CASES FOR DIGESTING IN CIVIL PROCEDURE

1. Atty. Romulo Macalintal vs. Presidential Electoral Tribunal, G.R. No. 191618, June 7, 2011

2. Jimmy Barnes vs. Judge Padilla, G.R. No. 160753, June 28, 2005 3. Solgen vs. Metro Manila Authority, G.R. No. 102782, December 11, 1991 Alexis & Dynavie 4. Domingo De Guzman vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 103276, April 11, 1996 5. Danilo Parel vs. Heirs of Simeon Prudencio, G.R. No. 192217, March 2, 2011 Aran & Lara 6. Golden Arches Development Corporation vs. St. Francis Square Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 183843. January 19, 2011 7. Sps. Bergonia vs. CA, G.R. No. 189151, January 25, 2012 Bryan &Divine 8. Reyes vs. Lim, 408 SCRA 560 9. St. Martin Funeral Homes vs. NLRC, 295 SCRA 494 Gretel & Kristel 10. Alcazaren vs. Univet Agri., 476 SCRA 636 11. Lions Club International vs. Amores, 121 SCRA 621 Oscar &Leng 12. Felipe vs. Leuterio, 91 Phil. 482 13. U.S. vs. Caete, 38 Phil. 253 Janeth& Roger 14. Fortuno vs. Hon. Palma, G.R. No. 70203, December 18, 1987, 156 SCRA 691 15. Yau vs. Manila Banking Corporation, 384 SCRA 340 Sam & Carol 16. Ngo Bun Tiong vs. Judge Sayo, 163 SCRA 237 17. Paper Industries Corporation vs. IAC, 151 SCRA 161 Beth & Aiza 18. NEA vs. Mendoza, 138 SCRA 632 19. PICOP vs. IAC, 151 SCRA 161 Ira &Lyndon 20. Traders Royal Bank vs. IAC, 133 SCRA 259 21. Santos vs. Bayhon, 199 SCRA 525 22. Arevalo vs. Benedicto, 58 SCRA 186 23. Planas vs. CIR, 3 SCRA 395 24. Anuran vs. Aquino, 38 Phil. 29 25. Andaya vs. Abadia, 228 SCRA 705 26. Zamora vs. CA, 183 SCRA 279 27. Solid Homes Inc., vs. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72 28. Estoesta vs. CA, 179 SCRA 203 29. Abain vs. Chua, 11 SCRA 754 30. Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 31. ABC Auto Supply vs. CA, 284 SCRA 218 32. Heirs of Dela Cruz vs. Heirs of Dela Cruz, 475 SCRA 743 33. Asia Internationa Auctioneers vs. Parayno, G.R. No. 163445, Dec. 18, 2007 34. ACE vs. Commissioner of Customs, 11 SCRA 147 35. Padunan vs. DARAB, 396 SCRA 196 36. United Homeowners Association, Inc., vs. BF Homes, Inc., 310 SCRA 304 37. Municipality of Antipolo vs. Zapanta, 133 SCRA 820 38. Rep vs. Marcos, 29 SCRA 517 39. Rep vs. Marcos, 52 SCRA 238 40. Mangaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193 41. Manchester vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562 42. Sun Insurance vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 43. Pilipinas Shell vs. CA, 171 SCRA 674 44. Original Development and Construction Corp vs. CA, 202 SCRA 753 45. Ballatan vs. CA, 304 SCRA 35 46. Hodges vs. CA, 184 SCRA 281 47. Calauag vs. Pecson, 82 Phil. 12 48. Davao and Light Power Co., Inc., vs. CA, 204 SCRA 343 49. Ang Ping vs. CA, 310 SCRA 343 50. Navale vs. CA, 253 SCRA 699 51. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78; 2nd sentence, Sec. 20, Rule 14 and Sec. 8, Rule 15 52. Jose vs. Bayon, 414 SCRA 216 53. Avon Insurance PLC vs. CA, G.R. No. 97642, August 29, 1997

Reina & roel

54. French Oil Machinery Co., vs. CA, 295 SCRA 462 55. Asiavest Ltd., vs. CA, 296 SCRA 539 56. Gomez vs. CA, 425 SCRA 98 57. PCIB vs. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 58. Biaco vs. PCRB, 515 SCRA 106 59. Alba vs. CA, 465 SCRA 495 60. Navale vs. CA, 253 SCRA 705 61. Carballo vs. Encarnacion, 92 SCRA 974 62. De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 63. Sanchez vs. Marin, G.R. No. 171346, October 19, 2007 64. Department of Health vs. NLRC, 251 SCRA 700 65. Zamora vs. CA, 183 SCRA 279 66. Magay vs. Estandian, 69 SCRA 456 67. Sarmiento vs. CA, 262 SCRA 101 68. Tinitigan vs. Tinitigan, 100 SCRA 619 69. Notre Dame de Lourdes Hosp vs. Judge Mallare-Philipps, 197 SCRA 87 70. Bernardo vs. CA, 263 SCRA 660 71. Sea-Land Service Inc., vs. Cabato, 327 SCRA 521 72. Commart (Phils.), Inc., vs. SEC, 198 SCRA 73 73. Multinational Village Homeowners vs. CA, 203 SCRA 104 74. De Jesus vs. Bristol Laboratories 55 SCRA 349 75. Dela Rama vs. Mendiola, 401 SCRA 704
76. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78 77.Philex Mining Corp vs. Reyes, 118 SCRA 602 78.Union Glass and Container Corp., vs. SEC, 126 SCRA 31 79.BSBA vs. Leano, 127 SCRA 778 80.Realty Exchange vs. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 81.Solid Homes vs. Payawal, 177 SCRA 72

