ETEC 590 Graduating Project Assessment Rubrics

CATEGORY Excellent - includes a clearly stated theme consistently consistently seen throughout eP. - theme relevance thoroughly explained - theme enhances the connections found throughout eP - eP has a polished look - navigation throughout eP is very easy - content organized is meaningful way - font size, colour, headings and sub-headings are all appropriate and easy-to-read - multimedia enhances eP - a variety of multimedia is used throughout the eP - includes Web 2.0 tools - includes links that enhance the interactivity of eP -includes links within the eP - includes links outside the eP Adequate - a theme is stated, but slightly unclear. - theme relevance explained, but may be unclear. - some connections with theme confusing -relevance explained, but may still be unclear -eP has a dull look -navigation throughout eP is fairly easy, but sometimes confusing. -content organized in useful way, but sometimes -font-size, colour, headings, and sub-headings are appropriate and practical. -multimedia is used, but no real enhancement is seen. -some multimedia is used throughout the eP. -includes limited Web 2.0 tools -includes links -includes links within the eP. -includes links outside the eP Approaching - no theme is used OR theme not stated. - theme relevance is not explained. - no connections between theme and reflections or artifacts can be seen. - theme is seen sporadically throughout the eP. - eP has an amateur look -navigation is difficult and does not make sense. -content organization is in meaningless way -font-size, colour, headings, and sub-headings are unsuitable and awkward. -multimedia does not enhance eP - no or limited multimedia is used throughout the eP. - does not include Web 2.0 tools -links do not enhance the interactivity of eP. -does not include links within the eP. -does not include links outside the eP. -no reflection seen that relates to MET program to eP purpose/objectives. -reflection does not enhance connections between artifacts, knowledge gained, and research. -no connections can be seen between concepts and artifacts in eP. -are not relevant to the UBC MET program and purpose of the eP. -does not meet the UBC-TQS criteria for Capstone Project. -has no or limited quantities of artifacts included to demonstrate learning. - An unacceptable number of grammatical and/or spelling mistakes.

Theme

Design and Organization

Multimedia Tools and Hyperlinks

Reflection And Connections

- reflections relate to MET program and the eP purpose/objectives. - reflection enhances connections between artifacts, knowledge gained, and research. - connections can clearly be seen between concepts and artifacts in eP. - are relevant to the UBC MET program and purpose of the eP. - meets UBC-TQS criteria for Capstone Project -an appropriate quantity of artifacts are included to demonstrate learning. - No grammatical or spelling mistakes within eP.

Artifacts

Writing Mechanics

-reflections relate to the MET program, but may be unclear how relate to the eP purpose/objectives. -reflection shows connections between artifacts, knowledge gained, and research. -connections are sometimes confusing between concepts and artifacts in eP. -has some relevance to UBC MET program and purpose of the eP. -slightly meets UBC-TQS criteria for Capstone Project. -has an adequate quantity of artifacts are included to demonstrate learning. - Some noticeable grammatical and/or spelling mistakes within eP