You are on page 1of 5

31 4

2010 7

V o l1 31
July

A CT A PET ROLEI SINICA

N o1 4
2010

: 0253- 2697( 2010) 04-0649- 05

102249)

: , ,
, 9% , ,
, , 1/ 2
, ,
: ; ; ; ;
: T E973

: A

Engineering evaluation method for dented pipeline


YAN G Qiong SH U AI Jian
( F acul ty of M echanical and E lectr onic Engineering , China Univ er sity of Petr oleum, Beij ing 102249, China)
Abstract: A cubic spline inter po lating technique fo r appro x imating the dented pipeline profiles in bo th longitudinal and circumferential
directions w as pr oposed. T his method can be used to determine the strains of pipeline w ith inspectio n data of dent. T he pipeline dent
was evaluated by using strain- based cr iteria. T he r esult s o bta ined fro m the cubic spline interpolation metho d ar e in g ood ag reement
with those o f the f inite analyses when the st rain o f pipeline was less than 9% . T he new method can meet the requir ement of eng ineering evaluat ion. A ccor ding to ca lculatio n result, the length co rr esponding to ha lf of dent depth sho uld be taken as calculation leng th o f
dent, w hile calculat ing strain of pipeline based on the pipeline inspectio n data. T he evaluatio n r esults o f pipeline dents w ith different
depths sugg ested that the pipeline dent evaluat ion sho uld be based on both strain cr iteria and depth criter ia.
Key words: pipeline dent; surface co nt our; cubic spline interpolation method; dent length; ev aluatio n cr iteria

6% ,

( 6% 3% ~ 12% , 3%

, 7 022 km

ASM E B311 4 ASME B311 8

9 851

[ 1]

[ 2]

; ,

; 12% , ,
)
,
, ,

Rosenf eld [ 5]

Bessel , ; N o-

ronha

[ 3- 4]

[ 6]

B-

, ,
[ 1]

, 6%

Daw so n

[ 3]

ASM E B311 8( 2007) ,

, ,

: / 0 ( 2006BA K02B01)
: , , 1982 12 , 2003 , ( ) ,
E-mail: yqjx1228@ sin a. com

650

2010

31

, Ei Eo

,
,

, ASM E B311 8

Ebx

Eby Em y ,
Ebx = E1 = t 1 - 1
2 R0 R 1
- t
Eby = E2 =
2R 2

( 1)

Em ax = m ax { Ei , Eo }

( 7)

( 2)

,
, ,

( 3)

: t , m ; R 0 , m; R 1

1632 64
, , ,

Emy = E3 = 1 d
2 L

, m; R 2 , m; L

, m; d , m
R 1 R 2 :
2

1 = d y
2
R
d x

1+

dy
dx

3
2

( 4)

[ a, b] n ,

a = x0 < x1 ,< xn

-1

< xn = b

1 2
:

S ( x i ) = y i , S ( x ) ,
S i ( x ) [ x i , x i+ 1 ]

, R 1 ;

, [ 7]

, , R 1

S i ( x ) = a i ( x - x i ) 3 + b i ( x - x i ) 2 + ci ( x - x i ) + d i
i = 0, 1, ,, n - 1

( 8)

, a b c d 4 ,

Sc( x 0 ) = f c( x 0 ) ,

S( x 0 ) = S( x n ) ,
1
Fig1 1

S c( x n ) = f c( x n )

Sc( x 0 + 0) = Sc( x n - 0) ,

S d( x 0 + 0) = Sd( x n - 0)

Circumferential non- reentrant and reentrant

dented pipeline

, ,
,
, ,
, (
) , ,

, ( 4)
2
Fig1 2

Longitudinal dented pipeline profile

, - 180b~ 180b,
,

Ei =

E-

Eo =

E1 + E1 ( E3 - E2 ) + ( E3 - E2 ) 2

2
1

E1 ( E2 + E3 ) + ( E2 + E3 )

1
2

1
2

, ( 4)
( 5)

dx = Pr d H/ 180

( 6)


, ASM E B311 8( 2007)

( 9)

651

d/ 4 L 3 , 3


Rinehart [ 8]
Noro nha [ 9]

, ,
,

ASME B311 8( 2007)


, ,

Fig1 3 Dent length

1/ 2 [ 8]

1,

1 , ,

L , d / 2 L 1 , 3d / 8 L 2 ,

1
Table 1 Calculated data of pipelines longitudinal membrane strain

/ M Pa

/ m m

/ mm

16M n

350

720

X 60

440

660

Emy( d)

Emy( d/ 4)

Emy ( 3d/ 8)

Emy ( d/ 2)

