I. Topic 1: Evidence-based strategies of structured multisensory instruction to teach decoding and sound-symbol correspondence
TNCore ELA Standards: Reading Standards Foundational Skills K-5 Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 1. (Kindergarten): Print Concepts
Demonstrate understanding of the organization and basic features of print Instant letter recognition 1. A beginning readers instant letter recognition is a strong predictor of reading success.
2. Knowing the names of the letters can facilitate the learning of the letter sounds as many sounds are embedded in the letter names.
3. All letters have four properties: name, sound, shape, and feel. The name is the only property that does not change. The name of the letter is an anchor to which the reader can attach the other properties of the letter.
4. Automatic letter recognition allows the reader to see words as groups of letters instead of as individual letters that must be identified. 2. (Kindergarten): Phonological Awareness
Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes) Phonemic awareness 1. A beginning readers ability to segment a word into its phonemes (i.e., phoneme segmentation) is one of the best predictors of reading success. 2. A phoneme is the smallest unit of speech that makes a difference in the utterance of a word. 3. Thus, the readers awareness of individual sounds in a word increases his or her understanding of the role of the individual letters in words and how the written letters can be mapped onto sounds. 3. (Kindergarten): Phonological Awareness
Demonstrate understanding of spoken words, syllables, and sounds (phonemes) Blending 1. Once students have identified the letter-sound relationships of a word, they must meld the sounds to produce a word. 2. Blending sounds in word is a critical component of learning sound- symbol correspondences. 3. Fluid blending of letter sounds aids students in producing recognizable words. 2
4. Before students begin reading words, they should have opportunities to blend sounds together orally by using manipulatives (e.g., blocks, buttons, math counters, pennies). 5. When introducing any of the blending activities for reading, it is desirable to begin blending words that have continuant initial sounds (e.g., /f/, /l/, /m/, /n/, /s/). 6. The continuant sounds allow students to slide into the vowel sound. 4. (Kindergarten): Phonics and Word Recognition
Know and apply grade-level phonics and word analysis skills in decoding words Structural Analysis 1. Knowing sound-symbol correspondences enables a reader to successfully read one-syllable base words. 2. Once the reader has established a few sound-symbol correspondences and can blend them together successfully to form words, information about structural analysis is taught concurrently with new sound-symbol correspondences. 3. Structural analysis of the syllabic and morphemic segments of language facilitates the recognition of longer words. 4. Awareness of syllables helps the reader perceive the natural divisions of words to aid recognition. 5. Awareness of syllable types gives the reader a way to determine how to pronounce the vowel sound in a syllable (e.g., the vowel in a closed syllable is short; the vowel in an open, accented syllable is long).
II. Topic 2: Four evidence-based assessment measures, one for each of the following categories: (1) screening measure, (2) diagnostic measure, (3) progress monitoring measure, (4) outcome measure
TNCore Response to Instruction and Intervention Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 5. Skills-based universal screener (Screening measure)
Brief screening assessment of academic skills (i.e., basic reading skills, reading fluency, reading comprehension, math calculation, math problem solving, written expression) Universal screening reveals which students are performing at or above the easyCBM Lite Edition Tier 1 easyCBM provides benchmark and progress monitoring assessments for all students.
Provides a benchmark system that allows you to screen students up to three times a year fall, winter and spring.
Includes alternate forms that enable you to track growth (AYP accountability) and make 3
level considered necessary for achieving long-term success (general outcome measures). This data can also serve as a benchmark for measuring the improvement of a group, class, grade, school, or district. In grades K-8, it is recommended that the universal screener be administered three times a year: at the beginning, middle, and end of the school year. The same or parallel screeners are used at each administration and those measures are always at the students grade-placement level. In grades K-8, a record review may also provide important information such as grades, attendance, and behavioral concerns that may provide early warning signs for intervention.
instructional decisions with confidence.
Provides a snapshot of an entire school, grade, or classroom.
Provides progress-monitoring assessments that effectively facilitate differentiated instruction.
Delivers item-level data to pinpoint student strengths and weaknesses within a content area.
Tier 2 easyCBM provides real-time data to efficiently and effectively connect each student with valid interventions.
Features progress-monitoring measures and item analysis reports ensuring you can pinpoint instructional areas of concern for each student or group.
Eases the task of assigning small-group instruction and focuses instructional interventions with more accuracy.
Provides instant access to results, eliminating the need for data entry.
Includes rate-of-growth information needed to determine instructional progress.
Tier 3 easyCBM provides focused, reliable data at an item level to help customize interventions and enhance the rate of student learning.
Allows you to strategize a program of frequent 4
progress monitoring.
Provides the detailed data required to target an individual students needs.
