Date March 20, 2014 School Poca High School Grade/Subject English 12 CR Unit Topic Claim/Evidence/Warrants Lesson Topic Supporting a claim through evidence and warrants. Lesson 1, Lesson 2, or Lesson 3? Lesson 1 INSTRUCTIONAL OBJECTIVES/ STUDENT OUTCOMES 1. Students will establish a claim when given a highly argumentative, question-based prompt. 2. Students will justify their claims by giving reasons to why they chose the claim they did. 3. Students will correlate their reasoning with specific evidence they find via the Internet or other sources. 4. Students will connect their evidence to their reasoning for their claim through a warrant. WV CSOS ELA.12.W.C9.1 Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. Introduce precise, knowledgeable claim(s), establish the significance of the claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization that logically sequences claim(s), counterclaims, reasons and evidence. Develop and justify claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audiences knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. Analyze words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to link the major sections of the text, create cohesion, and clarify the relationships between claims(s) and reasons, between reasons and evidence and between claim(s) and counterclaims. Establish and maintain a formal style and objective tone while attending to the norms and conventions of the discipline in which they are writing. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument presented. MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK Overall Time: 70 Minutes Time Frame 10 Minutes Introduction: Why is argument important? 10 Minutes Take A Stand Questions 10 Minutes Board activity for reasoning 5 Minutes Explanation of evidence 15 Minutes Who Did It? Activity 20 Minutes Completion of worksheet STRATEGIES Teacher-Led Discussion Questions Probing Enhanced Lecture Writing in Class Problem-Based Learning Cases Problem-Based Learning Guided Design Reflective Discussion DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION/ ADAPTATIONS/ INTERVENTIONS (Learning Styles, Students with Special Needs, Cultural Differences, ELL) After introducing why argument is important, I will pass out a graphic organizer to all students so they can see the different parts of an argument and how they relate to one another. The exit worksheet I will give students will be sectioned off and labeled to correlate with the responses they are expected to give. If students are having a difficult time paying attention, I will allow them to be the ones to write on the board rather than me. PROCEDURES: Introduction/ Lesson Set
To begin the lesson, I will ask students to explain why they think argument is important. I will then ask them if they think fact or argument rules intellectual thinking. Upon their responses, whether they are correct or incorrect in their thinking, I will read to them the following: If you think fact, not argument, rules intelligent thinking, consider the following example. For nearly 2000 years, educated people in many Western cultures believed that bloodlettingdeliberately causing a sick person to lose bloodwas the most effective treatment for a variety of illnesses. The fact that bloodletting is beneficial to human health was not widely questioned until the 1800s, and some physicians continued to recommend bloodletting as late as the 1920s. We have come to accept a different set of facts now because some people began to doubt the effectiveness of bloodletting; these people argued against it and provided convincing evidence. Human knowledge grows out of such differences of opinion, and scholars, like many college professors and even high school teachers, spend their lives engaged in debate over what may be counted as true, real, or right in their fields.
From this, I will then ask students if they can think of any other examples where an argument has changed humanity. If they cannot think of any, I will add these on: Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement. Judith Sargent Murray and fighting for the equality of women against the domestic sphere.
Through this introduction, students will have a solid understanding as to why it is important to learn about argument. PROCEDURES: Body & Transitions
After students begin to understand the importance of the ability to argue, I will read the following list of argumentative prompts allowed one at a time. After reading a prompt, I will then call on a student and ask them to take a stand on it:
Should teachers carry guns? Should the school day start later for teens and earlier for younger students? Should teachers be friends with students on social networking sites such as Facebook? Do online students have more opportunities to cheat? Should energy drinks be banned in America? To encourage healthy eating, should higher taxes be imposed on soft drinks and junk food? Should drunk drivers be imprisoned on the first offense? Should all citizens be required by law to vote? Should students caught cheating on important exams or papers automatically fail the course? Should all students be required to take a physical education course? Should professional baseball players who are convicted of using performance- enhancing drugs be allowed to be inducted into the Hall of Fame?
Once each student has made a stance, I will explain how what they just did was made a claim. I will then define for them what exactly a claim is and how it is the basis for an entire argument. From the questions I asked them which they made a claim on, I will choose one that I think all students will feel strongly about and write it on the board. I will then ask them for reasons for their claim, and write them down on the board. As they go, if they pick out a reason that is illogical or weak, I will question them by asking, Can you gather facts and data on this? These questions and small rebuttals will help them to approach a formal and objective tone. After writing a few of their reasons on the board, I will have them make the connection of why those arguments are stronger than what they had originally said. If they give me all strong arguments, I will formulate a weak one myself and ask them why it isnt strong enough to be considered an appropriate reason.
