Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2011
- ,
,
,
, .
. ,
. ,
, -
, ,
, ,
. , ,
,
, SO LV IT, European Business Test Panel,
Red Tape Observatory, EU Pilot.
, ,
.
, ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
2
.
,
,
,
1%,
,
.
,
..
,
,
.
,
, ,
,
, ..
.
: , , , , ,
, , , ,
.
ABSTRAC T
The aim of this thesis is to examine the EU law and its impact on the M ember
States legislation. Special emphasis is laid on the EU directives, due to the fact that they
have to be transposed in to the M ember States legislation, w ithin a certain deadline.
The role of the Commission and the European Court of Justice is to ensure that
EU law is properly applied by national authorities. W ithin this framew ork, the
Commission can take formal action against national authorities in case they fail to
transpose EU directives into their national legislation or if they are suspected of breaking
EU law . This may involve taking them to the Court of Justice of the European U nion,
w hich is responsible for justifying the EU law breach and imposing sanctions to M ember
States. A dditionally, the Commission has launched some actions in order to facilitate the
application and implementation of EU directives. Tow ards this goal, better regulation
initiatives play an important role, since they ensure the quality of legislation.
A s far as G reece is concerned, the application and implementation of EU
directives has not alw ays been easy, due to the lack of supervision and coordination
among national authorities. A s a result, G reece has had for years one of the highest
implementation deficit among all EU M ember States. In order to re medy this problem, an
O ffice for International and European A ffairs w as established as part of the General
Secretariat of the G reek G overnment. M oreover, the Vice President of the G reek
G overnment has undertaken the responsibility to coordinate the competent M inistries in
order to decrease the transposition deficit of EU directives into national legislation.
A lthough, G reece is today in line w ith the agreed transposition deficit target, much has to
be done as far as the implementation of EU directives is concerned.
Finally, the current thesis points out the measures that certain M ember States put
in place in order to achieve good results and remarkable progress in their transposing
deficit. In conclusion, no mentioned M ember State managed to do so w ithout a political
organ, able to coordinate and exert pressure to all competent authorities.
In terms of methodology, the thesis w as based on analysis of regulation at a
national and EU level, on studies of the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European
4
BV erfG : Bundesverfassungsgericht,
:
:
:
.. :
:
:
:
:
:
:
. :
:
:
.. :
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
.. :
1. 9
1.1. .9
1.2. 10
2. ..11
2.1. 11
2.1.1. 15
2.1.2. ,
...18
2.2. .17
3.
.21
3.1. .21
3.2. 23
3.2.1.
...26
3.3. 32
3.4. .34
4.
. 35
4.1. ...35
4.2. 39
4.3. 42
4.4.
46
4.4.1. ..51
. 51
7
. ..52
5. , 54
6. 58
7. .60
8.
.65
1.
1.1.
,
1
.
, ,
,
.
. ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
. , ,
27 , ,
,
,
,
.
1
, ,
,
.
80%
2
,
,
,
.
3
..
28, . 2 3 ,
,
. .
,
. ,
.
1.2.
..
,
,
.
. ,
2
, .(2009), : ,
.
3
, . (2008), , ,
. ( ), . , , , :
.
10
,
,
. ,
.. ,
,
.
,
, ,
,
, ..
.
,
25
2011.
2.
2.1.
, ,
.
,
,
.
11
,
4
1956 ,
, M ayrice Lagrange, ,
,
, ,
, ,
5
,
,
, .
( ), C osta
6
EN EL , .
, ,
7
, ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
- . ,
,
- .
, , ,
, ,
, ., , . (2000),
, : , . 46.
5
, 8/55, Fe dechar / , 16.7.1956, 1954 1964, . 33.
6
, 6/64, Costa ENEL, 15.7.1964, 1954 -1964, . 1195.
7
, . (1997), , : .
12
. ,
, . ,
, ..
, Costa EN EL
,
.
, , ,
,
.
, Simmenthal
10
, ,
,
,
.
,
11
.
