer : “The police got bere fast, but A Summit Aveave couple are not arrest the’ sus: ypset with St. Paul Police today | Peet. Something “cvinks”" hire ‘or failing wo arrest a man who | Anderson said Usiay catruded foto their home, {ough “ith them and sprayed" ope of The Andersons were (reated ‘her with Mace Monday night, James and Sharon Anderson, (056 Sunamit Ave, said the man walked into their house at 9:20 Pm, claiming to be a process server. Mrs. Anderson has been a frequent candidate for public of- fices and is known for several ‘orays in St Paul courts. wee rabbing the man, Anderson wrestled with him’ before the ‘an shoved him over a porch sailing. AG that. point Mex Andersin, jumped the intruder and was struck in the side of the face. The man tan from the house to bis (ube Su 3//4/, "Realty firm. z tomanage contracts): for First Gu ta year’s real property to tion nearly m T feel total "eespa’~ Soemfhing raust stop this ma: 1 really believe on in do it, Thi Is what "the assessor have fone — aad indeed sur ‘mated market value ive, purchased in 1945 ain sum of $6,300 — = at a deal sacrifice in 1945 ¢ lars. We paid $75 a month on martghge out of $65. weekly come = which is more than percent now recommended ossitle house payments that while see kept a family fave fel! and ele. ned, Trug. it Is a fine old bo. Weil bhill on a hilltop, whic par'ially inacessible in” win: and a [oy of verdure in the sur keep dad repairs. 1's pureh:. price {s paid every five ye: just Northern Sates Poe is : This|71-year old howge has » cept E qe aes om 182;- 1978-$29;600, i979. Int that madness? 1 wast to die herd, but I don’t want to has. ten my demise by being robbed anty eck itnt perieareaisaer eae i tet ern, ot ad ™ : wrabbed the Mace and twice \shqtwitee = serosa it count 'GARET DORE? sete See = se eae ein ange jae Ser ueetret See tenes nie oie tan ae eeg PO Frigy to tmaage ae many er 2500 hace the mag drove off on Sura. FA"Seage contacts eld by tree What Jonnls wil do in effects mit Avene but returned a short - Companies afated with Firs Guare Ge resliy company iaformatica, ame later while police officers gary Carp. The companies filed for cluding camen ebout the sere trying to piece together —pankrapicy last month and are being holders and permit the company soca iemaimemaseat Sirs tins SS * on Te Minmepolia man, when Ant rind wal tog sg | viscid Tey sake ey ery nt Ur atm ae oe ToPURE leeal papers and ea GetCpatruce and Coles payments. fare ihe propery la touret, Set aeateines Ree Te wan ee Sat Sa Steet | ‘tea cman partments Semen c lee mely aon ea open ae Satescpeerese teow yrs ade Pt ur] erat oros . Seen os tren cance et Sees Semen mae saree ta ae Minnesots attorney general's of |' Remsen ;JUDITH A, DEWANE é exit 2 oe mo TS esac ae eee ane | ae is tasy POPs oa cB ta roy (6S 28rae ag ous nayRo a Lb Yal. ye HESSRs my meg 7 , ae “wr pil i at ita i—— = a a Fal ‘ania ct' FILED SEP1 1982 STATE OF MINNESOTA, . Gou.! TAX COUNTY OF RAMSEY gy Deputy jcourr SECOND JUDICIAL DIGTRICT Sharon L, Anderson, aka Scarrella, and Bernice A. Peterson and Bernae A, Peterson, Petitioners, | FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND -vs- ORDER FOR JUDGMENT county of Ramsey, Tom Foley, in District Court Filg #TA-140 his official capacity of Ramsey County Attorney and as individual, Respondents. The above matter came on for trial on September 9, before the Minnesota Tax Court in St. Paul, Minnesota, Ji Earl B. Gustafson presiding. 982, fage Sharon L. Anderson, aka Sharon Scarrella, and Bernice A. Peterson appeared pro se on behalf of the Petitioners. Janet R. Stenborg, Assistant County Attorney for R: County, appeared for Respondents. sey The issue is the correct estimated market value (EMV) for three separate properties in the City of St. Paul which Hetitioners claim are excessive. The Court now makes the following: FINDINGS OF PACT 1. This is a Chapter 278 real estate tax petition testing 1981 valuations for taxes payable 1981. 2, The petition was filed May 20, 1982. jcase con- 3. This matter was advanced on the calendar and hdard before the other scheduled Ramsey County property tax cases fildd in 1982 because Petitioner specifically requested that the matte! be heard before the last half taxes were due in October. The matifer was setAugust 23, 1982, confirming the new trial setting is attdched hereto as Exhibit "B". 5, Hach of the properties consist of land improved with a residential structure and can be identified as follows: Parcel #1 1058 Summit Avenue Lots 4 and 5, Block 39, Summit Park addition Parcel #2 309 Pelham Boulevard Lots 7 through 10, Block 29, Desnoyer Park Addition Parcel #3 2194 Marshall Avenue Lot 11, Block 49, Desnoyer Park Addition 6. Petitioner Sharon L. Anderson a/k/a Sharon Scayrella has sufficient interest in Parcel #1 and Parcel #3 to maintain this petition; all statutory and jurisdictional requirem¢nts have been complied with, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter. 7. Petitioner Bernice A. Peterson is the owner of Parcel #2, 309 Pelham Boulevard, uses this as her residence, and, therefore, has sufficient interest to maintain this petition as to this parcel. Parcel #1, 1058 Summit Avenue, is the homestead of Petitioner Anderson a/k/a Scarrella. 9. ‘The assessment date in question is January 2, 1981. 10. The assessor's estimated market values (EMV's)|are as follows: 1058 Summit Avenue (Parcel #1) $108,900 309 Pelham Boulevard (Parcel #2) $ 96,909 2194 Marshall Avenue (Parcel #3) § 52,966 ll. Parcel #1, 1058 Summit Avenue, is assessed at greater than market value and should be reduced as follows: } 1058 Summit Avenue (Parcel #1) $ 95,000 12. Parcel #2 and Parcel #3 are not assessed at greater than market value.3. Whe petition is dismissed as to Parcel #2 and parcel 43 and the assessor's estimated market values are affirmed. 4. The attached Memorandum is made a part of these Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. A STAY OF FIFTEEN (15) DAYS IS HEREBY ORDERED. By the Court, pated: september, 1982MEMORANDUM The subject properties are three residences in the City of St. Paul. Parcel #1 is Petitioner Anderson a/k/a Scarrella's homestead on Sunmit Avenue. Parcel #2 is Petitioner Peterson's homestead on Pelhan Boulevard. Parcel #3 is a residence|on Mar- shall Avenue owned by Anderson a/k/a Scarrella and leased to a third party who has an option to purchase at a yet to be|determined price. The property at 1058 Summit Avenue (Parcel #1) was determined by the Tax Court last year to have a market value of $95/000. The Court further reduced this value to $76,000 by applying 4 80% ratio which it determined, at that time, to be the approximate level of assessment of properties on Summit Avenue. There is no recent study of sales in the Summit Avenue neighborhood available to this Court but sales ratio studies pre- pared by the Minnesota Department of Revenue specially for the Tax court indicate homestead property in St. Paul in 1981 were valued at a median of 89.4% of sale price and mean average of 91.78. This does not indicate any “substantial” systematic undervaluatiion of other property, so no further reduction would be appropriate. T am, therefore, adopting the same market value the Court found last year. No increase for inflation is being made because no, evidence was presented. In regard to the other properties, there was no substantial or convincing evidence offered to rebut the prima facie validity of the assessor's values. E.B.G.STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY : orsrarct court ) ss. SECOND Jupictal) orsTRICT PILE NO. ta yun Sharon L- Anderson, aka Scarrella, and Bernice A+ Peterson and Bernae A. Peterson PETITIONERS, RERRRRRRE, vs County of Ramsey. Tom Foley» in official acity of Ramsev i RESPONDENTS: RELERMARE Pursuant to Findings of Facts Conclusions of Law» and Onder f Gustafson, J-1 dated September L4, and filed Septamber 1b. 14 which states: CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1, The books and records of the Ramsey County Ast PURSUANT SOSGHENT BOLE r_dudament. 