Professional Documents
Culture Documents
History
Nestl and Unilever had completely different starts.
Nestl (1866): one mans idea! Unilever (1930): Merger between two existing companies active in two different fields, but with same raw materials
Both companies grew through numerous acquisitions (Nestl under his brand as family brand, Unilever with individual brands)
2
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
History
70s Nestle acquires first non-food companies 80s Unilever: sleeping giant, Nestl Internal adjustments and diversificatons 90s new markets in Eastern Europe and China End of 90s / 2000: Unilever: total restructuring: path to growth, radical brand cutting, Nestl towards Health and Wellness Today: both multinational companies operating worldwide
3
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Presence
Workforce
Activities
4
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Unilever Food and home (culinary products, frozen foods, Ice-cream, Tea-based beverages, Spreads and cooking products, household care, Laundry) Personal care (Deodorants, hair care, personal wash, oral care and fragrances) Unilever's mission is to add vitality to life. We meet the everyday needs for nutrition, hygiene, and personal care with brands that help people feel good, look good and get more out of life. Global brands that meet local needs Completion of Path to Growth strategy (sales growth of 3-5% ) Vitality at the core of mission Make greater use of corporate brand
December 2004
Divisions
Mission/ Vision
Adapt products to local tastes target 2004+: Low manufacturing costs Globe technological platform for the group / E-marketing Become a food, nutrition, health and wellness company
Nestl Vs. Unilever
6
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
7
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
8
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Nestle Strategy
9
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
10
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
NGOs
WHO, Unicef, World Heart Organization, Red Cross, UN, Greenpeace
Competitors
Unilever, Nestle, Kraft
Retailers
Wal-Mart, Tesco, Carrefour,
Technology
SAP, IBM, Linux Toll-MST, Ariba B2B eCommerce
R&D
Central laboratories in EU, Asia and NA
Unilever Nstle
11
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Branding
Branding
Nestl Unilever
Brand
December 2004
Consumer Trends
Traditional eating patterns are fast disappearing because of major demographic changes
Trend Aging societies Consequences People eat less but more quality Less time for preparing meals Less people to feed, more eating out Impact on food sector More quality, preference for example for fruit & fish, new meal services More ready made meals and other forms of easy snacks More portioning & packaging for singles, more ready made meals
More women in the workforce More singleoccupancy households (less children) More ethnic diversity
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever
Mixed preferences More segmentation even in one society / in established markets even houshold
December 2004
15
Consumer Trends
More and more people will be better educated both in industrialized and developing world. They will want and need to know more about health and healthy diets (also weight / obesity problems). Trend Better education Consequences Demand for more quality Demand for food safety Demand for more knowledge about ingredients More Concerns about way of production: environment, people, animals, etc.
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever
Impact on food sector Need for higher quality, better more nutritious ingredients, organic food Safer food, more quality control Need for different packaging and labelling; maybe stricter legal requirements Need for sustainable production, . Issues: organic food, fair trade, animal welfare
16
December 2004
Consumer Trends
In general, expenditures on food will rise in the future.
Trend Total population growth drives total demand on food Better education drives demand for more (expensive) quality / healthy nutrition Better education and higher income per capita Consequences Higher food expediture Impact on food sector In general need for more products Need for more quality and healthy / nutricious products
December 2004
Weaknesses
>Branding >Distance to the consumer
Opportunities
>Responding to the global issues sustainable initiatives >Brand equity >Consumer safety
Threats
>Price-war / retailers power >Private Label Competition >EU approval procedure >Weather
18
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Weaknesses
>Forex impact >Commodity based > Potential conflict between health & wellness image and selling sweets
Opportunities
>Functional Foods in Ready Meals > Joint Ventures in Strategic Areas > Asian Market
Threats
>Corporate Brand >Private Label Competition >Energy and distribution costs
19
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Nestl
Unilever
21
Competitive Intelligence UBI Nestl Vs. Unilever December 2004
Competitors
COMPANY
Unilever Nestle Kraft Danone Oetker General Mills PepsiCo
Shapers
Adapters
Reserve