Les V erts, ,
12
,
. ,
:
8
,
, . , ,
, . . , .,
, . (2000), .., . 245.
9
http://e uropa.e u/le gislation_ summ arie s/institutional_ affairs/de cisionmaking_ proce ss/l14548_ e l.htm
10
. 106/77.
11
, . , ..
28, . 2 3 , law-constitution.we b.auth.gr/manitakis.
12
Le s Ve rts
, 1988, . 1365.
13
13
, Kadi A l
14
Barakaat , . .
15
, . 17 ,
,
,
, () ,
,
, ,
,
. ,
,
13
14
17
,
.
. , ,
(
)
,
17 .
2.1.1.
, , 60
- .
18
, ,
,
. , . ,
-,
,
. -
.
19
17
,
.
18
, ., , . (2000), .., . 246 254.
19
, . (27/3/2005), , ,
14424382.
15
,
,
, 1974,
(Bundesverfassungsgericht)
,
.. , ,
,
, .
20
, , ,
.
,
.
,
, ..
,
21
, ,
. ,
,
,
.
N ICO LO ,
.
20
21
16
,
.
22
,
. 1978,
, Cohn Bendit,
189 ,
23
.
.
24
, , ,
, ,
..
25
. ,
26
,
.. ,
27
22
17
2.1.2. ,
,
,
.
,
,
.
, 2001,
14, . 9 , ,
28
.
, . 3021/2002 3310/2004,
29
, ,
.
30
,
. 3310/2004,
,
,
, . ,
28
, . (2008), ..
,
.
30
, . (2005),
03.03.2005 Fabricom, ,
, . http://www.diske .gr/m isc/DISKE_ 1_ 2005_ arthra.pdf
29
18
. 3414/2005
14, . 9 ,
.
, ,
,
14, . 9
. 3021/2002 ..
, 16
2008, ,
,
31
. . .
2.2.
,
,
.
32
.
,
, , , .
33
,
.
,
. , ,
31
, . (14.01.2009), , .
, . (2007), , : .
33
288 ,
, , , .
32
19
, ,
, .
, ,
288 .
34
,
35
. ,
, , ,
,
36
.
,
37
, ,
,
,
.
,
38
34
, . (2010), ,
.
35
, ., , . (2011),
, .
, ,
, .
36
, . (2007), ..
37
189, . 3, . . . , 48/75, Roye r, 1976, . 497, 143/84,
. / , 1985, . 427.
38
10, .
20
, (.. ) ,
- .
39
3.
3.1.
,
, .
,
. , , ,
,
, .
40
, , ,
. ,
.
,
,
. ,
,
39
, . (2007), ..
DIM ITRAKOPOULO S, D. (2001), The transposition of EU Law: Post
Decisional Politics and Institutional Autonom y, Europe an Law Journal, vol. 7, no 4 : 442 458.
40
21
,
. ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
,
.
41
O liver Treib
42
, , ,
, ,
,
. , ,
,
, ,
. , Tanja
Borzel
43
,
.
, ,
,
41
, ., , . (2011), ..
TREIB, O. (2008), Im plem enting and com plying with EU governance outputs, Living Re vie ws in
Europe an Gove rnance, vol. 3, no 5.
43
BORZEL, T. (2001), Non com pliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical artifact? , Journal
of Europe an Public Policy, vol. 8, no 5 : 803 824.
42
22
. ,
goldplating,
, minimum harmonization,
,
,
.
3.2.
, ,
44
,
.. ,
,
45
,
,
.
46
,
258 , , ,
.
,
44
211 , * + : ,
* +.
45
, ., , . (2000), .., . 147.
46
corre lation table s, .
http://e c.e uropa.e u/gove rnance /be tte r_ re gulation/transp_ e u_ law_e n.htm
23
,
.
,
.
47
. ,
,
258
. ,
,
. ,
..,
258 .
,
. ,
, ,
, 260 .
,
/ .
) , )
)
, .
48
49
,
, . ,
47
. , . (2010), ..
