Oil well performance is often estimated by the productivity index. However, for multiphase flow, a curved relationship existed between flow rate and pressure. For reservoir pressures less than the bubblepoint pressure, the reservoir fluid exists as two phases, v apor and liquid.
Oil well performance is often estimated by the productivity index. However, for multiphase flow, a curved relationship existed between flow rate and pressure. For reservoir pressures less than the bubblepoint pressure, the reservoir fluid exists as two phases, v apor and liquid.
Oil well performance is often estimated by the productivity index. However, for multiphase flow, a curved relationship existed between flow rate and pressure. For reservoir pressures less than the bubblepoint pressure, the reservoir fluid exists as two phases, v apor and liquid.
When sadaconsidering theasd performance of oil wells, it is often assumed that a
wells performance cdsadasan be estimated by the productivity index. However, Evi nger and Muskat[1] pointed out that, for multiphase flow, a curved relationship existed between flow rate and pressure and that the straight-line productivity i ndex did not apply to multiphase flow. The constant productivity index concept i s only appropriate for oil wells producing under single-phase flow conditions, p ressures above the reservoir fluids bubblepoint pressure. For reservoir pressures less than the bubblepoint pressure, the reservoir fluid exists as two phases, v apor and liquid, and techniques other than the productivity index must be applie d to predict oilwell performance.