25 fessor and Auditor should be changed to reflect the new estimated market value on January 2, 1981, as follows: 1058 Summit Avenue (Parcel #1) $ 95,000 2. Real estate taxes on Parcel #1 should be reco} accordingly. 3. The petition is dismissed as to Parcel §2 and and the assessor's estimated market values are affirmed puted Parcel #3 4, The attached Memorandum is made a part of thege Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. A STAY OF F: DAYS IS HEREBY ORDERED, FTEEN (15) pate: b-82 By 22). Nace, e——— at Capies mailed: Sharon L- Anderson Bernice A. Peterson Fora COC 8158 Revised 3/81STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT} couRT COUNTY OF RAMSEY TAX COURT 140 sub.35 IN THE MATTER OF PETITIONERS CLAIM OF UNEQUALL PROPERTY ASSESS~ MENTS: 1058 Summit Lots 4&5 Blk 39, MOTION TO DETERMINE THE "Summit Pk edd." 309 Pelham Blvd. CONSTITUTIONALITY OF M.S. Desnoyer Pk, sub. to Blvd. Lts 7& 273.11 Valuation of 10, Blk 29,'2194 Marshall, Desnoyei = MARKET VALUE Pk, 11 Bik'49. | MOTION Sharon(Scarrella)Anderson, Bernice A. Peterson, Bernat A. Peterson, Attorney's Pro Se, and owners, petitioners of thb above named real-estate situated in the State of Minnesota hereby moves the Court to declare M.S. 273.11,UNCONSTITUTIONAL because L is in direct violation of the 14th Amendment of the Federal Constitution which reads as follows: “* * #No State shall make or enforce any law whichi shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any perkon of life, liberty, or property without due process of jaw, nor deny to any person withia its jurisdiction the| equal protection of the laws." Article X. sec. 1, of the Minnesota Constitution states: “* * Taxes shall be uniform upon the same class of| subjects, * * *levied and collected for public purposes." | The apparant term MARKET VALUE, as applied in M.S. 278.11, has been unequally applied by the Ramsey County Assessor, as Testlonere are not willing buyers or sellors, and have been deprived pf their property rights, by an inflated, imaginery assessed valual Petitioners allege that they could not and would not their properties at the inflated assessed valuation, and are deprived or penalized for purchasing their properties time of sale, that true reflected MARKET VLAUE 1s when pr were purchased, see attached Black Dictionary, and Ballen legal definition of MARKET VALUE, re: McCamme} case Sup. 1: 50446, 50469, The sale of real-estate 1s inflationary as |the inter- est rate fluctuates, plus the terms or market avatlab4, ing. Therefore a denial of due process and equal trea; be striken from the laws. Dated Sept. 8, 82MARKET QUOTATIONS ‘Trade of Chicago v. LA. Kinsey Co. C.A.Ind, 130 F. | 507, aff'd 198 US. 236, 25 S.Ct 637, 49 LEG 1031, | ‘Market share. The percentage of a market that is controlled by a firm _A.20 percent share of market ‘means that the frm has captured 20 percent of the Sctual sales in the marke. Market structure Refers to the broad organizational ccharacterstics of a market. The major eharactets- lcs are seller concentration, product eifferentation, and barriers to entry etivalus, The price propery would command ia ‘The highest price a willing buyer would pay ands wing seller accept, both being fully in- formed, and the property being exposed fora rexson- Able period of time. The market value may be afer. tat from the price a property can actually be sed for ata given time (market price). The market value of fn afticle or piece of property is the price shich it might be expected to bring satiated for sale in a fair Iarket; not the price which might be obtained on a Sale at public auction fa sale forced by the necessi- es of the owner, but such a price as would be fixed by negotiation and mutual’ agreement, after ample time to find a purchaser, as between a vendor who is ‘net compelled) to sell and a. purchaser res f© buy But fs not compelled to take the panieular article or piece of property. U.S. v. Cer- fain Property n Borough of Manhattan, City, County | and State of New York, CAN-Y.. 403 F.2d 600, 202, | See also Actual market value: Clear market value; Fair cash market value: Fair market value, “Markiag up. The process wherein 4 legislative commit | ee gore through « bill section by section, revising I language and amending the bil as desired. Extensive revision may lead to the introduction of a clean bil Under anew number. May also refer to procedure by whieh 2 case is placed om the tial calendar, ¢g. “marking up for teal” Markon. An amount originally added to cost to obtain Ist price. Usually expressed as a percentage of cost. Further incranses in lst price are called markups Asereases sre called markiowns. See also Markup. Marksman. In practice and conveyancing, one who ‘makes his mark: x person who cangot write, and nly makes his mark in executing instruments, Markup. An amount originally added to cost, Usually ‘expressed as a percentage of welling price. Also re. fers to an increase above an oripinlly-stablshed retail price. ‘See Markon. ‘Markus doctrine /mérkoth dolaraa/ The doctrine ‘permits am applicant for a patent where there 1s no Known subgenerc teem whieh would Include ele: ‘ents which applicant found useful snd exclude ‘those which are not, ( employ a generic term limited {othe elements found to be operative and recognizes 8 unobjectionable as to form, claims containing & oined subgeneric expression. In re Swenson, CC. PA, 132 Fed 396. Marque and reprisal, letters of /lédare ov, mérk on ‘epriyzal/, “These words, “marque” and “reprisal” ave frequently used as synonymous, but, taken in 3 Sic etree the tamer che pansy tiers (arches) tn order to such takog. Se tmarue sad trea are pant CY (aoe ‘nations, whenever the subjects of one state ast Dressed and injured by those of another, agit o> Std oy Tht ae own te Soa ae te Snd te py to hom hee ee SE hee ie ian a ee en SSojts oft nce fo wc te sede Sel ansncton be nae, wherever ep ene Stein tepals wets te amd ny tg idea and pen Soa of ee Ae Marquis, oF marquess /entskiy/mérkewss/. In Enghsh aw, one of the second order of nobly; next in sat to's duke, Margate sist /“2t/, The stgiony of ra ‘aus, Macrage Legal union of one man and one woman at TRusband and wife. Singer v. Tara, 11. Wash App 247, 822 P2a 1189, 1198. Marsage, as distingwaked from the agreement to marry and from the ac ot becoming married, is the legal status, condition or Felation Of one man and one soraan united in aw for Ute, or unc divorced, for