You are on page 1of 9

155

, Vol.2No.2 (2008), 155-163


MC - 2008-15
2008-08-14
2008-09-30
2007 MC

, 310018
tianhua1212@163.com

22

B 84
A

The Effect of Music to Memory English Words


for College Students
TIAN Hua
Psychology department, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310018, China
tianhua1212@163.com
Abstract: The purpose of this experiment is that study and research the effect of music to memory English
word for college students, the experiment chooses two types of music: The first is the popular music of modern
society, second is light music. The method is 22 mix experiment designs. The result of this research is that the
popular music of modern society is bad for the memory of English, but the light music is good. And there is no
significant difference between sexes.
Key words: music; English words; memory

156

1.1

1.1.1
60 16
22

60 8

97

60

1.1.2

157

60

17%

1.2

1.2.1.

1.2.2.

22)
10

2.1

60

2.2

SPSS.11.0
2.3

2.3.1
60 12 30

158

2.3.2
50 50
30 30
30 60 15 A
15 B
2.3.3
50 50
30 30
1 2
1
1
Tab.1 Test procedures

---]

31 [

---]

---]

32 [

---]

---]

33 [

---]

2.3.4

A B A B

2.4

11

SPSS for windows 11.0 Microsoft office Excel 2003

t
F

3
3.1

AB SPSS11.0 2

159

AB P=0.694 >0.05

2 AB
Tab.2 Homogeneity of the test results from A and B groups

3.2

21.14286

30

19.85714

30

0.435

3.2.1
3 3
23 22 (T =2.3P
0.073>0.05)(T =-3.34P
0.000**)<0.01)
1 23
18.44(P 0.000**<0.01)2
22 25.11(P 0.000**<0.01)
(P 0.073>0.05)

3
Tab.3 The average number of sub-word memory

23

7.2

18.44

6.2

6.357**

22

5.8

25.11

7.1

-6.17**

*P<0.05

** P<0.01

N=30

3.2.2
4
4
20.4 15.6 23.5 20.4
20.4 24 23.5
27

160

4
Tab.4 Average points of male and female subjects word memory test

20.4

7.2

15.6

6.4

24

7.0

-2.79**

23.5

5.9

20.4

5.4

27

7.2

-1.3**

*P<0.05

** P<0.01

5
5 P=0.3890.05
P=0.5560.05

5
Tab.5 Significant differences test of boys and girls pre-test and post-test

M-

-2.769

-4.307

0.878

5.2143

4.2857

0.596

6 7 6 7

6
Tab.6 Post-test analysis of variance

df

MS

303.501

58

49.581

59

F
6.121*

*P<0.05
7
Tab.7 Pre-test analysis of variance

df

MS

182.393

58

54.659

59

F
3.337

4
4.1

161

15 A 15 B

4.2

4.2.1

1958
1987WISC-R 1100 1099

1987
Hines,1990

12

4.2.2
,

13

162

,
,

14

1)

(P 0.000**<0.01)
(P 0.000**<0.01)

2)

3)

[1] .[J].: , 2001, 4:110-111.


[2] Peretz I, Zatorre RJ. Brain organization for music processing [J]. Annual Review of Psychology, 2005, 56(1):89-114.
[3] .[M].: , 2006, 13-16.
[4] .[J]., 2003, 26(1): 176-177.
[5] .[EB/OL]. : , 2006, http://www.cj100.com.
[6] Murphy L. Music to the mind [J].Psychology today, 2001, 1(34):79.
[7] .[J]., 2003,5:92.
[8] .[EB/OL]. http://www.39.net/baby/jygw/xlq/04/list/76610.html.
[9] . [J]., 2006,1:31.
[10] .[M]. :, 1998, 45-66.
[11] .[D]. : , 2006.
[12] .[M]. : , 2001, 418.
[13] , .[J].College English, 2003,6:40-41.
[14] , , .[J].,2005,44:4-6.

163

1984 - 2007

You might also like