Day 1 observations My theory stated before trial is thus: "Blending the most recent concoction of hound blood with that from a headless ombie will result in a beast with greater fury and resistance to !ain"" #est 1 $ubject 1 has the current concoction% and $ubject & has the new mi'ture" Battle 1: $ubject 1 lasted a!!ro'imately one minute before e'!iring% having done average amount of injury to $ubject &" $ubject & seemed not to notice most of the injuries it received" Battle &: (fter a drawn out combat% $ubject 1 )illed $ubject &% but suffered near fatal wounds" $ubject & fought to the bitter end with the same energy it started with" Battle *: $ubject 1 went out very +uic)ly" Battle ,: $ubject 1 lasted less that a minute" $ubject & too) little injury" #est & $ubject ( and B both have the standard blood" $ubject - and D both have the new blood" Battle 1 .( vs" B/: 0asted just over a minute% both hounds suffering grievous injury% and somewhat bothered by their wounds" Battle & .( vs" B/: 1early identical results" Battle * .- vs" D/: 0asted over two minutes% both hounds suffering grievous injury" 1either seemed very winded or bothered by their wounds" Battle , .- vs" D/: 0asted under 1 minute% both suffering grievous injury" 1either seemed very bothered by their wounds" 2t seems my original theory was correct" 2n future trials 2 will try watering down the headless ombie blood before adding it to the mi'ture% to gain some insight into the actual !otency of the blood itself and determine how much of the additional effect is coming from its combination with the e'isting ingredients"