Professional Documents
Culture Documents
0.60
Where
P = Design Pressure
r
o
= Outside Radius
t
min
= Minimum Wall Thickness
The minimum wall thickness is equal to the nominal thickness minus the
thickness tolerance and the thickness corrosion. The hoop stress may be
increased to 0.90
y
for the hydrostatic pressure condition.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
40
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Expansion Stress
The expansion stresses (
e
) due to pressure and temperature (IP-6
Section 4.2.5.7) are calculated according to the formula below and
should not exceed 72% of specified minimum yield stress:
.
2
+
.
2
+
2
1 0.072
Where
M
A
= Torque
M
B
= In-plane Bending Moment
M
C
= Out of plane Bending Moment
i
i
= In-plane intensification factor
i
o
= Out of plane intensification factor
Z = Section Modulus
All moments are due to the pressure and temperature expansion of the riser. The
displacements and forces at the riser to spool piece flange shall be taken into
account.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
41
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Longitudinal Stress
The longitudinal stresses (
L
) due to the combined effect of weight (
w
)
and internal pressure (
p
) (IP-6 Section 4.2.5.7) should not exceed 54%
of the specified minimum yield stress and shall be calculated as follows:
=
(
2
+
2
)
Where
F
a
= Axial Force
A = Pipe metal Cross sectional Area
=
.
2
(
2
2
)
Where
r
o
= Out of plane Bending Moment
r
i
= In-plane intensification factor
0.54
1
2
3
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
42
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
STRESSES DUE TO SURGE
Contractor shall consider in his design the results of a surge analysis to
be advised by Client.
SLUG LOADINGS
Contractor shall consider the effects of slug induced loadings in the
design of the risers. Loadings and design procedures, including fatigue,
shall be agreed with Client.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
43
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Allowable Stresses
The following environmental load stress check not specified in the IP
code must also be satisfied. This is a check that the riser will not fail
under the maximum operating plus extreme environmental loads. The
intention is not to exceed the Von Mises equivalent stress criterion.
The total stress (
T
) defined below shall be considered:
0.9
Where
L
= Longitudinal Stress
S
= Max. Direct Stress due to 100yr Storm waves and currents
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
44
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE- Allowable Stress
Von Mises equivalent stress (
eq
) is calculated according to the following
formula for all points on the riser, and should not exceed 90% of
specified minimum yield stress:
2
+
2
+
2
+ 3
2
0.9
Where
h
= Pressure Hoop Stress
p
= Internal Pressure
T
= Total Longitudinal Stress due to weight, pressure, temperature and wave loading
= Shear stress due to torque in the riser
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
45
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
It is noted that the allowable Von Mises stresses in the DNV pipeline &
riser code are somewhat different; a full set allowable stresses is given
in the table below.
STRESS/YIELD STRESS HYDRO TEST OPERATING SURVIVAL
Hoop Stress 0.90 0.60 0.60
Longitudinal Stress ~NA~ 0.54 ~NA~
Tensile Stress ~NA~ 0.90 0.90
Von Mises (DNV) 0.90 0.60 0.80
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
46
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Fatigue Design
The ability of the risers to withstand cyclic loading shall be considered.
The Department of Energy F2 curve / DNV / API and Miner's rule shall
be applied to assess the cumulative damage, including from the
following sources:
Service cycles of internal pressure and temperature
Wave loading
Vortex induced vibrations
Slug induced loadings
In addition a stress concentration factor (SCF) for single sided closure
welds of 1.4 may have to be considered. The fatigue life thus calculated
shall at all points be in excess of three times the design life of the
jacket. It is common practice to carry out the detailed fatigue analysis
on pre-installed risers or those risers which are installed at the
beginning of the platform life as part of the substructure fatigue
analysis.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
47
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Fatigue Design
Service Cycles
Fifty shutdown and start-up cycles each year shall be assumed when
assessing the fatigue due to cyclic internal pressure and temperature
loading. Note that pressure hoop stress may exhibit the largest direct
stress range over most of the riser, rather than longitudinal stresses.
Wave Loading
A deterministic analysis shall be used to assess fatigue. The stress may
either be drawn from a dynamic analysis or a static analysis combined
with dynamic amplification factors.
Vortex Induced Vibrations
Based on DnV
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
48
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF ANODE SUPPORTS
Anode supports near the pile guides need to be designed against the
consequences of environmental loading and pile driving vibrations. The
first subject of environmental loading is addressed in Slides 23~25 . It is
anticipated, however, that even when full marine growth and velocity
enhancement together with a Cd=1.0 are used that this loading will not
be governing for the anode supports.