Provides data that directs the process of intensive intervention needed for students at this RTI level. 6. Formative assessment data at least 3 times per year to determine instructional needs (Diagnostic measure) easyCBM Lite Edition easyCBM was first developed at the University of Oregon in 2006 with a federal grant for a Model Demonstration Project on Progress Monitoring in Early Literacy in a Response to Intervention Framework. Since then, easyCBM has grown to encompass both Reading and Mathematics for Grades K8, delivering instructionally relevant data for students, educators, and administrators. Many districts have adopted easyCBM due to the testimonials and excitement initially generated by their own local educators.
The University of Oregon and its College of Education are nationally respected institutions dedicated to instruction and research that meet the needs of children and families across the country.
Riverside, part of the Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Education Group, is a global leader in educational assessment. Chosen as the exclusive distributor of the easyCBM platform, Riverside is dedicated to bringing this product to schools and districts around the world.
easyCBM was developed and continues to be developed through a number of federal grants. 5
Those grants are listed below:
Reliability and Validity Evidence for Progress Measures in Reading. U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences, Budget $1,596,638 from June 2010 June 2014.
Developing Middle School Mathematics Progress Monitoring Measures. U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences, Budget $1,631,401 from June 2010 June 2014.
Response to Intervention with Reading Curriculum-Based Measures. U.S. Office of Special Education Programs, Steppingstones of Technology Innovation for Children with Disabilities. Budget $396,736 from May 2009 April 2011.
Assessments Aligned with Grade Level Content Standards and Scaled to Reflect Growth for Students with Disabilities (SWD) and Persistent Learning Problems (PLP). U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Educational Sciences. Budget $1,525,552 from May 2007 April 2011.
Model Demonstration Centers on Progress Monitoring (CFDA 84.326M). U.S. Department of Education. Budget: $1,189,790 from January 2006 December 2008. 7. Progress monitoring is used to assess students academic performance, to quantify a student rate of improvement or easyCBM Lite Edition Reporting The data utilization system within easyCBM produces rich reports that provide Response to 6
responsiveness to instruction, and to evaluate the effectiveness of instruction. Progress monitoring can be implemented with individual students or an entire class. Intervention data and fulfills a number of instructional functions including:
Identify students at risk Monitor effectiveness of interventions Organize students into intervention groups Progress monitor groups or individual students Diagnostic display of error analysis Target aim lines for improvement Movement of students across instructional tiers
Individual Student Report At-a-glance view of progress monitoring and interventions every member of an educational team can use to assist students.
Risk Rating - Analyze risk ratings across student, class, grade, and building based on your customized risk levels.
Item Analysis Review detailed item level information helpful for grouping students and planning instructional interventions.
History of Intervention Document a students detailed history of intervention to provide educators and parents with the knowledge to effectively plan for student improvement. 8. TNCore Assessments (Outcome Measures) K-2 assessment that measures basic reading and math skills. It is a norm- referenced assessment designed to measure individual student achievement compared to national norms. The K-2 assessment provides a benchmark of how students perform on the foundational easyCBM Lite Edition Outcome measures:
Reading K-1: Phonemic awareness, letter sounds, letter names, word fluency
1 st : Passage fluency
7
skills required for success in future grades. Grades 3-8 TCAP Achievement Test: The TCAP Achievement test is a timed, multiple choice assessment that measures skills in reading, language arts, mathematics, science and social studies. English Linguistically Simplified Assessment (ELSA): ELSA is an accommodated version of the TCAP Achievement Test available during Spring TCAP Achievement testing. It is intended for English Language Learner (ELL) students. The content areas tested on TCAP ELSA are Reading/Language Arts, Math, Science, and Social Studies. Test questions are the same as ACH test questions but feature simplified language to reduce linguistic barriers. Allowable ELL accommodations can be given to students taking the ELSA.
2-3: Word fluency, passage fluency, vocabulary, reading comprehension
CCSS Alignment (Read to perform a task, informational text, short literacy text) 3-8
Math K: Numbers and operations, geometry, measurement 1 st : Numbers and operations, geometry, algebra 2 nd : Numbers and operations, measurement, algebra 3 rd : Numbers and operations, geometry, algebra 4 th : Numbers and operations, measurement, algebra 5 th : Numbers and operations, geometry, geometry, measurement, algebra 6 th : Numbers and operations, algebra, ratios 7 th : Numbers and operations, geometry, measurement, algebra 8 th : Numbers and operations, geometry, measurement, data analysis, algebra Note: Edmodo which is a free learning management system offers Snapshot which is a frequent, formative assessment tool that allows teachers to gain real-time insight into student mastery. Snapshot provides teachers with pre-populated quizzes containing standards- aligned questions. Users are able to assign Snapshot quizzes to students as often as they like. Upon completion of the quizzes, a report will instantly be created with feedback as to student and overall class progress.