82. Arranza vs. B.F. Homes, Inc., 333 SCRA 799 83. Rep vs. Asset Privatization Trust, 475 SCRA 608 84. Tolentino vs. Leviste, 443 SCRA 274 85. Cabrera vs. Lapid, 510 SCRA 55 86. Heirs of Maura So vs. Obliosca, 542 SCRA 406 87.Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank vs. CA, 334 SCRA 305 88. Suntay vs. Gacolay, 470 SCRA 627 89. BPI vs. ALS Management & Development Corp., 427 SCRA 564 90. Makawiag vs. Balindong, 502 SCRA 454 4. How jurisdiction is conferred and determined 91. Padre vs. Badillo, et., al., G.R. No. 165423, January 19, 2011 92. De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 93. De Leon vs. CA, 245 SCRA 166 94. RP vs. Estipular, 336 SCRA 333 95. Sanchez vs. Marin, supra 96. Zamora vs. CA, supra 97. De Jesus vs. Garcia, supra 98 Santos vs. Northwest Orient Airlines, 210 SCRA 256 99. Del Castillo vs. Aguinaldo, 212 SCRA 169 100.Amigo vs. CA, 253 SCRA 382 101.Sea Land Service, Inc., vs. CA, 327 SCRA 135 102Navales vs. Abaya, 441 SCRA 393 103Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 104Guiang vs. CA, 510 SCRA 568 105Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34 106. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521

107. Tecson vs. Guiterrez, 452 SCRA 781 108. Gocotano vs. Gocotano, 469 SCRA 326 108.Denilla vs. Bellosillo, 64 SCRA 63 109Tinitigan vs. Tinitigan, supra 110. Lahom vs. Sibulo, 406 SCRA 135 111. Commart vs. SEC, supra 112. Multinational Village vs. CA, supra 113. Baltazar vs. Ombudsman, 510 SCRA 74 114. Solid Homes vs. CA, 271 SCRA 157 115. Bulao vs. CA, 218 SCRA 321Inton vs. Quintana, 81 Phil. 120 116. Concepcion vs. CFI of Bulacan, 119 SCRA 222 117. Bayog vs. Natino, 258 SCRA 378 118. Ignacio vs. CFI Bulacan, 42 SCRA 89 119.Dela Cruz vs. CA, 510 SCRA 103 120.Onquit vs. Binamira-Parcia, 297 SCRA 354 121. Vda de Victoria vs. CA, 449 SCRA 319 122. Hilado vs. Chavez, 438 SCRA 623 5. Doctrine of primary jurisdiction 123. Brett vs. IAC, 191 SCRA 687 124. Roxas vs. CA, G.R. No. 127876, Dec. 17, 1999 125. First Lepanto Ceramics vs. CA, 253 SCRA 552 126. Machete vs. CA, 250 SCRA 176 127. Paloma vs. Mora, 470 SCRA 711 6. Doctrine of adherence of jurisdiction/ Doctrine of continuity of jurisdiction 128. Dela Rosa vs. Roldan, 501 SCRA 34 129. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521 130. Bantua vs. Mercader, 350 SCRA 86 131. Aruego Jr vs. CA, 254 SCRA 711 132. Rep vs. Atlas Farms, 345 SCRA 296 7. Objections to jurisdiction over the subject matter 133. Laresma vs. Abellana, 442 SCRA 156 134. Estoesta vs. CA, 179 SCRA 203 135. De Leon vs. CA, 245 SCRA 166 136. La Naval Drug vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78 137. Fabian vs. Desierto, 295 SCRA 470 138. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399 139.Francel Realty Corp., vs. Sycip, 469 SCRA 424 140.Vda de Barrera vs. Heirs of Legaspi, G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008 8. Effect of estoppels on objections to jurisdiction 141.Tijam vs. Sibonghanoy, 23 SCRA 29 142. Tolentino vs. Escalona, 26 SCRA 613 143. Carrillo vs. Allied Workers, 24 SCRA 566 144. La Naval Drug Corporation vs. CA, 236 SCRA 78, supra 145. PNOC Shipping and Transport Corp., vs. CA 297 SCRA 402 146. Alday vs. FGU Insurance Corp., 350 SCRA 113 147. Calimlim vs. Ramirez, 118 SCRA 399 148. Pangilinan vs. CA, 321 SCRA 51 C. Jurisdiction over the issues 149. Reyes vs. Diaz, 73 Phil. 484