For a design of the anode support against fatigue attention should be
given to accelerations, dynamic amplification, number of blows,
attenuation, SCF and SN-curve which will subsequently be addressed.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
49
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF ANODE SUPPORTS
ACCELERATIONS AS A RESULT OF DRIVING
As indicated in slide 24, the accelerations due to pile driving can be as
high as 100g. It is anticipated, however, that this high value is to be
associated with the driving of inclined piles.
Basic accelerations due to the driving of vertical piles can be taken as:
Zone 1: Pile sleeves 50g
Zone 2: Parts of structure adjacent to pile sleeves 25g
Zone 3: All other areas of a pile cluster 10g
Zone 4: Bottle leg/leg up to next plan level above 10g
Zone 5: Remainder of the structure 0
DYNAMIC AMPLIFICATION
Dynamic amplification can only be assessed accurately if the
acceleration versus time history is specified or calculated using a time-
domain analysis of the pile driving process. In the absence of a detailed
analysis a uniform dynamic amplification factor (DAF) should be applied
of:
1.5 < DAF < 2.0.
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
50
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF ANODE SUPPORTS
NUMBER OF BLOWS
The number of blows is to be taken from the pile drivability report; it will
be of the order of 5000. In using this number in a simple and straight
forward manner an additional conservatism will be incorporated because
it assumes that target pile penetration will be reached using continuous
heavy driving.
ATTENUATION
Each blow will lead to vibrations of the anode the amplitude of which will
be reduced in time due to damping.
Using a damping coefficient ksi = 0.02 the amplitude reduction for each
full cycle will be reflected in a factor r given by:
r = exp(-2 ksi) = 0.88
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
51
RISERS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
FATIGUE ANALYSIS OF ANODE SUPPORTS
STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR AND SN CURVE
Since the thickness of the anode attachment is small in comparison with
the thickness of the component to which it is attached it is common
practice to adopt
SCF = 1.0
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
52
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
53
GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Design Methods
Clamps should be designed generally to the methods outlined in this
Specification. Adequate elastic analysis should be performed to show that
permissible stresses in bolts, clamp components, and jacket supporting members
are not exceeded. Where ultimate criteria is adopted the load factors
recommended in this specification should be used.
Load Combinations
The following load combinations should be checked so that permissible stresses
or allowable load capacities are not exceeded under any of the following load
combinations:
a) Xp (Xp = Design Pre-tensioning Load)
b) Xp+XF (XF = Functional loads such as dead loads, temperature loads)
c) Xp+XF+XE (XE = Extreme environmental loads)
NOTE:
i) The load factors recommended in Section 2.0 (2), (3), (4) should be applied to the
above combinations.
ii) The stub and support should be designed using normal elastic design. A factor of 0.75
load combination (c) can be used for design of these components.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
54
GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Slippage
Friction clamps should be designed to have adequate safety factors
against slippage. Safety factors recommended in Section 2.0 of this
specification should be used.
Fatigue
The maximum permissible stress range in the stud bolts should be
calculated and the fatigue life determined.
The reference life method of fatigue analysis enables the relatively simple calculation of fatigue life given
that certain parameters pertaining to the Bass Strait wave envelopes are known and do not vary.
An arbitrary stress range is input into the formula which has a unique reference fatigue life. A stress range
of 690 MPa has been chosen as the reference.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
55
DESIGN PARAMETERS
The following design parameters should be used for a standardized
design of long bolted clamps.
1) Ultimate coefficient of friction (steel to steel/inorganic zinc silicate
coating) = 0.25
2) Ultimate load safety factor on frictional resistance = 1.5
3) Ultimate load factor for punching of stub on top plate = 1.5
4) Load factor for checking and destressing of bolts= 1.1 to 1.21*
* Recommended actual "induced pretension" should include a 10% increase on the design
bolt pretension to allow for inaccuracies in bolt tensioning equipment and a further 10%
increase for bolt relaxation if bolts are tightened one at a time. The recommended "induced
bolt pretension" should not exceed 0.72Fy (396 MPa).
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
56
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Elastic Design of clamp components
Under the load combinations given in 1.2.2 with design to working
stress methods in accordance with AS 3990, API RP2A or special
provisions of this specification, whichever is appropriate.
Stud bolts shall be grade ASTM A193 Grade B7M
(UTS = 690 MPa, Fy = 550 MPa).
Design bolt pretension is not to exceed 0.6Fy (330 MPa)
The clamp components may be fabricated using either mild or high
strength steel. The use of high strength steel will allow significant
weight reduction to be achieved over mild steel however the
susceptibility to fatigue will be increased.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
57
CHOOSING THE MOST SUITABLE CLAMP CONFIGURATIONS
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
58
DESIGN LOADINGS
Types of Forces on Clamps
Design loadings on clamps are fundamentally environmental loadings
arising from wave and current forces. Other types of loadings can affect
clamp design in some applications. The following forces on clamps
should be considered:
Dead load
Environmental loads
wave
current
wind
Pipeline forces
expansion and contraction
other forms of pipeline movement
Platform movement
Impact forces from vessels
All other forces considered relevant.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
59
DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR LONG BOLTED CLAMPS
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
60
DESIGN PROCEDURES FOR LONG BOLTED CLAMPS- Contd.
