Professional Documents
Culture Documents
___________________________________________
6. Developmental Aid
Discussion Questions:
Reading
Former UN Secretary General, Marshal McLuhan, coined the
phrase, Global Village, in the 1960s. He referred to the
importance of television and believed that television would
change the world by bringing people closer together. He
believed that sporting events and cultural events around the
world could be broadcast live and people in other countries
would have a feeling of being there. In his word, the medium
became the message. It meant that through television, people
around the globe could exchange ideas and work towards
global peace.
Television has, indeed, brought people in some communities
together. Television has also been used to educate people in
small rural areas about such important topics as contraception.
Women, unable to read and write, would be able to watch
television and learn how to look after their families and
children and provide proper diet and hygiene.
Television has also been used as a tool by many politicians to
spread their message to the people and convince the voters to
vote in a particular way or support a certain group.
While television has been used as an educational and a
propaganda tool, it has no doubt been most widely accepted as
a means to provide entertainment and dumb down the masses.
Technological advances in the computer age, however, have
led to the demise of television in many circles with the arrival
of the internet.
Global Systems
The earth is made up of 71% water and 29% land area. The
atmosphere provides all living things with oxygen to breathe.
Land, water, and air are interactive systems that are constantly
in flux in a variety of ways.
Human activities take place in all three of these media and as a
result of human activity, these media are often affected by
human activity in a negative way.
As man works the land or mines the ocean, natural resources
are often changed in such a way that they take a long time to
degrade. This leads to concerns about the sustainability of our
global environment a human habitat, especially as population
increases. It is therefore imperative to understand how human
behaviour affects the environment so that humans can act
responsibly and manage their habitat with future generations in
mind.
What are some of these systems? They are the physical system,
the biological system, and the economic system.
Global Warming
Source: http://www.umanitoba.ca/faculties/afs/soil_science/MSSS/links/Images/cartoons/bush
%20global%20warming.jpg
Source: http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-
images/Guardian/Pix/maps_and_graphs/2000/11/14/climate_greenhouse2.gif
Source: http://www.newsroom.ucr.edu/releases/images/257_3.gif
Ozone Layer Depletion
What is Ozone Layer?
A region of the upper atmosphere, between about 15 and 30 kilometers (10 and 20
miles) in altitude, containing a relatively high concentration of ozone that absorbs
solar ultraviolet radiation in a wavelength range not screened by other
atmospheric components. Also called ozonosphere.
Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Ozone layer protects us from the
ultraviolet rays.
But a very large ozone hole was
discobered in the ozone layer over
Antarctic. It is as large as 3 times the area
of Australia.
Population pyramid
A population pyramid is two back-to-back bar graphs, one showing the number of
males and one showing females in a particular population in five-year age groups (also
called cohorts). Males are conventionally shown on the left and females on the right, and
they may be measured by raw number or as a percentage of the total population.
A great deal of information about the population broken down by age and sex can be read
from a population pyramid, and this can shed light on the extent of its development.
There are two basic shapes of population pyramid.
Note that there tends to be more females than males in the older age groups. This is
because females tend to have a longer life expectancy.
A worked example should make this clearer. Pakistan, which is a developing country, has
41% of its population less than 15, and 4% over 65. This makes 55% (100 - (41+4))
between the ages of 15 and 64.
New Zealand, a developed country, has 23% of its population less than 15, and 12% over
65. This makes 65% between 15 and 64.
Countries that have a high dependency ratio have more people who are not of working
age, and fewer who are working and paying taxes. The higher the number, the more
people that need looking after.
Lecture 19
Up until this point we have been talking about the world before (independent) of man.
There have been more changes in our environment in the last 10,000 years than in any
time in Earth’s history (except for rare catastrophic events, such as meteorite impacts).
For the next half of the class we will be talking about the human impact on the
environment.
One big question is natural resources.
• Exploitable resources (iron, coal, wood, etc.) are commercial resources
• Noncommercial resources are free (clean air, the aesthetic value of a landscape,
noncommercial organisms) provide no monetary gain and are generally not
referred to as natural resources.
Natural resources: These are either renewable or non-renewable: Minerals, coal, oil, gas
are non-renewable. Wind, water, wood, are renewable.
We have changed the courses or rivers, produced bountiful agricultural lands, developed
immense infrastructures, found ways to get to the moon. However, soil degradation,
deforestation, desertification, loss of species, pollution, acid rain, greenhouse effect,
radioactive wastes, poverty for some and great affluence for others are products of the
human situation.