Distinction between a question of law and a question of fact 150. Sps. Santos vs. CA, 337SCRA 67 151. Velayo-Fong vs. Sps. Velayo, 510 SCRA 320 152. Avon Cosmetics vs. LUNA, 511 SCRA 376 Exception: Sec. 5, Rule 10 153. Estolas vs. Acena, 448 SCRA 333 154. Cindy and Lynsy Garment vs. NLRC, 284 SCRA 38 D. Jurisdiction over the res or property in litigation 155. Perkins vs. Dizon, 69 Phil. 186 Sec. 15, Rule 14, 1997 Rules of Court E. Jurisdiction of courts 156. Valdez vs. China Banking Corp., 455 SCRA 687 157. Carandang vs. Hon. Aniano Desierto, G.R. No. 148076, G.R. No. 153161, January 12, 2011 158. Durisol Philippines, Inc., vs. CA, 377 SCRA 353 159.De Jesus vs. Garcia, 19 SCRA 554 160. Laresma vs. Abellana, 442 SCRA 156 161. Cruz vs. Tan, 87 Phil. 627 162. Vda. De Murga vs. Chan, 25 SCRA 441 163. Ortigas vs. Herrera, 120 SCRA 89 164. Raymundo vs. CA, 213 SCRA 457 165. Singson vs. Isabela Sawmill, 88 SCRA 623 166.Russel vs. Vestil, 304 SCRA 739 167. Barangay Sawmill vs. Heirs of Pastor, 334 SCRA 127 168.Polomok Water District vs. Polomok General Consumers Association, G.R. No.162124, October 19, 2007 169. Cruz vs. Tan, 87 Phil. 627 170. Bokingo vs. CA, 489 SCRA 521 171.Makati Development Corp., vs. Tanjuatco, 27 SCRA 401 172.Davao Light and Power Co., Inc., vs. CA, G.R. No. 147058, March 10, 2005 173. Hilaro vs. Salvador, 457 SCRA 815 174. Quinagoran vs.CA, G.R. No. 155179, August 24, 2007 175. Atuel vs. Valdez, 403 SCRA 517 176. Vda. De Barrera vs. Heirs of Legaspi, G.R. No. 174346, September 12, 2008 177. Brgy. Piapi vs. Talip, 469 SCRA 409 178. Heirs of Concha vs. Sps. Lumocso, 540 SCRA 1 179. Rosaria Pang-et, et., al., vs. Catherine Dao-as, G.R. No. 167261, March 2, 2007 180. Galuba vs. Sps. Alfredo Laureta, G.R. No. 71091, January 29, 1988 Summary Procedure 181. Go vs. CA, 297 SCRA 574 182. Five Star Marketing Corp., vs. Booc, 535 SCRA 28 183. Garcia vs. Zosa, Jr., 469 SCRA 334 184. Habagat Grill vs. DMC-Urban Property Developer,454 SCRA 653 G. Totality rule 185. Enerio vs. Alampay, 64 SCRA 142 186. Agustin vs. Bacalan, 135 SCRA 340 187. Flores vs. Mallare-Philipps, 144 SCRA 377 188.Pantranco North Express, Inc., vs. Standard Insurance Co, Inc., 453 SCRA 482 H. Residual jurisdiction

Sec. 9, Rule 41, 1997 Rules of Court 189. Alama vs. Abbas, 18 SCRA 836 190. Fortune Life Ins. vs. CA, 224 SCRA 829

III. Civil Procedure Liberal Interpretation 191. Asia Pacific Overseas Shipping Corporation vs. NLRC, 161 SCRA 122 192. Alonso vs. Villamor, 16 Phil. 315 193. Allied Banking Corporation vs. Eserjose, 453 SCRA 163 194. Tan Boon Bee & Co., Inc., vs. Judge Jarencio, 163 SCRA 205 195. Cometa vs. CA, 351 SCRA 294 196. Santos vs. CA, 198 SCRA 806 A. Actions 197. Denoso vs. CA, 163 SCRA 683 198. Lopez vs. Filipinas Compania de Seguros, 16 SCRA 859 199.Pacific Banking Corporation Employees Organization vs. CA, 249 SCRA 492 200.Mangaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193 201. Manchester vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562 202. Sun Insurance vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 203. Pilipinas Shell vs. CA, 171 SCRA 674 204. Original Development and Construction Corp vs. CA, 202 SCRA 753 205. Ballatan vs. CA, 304 SCRA 35 206. Hodges vs. CA, 184 SCRA 281 207. Hernandez vs. Development of the Philippines, 71 SCRA 292 208. Domagas vs. Jensen, G.R. No. 158407, January 17, 2005 209. Asiavest Ltd., vs. CA, 296 SCRA 539 210. Gomez vs. CA, 425 SCRA 98 211. PCIB vs. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 212. Biaco vs. PCRB, 515 SCRA 106 213. Alba vs. CA, 465 SCRA 495 214. Navale vs. CA, 253 SCRA 705 215. Carballo vs. Encarnacion, 92 SCRA 974 216. RP vs. Herbieto, G.R. No. 156117, May 26, 2005 217. Midgely vs. Fernandos, 64 SCRA 23 218. Banco-Filipino Espaol vs. Palanca, 37 Phil, 921 219. Valmonte vs. Santos, 252 SCRA 92 220.Rayray vs. Chae Kyung Lee, 18 SCRA 450 221. Barco vs. CA 420 SCRA162 222. Hernandez vs. Rural Bank of Lucena, 81 SCRA 75 223. PNB vs. CA, 153 SCRA 435 224. Domagas vs. Jansen, supra 225. Investors Finance Corp., vs. Ebarce, 163 SCRA 60 226. Dasmarias Village Association Inc., vs. CA, 299 SCRA 598 227. NPC vs. CA, 279 SCRA 506 228. Limjoco vs. Intestate Estate of Fragante, 8 Phil. 776 229. Nazareno vs. CA, 343 SCRA 637 230. Barlin vs. Ramirez, 7 Phil. 47 1. Real parties in interest