the discharge to exch het fad te community of the dies legally incumbent oo ‘hose whose association is founded on the deicton of sex A contract, ceording to the form presertbed by law, by which a man and woman capable of ‘entering into such contract, mutually engage wih ‘cach other fo live their whole lives (or unt dverced) fogether in state of union which ought 9 eo be- ‘ween a husband and wife. The word also signiey the act, ceremony, or formal proceeding by WNC Persons take each other for husband and wile Tm old English lew, marrage is used inthe sense of “woartaplurs” (a), or the feudal right enjoyed 2 the lord or guardian th chivalry of disposing of ward in marmage. ‘See alzo Avail of marriage; Banns of matnmony: ‘Commonviaw marrage: Consensual marrags: Re ‘Stmnint of marriage, Vordable marriages Vod marrage. (Ceremonial marriage. Marriage which follows a thé ‘Ratutory requlrements of blood test, ene, wating ‘und which has been solemnlzed before a8 ‘offical (religious or civ) expable of presiding # (M® sasringe. Informal rarriage tn which A marriage In which promis marriage are exchanged between the parties without af ‘eelesastcal representative present. In most CASA law requires cons onsider such valid ‘octitation of marriage ‘Manus marriage, fo {fformed a relation cal the wife ito the husbe {egal ghes in the post Marriage in jest. A Sroulment for tack ofr tomy. Mixed marriage, A 1 Giferent nationalities « {ary, between persons perween a white pers See Miseegenation. Morganatic marriage. Conjunction of 4 man, Sith s woman of infer pelther the wie nor he ties, arms, oF danity bis inbertanee, but be owed rank assigned 10 tuact. But since these rank of the parties and fut affecting the nat sent 1 must be consie marriage ceremony ts I indissoluble: the hi. Pra) marriage. Jn get ‘ous union, but partie. marrage of a man wh Under system of polvme hibted. Proxy marriage. Marr thy one or more agent Semselves. Putative marriage. Ont {in ignorance of some ex Of a feast one of the Fidelity & Guaranty Co ‘3 SW2¢ B11. Such very few Jurisdictions. ‘Act, Royal. An (G77), by which mer forbidden to marry oa consent, oF except on Marrlage articles. Article ties contemplating mart to a formal marrage § marrage. Mariage Broker. One wh ‘oman and fan togels ovoid and legal a8 ag ‘Marriage ceremony. The ‘solemnization of marr Marriage certificate. An ‘mamtage, and is execute ‘he marrage, its not parties, but is evidence{he commodity in elation 0 the supply the pie [B'ap open market so Am Jie Slee § 180, ithe market nt open ot subet (0 contol yall otra commodity of ike Kindy tang 2 pce ener by common, athough unaprened, i Undersanding the term market peice” meant ae erly quoted pie 96-Am st Safer § 189, y rmaket quotations. lit of ere or latest pices i Tar commaites or aecuntes bought and sd on ‘baaid of wade stock sxchange, or ober markt Board of Trade's fA. Rimcy Co. (CAD) 130 F fi smrerfe Dupes pecan age ‘ a i moat i ath ert eer lh prep ora day or during’ cern period of ame. County’ Law Labo ‘Ming Wel snd purcloe wiling boy ‘am Sam bf 267 OF realestate the pest bite te open uke rca, Ao. SEALR ie 68 ALN SE The reson of te redo of many mds ag te niyo el Bropery an probly farce eure fro (at eeprom the hues fran exert aly & Py Tia, 813 c1 508 ln condemnation proceedings {he hr markt value 27 Am 9) fm D 9367 Suandard of valvaion for inheritance Saxs—ait Irate pices cash values acral valve Anags 57 BURR e a9 ALR S09 and 117 ALR Toh ofde for ito be ai thats ting hav market, vale tis necesary that there shall bes mare! Torvrich ommodiy-tat 2 demand thecor theta ay Tro sack demande st he sme (then tle there ie dented 32 Am 2 Dag, vies “he cour an ecg the ek of corel son feces "nk se “ta le oF ‘Spore toc anno ST ALRae “her ark au; ket ce sariet anon, A vedic Comary fn freuen ne oe Fc ot nme whom he ther artes of mercharcse ram dab odor ftir to howe: Re Fabry 18 Ca S56 SP smarking ballot, part of he proces of “See marked baie is uring tren, eng dca by 4 ae a tera bin a Sea ‘ Ain etdcnce Snes Rhoads af On S397 3 Bid NE 186. ee ser ef hn expen inthe tof eu an. lg ea at ee ertoaet ous eae Siti a dy By a6 outset Plata tat {condiihal tur canis wh the understanding thatthe policy shall be consered at hang neve teen tn ove ond that he inser bende ay im for premiums under suc policy Bouteal! | | Som afd 198 Gs fa So LES 10,288 1 | Same ete acc | Biase oeinay coure of omnes Tide J2g Damg § 146. Tae pee which would be ‘igen upon at a yluntay sue between an cwnet | MARKET py MARRIAGE Se & Res Fe Co, 193 NY 32,8 NE marksman A peron who, beng unable 1 wee bis rey an erme Oy kag bh er ‘Sher aba witness or principal 357 Am st Wis 0. | Martboraugh. Set Statte of Martborog arn, Sa of marge; eer of marae tn |e | argue and expr See letters of marque and re ial | margoee. An awning or oof projecting rom 3 bil Tne, especialy theater, oer the ea 3 ‘niin trance, sometimes suppored by lure Gite Repay ne. 92 has 12, 18 NERS if ‘marais, An English nobleman ranking next below Tdute Ser 1 BI Comm #03, nate. Margi or Queensbury Rates. Rules governing bor. Tagged sparring exhtione State Dimple Cb, SOLS Aan 986 1850 190 mariage Ap instition; the Toundaton. of the Tarily and of society. 35 Am dist Mar § 8 The Sista or fltion e's man snd a oma legally | ited 2s etapa ond wife Baker v State a Ne | Fis13@ NW'360. personal relation apsing out (of el contract twig the sone of he par Tess essa The veuntary anion or ie of one | an nd one woman 2 nusGand and nf. f0 the ‘rcoron ofall other. forthe discharge fo cach ‘ther and tothe communi. f the des legally fnewmbent on those wheae Scaton i founded ‘nthe Siicton fen The ato Becoming a= Seas Am dis Mar 4 Sie clandestine marrnge; commonw mar riage; companionate-terriage: coverarey mor= ‘arti marriages putaie macrage imariageable age, The age of cancer, ypon arcing swe Senseo mene mo See due of convent Iaciage articles, The articles of an apecoment made Ty partir n etemglation of mage ally in sain ike dang os ea) marrage Selement 26 Am Sisk WE 2TR ‘See mariage element. marriage bans, See publication of mariage bana. matcage bene intrance. A contract by which he Thsure becomes oun to ay tet» ated sum fmoncr to ihe benetciary ovis wife on his mar Sage, if' the beneheary wl remain armani fot 2 tia of awe hes ot SHER APSA sent gle wien et sds dig ot Sen _Egutabe Mt Ben: Union, 96 Als 231 mariage broker, See mariage brokerage. | marriage, brokerage. The butnese of a “marriage | "rake Who wederats for eompenation 0 re ‘ire sfoutes Tor thse wha sek oem "Aron time the court ifered at 10 wheter subcontracts sould beset aise without Traud, (eee, oerion oa ttl are of consideration, batstoce the Howse of Lords desared Them toe rune public picy this sew has ern ge gener: MARR ally fl Englnc eri ise Sin ie mariage on af tng 35 smarisge heat Sam saringe Knits varie wera ¢ mete Spree marriage ve pres Tred suiher Sarmal i foxtane Mas sacle “ure saciage Rone responREPORT September 1, 1982 Subject Property #1: Sumit Park Addition Lots 4 & 5 Block 39 1058 Suemit Avenue 07-71200-050-39 Because of the petitioners refusal to permit access, the property pt 1058 Summit Avenue has not been reappraised on an individual basis in response tb the Petition for reduction of assessed