, SEC (2005), 1658,
http://e c.e uropa.e u/e u_ law/infringe m e nts/infringe me nts_260_e l.htm
49
260, . 2 .
48
24
260, . 2 ,
8 18 .
50
51
, , ,
, 258 ,
. , ,
.
,
,
,
.
,
,
52
,
,
,
, ..
53
,
,
50
, 260, . 3
, SEC (2010), 1371, 11.11.2010.
51
260, . 3 .
52
, 260, . 3
, SEC (2010), 1371, 11.11.2010.
53
, C 163/03, 14.4.2005
25
54
3.2.1.
,
,
, .
,
.
55
56
(Reunions Paquets),
, .
, . ,
,
. ,
, ,
, ,
.
54
, . (2008),
: , , . (),
: , , , : .
55
, ., , .,
. , , .,
, ., : ,
, :
56
. 12 2004,
, 2005/309/, L 98/47.
26
, on line ,
SOLV IT,
57
. SO LV IT, 2002,
,
,
.
( , )
SO LV IT,
. ,
. SO LV IT
,
, . SO LV IT
, ,
, ,
.
SO LV IT
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
. SO LV IT
. , , SO LV IT
, , 78 %
.
57
27
,
, .
, European Busine ss Test Panel (EBT P)
58
,
. , EBTP
, ,
. ,
EBTP
.
,
.
(.. ).
..
EBTP (public consultation),
.
, ,
,
.
R ed Tape Observatory (RTO ),
,
. ,
. ,
.
58
:
http://e c.e uropa.e u/yourvoice /ebtp/inde x_ el.htm
28
59
EU PILO T
.. EU PILO T
22 , . , ,
, ,
, , .
..,
,
60
2002,
(scoreboard).
.. .
2010,
59
60
29
1%. ,
,
,
.
61
,
..
,
.
62
63
, 2008,
,
,
.
,
27 ,
. , , ,
. ,
. ,
,
,
61
30
. , 2002
, ,
(Preliminary Impact A ssessment)
64
, ,
. ,
..
,
,
,
. ,
, 260 1200
.
, , ,
,
65
,
, ,
.
.. ,
,
66
,
.. .
64
65
66
, . (2004), ..
COM (2001), 428, 12.10.2001
http://e uropa.e u/le gislation_ summ arie s/institutional_ affairs/de cisionmaking_ proce ss/l10109_ e l.htm
31
,
, ,
67
e Justice.
3.3.
,
, ,
.. ,
.
, ,
. ,
,
.
,
,
. ,
,
, ,
68
,
,
67
68
th
32
,
.
69
,
, ,
.
,
,
70
,
.
71
, , ,
,
. , ,
,
,
,
.
72
,
.
73
69
, 29/84, , 247/85, , C
217/98, , C 98/03, .
70
, C 74/02 , , C 274/98, ,
C 259/94, .
71
, 10/76, , 1977, . 709, 102/79, 1980, .
1473, . ., ..
72
., , . (2011), ..
73
, C 14/02.
33
3.4.
,
..,
.
,
. ,
..,
74
2009, 2900
,
51% .
,
. ,
, 2009, ..
, , 6.140 1820 ,
27 . 1999 2003 1999
2008,
258
27 24 .
,
, ,
, .
, ..
,
,
74
34
,
75
4.
..,
,
. , ,
76
, (scoreboard) ,
. 2005, ,
, 5,1%, 2007 2,3%
2010 2,4%,
..
77
, , ,
,
4.1.
78
, ,
75
76
77
78
35
, ,
..,
.
. , 2000 2005, 111
,
, .
79
,
1980 , ,
80
. , ,
1990 , ,
, ,
. , ,
,
260 ( 228 ),
, 258
( 226 )
.
81
,
1 700
.
,
82
.
2001/18 ,
, 2004/36
79
, 150 123.
, . (2006), 25 ,
, 3.
81
, C 387/97, 4.7.2000.
82
, . (2010), ..
80
36
,
.