After students understand the importance of having reasoning for a claim, I will ask them what would help to support their reasoning. If they dont directly say evidence, I will give them the term. From here, I will explain what exactly evidence is. After this, I will ask them if they think providing evidence for their reasoning and claim is enough. Before they answer, I will give them an example based on their previous claim and reasoning on the board: So if I say this, do you think it would make for a strong argument? All energy drinks should be banned in America. They are bad for the health of those they who drink it. According to a study done in 2013 by the American Heart Association, drinking one to three energy drinks could mess with ones heart rhythm and increase blood pressure. Students should come to the conclusion that there needs to be something else included; there needs to be a connection between the evidence and the argument: a warrant. I will then begin the explanation of what a warrant is with the Who Did It? activity.
To begin the activity, I will project the image of the crime scene via the ELMO. After giving students a minute or two to look at it, I will read to them the following story:
At five-feet six and a hundred and ten pounds, Barbie Thompson was a sight to behold and to clasp. When she tore out of the house after a tiff with her husband, Arthur, she went to the country club where there was a party going on. She left the club shortly before one in the morning and invited a few friends to follow her home and have one more drink. They got to the Thompson house about ten minutes after Barbie, who met them at the door and said, Something terrible has happened! Arthur slipped and fell on the stairs. He was coming down for another drinkhe still had the glass in his handand I think hes dead! Oh my goodness what should I do? The autopsy conducted later concluded that Arthur had died from a wound on the head and confirmed that hed been drunk.
After reading the story, I will say, We need to attempt to determine what exactly happened in this crime scene. The main question we are going to focus on is, Can we believe what Barbie says? Is what you see in the picture consistent with what Barbie says? Students will then give me their claim: whether Barbie did it or didnt do it. From the claim decided upon as an entire class, I will construct a T-chart on the board and write the claim at the top. One side of the chart will be labeled evidence, and the other side will be labeled warrant. I will then ask students to, based on the picture, give me evidence to back their claim. I will write the evidence on the board as they go. After they have given as much evidence as they can find, I will ask what students think a warrant is that would relate to the evidence. From here, we will complete the entire T-Chart. If students begin to give warrants in a tone that is informal or subjective, I will point this out, and have them rephrase their ideas. An example of how the T-chart will look is as followed:
Evidence Warrant
Arthur is still holding his glass. When a person falls down, he or she drops what they are carrying to save him or herself.
PROCEDURES: Closure
After completing this activity, I will pass out a sheet with all the questions I asked earlier where they simply stated a claim. I will then give them a second worksheet that will have three sections: each of these will further be broken down into parts labeled prompt claim, reason, evidence, and warrant. Students will choose a topic from the list and write it in the prompt section, then make a claim on it, give a reason for their claim, give evidence to support their claim, and then give a warrant to connect their evidence. I will allow students to use their cell phones or the class set of laptops to find a specific piece of evidence for each claim they make. After completing three of them, they will turn these in to me before leaving.
ASSESSMENT: Diagnostic Diagnostic assessment for this lesson will be conducted informally through the different questions I pose to students relating to why they believe argument to be important. Diagnostic assessment will also be accomplished through the questions I ask them before introducing claim, evidence, and warrant. ASSESSMENT: Formative Formative assessment will be done through the class discussions I will help to lead and the T-chart I will help them to complete on the board for claim and reasoning. Their participation level in the Who Did It? activity will also pose as an informal version of formative assessment. ASSESSMENT: Summative Summative assessment for this lesson will take place with through the worksheet students will have to complete before leaving that has them make a claim, give a reason, give evidence for their reasoning, and connecting the evidence to their reasoning via a warrant. MATERIALS White Board ELMO (projection onto Smart Board) Who Did It? crime-scene image 12 copies of argumentative prompts (questions) 12 copies of final, exit worksheet. EXTENDED ACTIVITIES If Student Finishes Early If a student completes the final assignment early, I will ask him or her to continue to make as many claims/reasons/evidence/warrants as they can on their own piece of paper based on the other prompts they did not yet address. If Lesson Finishes Early If the lesson finishes early, I will have students to go around and share some of their answers on their worksheets. If Technology Fails If the ELMO fails when I try to project the Who Did It? image, I will have a back- up class set of copies for each individual student. If the WiFi were to not work in the classroom when students are beginning to look up their evidence to their reasons, I will ask them to make-up their own statistic to back their reasoning.
POST-TEACHING Reflections Data Based Decision Making