41 5%

01 000 258

01 010 957

01 017 398

01 023 772

01 021 203

6%
9%

01 000 334
01 000 523

01 016 487
01 028 657

01 026 088
01 047 269

01 035 886
01 068 067

01 038 339
01 088 230

3%
6%

01 000 087
01 000 230

01 004 589
01 013 387

01 005 929
01 018 816

01 007 293
01 019 210

01 000 121
01 008 015

8%

01 000 512

01 014 439

01 035 544

01 048 311

01 019 152

X 60

435

660

5%
8%

01 000 207
01 000 359

01 006 423
01 004 584

01 018 661
01 041 111

01 025 351
01 053 451

01 007 093
01 111 388

X 70

555

1 016

141 6

4%
6%

01 000 402
01 000 574

01 013 719
01 016 711

01 017 960
01 023 395

01 022 757
01 031 442

01 030 299
01 040 376

X 80

635

1 219

22

4%

01 000 321

01 008 696

01 014 101

01 020 600

01 022 282

7%

01 000 681

01 017 654

01 029 222

01 042 980

01 052 499

4%

01 000 353

01 009 885

01 015 001

01 022 373

01 024 305

6%

01 000 594

01 030 802

01 041 326

01 056 250

01 091 963

X 80

d/ D

620

1 219

181 4

,
ASM E B311 8( 2007)
,
, 1/ 4
, A nsys
,
4 :
,

,
,

Fig1 4 Comparison of longitudinal membrane strain

, ) 1,

4 , L 1

, d/ 2

652

2010

31

, ,
1,
,
, 5
, ,
9% ,

Fig1 5

5
Comparison between simulated and interpolated results

720 mm, 8 mm,

71 23% 41 7% 51 66% 6

, , 6,

Fig1 6 Longitudinal and circumferential dented pipeline profile

653

( 4) ,

2 2

, 6% , ;

, ,
6% , ,

Table 2 Comparison of the two methods

/ %

/ %

71 47

71 23

51 40

hanced assessm ent and an aly sis of dent s [ J] . J ou rnal of Pipeline

31 60

E ngineering, 2008, 7( 3) : 189-204.

5
6

8
8

51 00
41 70

71 80

51 20

51 66

[ 1]

D aw s on S J, R uss ell A, Pat t ers on A . Emergi ng t echn iqu es f or en-

, , . [ J ] . , 2009,

[ 2]

28( 6) : 10-15.
Y ang Qi on g, Shuai Jian , Zuo Shangzh i. Research act ualit y of pipelin es w it h dent s[ J] . O il & Gas St orage and Transport at ion , 2009,
28( 6) : 10-15
, , , .

[ 3]

, 6% ;

[ J ] . , 2006, 27( 1) : 119- 123.

6% 6

Zhao Xin wei, Lu o Jinheng, Zheng M aosheng, et al . A met hod f or

2 ,
,

p redict ing remain ing l ife of pipeline w it h dis persi on-t ype corrosi on
damage[ J ] . A ct a Pet rolei Si nica, 2006, 27( 1) : 119-123.
[ 4]

6% , ; ,
,

AS M E. B31. 8-2007 G as t ran smis sion and dis t ribut ion pipin g syst ems[ S] . [ s . l. ] : A SM E, 2007.

[ 5]

R osenfeld M J, Porter P C, Cox J A . St rain est imati on us ing vet co


def orm at ion t ool dat a: A SM E Int ernati onal Pipeli ne Conf erence,

6% , ,
,

Calgary, Can ada, June 7-11, 1998[ C] . N ew Y ork : A merican S ociet y of M echanical Engineers, 1999.

[ 6]

N oronh a D B, M artin s R R, J acob B P, et al. T he u se of B-spl ines


in t he ass ess ment of st rain levels associat ed w ith plain dent s : R io

( 1)
,
,
,

Pipeline Conf erence & Exposit ion, R io de J an eiro, O ct ober 17- 19,
2005[ C ] . R io de Janeiro: R io Pipeli ne C onf erence & Exp os iti on ,
20051
[ 7]

2005: 175-180.

, ASM E B311 8( 2007)

( 2) ,
9%
6% ,

, . [ M ] . 3 . : ,
W en Sh ipeng, Zhang M ing. A pplied n umeri cal analysis [ M ] . 3 rd
ed. Beijin g: Pet roleum Indu st ry Press, 2005: 175- 1801

[ 8]

Rin ehart A J. Eff ect s of localized geomet ric imp erf ect ions on t he
st res s behavior of pres suriz ed cylin drical shells [ D ] . T exas: T ex as
A & M U ni versit y, 20031

[ 9]

N oron ha D B, M art in s R R , Jacob B P, et al. S ome rem ark s on t he


s t rain b as ed as sessment of pipel ine dent s: 2008 A SM E Int erna-

( 3) ,

t ional Pipel ine Conf erence, Cal gary, Canada, S ept em ber 29- O ct o-

,
1/ 2 ,

ber 3, 2008[ C] . N ew Y ork: Am erican Soci et y of M ech ani cal Engi

neer s, 2009.
( 2009-11-16

2010- 02-05

You might also like