Philosophy Statement of Education Lisa Chernoh Educ 201: Foundations of Education Philosophy Statement 2
Philosophy Statement of Education Children are only children for a short length of time. After that time is over, they become adults that are responsible for how this world progresses, advances, and develops. They in turn become the instructors of the next generation of children who will become responsible for the next generation, and so on, and so forth. How they learn the information they need to become the best possible adults however, varies from individual to individual. The teacher is the key to showing them how to discover their own individual method of learning and helping them to cultivate it to achieve their highest potential. Cognitive Constructivism is the philosophy that I find myself most in agreement with. This philosophy states that The constructivist model, one of facilitating learning, views teachers as facilitators whose main function is to help students become active participants in their learning and make meaningful connections between prior knowledge, new knowledge and the processes involved in learning. The role of students from this perspective is to construct their own understandings and capabilities in carrying and challenging tasks (Copley). Another way to look at it is that children, through teacher guidance, will take the information they already have and reprocess it, adding new details and understanding, and thereby becoming able to analyze and breakdown new challenges and solve them. The part of this philosophy that I connect with the most is how the teacher acts as the facilitator for the learning. Looking back over my own experiences in grade-school, I have discovered that the most effective teaching was done by teachers and instructors that got you to think. They encouraged my classmates and I to look beyond the answers we found and discover the hows and whys behind them. This in turn aided us in discovering the methods that best enabled us to learn. I fully believe that each child is an individual and has their own technique of learning that is perfect for them. If they are directed at an early age how to best engage that learning style, than it can be applied to every aspect in their life throughout their life, leaving nothing un-learnable. I also fully support a common standards or core in education. Without it, children from different classes, schools, towns, etc. have no continuity in learning. For example, a child is in school in northern Idaho. But for some reason, the parents of that child have to move and transfer that child to a school in South-Central Idaho in the middle of the school year. Without a common core set of standards, that child has a very great possibility of either being so far ahead of the new class of students and becoming bored with the work, or being behind all the other students and becoming overwhelmed . Either way it is an invitation for failure. This does not mean that I am against having programs for those that have a tendency to excel, as they need to stay challenged, just as those who find learning extremely difficult need to have special programs in place to help them develop their individual style of learning so that they can also succeed. However, all of these programs can operate under a common core of standards so that if transfer is necessary, the child is not left behind. Finally, I thoroughly believe in presenting all information to the children in a manner that they can connect to the real world and build upon their understanding. Teaching them how to question their own knowledge and look for deeper meanings and understandings helps them to build a solid foundation of education. Without knowledge, or the pursuit of it, children cannot be expected to become responsible adults of the next generation. An old saying says "Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." Another way to say it is Tell a child to read a book and they will be entertained for a moment. Show Philosophy Statement 3
them the world behind the book, they will be engaged for a lifetime. These children are only children for a short period of time and then the type of adults they become depend upon the lessons they were shown. Philosophy Statement 4
References Chen, I. (1995, January 1). Copley. Copley. Retrieved June 18, 2014, from http://viking.coe.uh.edu/~ichen/ebook/et-it/copley.htm
Schools Of To-morrow & The Schools of Utopia (Illustrated Edition): A Case for Inclusive Education from the Renowned Philosopher, Psychologist & Educational Reformer of 20th Century