, ,
, 1992/43
83
, 2000/43 2000/78,
84
,
2002/22, ,
85
,
. ,
,
2002/14
,
. ,
86
,
,
, ,
.
, ,
, ,
83
,
,
.
, .
.
.
84
.
.
85
, C 252/2004
86
, C 381/2006.
37
, 89/48
,
87
. ,
,
.., ..
,
88
89
90
,
,
.
91
, ,
,
,
92
67.000 . ,
, .. 165/200 0,
. ..
,
,
. ,
93
89/48,
. , , ,
87
, . (2008),
, , . ( ), ,
, , , : .
88
.. 52/1993
89
.. 121/1993
90
.. 4/4112/24.7.1992
91
, C 365/1993, , 1995.
92
, C 197/1998, .
93
, C 274/2005, .
38
. 38/2010 ..,
89/48.
94
,
,
,
95
, ,
,
, .
4.2.
96
..
,
,
.
97
,
98
.
,
94
2005/36,
.
20.10.2007
95
, . (2002), , , .
96
, . (2008), ..
97
, ., , ., .. ,
., ..
98
.., 72, 78 .
39
. ,
, .
,
,
,
. ,
,
.
,
, .
99
1983
,
.
43, . 4 ,
.
,
100
,
101
.
. 1338/1983 ,
.
,
,
99
. 1338/1983, 34//17.3.1983, .
4, . 1338/1983.
101
2, . 1338/1983.
100
40
, 43, . 2 .
,
, ,
( ).
102
. ,
,
,
. ,
,
.
, ,
.
, o
,
43, . 2 . ,
,
, 2 .
1338/1983. ,
,
.
, . 1338/1983,
,
, ,
,
102
206/2006, 1784.
41
,
.
, ,
,
.
, ,
. ,
. ,
.
. 1338/1983
,
.
. ,
( , . ., .. )
, , ,
.
4.3.
,
.
,
,
.
, ,
42
.
, , ,
, .
,
.
103
, ,
, .
,
,
. ,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
, .
,
, .
103
, ., , ., ..
43
( ), 2000
104
, ,
.
,
,
, ,
.
. ,
. ,
( )
.
,
, ,
, ,
. 1338/1983 .
, 3 . 1140/1980,
.
,
,
(
Internal M arket Scoreboard).
104
178/14.07.2000
44
,
( )
105
, . 1640/1986,
,
.
. ,
, .
, ,
.
. .
, ,
.
. ,
,
,
.
106
, 2005,
,
. ,
, 2006
105
106
, ., ..
., , ., ..
45
, , ,
,
.
,
,
,
.
4.4.
, ,
,
,
, ,
,
. ,
, ,
. 2010
, ,
.
16 2010 , .. 18/2010 ,
,
46
14
2004.
, ,
.
.
107
,
. , ,
,
,
,
. ,
,
. ,
, .
,
,
.
. ,
,
. .,
(best practices),
108
107
47
22
109
,
,
,
. , ,
, ,
.
, 2010
,
, .
110
, ,
, ,
,
, ,
. ,
,
,
,
.
25 2010.
109
48
. .
111
,
,
.
:
. ,
.
,
, .
:
,
,
,
,
, ,
, .
. ,
.
111
, , 7 2009 15 2010 ,
www.antiproe dros.gov.gr
49
. ..,
.
online ,
, ,
. ,
,
, .
,
, .
, ,
,
, ,
.
,
,
. ,
,
,
,
, ,
, ,
50
(peer pressure).
112
4.4.1.
.
22
113
1%,
2007,
, 27 , ,
2,4%, 36 (. 1).
114
(best practices), ,
,
.
115
(14 10 2010)
, ,
. ,
2009 (7,4 ),
, , .. (5,8 ) (.
2).
112
, , 7 2009 15 2010 ,
www.antiproe dros.gov.gr
113
http://ec.e uropa.e u/internal_ m arke t/score /docs/score 22_ e n.pdf
114
o
SEC (2011), Inte rnal M arke t Scoreboard n 22, 21.3.2011
115
10 2010
.