8
III. Topic 3: Instructional strategies that could be used to remediate struggling readers in at least four of the core cognitive processes
TNCore Application to students with disabilities
In order for students with disabilities to meet high academic standards and to fully demonstrate their conceptual and procedural knowledge and skills in mathematics, reading, writing, speaking and listening (English language arts), their instruction must incorporate supports and accommodations, including:
supports and related services designed to meet the unique needs of these students and to enable their access to the general education curriculum (IDEA 34 CFR 300.34, 2004).
An Individualized Education Program (IEP)1 which includes annual goals aligned with and chosen to facilitate their attainment of grade- level academic standards.
Teachers and specialized instructional support personnel who are prepared and qualified to deliver high-quality, evidence-based, individualized instruction and support services.
Promoting a culture of high expectations for all students is a Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 9
fundamental goal of the Common Core State Standards. In order to participate with success in the general curriculum, students with disabilities, as appropriate, may be provided additional supports and services, such as:
Instructional supports for learning based on the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)2 which foster student engagement by presenting information in multiple ways and allowing for diverse avenues of action and expression.
Instructional accommodations (Thompson, Morse, Sharpe & Hall, 2005) changes in materials or procedures which do not change the standards but allow students to learn within the framework of the Common Core.
Assistive technology devices and services to ensure access to the general education curriculum and the Common Core State Standards. 9. Working memory Graphic organizers Students with limited working memory benefit from their use as memory aids during instructions; students with attention or listening problems also benefit from having a completed graphic before, during, and after reading; and 10
using a graphic organizer while students are reading stimulates interest, keeps students actively thinking, and organizes information for them so that they retain it longer. 10. Higher-order processes Multi-strategy approach: picture walk (inferencing), comprehension monitoring through rereading and summarizing Cain, Oakhill, & Bryant (2000); Cain et al., (2004a); and Nation & Snowling (1998) state that even when decoding basic language skills, and working memory are controlled, deficits in reading comprehension still arise because of difficulties with discourse-level skills involving inferencing, comprehension monitoring, text integration, and other metacognitive skills related to comprehension
1. Picture walk or text walk is a technique whereby the teacher guides students through a piece of literature to be read, using the pictures, illustrations, or other graphics to develop the big idea of what the text is all about. This technique sets the reader up to succeed with the text by developing key concepts, vocabulary, and a general picture of the text before it is read. Clay in 1985 says that carrying out this type of procedure before reading ensures that the child has in his head the ideas and the language he needs to produce when prompted in sequence by printed cues.
2. Cataldo & Cornoldi in 1998 explained that successful comprehension monitoring requires the reader to identify inconsistencies in the text, gaps in understanding, or the need to seek information from other parts of the text.
[Some] strategies employed by good readers to improve understanding are called "repair" or 11
"fix-up" strategies. Specific repair strategies include rereading, reading ahead, clarifying words by looking them up in a dictionary or glossary, or asking someone for help.
3. Summarizing: The two strategies of summarizing and synthesizing involve the same basic processes and can therefore be taught together, even though you may teach each separately before students can move from one to the other smoothly. Summarizing is the process of pulling together the essential elements in a single longer passage of text. Synthesizing is combining elements from multiple sources and integrating them into a new whole. When a reader synthesizes, he or she begins with the knowledge in his or her head, and then continually adds new information and recombines the old and the new. 11. Listening comprehension Collaborative strategic reading According to the Colorado Department of Education, Listening comprehension refers to the understanding of the implications and explicit meanings of words and sentences of spoken language. Fountas & Pinnell (2001) wrote that four decades of research has established oral language as the foundation of reading and writing development (p.21). Furthermore, they said that we learn language in 3 ways conversation, experience, and text. We acquire 4 types of vocabulary and listening vocabulary is the largest. This is not surprising since we learn most of our vocabulary indirectly by having conversations with others, being read to, and while doing our own reading.
12
In collaborative strategic reading, four strategies are taught to students: (1) a preview component, in which students essentially attempt to activate background knowledge, (2) comprehension monitoring during reading by identifying difficult words and concepts in the passage and using strategies that address what to do when text does not make sense, (3) restudying the most important idea in the paragraph, and (4) summarization/question asking. 12. Phonological processing and phonemic awareness Multisensory methods Historically prominent remediation approaches used with disabled readers have been characterized as multisensory in nature, were provided in individualized fashion, and were used to develop spelling and writing skills as well as reading skills.