231. Aguila vs. CA, 319 SCRA 246 232. Balagtas vs. CA, 317 SCRA 69 233. Rayo vs. Metrobank, 539 SCRA 571 234. Fortich vs. Corona, 289 SCRA 624 235. Figuracion vs. Libi, 539 SCRA 50 236. Samaniego vs. Aguila, 334 SCRA 438 237. Mayor Rhustom Dagadag vs. Tongnawa, 450 SCRA 437 238. Lee vs. Romillo, 161 SCRA 589 239. Sustiguer vs. Tamayo, 176 SCRA 579 240. Uy vs. CA, 314 SCRA 69 241. Westmont Bank vs. Shugo Noda & Co., Ltd., 307 SCRA 381 242. Periquet Jr., vs. IAC, 238 SCRA 697 243. Carillo vs. CA, 503 SCRA 66 244. Phil Trust Co., vs. CA, 320 SCRA 719 245. Stonehill vs. Diokno 20 SCRA383 246. Asset Privatization Trust Fund vs. CA, 300 SCRA 579 247. Aguila vs. CA, 319 SCRA 345 248. Figuracion vs. Libi, 539 SCRA 50 249. Rep vs. Aquino Sr., 451 SCRA735 250. Balagtas vs. CA, 317 SCRA 69 251. Vlason Enterprises vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26 252. Baltazar vs. Ombudsman, G.R. No. 136433, December 6, 2006 253. Kilosbayan Inc., vs. Morato 246 SCRA 540 Indispensable parties 254. Servicewide Specialist, Inc., vs. CA, 318 SCRA 493 255. De Castro vs. CA, 384 SCRA 607 256. Lucman vs. Malawi, G.R. No. 159794, December 19, 2006 257. MWSS vs. CA, 297 SCRA 287 258. Plasabas vs. CA, G.R. No. 166519, March 31, 2009 259. Pamplona Plantation Co vs. Tinghil, 450 SCRA 421 260. Uy vs. CA, 494 SCRA 535 Necessary parties 261. Borlasa vs. Polistico, 47 Phil. 345 262. Chua vs. Torres, 468 SCRA 358 263. Seno vs. Mangubat, 156 SCRA 113 264. Agro Conglomerates, Inc., vs. CA, 348 SCRA 450 265. Hemedez vs. CA, 316 SCRA 347 266. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 173 SCRA 72 267. Operators Inc., vs. American Biscuit Co., 154 SCRA 738 268. Santiago Land Development Corporation vs. CA, 267 SCRA 79 269. Galarosa vs. Valencia, 227 SCRA 726 270. Lozano vs. Ballesteros, 195 SCRA 681 Alternative defendants 271. Rizal Surety and Insurance Co., vs. Manila, 70 SCRA 187 2. Compulsory and permissive joinder of parties 272. Sepulveda Sr., vs. Palaez, 450 SCRA 302 3. Misjoinder and non-joinder of parties 273. Almendras vs. CA, 293 SCRA 540 274. Republic vs. Herbieto, 459 SCRA 183 275. Lim Tan Hu vs. Ramolete, 66 SCRA 425

4. Class suit 276. Mathay vs. Consolidated Bank and Trust Co., 58 SCRA 559 277. Borlasa vs. Polistico, 47 Phil. 345 278. Berses vs. Villanueva, 25 Phil. 473 279. Sulo ng Bayan, Inc., vs. Araneta, 72 SCRA 347 280. Ibaes vs. Roman Catholic Church, 12 Phi. 227 281. Ortigas & Co., Ltd., Partnership vs. Ruiz, 148 SCRA 326 282. Mathay vs. Consolidated Bank and Trust Co., 58 SCRA 559 283. Newsweek Inc., vs. IAC, 142 SCRA 171 284. Oposa vs. Factoran, 224 SCRA 792 D. Venue 285. Manila Rail Road Co., vs. Attorney General, 20 Phil. 523 286. Heirs of Lopez vs. De Castro, 324 SCRA 591 287. Universal Corp., vs. Lim, G.R. No. 154338, October 5, 2007 288. Universal Robina Corp., vs. Lim 535 SCRA 95 289. Republic vs. Glasgow Credit, 542 SCRA 95 290. Dacuycoy vs. IAC, 195 SCRA 641 291. Consolidated Bank vs. IAC, 198 SCRA 34 292.Brgy. San Roque vs. Pastor, 334 SCRA 127 293. Torres vs. J.M. Tuason & Co., Inc., 12 SCRA 174 294. Dr. Antonio Lizares vs. Caluag, 14 SCRA 746 1. Venue versus jurisdiction 295. Padre vs. Badillo, et., al., G.R. No. 165423, January 19, 2011 2. Venue of real actions 296. Gumabon vs. Larin, G. R. No. 142523, November 27, 2001 297. Go vs. UCPB, 442 SCRA 264 298. Paderanga vs. Buissan, 226 SCRA 786 3. Venue of personal actions 299. Golden Arches Development Corporation vs. St. Francis Square Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 183843. January 19, 2011 300. Clavecilla Radio System vs. Antillon, 19 SCRA 379 5. When the rules on venue do not apply 301. Lacquian vs. Baltazar, 31 SCRA 552 302.Diaz vs. Adiong, 219 SCRA 631 6. Effects of stipulations on venue 303. Universal Robina Corp., vs. Lim, 535 SCRA 95 305. Polytrade Corp., vs. Blanco, 30 SCRA 187 306. Supena vs. De la Rosa, 267 SCRA 1 307. Sps. Lantin vs. Lantion, 499 SCRA 718 308. Unimasters Conglomerations vs. CA, 267 SCRA 759 309. PBC vs. Trazo, G.R. No. 165500, August 30, 2006 310. Langkaan Realty Devt vs. UCPB, G.R. No. 139427, December 8, 2000 311. Auction in Malinta Inc., vs. Luyaben, G.R.No. 173979, February 12, 2007 312. Pacific Consultants, International Asia, vs. Schonfeld, G.R. No. 166920, Feb 19, 2007 313. Hoechst, Inc., vs. Torres, 83 SCRA 297 314. Emergency Loan Pawnshop vs. CA, 353 SCRA 89 315. Nocum vs. Tan, 470 SCRA 639

E. Pleadings

316. 317. 318. 319. 320. 321.

Republic vs. Sarabia, G.R. No. 157847, August 25, 2005 Aquintey vs. Tibong, G.R.No. 166704, December 20, 2006 Camitan vs. CA, G.R. No. 128099, December 20, 2006 Warner Barnes vs. Reyes, 103 Phil. 662 Acabal vs. Acabal, 454 SCRA 555 Pesane Animas Mongao vs. Pryce Properties Corp., G.R. No. 156474, Aug 16, 2005

