Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nanci,
I received the 1st amendment signed in California from Robert Jones' office.
When I showed it to Elizabeth, she advised me that it was not her signature on
the document and that she did not recall signing such a document in California.
She definitely recalls signing the First Amendment dated September 16, 1997, in
Hawaii before the notary.
In further discussions with Mr. Jones, he is not sure how the unnotarized First
Amendment dated September 19, 1997, came to be in his file. As stated in our
recent pleading, he believes he made an erroneous assumption when he saw it
in his file and prepared the affidavit that he had submitted earlier.
We will let the California authorities handle the investigation into the alleged
forgery because that is where jurisdiction properly lies. It is our position that the
signatures on the California 1st Amendment do not affect the validity of the First
Amendment that was signed and notarized in Hawaii.
Rhonda
Rhonda L. Griswold
Cades Schutte LLLP
1000 Bishop Street
12th Floor
Honolulu, HI 96813
(808) 544-3871 direct line
(808) 540-5064 fax
-----Original Message-----
From: NMeek48409@aol.com [mailto:NMeek48409@aol.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 7:39 AM
To: Rhonda Griswold
Cc: James Ashford
Subject: questions regarding 1st amendment
How did you obtain a copy of the 1st Amendment signed in California? Did
Robert Jones send that to you? Also according to the police Detective in
Atascadero, Fred Pflum, you stated that Elizabeth was NOT in
California on September of 1997 three days after the 1st Amendment was signed
in Hawaii and therefore she DID NOT SIGN the document.
If that is true then do you anticipate any legal recourse against Robert Jones with
respect to the forgery on the Amendment signed in California?
Nanci Meek
Private Investigator
(760) 413-5660 Cell
nmeek48409@aol.com