valuation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter May 19, 1982 in Minnesota Tax Court - Regular Division Petitioner refused appraiser admittance to the dwelling. Denial opportunity to examine the subject, both exterior and interior and to anal data, makes it impossible for the appraiser to properly estimate market val| 278 ftled the e all pertinent e as of January 2, 1981 in conformity with the code of ethics and standards of condlict in the appraisal profession. Response to the petition, therefore, will be limited to the presenkation of available data which may, with some degree of relevance, allow consideratiol of the facts in the matter within the arbitrary restraints imposed by the petitionpr. espenDescription of Inprovenent's Subject property #1 consists of a 1-1/2 story detached duelling axfé a detached 4estall garage situated on an 80 x 250 ft. interior lot on the south side df Sumit Ave. between Lexington Parkway and Oxford Street. Originally constructed in 1910 at 44 No. Lexington Parkway, it wag moved to its present location in 1952. The records of the Gounty Assessor indicate the basement to have q 2 room, 3/4 bath apartment which was not included in the data at the time of the 1952 nove and which was first noted, for assessment purposes, as of January 2, 1968. | The first floor is, according to the records, made up of @ Living jroom, dining roon, kitchen, 2 bedrooms and full bath. Two bedrooms and a full bath condtitute the second floor development. A gas fired hot-water heating systen serves the residence. Condition of the exterior appears to be average, Interior conditfon would have to be assuned. The residence contains 1676 square feet at ground level in additiqn to which there is an indicated 608 square feet on the second floor, Finished squarq area in the basement apartment is estimated to be 300 square feet. Total living area is 2584 square feet.Assessors Valuation Dat As of January 2, 1981, the assessor's Estimated Market Value for dubject #1 on a mass appraisal basis without examination of the property on a specifiq appraisal review was: seed, coo | Inprovenents.. oo | Total...., . $108,900 The tax based on the January 2, 1981 assessment, payable in the yqar 1982, and reflecting a homestead classification is: $2,039.12 tax 64,00 maintenance assessmentGost _Approach ‘The cost approach to value, based on the theory of substitution, agsumes that a current replacement cost new, less depreciation fron all causes, will represent the price which the property should command in the sarket. However, the appropriate and practical use of a cost approach is tf estimate the upper Limit of value as relates to the cost of new construction. This approach, where it is attempted to be used on other than new fonstruction, displays serious weaknesses in its inability to: (1) Measure the buyer reponse to all forms of depreciation and obsolescence and (2) Correlate with the comparable sales approach to the estimate of market value. | Without examination of the interior of the subject, an attempt to palidate a cost approach with several assumptions involving physical and functional chpracteristice and their impact on depreciation and obsolescence would not be judicious. It is the opinion of the County Assessor that the cost approach to value cannot be made nor any hypothetical exercise be useful in estimating market value pf the subject property or properties.Income Approach The income approach to value based on the theory of contribution (producing rent) and anticipation (future income) including the element of discounting gross income is appropriate on residential properties where the market contains quitable samples of rental properties which have been sold and thus indicates gross rental multipliers. | The assessor is unable to locate appropriate sales of rental propqrties comparable to the subject property or properties and {s of the opinion that there is virtually no evidence which vould make this approach possible.Market Comparison Approach ‘The market comparison approach to value on residential properties|is generally considered to be the most appropriate method of estimating market value whére it is possible to analyze sufficient nusbers of sales of similar properties which can be compared (or adjusted to compare) with the subject property. Strengths of the approach include the use of actual market transattions as a guide to appraising property of similar size, type, function, condition, abd neighbor- hood. ‘The weakness of the approach is recognized where there are insufficient com- parable sales or seles of properties which are not similar enough or which! require too much adjustment to attain effective comparability with the subject of the pppraisal. Comparison of sales with a subject property requires knowledge of| physical and functional characteristics of the subject. Without that information a conbentional sales comp approach is not made, Produced on an assumption basis, such an exercise cannot be described as an appraisal. ‘The assessor's estimate of market value on subject #1 on a mass appraisal basis as of January 2, 1981 is $108,900, It was derived via the use of the Ramsey County computer assisted property appraisal system, (CAPA), CAPA is a statistical method of mass appraising which, simply stated, involves the analysis of information from a pool of sales data on all types of residential properties. Analysis results in identifying property characteristics whidh were most important in the market's measure of value, translated to sales price. THese parameters (predictors) from the sales of various types of properties can then be usdd as a guide to estimating or predicting values on comparable unsold properties with similar characteristics within similar neighborhoods.Various measurenents of the results can be made along with reports|to assist in the review process. All CAPA results are cubject to appraiser review. | The folloving can be stated in the context of a sales comparison approach in connection with subject property #1. i Sunmit Avenue properties cannot be combined with other avenues adjpining in developing neighborhoods, and separate neighborhoods exist even when restrifcted to that one thoroughfare, | Sumit Avenue contains various classes of properties with enphasiq on manston types or higher-quality generally larger, architecturally styled residenced. Along the avenue's length from the Cathedral to the river are foufd {llustra~ tions of respective periods of architectural and economic change. The appraiser has assembled all sales on Sumit Avenue vhich occufred in 1980 and 1981 with the following identifiers: 1. 15 sales took place in 1980 ‘The average selling price was $146,000 |. The median selling price was $123,000 average selling price per square foot was $44.47 . The median selling price per square foot was $44.87 | 2. 