As outlined in Birsh (1999), the content of multisensory structured language instruction involves six components: (1) phonology and phonological awareness, (2) sound-symbol association, (3) syllable instruction, (4) morphology, (5) syntax, and (6) semantics.
This content is embedded in five principles of instruction: (1) simultaneous, multisensory teaching to all learning modalities (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) to enhance memory and learning; (2) systematic and cumulative organization of material; (3) direct teaching through continued teacher-student interaction; (4) diagnostic teaching involving continued assessment of individual needs; (5) both synthetic (putting parts of language together to form a whole) and analytic (presenting the whole and breaking it into constituent parts) 13
instruction.
IV. Topic 4: Strategies meant to address each of these word learning components: orthography, morphology, word origins, structural analysis, and contextual analysis
TNCore ELA Standards: Language Standards Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 13. Orthography
Conventions of Standard English: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing Phonics Orthography refers to the rules that govern how words are represented in writing. The spellers task is to determine how the phonemes of oral language are transcribed into the graphemes.
Phonics is an instructional method that teaches the use of written symbols to represent speech sounds for reading and spelling. Phonics provides a visual representation of the phonology of spoken language. In order for students to be successful with phonics, they must be aware of the sounds in spoken words. 14. Morphology
Vocabulary Acquisition and Use:
Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade (appropriate grade level) reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies Vocabulary from Classical Roots Morphology is the study of morphemes, the smallest units of language that carry meaning (prefixes, suffixes, roots, and combining forms). According to Adams in 1990, study of morphemes not only facilitates decoding but also provides a springboard for vocabulary development and spelling and Foorman & Schatschneider in 1997 attest that the study of morpheme bridges the gap between alphabetic reading (i.e., word-level reading) and comprehension.
Vocabulary from Classical Roots is a vocabulary curriculum used in many schools that follow the classical curriculum and it is also used by many homeschooling parents. The skills addressed by this curriculum are Greek 14
and Latin roots, word origins and etymologies, synonyms and antonyms, analogies, word usage, word forms, critical thinking, dictionary and glossary use, test taking/assessment, editing sentences, homophones, multiple-meaning words, parts of speech, prefixes, suffixes, spelling, syllables, and writing
A typical lesson would look like this: Day 1 of a typical vocabulary instruction is an activation of prior knowledge. The 10 key words are presented as well as the 2 Latin and/or Greek roots found in the 10 key words. Usually, the students list down as many English words that they can think of that contain the 2 Latin and/or Greek roots being studied. Days 2- 3 are spent on direct instruction in which the students learn the pronunciation, parts of speech, definition, and how each word is used in a sentence. Day 4 is spent on exercises synonyms, meaning in context, and extension. Day 5 is spent on a quiz.
The lessons are structured in such a way that they target all types of learners. The lessons: 1. Help students to access prior knowledge, thereby enabling them to make connections between familiar words & new words that share the same classical root. For example, the familiar word aquarium, with its root aqua, can provide scaffolding for learning the related word aquatic. 2. Provide a variety of oral activities as well as additional written activities on reproducible worksheets. Discussions and games (classroom contests, synonym tic-tac-toe, charades, word puzzles, and syllable sorts) lead students to 15
incorporate the new words into their oral and written vocabularies. 3. Expand students understanding of classical roots, which is the unique focus of vocabulary instruction from grades 5 to 8. They provide the teacher with a sensible and effective way to teach vocabulary from a roots-based perspective, even when a background in classical-language roots is not part of the teachers own experience. Knowledge of Latin and Greek roots can give students a head start on unlocking the meanings of innumerable words they will meet in the intermediate and secondary grades. 15. Structural analysis
Conventions of Standard English: Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking
Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing
Knowledge of Language: Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening.
Vocabulary Acquisition and Use: Determine or clarify the meaning of unknown and multiple-meaning words and phrases based on grade (appropriate grade level) reading and content, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies. Explicit and systematic instruction Structural analysis is the study of meaningful word parts such as endings, prefixes, suffixes, base words, and root words. The instruction in and acquisition of phonological and phonemic awareness leads directly to teaching letter- sound associations. A systematic system ensures that no skills are overlooked and works best for most children.
The following general guidelines should be helpful in developing an appropriate sequence for teaching phonics and structural analysis skills: 1. Teach and develop phonemic awareness skills. 2. Teach one short vowel and a few consonants that will make a word or words for example, short a and the consonants s, t, and m. These letters can be used to make words. 3. Teach a few high frequency words. 4. Continue teaching consonants and vowels until all have been taught. 16
5. Continue adding high frequency words. 6. Teach other phonic elements, such as blends/clusters and digraphs. 7. Teach students a strategy that will assist them in applying the decoding skills being taught. 8. Teach structural elements such as endings, prefixes, and suffixes. 9. Continue teaching all phonic and structural elements until students are able to apply their knowledge independently while reading.