A long bolted clamp using only four
bolts and very stiff clamping shells
has been adopted as standard and
the formulae quoted have been
developed on this basis. The stiff
shells are considered necessary to
eliminate the "pincer" effect of
clamp shells that are relatively
flexible and to ensure that the
brace being clamped is deformed
to fit the shape of the shell to
ensure good frictional contact.
The use of more than 4 bolts can
easily be accommodated as the
formulae have been presented
giving the required total clamping
force. However in the majority of
cases it is considered 4 bolts will
be sufficient to produce the
clamping force required.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
61
LOADS
The design loads shall be taken as the
worst combination.
Clamp Configuration - The most suitable
configuration of clamp and support stub
should be selected taking into
consideration:
the degree of restraint required
amount of adjustment required
ease of installation
See Figure on next slide for typical clamp
configurations.
Component Loads - for design purposes,
the loads acting on the clamp configuration
are to be resolved about the major axes of
each component. Refer to Figure (this
slide) for details of force components.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
62
TYPICAL CLAMP CONFIGURATIONS
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
63
RISER STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Max Allowable Bolt Pretension
The clamped member hoop stress is limited by two criteria:
a) The general requirement of AS 3990 that compressive hoop stresses
be limited to 0.6Fy.
b) Von Mises criteria for combined stresses assuming a 1.1 factor of
safety for yield and using the maximum axial stresses expected in the
member. Tension will be the critical axial stress.
Either a) or b) above may govern the allowable bolt tension, although b) will usually only be
critical when the clamped member is in tension exceeding 110 MPa.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
64
Required Bolt Force
Frictional Resistance, Radial Contact Pressure, and Bolt Force
The frictional resistance of a long bolted clamp is a function of the radial contact
pressure between the clamp and jacket tubular, which is a function of the bolt
pretension force. A uniform radial pressure distribution along the clamp contact
surface, resulting from bolt pre-tensioning is assumed. The relationship between
contact pressure and bolt force is given below (refer next slide)
The bolt design procedure will be divided into two basic parts:
Frictional Resistance - Bolt force required to prevent clamp sliding;
Radial Contact Pressure - Bolt force required to ensure that contact
pressure is maintained at all points along the clamp.
Design Bolt Force
The design criteria discussed above will yield two bolt forces, one to prevent
sliding and one to prevent loss of contact pressure at any location along the
clamp. The design bolt force shall be taken as the larger of the two.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
65
RADIAL CONTACT PRESSURE FROM A GIVEN BOLT FORCE
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
66
REQUIRED BOLT FORCE TO DEVELOP FRICTIONAL RESISTANCE
Frictional Resistance
There can be six components of external load acting on the clamp (see
slide 61). However, only four of these components affect the required
frictional resistance. These are:
Torsion
Transverse shear (combined with torsion)
Longitudinal shear
Pull-off force
The above loads are used to calculate the bolt force required to prevent
clamp sliding. The pull-off force is included here since it causes a net
reduction in contact pressure, thus reducing the frictional resistance.
The safety factor (SF) to be used in these calculations is 1.5.
In addition to the above, axial tension in the clamped member will
reduce the member diameter thus reducing the radial contact pressure
and the frictional resistance. This effect shall be considered in the
calculation of the bolt force required to prevent clamp sliding.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
67
TORSION + TRANSVERSE SHEAR
This is a conservative formulation which does not account for the contribution
of frictional resistance from the bottom half of the clamp.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
68
LONGITUDINAL SHEAR
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
69
PULL OFF FORCE
This load will cause a net reduction in
contact pressure
along the entire length of the clamp, thus
reducing the
fictional resistance. The total bolt force
must be increased to counter-act this
load.
Call this bolt force F3,
F3= SF P
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
70
CALCULATING EFFECT OF JACKET MEMBER AXIAL STRESS
Total Bolt Force to Prevent Clamp Sliding
To determine the total bolt force required to prevent clamp sliding, the individual components
calculated above shall be combined as follows:
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
71
Required Bolt Force to Prevent Loss of Contact Pressure
Radial Contact Pressure
In addition to preventing sliding failure as discussed above, another combination
of loads shall be used to ensure that positive contact pressure is maintained
locally. If contact pressure is maintained along the clamp, the initial bolt force will
not change as a result of externally applied clamp loads. This is to prevent the
continuous cycling of loads (stresses), thus enhancing the fatigue performance of
the bolts. The loads that may affect the contact pressure are:
Longitudinal moment
Transverse moment
Transverse shear
Pull-off force
Note that while the first three components cause local changes in radial contact pressure, they do not cause a net
contact pressure reduction, and thus, do not affect frictional resistance. Also note that the pull-off force affects both
the contact pressure and frictional resistance. Again, axial tension in the jacket member shall be considered.