Most of the wealth is in the northern hemisphere. Most of the population is in the
south. Why? Let’s consider it from a historical perspective.
Historical review
Early man came onto the scene about 400,000 years ago. The earth was well-stocked for
them in terms of food and places to live.
Modern humans, Cro-Magnon evolved some 30,000 to 50,000 years ago. They
developed their hunting skills, and were able to control their environment, so by the end
of the Pleistocene, 10,000 years ago, human population was about 10 million. Then the
agricultural revolution began. This was the first population explosion and the first
impact on the environment. Slash-and-burn techniques were developed. The countryside
could be modified. Animals were domesticated. Agricultural communities developed –
Pakistan, China, Africa, Egypt and the Tigris-Euphrates Valley in Iraq. More people
could live in a smaller area.
Changes occurred: The Mediterranean region went from vast primordial forests to what
it is today.
Consider that the Romans went as far as Great Britain to get wood. They had eliminated
so many of the forests. Part of the reason that the Unites States has been so prosperous is
that it did not have the centuries of modification that was seen in Europe.
Things were relatively unchanged until the last two centuries. Then a profound change
occurred.
The Industrial Revolution in the 19th century. Labor was no longer a limitation as power
was much less limited. More people and natural resources were needed to sustain
the new industrial system and the needs of growing societies.
Up until this point, birth and death rates were equal. Now, the birth rates far outweighed
the death rates due to improved medicine, sanitation and disease control. Standards of
living went way up, with coincident increase in energy consumption.
By the end of the 17th century, the Atlantic forests in N. and S. America were cleared.
Only small parts of primordial forests remain in the United States, and these are
threatened today. Our ocean fisheries are being seriously depleted.
According to the Food and Agricultural Organization, between 1981 and 1990, tropical
forest areas were lost at a rate of roughly 0.7% per year.
We are using our coal and oil at an unprecedented rate. How long will that last? For oil,
some estimates are early 21st century. This is soon, folks. (More on this later).
The next great revolution that we are entering is the technological revolution.
Consumption has mushroomed along with the technological advances.
The World’s population has increased dramatically in the past several hundred years.
Beginning with the agricultural revolution, humankind became able to manipulate his
environment. This started with slash and burn techniques. For the first time, CO2 levels
were modified.
• • People were able to live more closely together (Cities and civilizations)
• • Closeness of cities led to desertification (Extreme example is the Middle East—
Mediterranean. The primordial forests of Lebanon are replaced by desert). In fact,
primordial forests are rare in the United States. Only in Pacific Northwest.
The population really started growing with the Industrial Revolution. Now, power was
no longer a limitation.
• • Manpower and oxen were replaced by machines. “More people and natural
resources were needed to sustain the new industrial system and the needs of
growing societies”. Who’s feeding who?
• • More forests needed to be stripped for agriculture and fuel.
• • Better sanitation, better medicine. Birth rates remained the same, but death
rates declined.
Sustainable development:
• • economic progress
• • investment in human resources
• • stable population growth
• • technology that does not degrade the environment
• • does not deplete natural resource base
Different parts of the world have dealt with the problem of development differently.
• • 1st world: US, Western Europe, Japan have an enormous consumption of raw
goods to ‘fuel’ their economy. At the same time, they are ‘rich enough’ to afford to
be concerned about environment.
• • 2nd world: Former Soviet Bloc: The only concern during communist rule was
economic growth (examples of E. German factories, and pollution in the East). Now
they are trying to deal with a crippling, unbelievable problem
• • 3rd world. Their concern is more survival. Generally in the South – South
America and Africa. Their resources are limited. Unfortunately, their political
system is corrupt. They have large population increases, land degradation, extreme
poverty.
• • There are also rapidly developing countries, such as Indonesia, Malaysia,
Thailand, Mexico, Brazil and Chile. Air and water pollution, environmental
degradation are not a concern.
Population growth
• 10,000 years ago, 10 million people
• by 1850, population was 1 billion
• 80 more years to reach 2 billion (1930)
• 45 years, it doubled again (4 billion in 1975)
• 12 years to reach to reach 5 billion (1987)
• 6 billion in 1999
• by the year 2020, there will be 8 billion?
How does exponential growth work? Imagine having 1 penny. Each day you double the
number of pennies you have.
In 1950, 66% of the world’s population were in underdeveloped countries. By the early
1990s, it was up to 77% --4.4 billion people in developing nations. By 2025, it is
projected as 84%. The developed countries are experiencing near zero population
growth, while the underdeveloped countries are undergoing a population explosion.