Teachers can help children begin to practice structural analysis in the same ways as for onset and rime. The idea to get across to students is that whenever a good reader comes to a word he/she cannot identify through context and phonics alone, he/she looks within the word for a recognizable base (root) and its accompanying prefix, suffix, or endings. 16. Contextual analysis
TNCore College and Career Readiness Anchor Standards for Reading
Key Ideas and details 1. Read closely to determine what the text says explicitly and to make logical inferences from it; cite specific textual evidence when writing or speaking to support conclusions drawn from the text. 2. Determine central ideas or themes of a text and analyze their development; summarize the key supporting details and ideas. 3. Analyze how and why individuals, events, and ideas develop and interact over the course of a text. Explicit instruction that includes teacher modeling, guided practice, independent practice Edwards, Font, Baumann, & Boland (2004) stated that context can be broadly interpreted as any meaning cues within context, including linguistic (e.g., words, phrases, sentences) and nonlinguistic information (e.g., illustrations, typographic features that surround the unfamiliar word), that can be used to infer the words meaning. Generally, research studies have focused on using linguistic cues. Blachowicz & Fisher (2010) suggested that the following are representative of necessary metacognitive processes for using context: 1. Students must know why and when to use context. 2. Students must have a general idea about clues that may be provided by context. 3. Students must know how to look for and use 17
Craft and Structure 4. Interpret words and phrases as they are used in a text, including determining technical, connotative, and figurative meanings, and analyze how specific word choices shape meaning or tone. 5. Analyze the structure of texts, including how specific sentences, paragraphs, and larger portions of the text (e.g., a section, chapter, scene, or stanza) relate to each other and the whole. 6. Assess how point of view or purpose shapes the content and style of a text.
Integration of Knowledge and Ideas 7. Integrate and evaluate content presented in diverse media and formats, including visually and quantitatively, as well as in words. 8. Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence. 9. Analyze how two or more texts address similar themes or topics in order to build knowledge or to compare the approaches the authors take.
Range of Reading and Level of Text Complexity 10. Read and comprehend complex literary and informational texts independently and proficiently.
these clues.
Baumann, Edwards, Boland, Olejnik, & Kameenui (2003) directly explained and taught middle school students to use different types of context cues, including: 1. Definition: The author explains the meaning of the word in the sentence or selection. 2. Synonym: The author uses a word similar in meaning. 3. Antonym: The author uses a word nearly opposite in meaning. 4. Example: The author provides one or more examples of words or ideas. 5. General: The author provides several words or statements that give clues to the words meanings.
Another method developed by Lubliner (2005) uses a context cue card that prompts students to use the following clues that have been previously taught: 1. Consider the context (read the sentence, paragraph, or passage for clues) 2. Look for comma clues (meanings sometimes hide within commas [e.g., definition]) 3. Look for explanation clues (explanation is sometimes provided in adjacent sentences) 4. Look for feeling clues (other words that represent a feeling or emotion) 5. Look for opposition clues- words such as adversative or conditional conjunctions (e.g., but, even, though, however) 18
Topic 5: Modified strategies in terms of frequency, intensity, and explicitness to meet the needs of students with phonologically-based reading disorders
TNCore Application to students with disabilities
In order for students with disabilities to meet high academic standards and to fully demonstrate their conceptual and procedural knowledge and skills in mathematics, reading, writing, speaking and listening (English language arts), their instruction must incorporate supports and accommodations, including:
supports and related services designed to meet the unique needs of these students and to enable their access to the general education curriculum (IDEA 34 CFR 300.34, 2004).
An Individualized Education Program (IEP) 1 which includes annual goals aligned with and chosen to facilitate their attainment of grade-level academic standards.
Teachers and specialized instructional support personnel who are prepared and qualified to deliver high-quality, evidence- based, individualized instruction and support services.
Promoting a culture of high expectations for all students is a fundamental goal of Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 19
the Common Core State Standards.
In order to participate with success in the general curriculum, students with disabilities, as appropriate, may be provided additional supports and services, such as:
Instructional supports for learning based on the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)2 which foster student engagement by presenting information in multiple ways and allowing for diverse avenues of action and expression. Instructional accommodations (Thompson, Morse, Sharpe & Hall, 2005) changes in materials or procedures which do not change the standards but allow students to learn within the framework of the Common Core.
Assistive technology devices and services to ensure access to the general education curriculum and the Common Core State Standards. 17. Phonological processing and phonemic awareness Excellence in Spelling or Phonetic Zoo The Excellence in Spelling or Phonetic Zoo rationalizes that auditory input and then spelling the word out loud, letter by letter, ensures accurate storage of the correct sequence in the brain, which allows for correct retrieval and accurate spelling.