The above load components will be factored, converted to equivalent bolt forces, and summed. Clamp sliding is a
function of load and resistance, loss of contact pressure is only a function of loads.
Clamp sliding represents "failure" whereas the consequences of loss of contact pressure near one or two bolts are
minimal. If loss of contact pressure occurs, any additional applied load would increase the bolt load(s), but failure
would not occur. As a result, a safety factor of 1.2 is used for loss of contact pressure calculations
It should also be mentioned that by using this criterion, loss of contact pressure would be a rare event and thus would
not have a significant effect on bolt fatigue.
A simple statics approach will be used to determine the required bolt force. To do this, assumptions will be made. A
four-bolt clamp is assumed.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
72
LONGITUDINAL MOMENT
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
73
TRANSVERSE MOMENT
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
74
TRANSVERSE SHEAR
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
75
Pull-Off
Refer Slide No: 69
Effect of Jacket Member Axial Stress
Refer Slide No: 70
Total Bolt Force to Prevent Loss of Contact Pressure
Fc = F5 + F6 + F7 + F8 + F9
Critical Bolt Forces
The critical bolt force should be the maximum of Fs and Fc
(Slide 66~74 ).
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
76
Check Jacket Tubular
The clamped jacket member stress shall be checked for the combination
of the following:
Design stresses in member prior to clamping;
Stresses caused by bolt pre-tensioning;
Stresses caused by external loads on the clamp.
Check Local Buckling of Tubular
In addition to comparing the bolt pretension
to the maximum allowable member hoop
stress, local buckling of the clamped member
shall be checked.
The section between the clamp halves shall be
checked for column buckling and the
eccentricity of the load due to the curved
section should be considered
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
77
Top Plate of the Clamp
Using a configuration of gusset plates that allow only a small clearance around
the bolts, the critical top plate size is determined by punching shear forces and
moments obtained from the connecting stub. Ultimate punching shear force if
given by:
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
78
Design of Clamp Components
The design of the clamp members themselves should comply with the
requirements of AS 3990 and/or API RP2A.
a) Gusset Plates - The limiting width to thickness ratio shall be 6.
Clearance to bolts shall be small (10mm) to allow bolt forces to be
taken in direct bearing.
b) Side Plates - Side Plates shall be designed as stocky struts. Particular
attention should be paid to the weld along the base of the side plate,
with the critical weld area immediately behind the gusset plates and
weld failure plane at 45o to axis of clamp.
c) Wrap Plate - This shall be the same thickness as the side plate, and it
is recommended that minimum thickness be 20mm.
It is recommended that all welds, except those fixing the side plates to
the shell, be full strength butt welds. (refer next slide)
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
79
Clamp Layout & Details
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
80
Clamp Strength
The strength of the clamp shells in
bending about both principal axes
should be checked. For bending about
the y-y axis of the clamp, it is assumed
that the vertical component of loading
on the tubular member follows a sine
curve.
The properties of the clamp shells
should be determined, and the bending
stresses evaluated for both across the
width of the clamp and in a
longitudinal direction.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
81
Installation Stresses during Re-tensioning
During the installation process the tubular brace will be deformed to take up
the shape of the clamp shells provided that the bolt force is sufficiently high.
Otherwise, the clamp may only achieve point contact eg. at a weld bead, and
the shell should therefore be checked for either the bolt force or the force
required to deform the member (MF), whichever is the lesser.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
82
Installation Stresses during Re-tensioning Contd
This should be less than the allowable bending moment across the width of each
shell.
NOTE
In most cases the tubular will deform at relatively low bolt loads and the critical
bending moments on the shell will be due to the full bolt load and the contact
pressure.
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
83
Typical Hinge Clamp Details
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
84
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
85
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
86
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
87
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
88
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
89
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
90
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
91
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
92
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
93
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
94
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
95
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
96
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
97
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
98
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
99
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
100
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
10
1
Example Calculations: RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
102
References :
1. Hollow Section Joints - Jaap Wardenier
2. Cojac User Manual - E.P.R.
3. Report on Design of Fortescue Repair Clamps - Wimpey Offshore
4. Sea load Computer Program Theoretical Manuals
5. Strand7 Computer Program Theoretical Manuals
6. Derivation of Fatigue Life for bolts - WGP-BC-01
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
103
RISER CLAMPS ANALYSIS & DESIGN
A TYPICAL ANCHOR CLAMP
Dr. R. Venkatesh, Department of Ocean
Engineering, Indian Institute of
Technology Madras
104
End of Lecture