7 sales took place in 1981 A, ‘The average selling price was $155,700 . The median selling price was $134,200 average selling price per square foot was $55.28 D, The median selling price per square foot was $49.833, 22 sales occurred over the 2 year period, 1980 and 1981 A, The average selling price was $149,200 ft B, The median selling price was $129,200 ‘The average selling price per sq. ft. was $67.90 D, The median selling price per sq. ft. was $45.28 ‘There are no properties within the group which have sold (nor witHin the total number of properties on Sumit Ave.) which are suitable comparisons to the |oubject. The closest property in tems of type and size and appearance (1773 Sumit) 1s not judged suitably comparable by this appraiser. That property sold for $120,000 in July, 1980, Its selling price per sq. ft. was $45.64. Given the imposed limitations but attempting to do some form of mfasurement using gross data, the following can be stated: 1, The average selling price on Summit Avenue in 1960 t was $44.47 per sq. ft. The median was $44.87 per sq. ft. } A. Subject #1 property: 2584 sq. ft. x 44.47 = $114,910 2584 aq. ft. x 44.87 = $115,944 2. The average selling price on Summit Avenue in 1981 was $55.28 per sq. ft. ‘The median was $49.83 per sq. ft. Subject #1 property: 2584 sq. ft. x 55.28 = $142,843 2584 sq. ft, x 49.83 = 9128,7603, the average selling price on Summit Avenue using combined sales of years 1980 & 1981 was $47.90 per sq. ft. The median vas $45.28 per sq. ft. A. Subject property: 2584 sq. ft. x 47.90 = $123,773 2584 sq. ft. x 45.28 = $117,003 To summarize = the range of selling prices per sq. ft. (across the| for separate years and combined years) was: Average Median 944,47 to $95.28 $44.87 to $49.83, ‘The subject property total sq. ft. multiplied by the lowest figure ranges indicates a selling price or estimated market of Average Median $114,900 $117,900 This appraiser reiterates that the use of the data as shown above! resulting indicators of $114,900 and $117,900 is not an opinion of value b appraisal process, the sole purpose being to assist in identifying mathemal measures. gross data r tn those with its sed on any scatREPORT September 1, 1982 Subject Property #2: Desnoyer Park Addition Subj. to Blvd. the fol: Lots 7 thru 10, Block 29 309 Pelham Blvd. 11-22100-101-29 Because of the petitioners refusal to peratt access, the property|at 309 Pelhan biwd. has nor been reappratsed on an Sadividuat basis ta response to che Mfeteton for eduction of assessed valuation pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 27} fled vay 19, 1982 tm Minnesota Tax Court ~ Regular Division. Petieiooer refused appraiser adaistance to the dvelling. Dental of the opportunity to exaaine che subject, boch extertor afd intertor and to analyze all pertinent data, makes it impossible for the appraiser to prpperly estimate narket value an of Sanuary 2, 1961 {9 conformity with the code of ethics ahd standards of conduct in the appraisal profession. Response to the petition, therefore, witl be Linked co che prenepetton of avatlable daca which nay, with soae degree of relevance, atlew constderatipn of the facts in the matter within the arbitrary restraints imposed by the petitioner. Recpen Ex hien 2 9-92 DIADescription of Improvement Subject property #2 consists of a 2 story detached dwelling and ah attached 2 car basement level garage situated on an irregularly shaped triangular 1¢e (approximately 200 feet frontage on Pelham Blvd, and approximately 175 feet frontage on Otis Avenue) on the west side of Pelham Bivd., at the corner of Otie Avpnue, The dwelling was constructed in 1911. | The records of the county assessor indicate the first floor to be|made up of 4 Living rooms and the 2nd floor to have 4 bedrooms and 1 bath. Basement prea include a recreation room and totlet, There is a gas fred hot water heating syst and 2 ftreplaces. Condition of the exterior appears to be average. Interior condition would have to be assumed. The residence contains 1111 square feet on the first floor and 1056 square feet on the 2nd floor, Basement finished area 1s an estimated 500 square (feet. Total Living area is 2667 square feet.sors Valuation Data As of January 2, 1981, the assessor's Estimated Market Value for on a mass appraisal basis without examination of the property on a specifi . sees $9,000 Improvements. ++ 81,909 Total, ceneeae $96,909 jubject #2 appraisal The tax based on the January 2, 1981 assessment, payable in the ytar 1982, and reflecting a homestead classification is: $1,686.94 tax 239.56 maintenance assessments $1,926.50 total |Market Comparison Approach The market comparison approach to value on residential properties lis generally considered to be the most appropriate method of estimating market value whgre it is possible to analyze sufficient munbers of sales of similar properties which can be compared (or adjusted to compare) with the subject property. Strengths of the approach include the use of actual market transa { tions as a guide to appraising property of similar size, type, function, condition, afd neighbor- hood. ‘The weakness of the approach is recognized where there are insuffhcient comparable sales or sales of properties which are not similar enough or wh| too mich adjustment to attain effective comparability with the subject of Comparison of sales with a subject property requires knowledge of functional characteristics of the subject. Without that information a conventional comp approach is not made. Produced on an assumption basis, such an exerct described as an appraisal. ‘The assessor's estimate of market value on subject #2 on a mai ch require fhe appraisal. | physical and es jise cannot be spprateat baste as of Jamuary 2, 1961 is $96,909. It was derived via the use of the anedy County computer assisted property appraisal system (CAPA). | CAPA is a statistical method of mass appraising which, simply stqted, involves the analysis of information from a pool of sales data on all types of residential ’ properties. Analysis results in identifying property charactertstics whli were most. Important in the market's measure of value, tranclated to sales price. ‘TWese parameters (predictors) from the sales of various types of properties can then be usqd as a guide to estimating or predicting values on comparable unsold properties with s istics within similar neighborhoods, lar character-Cost Approach ‘The cost approach to value, based on the theory of substitution, agsunes that a current replacement cost new, less depreciation from all causes, will represent the price which the property should comand in the market. However, the appropriate and practical use of a cost approach is tp estimate the upper Limit of value as relates to the cost of new construction. ‘This approach, where it is attempted to be used on other than new onstruction, displays serious weaknesses in its inability to: (1) Measure the buyer repponse to all forms of deprectation and obsolescence and (2) Correlate with the comparable sales approach to the estimate of market value. Without examination of the interior of the subject, an attempt to hatidate « cost approach with several assumptions involving physical and functional chkracteristics and thet impact on depreciation and obsolescence would not be judicious. It is the opinton of the County Assessor that the cost approach t be made nor any hypothetical exercise be useful in estimating market value Property or properties, value cannot f the subjectIncome Approach The income approach to value based on the theory of contribution |(producing rent) and anticipation (future