The materials used by a student are the 20
following: small Zoo cards that include the lesson title and animals whose names illustrate the spelling rule and on the back of each card is the rule or jingle that accompanies each lesson, headphones, paper and pen, discs, and a disc player. The Phonetic Zoo spelling words have three levels A, B, and C.
The teacher keeps a copy of the bigger version of the Zoo flash cards. The teacher uses the cards to preview and review the lessons with the students.
A typical spelling period would run like this: a. Students bring out their flash cards. b. The teacher reads the rule out loud (from the back of the flash card), and have the students read and spell out loud the three words on the front of the card which correspond to the chosen level. c. The teacher briefly discusses how the animal name shown on the front meets the rule of the lesson. The teacher notes a deeper explanation of the spelling rules, some history behind the rule, and additional commentary to add to the students understanding of spelling. d. Each student prepares his/her spelling paper by numbering 1-15 on the left side, double- spaced (leaving a blank space between lines). Students use pen and not pencil. Students go to the A-V corner to take the spelling test. The other students remain in their seats practicing and studying for their turn. e. Students who are at the A-V corner use the headphones to listen to the rule or jingle once again, take the spelling quiz, and make corrections to their paper. 21
f. Students take the take the test every day until they achieve 100 % twice in a row.
Students phonemic awareness skills are developed while listening to the rule and their phonic skills are enhanced when they transfer to the paper the corresponding symbol of the sound that they are learning.
Each spelling rule is studied for 5 days. 18. Verbal short term memory through multisensory strategies Vocabulary from Classical Roots Vocabulary from Classical Roots is a vocabulary curriculum used in many schools that follow the classical curriculum and it is also used by many homeschooling parents. The skills addressed by this curriculum are Greek and Latin roots, word origins and etymologies, synonyms and antonyms, analogies, word usage, word forms, critical thinking, dictionary and glossary use, test taking/assessment, editing sentences, homophones, multiple-meaning words, parts of speech, prefixes, suffixes, spelling, syllables, and writing
A typical lesson would look like this: Day 1 of a typical vocabulary instruction is an activation of prior knowledge. The 10 key words are presented as well as the 2 Latin and/or Greek roots found in the 10 key words. Usually, the students list down as many English words that they can think of that contain the 2 Latin and/or Greek roots being studied. Days 2- 3 are spent on direct instruction in which the students learn the pronunciation, parts of speech, definition, and how each word is used in a sentence. Day 4 is spent on exercises synonyms, meaning in context, and extension. 22
Day 5 is spent on a quiz.
The lessons are structured in such a way that they target all types of learners. The lessons: 1. Help students to access prior knowledge, thereby enabling them to make connections between familiar words & new words that share the same classical root. For example, the familiar word aquarium, with its root aqua, can provide scaffolding for learning the related word aquatic. 2. Provide a variety of oral activities as well as additional written activities on reproducible worksheets. Discussions and games (classroom contests, synonym tic-tac-toe, charades, word puzzles, and syllable sorts) lead students to incorporate the new words into their oral and written vocabularies. 3. Expand students understanding of classical roots, which is the unique focus of vocabulary instruction from grades 5 to 8. They provide the teacher with a sensible and effective way to teach vocabulary from a roots-based perspective, even when a background in classical-language roots is not part of the teachers own experience. Knowledge of Latin and Greek roots can give students a head start on unlocking the meanings of innumerable words they will meet in the intermediate and secondary grades.
Aside from the modifications mentioned above, other modifications may include using graphic organizers, skywriting, using highlighters, and peer-assisted learning strategies. 19. Single word identification inefficiency Visual representations and physical responses Creating visual representations of word 23
meaning can be effective with younger and older students as well as those with individual needs. Pictures can be accessed electronically (clip art) or drawn by hand. A key consideration is the students ability to explain why the picture is representative of meaning. Following explicit teaching of word meaning, students write their own definitions of words, create pictures, and generate example sentences. These may be recorded on index cards, in notebooks, in vocabulary logs, or on posters. Movement can also play a role in learning word meaning. Beck and colleagues (1982) designed an activity that grouped specific words from a reading passage by the semantic category How We Move Our Legs. Students were taught a limited set of movements for each word (e.g., stalk, trudge). As words were encountered during oral reading of the passage, students acted them out. Teachers indicated students were enthusiastic about this activity and researchers reports some success with putting motions to words.