c. Counterclaims 322. Pro-Line Sports Center, Inc., vs. CA, 281 SCRA 162 323. Yulienco vs.CA, 308 SCRA 206 324. Raymundo vs. Felipe, 42 SCRA 615 325. Mercado vs. CA, G.R. No. 169576, October 17, 2008 i. Compulsory counterclaim 326. Arenas vs. CA, G.R. No. 126640, November 23, 2000 327. Yulienco vs. CA, 308 SCRA 206 328. Financial Building Corp., vs. Forbes Park Association, G.R.No. 133119, Aug 17, 2000 329. Bayer Philippines vs. CA, 340 SCRA 437 330. Beltran vs. Balbuena, 53 Phil. 697 331. Meliton vs. CA, 216 SCRA 485 332. Maceda vs. CA, 176 SCRA 440 333. Agustin vs. Bacalan, 135 SCRA 340 334. Calo vs. Ajax International, Inc., 22 SCRA 996 335. Reyes vs. CA, 38 SCRA 138 336. Financial Building Corp., vs. Forbes Park Association, G.R. No. 133119, August 17, 2000 ii. Permissive counterclaim 337. International Container Terminal Services vs. CA, G.R. No. 90530, October 17, 1992 338. Sandejas vs. Ignacio, G.R.No. 155033, December 19, 2007 339. Arenas vs. CAm G.R. No. 126640, November 23, 2000 Permissive counterclaim vs. Compulsory counterclaim 340. Sto. Tomas University vs. Surla, G.R. No. 129718, August 17, 1998 341. Ponciano vs. Parentela, 331 SCRA 605 342. Gojo vs. Goyala, 35 SCRA 557 343. Sarmiento vs. San Juan, 120 SCRA 403 344. La Tondea Distillers vs. CA, 209 SCRA 553 345. Cabaero vs. Cantos, 271 SCRA 391 346. Metals Engineerng Resources Corp., vs. CA, 203 SCRA 273 Sandejas vs. Ignacio, supra 347. Korea Technologies Co., Ltd., vs. Lerma, 542SCRA 1 iii. Effect of counterclaim when the complaint is dismissed 348. BA Finance Corp., vs. Co et., al., G.R. No. 105751, June 30, 1993 349. Pinga vs. Heirs of Santiago, G.R.No. 170354, June 30, 2006 e. Third (fourth, etc.) party complaints 350. China Banking Corporation vs. Padilla, G.R. No. 143490, February 2, 2007 351. Sps. Uy vs. Ariza, G.R. No. 158370, August 17, 2006

f. Complaint-in-intervention 352. First Philippine Holdings Corp., vs. Sandiganbayan, 253 SCRA 30 353. Office of the Ombudsman vs. Samaniego, G.R. No. 175573, September 11, 2008 354. Santiago Land Development Corp., vs. CA, 267 SCRA 79 355. Mabayo Farms Inc., vs. Manila Banking Corp., G.R. No. 126731, July 11, 2002 356. Mago vs. CA, G.R. No. 115624, February 25, 1999 357. Mabayo Farms Inc., vs. CA, G.R. No. 140058, August 1, 2002 358. Acenas II vs. CA, 247 SCRA 773 359. Firestone Ceramics vs. CA, 313 SCRA 522 360. Robles vs. Timario, 6 SCRA 380 361. Roxas vs. Dinglasan, 28 SCRA 430 362. Heirs of Antonio Pael vs. CA, 325 SCRA 341 i. Requirement of a corporation executing the verification/certification against forum-shopping 363. Loyola vs. CA, 245 SCRA 477 364. Gabionza vs. CA, 234 SCRA 192 365. Prince Transport Inc., vs. Diosdado Garcia, et., al., G.R. No. 167291, January 12, 2011 366. Sameer Oversees Placement Agency, Inc. v. Mildred R. Santos, G.R. No. 152579, August 4, 2009 367.Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC) Vs. Philippine Countryside Rural Bank, Inc., et al., G.R. No. 176438. January 24, 2011

6. Default a. When a declaration of default is proper 368. Monzon vs. Addio Properties, Inc., G.R. No. 171827, September 17, 2008 369. Cathay Pacific Airways vs. Romillo Jr., 141 SCRA 451 370. Sps. De Los Santos vs. Carpio, G.R. No. 153696, September 11, 2006 371. Sablas vs. Sablas, G.R> No. 144568, July 3, 2007 372. Monarch Insurance vs. CA, 333 SCRA 7 373. Vlason Enterprises Corp., vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26 c. Relief from an order of default 374. Villareal vs. CA, 295 SCRA 511 375. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 148154, December 17, 2007 376. Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 540 SCRA 431 377. Talsan Enterprises Inc., vs. Baliwag Transit, Inc., 431 SCRA 156 378. Lina vs. CA, 135 SCRA 637 379. Balangcad vs. Justice of the Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 83888, February 12, 1992 380. Ampeloquio vs. CA, 333 SCRA 465 381. Lorbes vs. CA, G.R. No. 139884, February 15, 2001 382. Samartino vs. Raon, G.R. No. 131482, July 3, 2002 383. Sablas vs. Sablas, G.R. No. 144568, July 3, 2007 e. Extent of relief 384. Vlason vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26 a. Payment of docket fees and acquisition of jurisdiction 385. Mangaspi vs. Ramolete, 115 SCRA 193 386. Manchester vs. CA, 149 SCRA 562 387. Sun Insurance vs. Asuncion, 170 SCRA 274 388. Pilipinas Shell vs. CA, 171 SCRA 674 389. Original Development and Construction Corp vs. CA, 202 SCRA 753 390. PAGCOR vs. Lopez, 474 SCRA 76

391. 392. 393. 394. 395. 396.

Nestle Philippines, Inc., vs. FY Sons, Inc., 489 624 Proton Pilipinas Corp., vs. Banque National de Paris, 460 SCRA 260 Rivera vs. Del Rosario, 419 SCRA 626 Regalado vs. Go, G.R. No. 167988, February 6, 2007 M.A. Santander Construction Inc., vs. Villanueva, 441 SCRA 525 Villamor vs. CA, 434 SCRA 565

Different Rule on Appeal 397. Macabungkil vs. Peoples Homesite and Housing Corp., 72 SCRA 326 398. Agricultural and Industrial Marketing vs. CA, 118 SCRA 49 399. Santos vs. CA, 125 SCRA 22 400. Garcia vs. Echiverri, 132 SCRA 631 401. Regalado vs. Go., G.R. No. 167988, February 6, 2007 402. M.A. Santader Construction Inc., Villanueva, 441 SCRA 525 403. Villamor vs. CA, 434 SCRA 565 404. 405. 406. 407. 408. 409. 410.
411.