income) including the element of discountixg gros where the market contains |sultable income 1s appropriate on residential propertt samples of rental properties which have been sold and thus indicates grosq rental multipliers. ‘The assessor 1s unable to locate appropriate sales of rental progerties comparable to the subject property or properties and is of the opinion thdt there is virtually no evidence which would make this approach possible.Various measurements of the results can be made along with report im the review process. All CAPA results are subject to appraiser review. to assist ‘The following can be stated on the context of a sales-comparison 4pproach in connection with subject property #2. ‘The neighborhood in which the property is located is generally bo Otis, Pelham Blvd., Beverly Road and the west city line. ‘The appraiser has assembled all sales in the neighborhood which o 1980 and 1981 on 2 story single family residences, with the following ident It is to be noted that there were only 3 sales in each year and they have as follows: 1, A total of 6 sales took place in 1980 and 1981 A, ‘The average selling price was $94,783 B. The median selling price was $90,600 C. The average selling price per sq. ft. was $57.89 D. ‘The median selling price per sq. ft. was $57.28 Given the imposed limitations but attempting to do some form of m using gross data for this subject neighborhood, the following can be state 1. The average selling price using combined sales of years 1980 was $57.89 per sq. ft. ‘The median was $57.28 per sq. ft. + Subject property #2: 2667 sq. ft. x 57.89 = $154,393 2667 sq. ft. x 57.28 = $152,765 jered by jcurred in Afters. Jen combined jasurement, 1981, ‘The subject property total sq. ft. multiplied by the average and median aq. ft. selling prices indicates a selling price or estimated market of: Average Median $152,765 $154,393 ‘The appraiser reiterates that the use of the data as shown above fith its resulting indicators of $152,700 and $154,300 is not an opinion of value baged on any appraisal process, the sole purpose being to assist in identifying mathemat ical measures.pr Ors vu Seng Taeietsagt sxouoqapaed aya 4q pasoday squrexzsex Axe2qqqze oy UTYITA 2923 Oya UT SI0eF ou Jo uoyzexeprouos aoTTe ‘souPAeTeX Jo saz89p amos YITA ‘Kew yDTYS Jo uoTzequssaad ay3 03 peryUsT eq TTTM ‘exoseray] tuoTITIed ey2 03 asus suozssazoad resyuadde 94a uy zonpLO: pue soquae Jo apoo sya yaTA aquI0gUOD UT IgE ‘Z AxonUBE Jo SE anTEA 3 fay aiqerTene jdsou Jo spaepueas jzem 93euT3s9 kyxedord 03 zesyvadde 249 303 ayqyssodmy 37 seyeu ‘vyup quouTazed [Te 4zKTEUE 03 pur saoyaoauy pue ZoFxeaKe Y3Oq f309fqns 943 UTURXE 07 A7FUNaZOddo ey2 JOT) “SuyTT@Ap 949 03 GouvIaTHpy sasTerdde pasngax TeUOy: svopsyaya TeTNBey ~ 33N0D XBL PIOSOUUTA UT ZE6T ‘6T aegdeyp ‘saqnaeag e0suUFH O3 qUENsind UOTZENTEA passesse Jo UOTIONpe: rod, r384 Soy parts adz og vorataeq au) 03 esuodsax UT sTseq TenpyATPUT UP Uo pasTerddeer useq FOU sey edueay TTeYSTEH yore 2 Aazodord ay ‘ss200e ayuted 03 Tesnyex sxoUOTIFI—d BHA 30 obo 67-OLL-O0TZZ-11 s@ay TTEUSZEH 7OTC 67 NOTE TL 307 uoraeppy ava aefouseq 786 ¢ Sabadoza qoefang “1 aaquaadas amtvag ‘De gccT st vere SuTATT saz ‘bs QOL peaewyase uv sy vere poystury quonoseg e201, s40013 pucoas ug uo +33 ‘be 27g pue 20013 SaTy ay UO “ay “bs He9 euTEaUOD oouOprsat FUL +pounsee 2q 03 envy pjnom uoTa7puCS zoprequy ‘aBezeav-noyaq 03 aereAy aq 07 sxvadde 107I03x0 oy3 JO LoTa}PUED sweqsks Bupqe0y x9IWN 304 PeATy seB BST seoe1d uF T bxeqr, yas 9ae ‘aver pue qu0zy ‘20013 pag aya 03 sxeppeT edeosa e175 epysing “esn eTdrainh Jo edXa amos 02 paadepe waaq 29y]Ava pry Kaxedord aya Inq eTGET TEA Sy wOFAEMIO;UT aeDpI ON +auaueseq 9 puv woox Supat] ST a4943 UOTITPPE UT “swoorpeq om3 sey A0OTS PITS SUL smoozpaq ¢ sMoys 20013 puor®S ey, “moopeq guO pue ‘wyDIyy ‘woos uTUT| a uy MEG Z/T *uaeq au pur ‘woo SUTATT v jo dn apem aq 03 20013 38273 949 eavOTPUT sosseEsy AquNoD aya Jo spro9e} OMT ‘HL6T BF peasnzasucs sea BuTTTaHp ous, yeyoreumos w Xq 3sBa aya uO pouyofpE st 31 *#eIg Aeqexg puR enuoAY anuany 1TPYSIeA FO APTS YANOS By] UO JO] “33 EST x ‘33 OY B UO peaenay ~SuyPTFa fa029 uaanaeq, p eBeae8 32> | peyseaep & pus SurTTaap peyserep A103s z v Zo szeTSuOS EY Aqzedoxd axpfang JaSuSAOT ow ead96" 496‘I8 i squoussassy eoueuaqures O0°ZE— | mEI 96°SSS"TS | 10] UoTIwoTsTSsETD PEOTSIUOT. ‘zg6q reek 943 UT oTqRdud ‘quewssasse Te61 *Z Kren aya vO paseq x1 CTT entered ga 9 SOF +++ +squemanoadar o06'9 § ** serteereespuey jeuyacerzea pur h eu. :8BA maTAeT Testeadée oysToeds e uo Aqzedozd aya Jo uoTaeUTwExe jnoyITA syeeq TesTFaddy sseU BP UO ef a9afqns 203 anyea reyzem paqwaTyse 8, rossasse ayy ‘Test ‘Z AaenuEs| Ted wrath yo ey RIOR © TOUSSERY+s27320dpxd 20 £q20do2d yoafgns eta Jo-enyes JexTeM SuTIeMPISs Uy [NFeEN eq esFoIeXe TeoeyI0dKy fue ad apem oq ouuss enqea 03 yowordde 3803 943 qeuR Jossassy etfs yITA e2vTeII09 (z) puR PoUBDSeTOSGo PUP UOTIB]>exdep Jo BMI05 T1® 03 esuodser xe4ng oya oansse (1) 102 AITTTqUUE say UT eessauyPEN Gnojaes ekeTdSTP ‘woysonz3sue> Aeu UEYR AeyIo Uo pasn aq og pazdueaae sy ay oxeyR ‘yRordde eTUT suoTaonzasu0s Meu 30 asoD vy2 02 SezeTeA SE enqvA Jo FMF] aedin ‘24a eavu}ase 02 87 yovordde 3609 w Jo aon TeoyaDead pue oywTAdosdde ey “soAHoH *aeyzum aya UT puemos pynoys £4x8doad ey] yorys eoFad |yF auesoadea {TIM ‘wesneo TTe wory uoyaeyoeadep sso1_ ‘AeU 30D aueneDR[dex aueZAND w amy saunsse ‘uoyanatzegns Jo £zoey2 ey2 wo paseg ‘entea 03 yRozdde apo> eML ‘PROTTY THT |a f ‘etqrssod yowoadde sqy3 aqym prnon yoTYA souapzas|ou ATTenazTA sy sxama ama vormdo wa 30 67 pur serazedoud ao fasodoud aoafens ons fo etgnzedans soyaxodoxd yeauex 30 soyee eaeqadosddy saes0t 03 oyqvan ef aosseese| out : : veaoréy3tnm Yequer ss028 seavotpuT enya pu pros ueeq eAey yDzuA Sazazedoad Jesup Jo sotduve P1qPITNS sUyeQUOD IexIvM ayy azVyA seTrzedoId TwTAUePT#eI WO a3BT2dOXt 8} 2a02uy seox8 Suyaunose7p Jo awaueTS aya SuypnTouy (enooUT eananz) uoFaPdTOTHUP pu (suaZ Buyonpord) uopyngyzques 30 £20943 aya vO passq anTwA 03 YoRoAdde emoDUT| yi, BporTEy say-spoouroquereu 3eyyurs uyyATA serTas WIR soyaredoad prosun etqereew> uo senqwa SuTZOTpeRM opin e sv pasn oq ayy ues sazaiedozd Jo sada snoysvA Jo s9zes ya wo: sxeqomered osayy “soqad sates 02 poyeysuasa ‘antea 30 sunssaw 9,q9y20u 2 sq7267z0,08a2y9 10 |Suyaemyasa oa aj (sx032ypaxd) 4} UE queqzoduy sou arom YoTUA soTZsTxeqEIEYD Aqzedozd Buzk;yaUepT UF satnser seXteup ‘seqzzedo2d Teyquspyser Jo sadka TTP uo wIEp saTPE Jo Tood w woIy UOFIEMIOJUT saaqoaut ‘poqezs Aqduys ‘yorHA SuysTeadde sem Jo poyrem TeoTI97IEI9 Bs: *(vayo) warsks esteadde 4yzadoad po: Aqun0y Aosumy ay Jo 98N OY VTA PAATIOP SPA I. “996'ZSS ST TS6T ‘ stseq qesyeadde sam vo cy aoefqne Yo antes aeyaEH 50 aImET39e vot our sqesqeadde uv se poqT: a sti an oxo 2| kzwnuep 30 5B eee teers soyoznes uw yane feyony uoy,denery so uo paanpoig “apm tou #7 yowoiide dacs sores Teorasssnoo # voraemoyer eq) anomnan “a2efene oa Jo soTasTzeHeEAeKP TeueTIOUNY pur Twoqsdyd Jo aBpaaouy soxtnbax £a2adoad qoe[qns w YATA SETS Jo UOST sqesyezdde ay 30 yefqns aya uaTA Kaz TFqVzVduoD eATIDaZze UTPIaE 07 I aaynbea ypTys zo yBnous sey FETs jou axe YoTYA soFasedosd Jo seqes 30 aueyoTsgNeUT eae azayy axoya pazTusooar sy yowordde aya Jo ssouye: pus ‘uopaqpuos ‘woygounz ‘ad4y ‘ozts aeTymys go