Paynter et al. (2005) described a sixth-grade activity involving words associated with parts of a tree such as crown, trunk, xylem, sapwood, phloem, and bark. After instruction and creating word cards with a definition and picture, students thought about the position their word would occupy in a drawing of a tree. Then, instead of drawing it, students became the tree by placing themselves on the floor to represent each of their words. 20. Lack of oral word reading fluency Collaborative strategic reading through Readers Theatre In collaborative strategic reading, four strategies are taught to students: (1) a preview component, 24
in which students essentially attempt to activate background knowledge, (2) comprehension monitoring during reading by identifying difficult words and concepts in the passage and using strategies that address what to do when text does not make sense, (3) restudying the most important idea in the paragraph, and (4) summarization/question asking.
All of these 4 strategies may be embedded by participation in a readers theatre. Readers theatre has a considerable reputation as a real- world reason to reread- the imperative to rehearse in preparation for performance. Readers theatre has interesting aspects that can spur fluency and be a serious motivator for reading and rereading. It makes use of performance scripts and a rehearsal process but does not culminate in a full-scale production. Students, commonly rehearse sitting on stools with music stands to hold their scripts. They perform in that same format, without costumes, sets, or interactive movement (but may be done too). The teacher/director orchestrates rehearsals (rereadings), urging fluency and expression. Often, readers are taught to scan their line, look up, and then deliver it- a practice that promotes seeing/reading in phrases. An interesting twist is reading lines sequentially, rather than assigning character parts to particular students. In this mode, each reader delivers a line, with the next reading the next line, and so forth down the row of readers on their stools. Not being assigned parts requires that everyone perform with the expression of the character, even though characters lines are spoken by various readers. Details and 25
variations of readers theatre can be found on the Internet, which offers multiple resources and video demonstrations.
Topic 6: Strategies that could be used to remediate students in the following aspects of written expression: handwriting, spelling, organization, and composition
TNCore College College and Career Readiness anchor Standards for Writing
Text types and Purposes 1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence. 2. Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content. 3. Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective technique, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
Production and distribution of Writing 4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. 5. Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach. 6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to interact and collaborate with others. Evidence-based Strategy Title Evidence-based Strategy Description 26
Research to Build and Present Knowledge 7. Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects based on focused questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. 8. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism. 9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Range of Writing 10. Write routinely over extended time frames (time for research, reflection, and revision) and shorter time frames (a single sitting or a day or two) for a range of tasks, purposes, and audiences. 21. Composition Excellence in Writing Duke & Pearson (2004) write:
Gradual release of responsibility stipulates that the teacher moves from assuming all the responsibility for performing a task to a situation in which students assume all of the responsibility. This gradual release may occur over a day, a week, a month, or a year.
Michael Graves and Bonnie Graves also write that effective instruction often follows a progression in which teachers gradually do less of the work and students do more. It is through this process of gradually assuming more responsibility for their learning that students 27
become competent, independent learners.
Fisher & Frey (2007) further describe the gradual release of responsibility framework for writing instruction:
In a gradual release of responsibility instructional framework, the teacher first models the desired learning. Over time, students assume more responsibility for the task as they move from participants in modeled lessons, to apprentices in shared instruction, to collaborators with their peers, to independent performers.
One instructional approach that uses the gradual release of responsibility framework is the Excellence in Writing Program. What is it?
The Institute for Excellence in Writings (IEW's) unique approach provides the structure that teachers need to move students from imitation to innovation in all types of writing. Students develop confidence in the speaking and writing process while gradually guiding them toward greater independence and creativity. They will learn nine structural models (note-taking, writing paragraphs, stories, simple reports, writing from pictures, research reports, creative writing, essays, and critiques) to help them organize any type of composition and the thinking skills they need to develop and express their own thoughts.
Additionally, stylistic techniques (strong verbs, quality adjectives, sentence openers, and more) are taught incrementally to gently move 28
students from the basics into more sophisticated writing. As students work through the writing process, they use collaboration activities to learn group listening and speaking skills as well as public speaking skills.
The teacher guides the students through a lesson, which will include a structural model and stylistic techniques for the students to practice. For example, in Lesson 2 of the Classroom Supplement & Lesson Plans the teacher presents a lesson modeled by Andrew Pudewa on the Models for Imitation DVD. Students will learn how to create a key word outline from a non-fiction source text. After testing the outline and the students' comprehension by orally turning it back into sentences, the teacher demonstrates for them how to add a strong verb and creates a student generated word wall of possible appropriate verb choices. He or she gives them several examples of how to do this, and the students are instructed to use the outline to write a paragraph including a strong verb. As students progress, they will incrementally learn additional elements to include in their compositions. As students show proficiency, they move to independence. The teacher continues to model for students who need more support. 22. Organization Writing Workshop Fountas & Pinnell (2001) explain what the writing workshop is all about:
For more than two decades, writing workshop has been a remarkably effective structure for supporting developing student writers. It is commonly thought of as a portion of the school 29
day during which students write independently on topic they choose themselves. We define writing workshop as an interrelated combination of writing experiences that occur during the writing block of the language/literacy framework. It encompasses focused writing- both assigned and self-selected- in a variety of genres and content areas, including longer research projects. It also includes providing specific writing instruction to small groups of students.