51
,
9
116
2011,
119 , 35,
6 25 2010,
,
. ,
, , ,
.
,
,
.
,
,
. ,
1% . ,
,
,
, .
.
, ,
,
116
52
117
,
, , ,
.
, ,
, ,
, .
, ,
.
, 22 ,
,
, 88 ,
40 (. 3). , ,
, , 77%
(. 4).
,
.
, 73%
27% ,
44% .
9 2011,
, 93,
117
, . (2009), ,
, ., , . ( ), :
, , : .
53
, (27
),
, 16 15 .
,
..,
.
,
. ,
, 500
.
118
5. ,
(best practices)
- , 22
119
, , ,
.
120
, 2010,
, , 27
, 2,1%. 22 ,
118
54
0,9%, 1%
2007.
SIM PLEG IS,
2010, ,
,
, .
, ,
2011.
,
,
,
.
,
(
).
, (Sistema de
Controlo de A ctos SCAN System),
,
. ,
, ,
,
. ,
,
55
.., 22
1%,
2007.
,
. , ,
2000 2005,
..
121
, 82.
,
, ,
,
.
122
, ( )
.
,
,
.
,
.., , ,
.
, 22 ,
. ., 0,1%, 2
121
122
, . (2008), ..
JACQUE, J.P. (2004), Droit institutionnel de l Union Europeen.
56
. ..
.
, ,
..
,
.
.
, .
, ,
,
,
. .
,
.
.
,
. ,
. ,
..
.
57
6.
,
,
,
,
.
,
, ,
.
,
(
) ,
,
.
123
,
,
, ,
. ,
, . ,
, ,
123
, . (2009), ..
58
,
.
, , , ,
, .
, ,
,
,
, ,
.
,
.
500
.
.
59
7.
, ., , .,
. , ,
., , ., : ,
, :
, . (2010),
,
, . (2004),
, ,
, .
, . (2005),
03.03.2005 Fabricom,
,
, . (2008),
: , , .
(), : , , , :
.
, . (2007), , :
, . (2008),
, , . (),
, , , , : .
, . (2006), 25 ,
, 3.
60
(2008),
, , . (), .
, , , :
, . (2009), :
,
, . (2009),
, , ., , . (),
: ,
, :
, . (2002), , ,
, ., , . (2000),
, :
, . (1997), , :
, ., , . (2011),
, .
,
,
,
BO RZEL, T. (2001), Non com pliance in the European Union: Pathology or statistical
artifact?, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 8, no 5 : 803 824
D IM ITRA K O PO U LO S, D . (2001), The transposition of EU Law: Post D ecisional
Politics and Institutional Autonomy , European Law Journal, vol. 7, no 4 : 442 458
JA CQ U E, J.P. (2004), D roit institutionnel de l U nion Europeen
61
TREIB, O . (2008), Im plem enting and com plying with EU governance outputs, Living
Review s in European G overnance, vol. 3, no 5
, . (27/3/2005), ,
, 14424382
, . , ..
28, . 2 3 , law -constitution.w eb.auth.gr/manitakis
, . (14.01.2009), ,
, , CO M (2007), 502,
5.9.2007
, SEC (2005), 1658
, 260, . 3
, SEC (2010), 1371, 11.11.2010
12
2004,
, 2005/309/ , L 98/47
, EU PILO T, CO M
(2010), 70, 3.3.2010
62
,
CO M (2008), 777, 18.11.2008
, CO M (2001), 428, 12.10.2001
, 27
th
21.03.2011
: w w w .europa.eu
: w ww .ec.euro pa.eu
: ww w .curia.euro pa.eu
: w w w .m fa.gr
: w w w .m infin.gr
w w w .ypoian.gr
: w ww .ggk.gov.gr
: http://antipr oed ros.gov.gr
: w w w .et.gr
: ww w .tovim a.gr
: w w w .kathim erini.gr
63
: ww w .tanea.gr
http://law -
64
8.
1:
2:
65
3:
4:
66