Kaaadoad Buys feduwoy jenfpe yon 003 ies erqvreduos eur *poouzoqysyau jexddv 03 epyn & 8 suopasesusaa jayzem Tonaoe Jo 9sn aya opnToUT Ypeordde aya Jo syafuedag sAqzadoad yo9fqns aya yaya (exeduon 03 pagent} ye 40) poavduo> 2q ues yoru sezazedozd avTyuTS Jo saTes Jo sxoqunu JUOTDTFINS Ozh{buP oa a{qTEsod Sy 37 azays anqea yaya0m SuzIwUTIS9 Jo poyrau squtadoaddy asow oy | 03 pazaprsuos Aqyezoues 97 soyaiedard yeyauepysex wo onyea 02 qoeosdde worTiedso® se4abe SL ‘earday Th FETED FOTTE[eoyaeuoyzem Buz4z;IUepF UT JeTSse 02 Buyeq asodand 210s oya ‘ssapord TwsTeadde ue uo paseq enyeA 30 uoTuydo uw a0u St 007"09$ PUR OOR‘Z9$ FO sx0zvofpUT SuFaTNEOT 837 YAFA eAoqU uMoYs eIEP ayI JO as 9yI IPYI SaIvIeITer sosyoadd| 6L7‘09S = ER*BES x “33 “bs OScT 9ne°Z9$ = 6f'0%$ x ‘ax “bs gost :Aaaedord avefqns | “es"ees Sem UvTpoW OU az “bs 1d 6¢*ons sem 196) Pur O96T S5v—K 50 sopes pourquos Susen soqad SuTTTSe sHezene ML speguas eq uvo BupHoTTOs ay3 ‘pooyzoqysyau aoafqns sTya 103 PAI auauaanseen Jo w10j awos op 03 Buzaduey3e ang suotaesTuyT pasoduy aya fu “€g'ge$ Sen ‘ay “bs z0d aozad SurtTes weTpIm ay, 6€70rs Sem “az ‘bs aad aotad BUTT Tes eBurenv oyL 062'29$ sem 073d FUT] Tes UeyPEM euT 066‘s9g sen aotad Buri {95 aeieae ou, fy *Tg6T pUe Og6L xoqueg dovds zootd U5 qanoo Aes, eROSSUUTH FO 2323S /ATSTO wosxeqeg Juorg zeot ‘ez agnbny “ino, ZOLSS VIOSANNEW “INVa “IS Typ PIVAOS AN WOT OE “ hay AANNOD AASV oy iit ng MMtganonit XINAOD ABEL 10 91840 boy? Sy re KaTOs NOL4 vr ag hay meg, AEH Ake . Bee ag te PMdy Gegey gehees pte oa fey. aes | PN! Kdonoiny (& 2°87 (E peolly 49 eibiy (“Vp wet Wa at yo dee 1 & wn a be- or mi 210 “DAY VO SS Py os PAIS ep Oy 94 ee, ws aM kn Sgr eM OTE DL * 'S4dWuars asprc Jad — bppasn2g vor ys guper ca al Le-si-G, ae gd 9067'S 6 ap parsst bwoadgrg po d2Q ava + le Supt Plat Li ge | | Pe \ ee abynr. ail ~¥nzwos a9 oY Wrssk gerd Gre 32 sardra oo Bly cen) Dai ait Ah 750 3. | am arpao 7 Pe “ sayL or aD YO prnTa, Quapurd © Berens, i “6 | any aa} jo VAS Me U ° | i E 6 i DAL om yo ears URW moto proprio JO Mee 14 | frog) BVNS SN oot. wp, cncdnuinlic. Wa BUD VIVOPIes yO peeyse! “ oe sse1) DL2D XY -fl-F “ ‘wodnazanys| Sea} i eee ‘oho fy a Se \ (oS od) ee nagar arvot rn i Ye ACN omar ey poxtemio9 Praserbracn puw Si ! “aunyscons co jo poe oe 30 Afunog meg 3S 30 40 PIES UF OBE ee Set —yo-qyz0_ayy“nnda — yng sy Jo TL sods paBavyp puw xn0g siqz/ez07q dyBnorg pav ‘yuneg Aevurey Jo BUOYS s—IMeA IS FO AYO ou Jo‘ Boo forlod cats ASH yp on : (54 possonte Da uepuesea AL nrwe REL £aea c TaBUOU RY ‘pordaoxa squowiaja auy Aq safeurep pue joasey sea pur gen soetoees tetra 32 wemuvoeoucs ay yy ABs a £9 SOR Fat Poaet aah SSR2SE LNA AT SN A Se ee le Ea Satan or sober 400 wqunyy naenry Bussaip “you pasnmde: Ay 30 Acsuowed paNIN ‘pre asain SETS HELA od Sg. wong semen san igs fata se unui pons ones Sn a See ee cao aoa ee uale aw som igus tn 04 UA" SA oad yemauar sjyy, ‘suopesdxe iuenbesqns Auw pT ‘uoNNsdxa YoNs WoT 3u0R-g— 205 38091. ee ee et one oe. esa a erect i Agana eg ry ae ea Soon a el eg corn nto set cy ome ay welt ec aa pnts hve ea Ss oe yes rn sei. Ets ores ue yeu asa fn a | Barapa, Bee? Bia Rn seas area ac Hag BEBE RUM, meairers Gites Morne roan 02 Sater PRS “sa mn unto eg ney ea pete tonea Bee Re | oye 2 ae ee ee Te ae TY | 21 OLR e OSE REtetNR ieee athe T ESPERO 319 iSU0dsaL 3q Sigrid hia ee at ateameeeiennaty fg ik ites esnalnne Ss Eyeae ok oe eh aes | SRR ZSRO'R Getta hard gig aly Se cemy moter ato hi Beka a a SN RSE Uo a ue ese ssa Sa AL SPERENA Sac I Bag Soa a a aes ee rah ea a eae By a ae ee Pate a Hettaaae ens ts utente le Sey 5 is ule tlle ra ata Si), Be sae SOUTER Ate Ae Saeed SRE Pantene caaenekN eS ite a eager ae pe Seo | Rett halin Gra!) nti nb ou Ae aaa RANT See panna oa alter ee nasa GN SVR SIERO | RAAT ssosjwiaia ayy uo paxinbs: saorsoe Aan Te 20} BuyKEd sof opa|suodsox oq [Uys B9859 “SEILITULN "9 ‘ujazoy pauteuoo uorsyaosd apeFOp a1 watH dowe| [Cu uy parejas 2q ‘uondo s,1055—] ‘yous aseat oun puv pyoa og Weus “wel Jo uoHIeIeda 4 Bupogne vo juouUatssy Uv Jo “ose Jo iwestiCD Ue Saya aouud ayy Mot BsUb9T| Jo uorssedUED "FuMoTans VuswUs|see UY “osuad|| 4 Uo|seasuaS Bumo|gns yuu “UBtesu iuonboaqns Aw o} iuosuoo gag 0 powsas'aq Jou Treys 9suoor 20 woyssooulD AupyoaNs TUTTE puo'on sossory aq juasuce Y Jooserp wed cue vo sosfuinud aig Sen oy amu 10 UolssaauoD AUE Ie 10 19rqnNe 10 ‘SEO sft URyese tou Tjeys deseo] sosszT Jo WasueD WORTM JHE INO. "ONULATANS ONV LNSANOISSY. ‘Koueuay aus 30 uoH¥s|dxa Ju) Jo skep OE urn ‘Kup aya Jo Snow alqeuoseai 4w suBo|tAde awa: sou oy sosturoid posjuiap ayp sous 0} Jossory op Utesquuod mUeI Aqaloy sossa7 “sas[tiatd pastUTOD ath ©) suoneinge pur sireder syeur 0} acvot Sn 0 tat Gey aye ate uy Ke pouio}id ‘&%q OF sqUBUEAGD 9xy puIE pled aq o} sTtAr a4) Jo sunyToyAO) © BuIysOM A1Io-a2 Yons ynoKyIM AONE pu ALTA} ‘ures oy UDO PUY pioW O} PUT sostulesd ples Jo Uofseaesod oT) PUD To}UE-w Pu “puD te JE 9580] SI BIEDOP en aos ony my (YRUL 2 EWM] ove RHC] PE Ly peau any aaa 20 enuenco of yo Rue THA OF ump orb Ute pptbogs suet otf fo Sue fon me paufoods tengo Syooned peuoguear sea {Roe oer pre pomp an 0 ned ume Jo aaa foun Ya “eau on aL | su 69 pacone_ 94 tous esto prs eR CETCLTAONA ‘samulle Aeuh TET Sy a Be Ya 20 20 | ‘wyosouiy Jo amg se RE Eg co | Sye6t J quay Hurutfoq eyUoNs sepuoTeD yoee Jo Kep —FAT— aap wo souwape uy quo sad mtd OOrOStE *) UCD — TG TYR JO BEAVER PUT Fea US —SOTSTT TIN ANTS F "00° OSE Jo une ayn coousond postop ay 30} 1u01 v Z0982] 01 ‘puvuiop snoys‘Ked 0) seaue esse] puY | sanoyacdd skep OF — wang son-w9899 3 aH-Nogn Cz ;ERO -dO-KOBOA —KEAKS oy prv [eT ysareg— oe exoumen «} ————eggnom-g—— 0 mi 20 Pena | \ THe ways soujaoa on208qeyM asodandl so4o ow 30} pl '29uNpISeL [NuOSIOd W Se a9EET Aq pardnaoo PU pasN oq OL *eossoy 03 poustuans Adoo USTH "LerTe-h PUB ZE-Tg-C CUUTK TTATO "38TC “Stn [AIMSKET SQUSTE THAT © aoe - -=s votre *fon‘egutiod $renowy woas OSVaT UNGWLUVdV AS O3LsVuG SYM INSWAUISN! SIKL a Gxtnoarsnoweoy ovis Noseta 40 2¥nzyN919 suorrosodso9 au2 fo Jyoysq uo ‘uotsvsodsos ‘senavtoevoo 40rd 248 ° {omognrmonsoy noteynounen 40 sv) _ laxa0y x0 wonaso 40 En NADY ¥O HOA £0 IM pa i (oonoy 40 Ht 40,2 IL “ESROY 40 NLD 4 sr) . te mena hop an 2 210fog peBpoynouyen son guounszeus FuroBosof OL { Jo fqunog ‘BIOSIUNS jo anes ~ | ‘fo hep wma ue stofay poSpapnonysn san neaunspens SUs0BO40] HM *queq 09 pettdds pus eessey fq peueseany fo Agno; a 23 2 ‘nequooeg uy Saran fq pexts t04eey so4uK ‘20 ‘xjogautty z Suyqua18 TL, ee WEF MIG o0g m.2048_ uyeB *guors KooTs Pf smou;s Butsstm to nome ‘wexorg ouked TeqUGT Aqyavan yaya ogmqer 04 xm agdranes uate MaoqeseSyazox vaqxe Jo TeAoned ' 19g) —--- ———--_ ta / jem am | 0 ~—om oe Hannan nv a “Hla Annas See oo eea aiaLoad eFob-h ‘ ane saute , join ng sunny tub 3940- ty, Sete [pps sms gD “aa, saat 2 UapITe SISSS.ed yy jut pH BON oe 03 ac95 san ype AO} nur yrs ep ga aod Jos jes? jepgye fm now Som > ared Aigesstous ave 40% luaptsatg 20)“ 8248009 20} Du Aews Soup BRE EW, |S gunyaue Yen 9pr9e PID posoqaq. Siquiansaid 2 ‘no aos 9 png “PERAL, go esos st ye Ayuasage ded si Spoq@iios zqega seiep Suu spavpuers wwaos, sia pain nop autvadng nL worateRs oad oqo} aaapitg? sais ‘941 punve 191082 Jogo si eu jo KOSS sax) ont fou 5A0POL oranaossod jattod. snot jo wopasicad saya ‘agement 2am fa4. 