Writing workshop provides the instructional support students need to become effective writers who can: 1. Conceptualize a message, story, or topic and express it in a more or less complete form of writing. 2. Use language with clarity and voice to communicate meaning. 3. Think about the reader (audience) while writing. 4. Organize a written text in a variety of ways to fit purpose, topic, and audience. 5. Demonstrate a command of spelling, punctuation, word usage, and sentence structure. 6. Rethink, revise, and edit their writing.
Fountas & Pinnell (2001) suggest three instructional contexts in teaching the writing workshop: 1. Independent writing students work individually and silently on their writing. 2. Guided writing a teacher pulls together small temporary groups of writers and teach the craft, strategies, and skills those writers need at 30
that particular time. 3. Investigations students explore a piece of literature or a content-area topic in depth, using reading, writing, and a variety of media resources, including technology. 23. Spelling Phonetic Zoo The Excellence in Spelling or Phonetic Zoo rationalizes that auditory input and then spelling the word out loud, letter by letter, ensures accurate storage of the correct sequence in the brain, which allows for correct retrieval and accurate spelling.
The materials used by a student are the following: small Zoo cards that include the lesson title and animals whose names illustrate the spelling rule and on the back of each card is the rule or jingle that accompanies each lesson, headphones, paper and pen, discs, and a disc player. The Phonetic Zoo spelling words have three levels A, B, and C.
The teacher keeps a copy of the bigger version of the Zoo flash cards. The teacher uses the cards to preview and review the lessons with the students.
A typical spelling period would run like this: a. Students bring out their flash cards. b. The teacher reads the rule out loud (from the back of the flash card), and have the students read and spell out loud the three words on the front of the card which correspond to the chosen level. c. The teacher briefly discusses how the animal name shown on the front meets the rule of the lesson. The teacher notes a deeper explanation 31
of the spelling rules, some history behind the rule, and additional commentary to add to the students understanding of spelling. d. Each student prepares his/her spelling paper by numbering 1-15 on the left side, double- spaced (leaving a blank space between lines). Students use pen and not pencil. Students go to the A-V corner to take the spelling test. The other students remain in their seats practicing and studying for their turn. e. Students who are at the A-V corner use the headphones to listen to the rule or jingle once again, take the spelling quiz, and make corrections to their paper. f. Students take the take the test every day until they achieve 100 % twice in a row.
Students phonemic awareness skills are developed while listening to the rule and their phonic skills are enhanced when they transfer to the paper the corresponding symbol of the sound that they are learning.
Each spelling rule is studied for 5 days. 24. Handwriting Formal handwriting instruction Research emphasizes the importance of handwriting in developing the orthographic skills needed for reading. According to Berninger & Richards (2002), Research shows that handwriting, spelling, and composition are separable processes but that, when all these component processes are adequately developed, they function in concert in the functional writing system.
There are many advantages to formal handwriting instruction: 32
1. Beginning readers are reinforcing awareness of letter shapes when they learn to write- connecting symbols to letter names and sounds. Louise Spear-Swerling said that writing focuses attention on letter form. 2. Time spent on handwriting practice to improve legibility and develop fluency is a time saver for both the teacher, who spends less effort deciphering the writing, and the pupils, who complete written assignments more quickly (McMenamin & Martin, 1980). 3. Spelling improves when legibility increases (Strickling, 1974). 4. Automaticity and fluency in handwriting are also important because they give individuals
Topic 7: TNCore alignment with evidence-based strategies
TNCore Students Who are College and Career Ready in Reading, Writing, Speaking, Listening, and Language Strategy Number 1. They demonstrate independence. (self-directed learner) 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24 2. They build strong content knowledge. (base of knowledge across content areas) 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24 3. They respond to the varying demands of audience, task, purpose, and discipline. (adapt communication in relation to audience, task, purpose, discipline) 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24 4. They comprehend as well as critique. (discerning readers and listeners) 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24 5. They value evidence. (use evidence to support points in oral or written interpretation) 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24 6. They use technology and digital media strategically. 5-8, 9, 14, 17, 18, 21 7. They come to understand other perspectives and cultures. 1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, 17-20, 21-24
33
References
Birsh, J. R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3 rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co., Inc.
Colorado Department of Education. (n. d.). Oral expression & listening comprehension as areas of sld. Retrieved from