Paluwagan ng Bayan Savings Bank vs. King, 172 SCRA 62 Venturanza vs. CA, 156 SCRA 305 Samartino vs. Raon, G.R. No. 131482, July 3, 2002 Keister vs. Navarro 77 SCRA 209 Arevalo vs. Quilatan, 116 SCRA 700 Ma. Imelda Manotoc vs. CA, 499 SCRA 21
Solar Team Entertainment vs. Judge Ricafort, G.R. No. 132007. August 5, 1998 Peoroso vs. Dona, G.R. No. 154018, April 3, 2007

412. 413. 414. 415. 416. 417. 418. 419. 420. 421. 422.

Cadornigara vs. NLRC, G.R. No. 158073, November 23, 2007 Republic vs. Resin Incorp., G.R. No. 175891, January 12, 2011 Navarro vs. Vda. De Taroma, 478 SCRA 336 Bautista vs. Maya-Maya Cottages, Inc., 476 SCRA 416 Breslin vs. Luzon Stevedorin, 84 Phil. 618 Ong Peng vs. Custodio, 1 SCRA 780 Alpine Lending Investors vs. Corpus, 508 SCRA 45 Paeste vs. Jaurigue, 94 Phil. 179 Republic vs. Ilao, 4 SCRA 106 Remington Industrial Sales vs. CA, 382 SCRA 499 National Mines and Allied Workers Union, vs. G.R. No. 157232, December 10, 2007

b. Amendment by leave of court 423. Calo and San Jose vs. Roldan, 76 Phil. 445 425. Buenaventura vs. Buenaventura, 94 Phil. 193 426. Siasoco vs. CA, 303 SCRA 186 427. Philippine Ports Authority vs. Gothong and Aboitiz,542 SCRA 406 428. 429. Philippine Export and Foreign Loan Guarantee Corp., vs. Philippine Infrastructure Inc., 419 SCRA 6 Azola Farms vs. CA, 442 SCRA 133

e. Amendment, cause of action and jurisdiction 430. Swagman Hotels and Travel Inc., vs. CA, 455 SCRA 175 431. Gumabay vs. Baralin, 77 SCRA 258 432. Soledad vs. Mamangun, 8 SCRA 110 433. Campos Rueda Corp., vs. Bautista, 6 SCRA 240 434. Rosario vs. Carandang, 96 Phil. 845 435. Gaspar vs. Dorado, 15 SCRA 331 436. Calabig vs. Villanueva, 135 SCRA 300

f. Effect of amended pleading Sec. 8, Rule 10 437. Verzosa vs. CA, 299 SCRA 100 438. Ching vs. CA, 331 SCRA 16 439. Bastida vs. Menzi & Co., Inc., 58 Phil. 188 440. Torres vs. CA, 131 SCRA 224 441. Ching vs. CA, 331 SCRA 16 442. Vlason Enterprises vs. CA, 310 SCRA 26 443. Arcenas vs. CA, 299 SCRA 733 g. Different from supplemental pleadings Sec. 6, Rule 10 444. Asset Privatization Trust Fund vs. CA, 324 SCRA 533 445. Young vs. Spouses Sy, 503 SCRA 151 446. Chan vs. Chan, G.R. No. 150746, October 15, 2008 F. Summons 447. Cano-Gutierrez vs. Gutierrez, 341 SCRA 670 448. Guanzon vs. Arradaza, 510 SCRA 309 449. Umandap vs. Sabio Jr., 339 SCRA 243 450. Habaa vs. Vamenta, 33 SCRA 569 Gomez vs. CA, 420 SCRA 98 Biaco vs. PCRB, 515 SCRA 106 PCI Bank vs. Alejandro, 533 SCRA 738 Pagalaran vs. Bal-latan, 13 Phil. 135 1. Nature and purpose of summons in relation to actions in personam, in rem, and quasi in rem Pantaleon vs. Asuncion, 105 Phil. 761 Citizens Surety vs. Melencio-Herrera, 38 SCRA 369 Magdalena Estate, Inc., vs. Nieto, 125 SCRA 758 Ma. Imelda Manotoc vs. CA, 499 SCRA 21 Banco de Brasil vs. CA, 333 SCRA 545 2. Voluntary appearance 3. Personal service Where defendant is a juridical person E.B. Villarosa vs. Hon. Benito, 312 SCRA 65 Summit Trading vs. Avendao, 135 SCRA 397 Mason vs. CA, 413 SCRA 303 Paramount Insurance Corp vs. A.C. Ordoez Corp., G.R. No. 175109, August 6, 2008 Substantial Compliance Rule G & G Trading Corp., vs. CA, 158 SCRA 466 Porac Trucking Inc., vs. CA, 183 SCRA 45 Millennium Industrial Commercial Corp., vs. Tan, G.R. No. 131724, February 28, 2000 Talsan Enterprises Inc., vs. Baliwag Transit, G.R. No. 126258, July 8, 1999 Isolated Transaction Rule Foreign Corporations CIR vs. K.M.K. Gani, 182 SCRA 591 4. Substituted service Paluwagan ng Bayan Savings Bank vs. King, 172 SCRA 62 Venturanza vs. CA, 156 SCRA 305 Samartino vs. Raon, G.R. No. 131482, July 3, 2002 Keister vs. Navarro 77 SCRA 209