889Hy Ipod .c7 ayer ahah pan eu 03 9 aauustone pres Jo 9 siojane oxy aported 3,009 vaoad ane Powe "BAY tHsea03 9) Soe ci ao 2 yh. spofood aU Og ound aso sy baw caeoey BOW, ob, 2904 ATO eau Apogéut 212 ou sop omowy an 9g aCe RL Haepeay 200 ane suwardns £4 voqyeAE=p owio> yasqouy OM) mune fo tote, 308 YORE 1 s81a0g ou jo yuoBe we st {Bu 1904 joi) BnoKyANORE 4 uae ‘ony oy usan a aymasqe otf aad) "SUED! a 2 0p 29 "ss 3 IH 1 Sagy 09, asbaqd aL ‘pssana ai 3010 1s 40 exopeaiy ayy apLae 1 ou ote frag sas8409, atqes "ue aninswo.y om) rary 383,334) aon ypaads 299. uo Sate Suns PH [puss oon) 2509} “ sat sajog stony, aes ara ‘are 003 4 ety st AsuaDegD X pores oy wus yey 70 fog stop 01 ates Bunn Bt > 9G, JOLONTRSYA > ecb sh ae -wout ands sm paqored 9g sit 40} ses eUDAMS 9p "oy osiid eakauo 2 0} porsoqune Sugano; sem "ae “kx ueyE a waADO NT NEaHOL aFpOP win ‘Son pres MPU shoqaae AION Ese sjonpoid jnyuarey eody ged oy je uonseioud omy asta Ie ‘vaReupina pawadens hyena? jwupzajarse 24) oeneoq 126i ‘ pauung som 2eamdos yan sje aug, BTML Gta payenn, sees 1d SUaHpI ED JO ye COD‘ Bil eesoy sau fuaduoo fe eas “yours or to a0uajuas pesodest Siyeepmiga Ut pat esapor y nosy sqiuoW ano} 0, faousyaes useq Sey Has Jus Saoueo papadans © te payee, Feomdaste yuesur Buyt95. 20 Panerord Nosuad LSULA ATLL “Jalg ut (@ 984g v0 pam) Aauoyny Jo EN "39 Ag SHON. xoov pe Aecouen, “rose {Bquope s,a0enied “yeoday Jo duno sing HOA, mow 93 oy fad {av sop 5 Sens sae ou, ote ey. 98949p9p Gout ona eORPOMITG, of asa iim cones ssieopundsns “Roney 36a Jo Goren arn ea in pate pow am aad iq asters ouaby aah aye “A{snoudes pov ftoentgee poi sromrese aL 2h dopa yng ‘gen peep edo aye joa pgs 20 pinoxs ayes ot) $Syaen ou OH, a, oto sm onearnya morte oh anya oF Souinere st 98 197 en0.de9 30" Azezse 300" sea) Buty “Seconeye HBP pated SM sSonmmerpoorny pap. nating img "nog copay ot Fumes emcee dot yea 2 and sapeie 0.93 Soto youre wioy suoheuqare — oe'pactge Oh 2x0 ain 599 ays 00H. Saul ays EN) uopsod. 943 100% "Ana poe ‘aan oy "prb0q a, WOH EDHT903. ‘spyinbatand mot 2368 poyaedwiog “Arqnystoons ay ponde AouoyeRN “wowsype 409 5 1019 to ese uy ype or sroure, 0770 prvog apE4g 9 (243109 0} par Aouoyeye uoqemnnpe PaTeID ssafaqqouod that 94 U@6L AIST {u woriaes ape 59501 PUL TREE Bujon 50 aed} }nowgtas ynowuapny sparen oy iduonye of age 90 RE FauI0We sph “S8NRE_ HONEA usu Butinp yuayae quae dar AigrowoRia 01 jag “woludo. 7z Tisdy 51 or prog yno9 aa 09 wootsaayay suloa 4) 30" 33n8, suo shojoqeur 20 jusfaphen, Ul obvana 9} joe saseszanpe tet OS ‘np v amo op skousestoy) "npons yeogetow srqroar Ssudtaomg You oop sat! sApe ‘oy osma.anp jo AynpsaoGarey © me fpeioqag 2p tex Furpyoy EL sage ou puny M383 BAO] SUL, ‘dod sit poisas aq oy sununystase® jo ‘sea og) Buysne9 sound ou ty Jo aynsau ese poavuiep se: 3 ‘aqje OwORE aR) pane IY pajmadde pey Ases:9ie, 8 san9q 961 ON 82 B27 “resamoy “SIH OAL SUE "an 395 Tepuenr PONY “AEC Fay “sof aus ssuyede pontst 9g 0} astusul Jo Sys posto pate yo0, S514 205 wwaurzpnt 2n09 E2993; © pauaygo ‘agit OpesmI09 y ‘am sjeaday yo asm, masig "8.0 OK waWHSTEe jo ‘am 3ndoudta, IAS 0p TVET YON WIAAVT INZOFIOIN nn pred sey yeWp. powuossad sem aoupptas ziye pny ets poe uysep9pe: jo yyuoUur se aT panoy sem cere “SuOroNpAr rwsinpnes) pauyeyao 3 2 na ako wih op pazopz0 Areniaass sem “pn oy om eat zasie i oth retuonan “aPee 5 pin poe uoreant Supine pip jaepusqapoemar somouy) ‘roused se] sp Jo 0 ‘au ons 0} suosF® sit wopTEge ARS Ss eo” wen psa “soe a won gE Rao “aun oy Sr jestanonay fo ston ood pure aoa ca : Serres rare ‘heneg tt earhias Sey — Se BE a sna 8 pe, Sone oe Ta Sa ae ‘97M Ser oveprpuee va ony aaa Te aaa ut aq gt PuE SKE! is suede pays Buroq sazz04D aeour sey A290 ces pup uojedrisoau yesppor © was iter ke post ave saey3 0 Renesas 3509 aot eB 5082299 oF hom sy398 yar ‘uresdasd Te29] s.snyns0 a o aqui wos} 200 0} popodka asr caren yey ues cd aay, 05 Seong worTeST umora-tsy ues rodbayo 24 p1ooHs soo WI gegen! Some a supa, woqynjosou ayeand yo suz0p Sroueaayenyeas pu toxtuod senaay aya morte in SIpeLi0da: spunp aug veld au) ses 0) 1Ue13 ooo'shz$ ® pypatane rey ou wonepunod dijensea m ayr7 BUY sq; Sumuepee omy Uy s¥Eak omy {bye Bupueuy sos 39 tym tat ‘ard ayy jrpatd steayse 293399 ‘Hogue syoued oe Jo pastnbas aust pus Aijeajdeiaa age> uo Buppuadp 9} = paBimy> 99 ose juin siae84ir7 ‘Daatonuy safsod sya woapvowtes sxaduoo Jo saves tensa sian ered 20 tli ssoyerpots aaa ont yh you Ul duunsyudIs ssopAp we Saaqua9 Word ow vat “3459109 aenfesuat, po} aeypais “ones 2 women “dings jo. sup iq s9unyD <2uz01Ve oT tues pu soa S07 uy Aocepz00e om Paipsaee F MOSES “OTA UOI—=ISyO Pe ops H Aoutus spn moat “s'n| tommy “sueraoyte3, my sepRiout so} os “papund x9 11% Goa “Seas yy ‘xowteam prose 9 rue ppd oy sroputpoe} pie spn0 Se ans fm ssnguinuy qouEg “Syueynsti esinae se an ae &q soind'rp opiop.Atpyeatd uy oy samy esa) paswrnd "Ae Jo taued 2 scqasko (0) #304 MON UF Eaornossa TaN 235 990 mn Pat #04 sis0> Pu Serop wonEAHH sono wiao_&sn 3 Rw Jy. Beka eegE TREE 40942 sovoly 47g foo ee te aes 1 oa a NB er lee eA al a par Sistaite Bsposition title Executive Assistant Aesist and coordinate the devel or programs initiated by the Cr the County Board Expand and maintain County rele intergovernmental associations, and private sector. Develop, implement and mdnage + administrative processes, such items for County Board action.TA HO March 28, 1983 70 : Tom Fe p Remaeg Counts Cink Count, ae ene 783) Lu fleKenna, Dinecton, Property Taxation & County Auditor FROM Bernae A. Pe Beanize A. Peterson, 309 Pathan Bérd., St. Paul, MW 55104 664 6248 PURSUANT TO LEGAL NOTICE OF FRIDAL, MARCH 25, 1983, andl. RANGE: DISTRICT COLI EME $460 985 TED Bay %, 1983, te Lake objection to the page (19) of the St, Paut "Bernas Ae Peterson, pang dhe following lots 7-10, BE, 29, 1982, $1,059.58, fetinpent 1 apenty taxes Pelham Blud)’ Laccuse of the oe 2 to tax count pita 160 and WW Segrone Cousk Fie 6S se gin ns B. The first half taxes wore paid (refer to file nunkors.) C. Mh. PloKenna to he in error as this documentation does nat show this first half of 1982 as was paid. D, Sea attached (pp. 19.) & ae pape Park). A) fail te apes on 19, ee fesse ree ibe 82-1292, F, Finely Notice ia tox, Litigation 2s HMesely Given, that 2a ges at oy the Depantoent of fon bal ohio Hind of te Very truly yours, py (Dermat, (oreni tae Bernae and Bernice Peterson Ate MAR 3.01983 4s E. an Clerk oy,ee - 2 Bom . we sas tg SS re Bab eee Oe 2 me OULEVARD ADDON HOS Denedd Ae on wl eae ‘oviavatn ADom0N coe : 1 DuR RA Air aisenre 2 kes eae oe 7 wa Peal Rowan ¥ Sands i “ Ra Rettatraan ISR ote = : eatroL aboinos Yon rn B Sahn Patan © Sct Al isa “sian is yam aa Montara se aerstsRLa® « Deca sm tis waet ota a 1 Demet Po gues Aen ‘Teme no Figes Agatena OroernipNose ec Read oon, tedemlten vr ey mers te WiotomerW ina csese La Bacersntaaatettosite sb, Sattvieg teeta. Deva Vtamberp tal [Sly ot Cente oe wl Uk and Sey ot bn had tet ks oma Mee ey Je They ciate Ty Allet Drege PM oi and 820 ‘Milanet qa Wi aterimied yet 52 nalntntet Drage DBAPERANDPAREERS ADDEROR ay Aste Bremer = owo00 1 ~ Toman E Fret eat So . We cttate and acer reeee FUuEn AND omRIBOND I me hrcA senate eer 5kateb 515 transportstios 2 ‘St. Paul, Ma- 5!* ng tinkeg ge SyH/o 6 SS £85094 oy ne \ Arp hog, > ( GG —== ae SF Bn ee —~ : : :