By 2025, the population of Africa and Asia are expected to reach 6 billion, equal to the
total in the world today! How population increases depends on the mortality/fertility
rates.
But it isn’t growth everywhere. Europe and many countries in the former Soviet bloc
have a zero-rate population growth. Between 1995 and 2025, Ukraine, Belarus, Bulgaria,
Hungary, Romania, etc. Also for Denmark, Greece, Italy Spain and Portugal. (Notice
that Catholic countries have declines. So the strict dictates of the Pope are not a major
problem for population growth).
Demographic transition
Demographers have organized the growth of a population into 4 stages:
1. 1. birth rate, death rate. Early on. Disease, lack of health care, limited food kept
population stable. (Most of human population).
2. 2. birth rate, ↓ death rate. A time of ‘prosperity’. Better health care, better
organized society, higher food supply, etc. Same high birth rate, lower death rate.
Population grows. (Industrial revolution was the classic conversion from 1 to 2).
3. 3. ↓ birth rate, ↓ death rate. As conditions improve, there is less need to have
children. Higher standard of living – affluence increases.
4. 4. Continued low birth and death rate. Stabilized population. This has nearly been
achieved in first-world countries. The U.S. is an exception because of immigration.
The developed nations survive by ‘feeding’ off the less-developed nations for their
energy and natural resource needs.
The developing nations are poor. They have often had corrupt governments, and their
economies are based on fueling the richer countries. This does not help them in the long
term. Environmental degradation on a huge scale is occurring.
One problem with reducing the population drastically is that the population pyramid is
inverted.
GNP. The developed countries use far more than their share of materials. They export
(exploit) poorer countries to maintain their standard of living. Poorer countries striving
to achieve the same wealth exploit their resources. Minerals, natural resources
(forests) are traded for goods from the wealthier countries.
It doesn’t balance, however. There is a net cash flow of $50 billion to the North. This
requires further destruction of resources to pay off the debt. It is exacerbated by
inequality between rich and poor and is not helped by the politics of governments.
In summary: 3 billion people live on the edge of poverty and consume very little.
1 billion live in extreme poverty.
The Standard of living refers to the quality and quantity of goods and services available
to people and the way these services and goods are distributed within a population. It is
generally measured by standards such as income inequality, poverty rate, real (i.e.
inflation adjusted) income per person. Other measures such as access and quality of
health care, educational standards and social rights are often used too. Examples are
access to certain goods (such as number of refrigerators per 1000 people), or measures of
health such as life expectancy. It is the ease by which people living in a country are able
to satisfy their wants.
The idea of a 'standard' may be contrasted with the quality of life, which takes into
account not only the material standard of living, but also other more subjective factors
that contribute to human life, such as leisure, safety, cultural resources, social life, mental
health, environmental quality issues etc. More complex means of measuring well-being
must be employed to make such judgements, and these are very often political, thus
controversial. Even among two nations or societies that have similar material standards of
living, quality of life factors may in fact make one of these places more attractive to a
given individual or group.
However, there can be problems even with just using numerical averages to compare
material standards of living, as opposed to, for instance, a Pareto index. Standards of
living are perhaps inherently subjective. As an example, countries with a very small, very
rich upper class and a very large, very poor lower class may have a high mean level of
income, even though the majority of people have a low "standard of living". This mirrors
the problem of poverty measurement, which also tends towards the relative. This
illustrates how distribution of income can disguise the actual Standard of living.
There are many factors being considered before measuring standard of living. Some
factors are gross domestic product, the per capita income, population, infrastructural
development, stability (political and social), and many other indicators.
The physical quality-of-life index (PQLI) is an attempt to measure the quality of life or
well-being of a country. The value is a single number derived from basic literacy rate,
infant mortality, and life expectancy at age one, all equally weighted on a 0 to 100 scale.
It was developed for the Overseas Development Council in the mid-1970s by Morris
David Morris, as one of a number of measures created due to dissatisfaction with the use
of GNP as an indicator of development. PQLI might be regarded as an improvement but
shares the general problems of measuring quality of life in a quantitative way. It has also
been criticized because there is considerable overlap between infant mortality and life
expectancy.
The UN Human Development Index is a more widely used means of measuring well-
being.
The physical quality of life is an average of three statistics; literacy rate, infant mortality
rate, and life expectancy. However before these statistics can be averaged, infant
mortality and life expectancy must be indexed. It is the indexed infant mortality rate,
indexed mortality rate and the literacy rate that is averaged out to give the Physical
Quality of Life value.
Developmental Aid