Arevalo vs. Quilatan, 116 SCRA 700 Ma. Imelda Manotoc vs. CA, 499 SCRA 21 Guanzon vs, Arradaza, 510 SCRA 309 Montalban vs. Maximo, 22 SCRA 1070 Robinson vs. Miralles, 510 SCRA 678 Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA 216 Domagas vs. Jensen, 448 SCRA 663 Paluwagan ng Bayan Savings Bank vs. King 172 SCRA 62 Laus vs. CA, 219 SCRA 688 5. Alias Summons Millennium Industrial Commercial Corporation vs. Tan, G.R. No. 131724, June 21, 2001 Paluwagan ng Bayan Savings Bank vs. King 172 SCRA 62, supra Santos vs. NLRC, 254 SCRA 673 6. Constructive service (by publication) a. Service upon a defendant where his identity is unknown or where his whereabouts are unknown Santos vs. PNOC Exploration Corp., G.R. No. 170943, September 23, 2008 Pantaleon v.s Asuncion, 105 Phil. 761 Citizens Surety vs. Melencio-Herrera, 38 SCRA 369 Magdalena Estate, Inc., vs. Nieto, 125 SCRA 758 Fontanilla vs. Dominguez, 73 Phil. 579 b. Service upon residents temporarily outside the Philippines Sahagun vs. CA, 198 SCRA 44 Mengha vs. Tarachand, 67 Phil. 286 Montalban vs. Maximo, 22 SCRA 1070 7. Extra-territorial service, when allowed Banco de Brasil vs. CA, 333 SCRA 545 Cynthia Alaban vs. CA, 470 SCRA 697 Jose vs. Boyon, 414 SCRA 216 Kawasaki Port Service Corp., vs. Amores, 199 SCRA 230 Banco Espaol vs. Palanca, 37 Phil. 921 Perkins vs. Dizon, 69 Phil. 186 Asiavest Limited vs. CA, 296 SCRA 539 Valmonte vs. CA, 252 SCRA 92 Gemperle vs. Schenker, 125 Phil. 458 Velayo Fong vs. Sps. Velayo, 510 SCRA 320 8. Summons when complaint is amended Paradise Sauna Massage Corp., vs. Ng, 181 SCRA 719 Atkins vs. Domingo, 44 Phil. 680 Ong Peng vs. Custodio, 1 SCRA 780 Gumabay vs. Baralin, 77 SCRA 258 Vlason Enterprises vs. CA, 310 SCRA 49 9. Proof of service G. Motions 1. Motions in general a. Definition of a motion b. Motion versus pleading c. Contents and forms of motions

Jehan Shipping Corporation vs. NFA, 477 SCRA 781 Philville vs. Javier, 477 SCRA 533 d. Notice of hearing and hearing of motions e. Omnibus motion rule Misamis Occidental II Cooperative Inc., vs. David, 468 SCRA 63 f. Litigated and ex parte motions Bayview Hotel Inc., vs. CA, G.R. No. 119337, June 17, 1997 g. Pro-forma motions 2. Motions for bill of particulars a. Purpose and when applied for Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, 540 SCRA 431 Lirag, et., al., vs. Hon. Galano, G.R. No. L-46244 August 18, 1988 Tantuico, Jr. v. Republic, 204 SCRA 428 Salita vs. Hon. Magtolis, G.R. No. 106429 June 13, 1994 b. Actions of the court c. Compliance with the order and effect of non-compliance d. Effect of the period to file a responsive pleading 3. Motion to dismiss A.M. No. 03-1-09 SC, July 13, 2004 a. Grounds Peltan Development Inc., vs. CA, 270 SCRA 82 De Dios vs. Bristol Laboratories, 55 SCRA 349 Dalandan vs. Julio, 10 SCRA 4000 Vette Industrial Sales Co., vs. Cheng, 509 SCRA 532 Laches Pineda vs. Heirs of Guevara, G.R. No. 143188, February 14, 2007 Res Judicata Fels, Inc., vs. Province of Batangas, G.R. No. 168557, February 19, 2007 Heirs of Wenceslao Tabia vs. CA, G.R. Nos. 129377 and 129399, February 22, 2007 Moraga vs. Sps. Somo, 501 SCRA 118 Trinidad vs. Office of the Ombudsman, G.R. No. 166038, December 4, 2007 b. Resolution of motion c. Remedies of plaintiff when the complaint is dismissed d. Remedies of defendant when the motion is denied Douglas Lu Ym vs. Nabua, 451 SCRA 298 e. Effect of dismissal of complaint on certain grounds f. When grounds pleaded as affirmative defenses Sps. Rasdas vs. Villa, 477 SCRA 538 g. Bar by dismissal h. Distinguished from demurrer to evidence under Rule 33 H. Dismissal of actions 1. Dismissal upon notice by plaintiff; two-dismissal rule 2. Dismissal upon motion by plaintiff; effect on existing counterclaim 3. Dismissal due to the fault of plaintiff 4. Dismissal of counterclaim, cross-claim or third-party complaint

I. Pre-trial 1. Concept of pre-trial 2. Nature and purpose of pre-trial Tiu vs. Middleton, G.R. No. 134998 July 19, 1999 3. Notice of pre-trial 4. Appearance of parties; effect of failure to appear Olave v. Mistas, G.R. No. 155193, November 26, 2004, 444 SCRA 479, 495 BPI vs. Dando, G.R. No. 177456, September 4, 2009 PhilAmLife vs. Enario, G.R. No. 182075, September 15, 2010 5. Pre-trial brief; effect of failure to appear Durban Apartment Corp., vs. Pioneer Insurance Corp., G.R. No. 179419, January 12, 2011 6. Distinction between pre-trial in civil case and pre-trial in criminal case 7. A.M. No. 03-1-09-SC, Proposed rule on guidelines to be observed by trial court judges and clerks of court in the conduct of pre-trial and use of deposition-discovery measures 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) links: http://www.pmc.org.ph/faq-the-case-for-mediation.htm links: http://www.congress.gov.ph/download/researches/rrb_0302_1.pdf links: http://pmc.judiciary.gov.ph/downloads/JURIS_Primer.pdf a. Court Annexed Mediation (CAM) A. M. No. 02-2-17SC, April 16, 2002 A.M. No. 01-10-5-SC-PHILJA, October 16, 2001 b. Judicial Dispute Resolution (JDR) A.M. No. 04-1-12-SC-PhilJA, August 29, 2006 Linda Kent vs. Dionesio Micarez, et., al., G.R. No. 185758, March 9, 2011 J. Intervention First Philippine Holdings Corp., vs. Sandiganbayan, 253 SCRA 30 Office of the Ombudsman vs. Samaniego, G.R. No. 175573, September 11, 2008 Santiago Land Development Corp., vs. CA, 267 SCRA 79 Mabayo Farms Inc., vs. Manila Banking Corp., G.R. No. 126731, July 11, 2002 Mago vs. CA, G.R. No. 115624, February 25, 1999 Mabayo Farms Inc., vs. CA, G.R. No. 140058, August 1, 2002 Acenas II vs. CA, 247 SCRA 773 Firestone Ceramics vs. CA, 313 SCRA 522 Robles vs. Timario, 6 SCRA 380 Roxas vs. Dinglasan, 28 SCRA 430 Heirs of Antonio Pael vs. CA, 325 SCRA 341 1. Requisites for intervention 2. Time to intervene 3. Remedy for the denial of motion to intervene K. Subpoena 1. Subpoena duces tecum 2. Subpoena ad testificandum 3. Service of subpoena 4. Compelling attendance of witnesses; contempt 5. Quashing of sobpoena L. Computation of Time Golden Arches Development Corporation vs. St. Francis Square Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 183843. January 19, 2011

Syllabus Civil Procedure for Finals L. Modes of discovery 1. Depositions pending action; depositions before action or pending appeal a) Meaning of deposition b) Uses; scope of examination c) When may objections to admissibility be made d) When may taking of deposition be terminated or its scope limited 2. Written interrogatories to adverse parties a) Consequences of refusal to answer b) Effect of failure to serve written interrogatories 3. Request for admission a) Implied admission by adverse party b) Consequences of failure to answer request for admission c) Effect of admission d) Effect of failure to file and serve request for admission

4. Production or inspection of documents or things 5. Physical and mental examination of persons 6. Consequences of refusal to comply with modes of discovery M. Trial 1. Adjournments and postponements 2. Requisites of motion to postpone trial a) For absence of evidence b) For illness of party or counsel 3. Agreed statement of facts 4. Order of trial; reversal of order 5. Consolidation or severance of hearing or trial 6. Delegation of reception of evidence 7. Trial by commissioners a) Reference by consent or ordered on motion b) Powers of the commissioner c) Commissioners report; notice to parties and hearing on the report N. Demurrer to evidence 1. Ground 2. Effect of denial 3. Effect of grant 4. Waiver of right to present evidence 5. Demurrer to evidence in a civil case versus demurrer to evidence in a criminal case O. Judgments and final orders 1. Judgment without trial 2. Contents of a judgment 3. Judgment on the pleadings 4. Summary judgments a) For the claimant GRAND FARMS, INC. and PHILIPPINE SHARES CORPORATION vs. COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE ADRIAN R. OSORIO, and BANCO FILIPINO SAVINGS AND MORTGAGE BANK, G.R. No. 91779 February 7, 1991 b) For the defendant c) When the case not fully adjudicated d) Affidavits and attachments 5. Judgment on the pleadings versus summary judgments 6. Rendition of judgments and final orders 7. Entry of judgment and final order P. Post-judgment remedies 1. Motion for new trial or reconsideration a) Grounds b) When to file c) Denial of the motion; effect d) Grant of the motion; effect e) Remedy when motion is denied, fresh 15-day period rule 2. Appeals in general a) Judgments and final orders subject to appeal b) Matters not appealable c) Remedy against judgments and orders which are not appealable d) Modes of appeal

(i) Ordinary appeal (ii) Petition for review (iii) Petition for review on certiorari e) Issues to be raised on appeal f) Period of appeal g) Perfection of appeal h) Appeal from judgments or final orders of the MTC i) Appeal from judgments or final orders of the RTC j) Appeal from judgments or final orders of the CA k) Appeal from judgments or final orders of the CTA l). Review of final judgments or final orders of the COA m) Review of final judgments or final orders of the Comelec n) Review of final judgments or final orders of the CSC o) Review of final judgments or final orders of the Ombudsman p) Review of final judgments or final orders of the NLRC q) Review of final judgments or final orders of quasi-judicial agencies 3. Relief from judgments, orders and other proceedings a) Grounds for availing of the remedy b) Time to file petition c) Contents of petition 4. Annulment of judgments or final orders and resolutions a) Grounds for annulment b) Period to file action c) Effects of judgment of annulment 5. Collateral attack of judgments Q. Execution, satisfaction and effect of judgments 1. Difference between finality of judgment for purposes of appeal; for purposes of execution 2. When execution shall issue a) Execution as a matter of right b) Discretionary execution 3. How a judgment is executed a) Execution by motion or by independent action b) Issuance and contents of a writ of execution c) Execution of judgments for money d) Execution of judgments for specific acts e) Execution of special judgments f) Effect of levy on third persons 4. Properties exempt from execution 5. Proceedings where property is claimed by third persons a) In relation to third party claim in attachment and replevin 6. Rules on redemption 7. Examination of judgment obligor when judgment is unsatisfied 8. Examination of obligor of judgment obligor 9. Effect of judgment or final orders 10. Enforcement and effect of foreign judgments or final orders