4.7K views

Uploaded by Arthur Lee

catering for individual differences in math teaching

- final project - teaching geometry using the sims 3
- Demonstration Method of Teaching
- The Coffin is Too Big for the Hole
- ask 5th grade math curriculum parent view
- Eng Short Story-Mariah
- test10_math5.pdf
- How to prepare Schemes of work, a paper presented at Ntchisi Secondary School workshop of Heads of Depertment
- Contemporary Lit
- Sample Essay TSL3102-Lit Essay Assignment
- Advanced GRE Math Questions - Version 3
- Introduction to School Based Experience
- What Nietzsche Really Said
- EDUC354 Course Outline
- We Could Kill Mr. Birch (Social Structure)
- edu 5201 lesson plan revised
- NOTES - 3.9 - Related Rates
- 3DPrintingGAK-12Standards
- Y9endofyearexam2006
- TnP - Venkata Subbu.B
- math measurements for toms logo

You are on page 1of 41

Differences

PGDE (Full Time) Mathematics Major

Arthur Lee

Dec, 2009

Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on

S1-5 Mathematics

parental expectation towards their performance,

cognition, learning sequences, motivation towards

learnings, their own perception on performance in

mathematics and their role in the learning process.

differences. They are variables for each learner and

interact in a complex way. They affect teaching and

learning activities and the quality of learning.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Central Curriculum

different parts:

1. the Foundation Part

2. the Whole Syllabus

3. the Enrichment topics

core syllabus.

the normal school time allocated to mathematics as spare periods.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Central Curriculum

an example in the learning unit "Congruence and Similarity" in the MSS dimension

The objectives underlined are considered as non-foundation part of the syllabus.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, School level

mathematics curriculum and at each Key Stage.

◆ Adopt organizational arrangements such as

providing additional lessons to certain students

and ability grouping strategies like streaming,

split class, withdrawal and cross-level subject

setting. (Appropriate measures of flexible

grouping would help reducing labeling effect.)

◆ Appropriately select the depth of treatment of

the learning units that lie outside the

Foundation Part of the Syllabus as the common

core learning contents for all students.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, School level

for each year level. This arrangement should

take into consideration

◇ cognitive development and abilities of

students;

◇ affective elements of students;

◇ learning objectives of the learning units and

their inter-relation;

◇ the inter-relation of mathematical learning at

different year levels;

◇ the resources (e.g. no. of periods) available to

mathematics learning at different year levels.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, School level

produce instructional materials.

◆ Design a wide variety of informal and non-formal

learning activities such as statistical projects, weekly

questions posted in the mathematics bulletin

boards, mathematics books reading scheme, poster

design using transformation of shapes, mathematics

camp, Mathematics Olympiad, etc.

◆ Set up assessment policies that allow the method of

recording and reporting to encourage continuous

effort of students and to provide feedback for

teaching and learning.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Classroom level

◇ e.g. by gathering information about their

interests, strengths and weakness. Note also

that results from HK Attainment Test, Basic

Competence Assessment, class-tests and/or

examinations are useful information. Your

own observations in the classroom, their

classwork and homework provide even more

immediate impressions.

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Classroom level

covered

◇ select, adapt or design materials at

appropriate level

◇ give less able students greater sense of

satisfaction and hence greater confidence

◇ give more able students challenges to

cultivate as well as to sustain their interest in

mathematics

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Classroom level

◆ Variation in clues provided in tasks

◆ Variation in approaches in introducing concepts

◆ Variation in using computer packages (e.g.

dynamic objects, spreadsheets, simulation)

◆ Variation in Peer Learning (e.g. various classroom

organization like group work)

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Strategies, Classroom level

would cover various aspects of understanding

and achievements. In particular, when

assessment (ranging from classwork, quizzes, to

tests) does not need to completely match any

other "standard" examinations, it should

encourage a broader scope of comprehension

and a wider spectrum of understanding.

◆ Arousing Learning Motivation (varieties of tasks

and activities including competitions, games,

group discussion, and something extra-

curricular)

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5 Mathematics.

Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

Closer look at some classroom level strategies

... teachers can ask simple and straightforward

questions to less able students and

comparatively more challenging questions to

more able ones ...

... for the more able students, teachers ask

open-ended questions and provide fewer hints

in the process of solving problems ...

Your comments?

Mathematics Section, Education Department (2001). Catering for Learner Differences: Teaching Package on S1–5

Mathematics. Hong Kong: Education Department.

http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/maths/en/ref_res/MATERIAL/ld_e/LD_e%20index.htm

One thing that people have

in common is that they are

all different.

Learning and Awareness

Catering for Individual Differences--Building

on Variation

another way

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/

seeing individual

differences

What is 'Learning Study'

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/learning/e_learn.htm

Theoretical Framework

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/intro/e_intro_m3.htm

Some Beliefs on Catering for Individual

Differences

caused by:

◆ difference in ability

◆ difference in motivation

◆ difference in teaching arrangement

◆ different ways of seeing the object of

learning

Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y. & Chik, P. P. M. (2005) For each and everyone. Catering for individual differences through

Learning Studies Hong Kong , The HKU Press.

Some Beliefs on Catering for Individual

Differences

The range of ability among normal children should not hinder students from

learning what is intended in the school curriculum. Therefore in catering for

individual differences, the focus is not on the variations in abilities. Rather, the

focus is on the variations in the learning outcomes (what students actually

learnt).

For every worthwhile learning outcome that we can identify, there are also some

critical aspects that can be identified and communicated. In order to help every

student master these learning outcomes, teachers should be clear about the

learning outcomes they wish to achieve in each lesson and the critical aspects

that students must grasp.

Catering for individual differences: helping every (normal) child to learn what is

worthwhile, essential and reasonable for them to learn, given the school

curriculum, and irrespective of their ability.

primarily due to their lack of ability, but mainly due to the incomplete ways of

seeing that they acquired of the object of learning.

Lo, M. L., Pong, W. Y. & Chik, P. P. M. (2005) For each and everyone. Catering for individual differences

through Learning Studies Hong Kong , The HKU Press.

What is 'Learning Study'

The main aim of the project is to establish an infrastructure in schools to facilitate teachers'

professional development by learning from each others, from pupils' feedback and from the

use of the theory of variation, thus improving the quality of teaching and learning.

To realise this objective, we consider the 'Lesson Study Model' which is widely adopted in

Japanese schools as a good method. Participant teachers form subject-based groups, who

among themselves and with the university team meet regularly to carry out a number of

'research lessons'. For each research lesson, they discuss the objects of learning and its

critical features. Together they develop ways to structure the lesson, taking into account the

pupils' varied understandings of the subject matter in identifying the objects of learning.

Some lessons are video-taped to facilitate the review work afterwards and serve as inputs

for another round of study.

Within such a model, we have also introduced an important element which is the use of the

theory of variation (see Theoretical framework). Therefore, we describe our way of

conducting the project as 'Learning Study' so as to distinguish it from the Japanese lesson

study on the one hand; and on the other hand, to highlight our point of departure--how

pupils understand what is to be learnt.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/learning/e_learn.htm

Theoretical Framework

The basic idea of this project is to make use of the variation between pupils'

different abilities and ways of understanding to actually decrease this

variation. Such idea is derived from a learning theory which concerns

variation and learners' structure of awareness (Marton and Booth, 1997;

Bowden and Marton, 1998). The following briefly outlines the three aspects of

variation which we have drawn from the theory of learning and variation to

develop strategies to cope with individual learning differences.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/intro/e_intro_m3.htm

Variation in terms of pupils' understanding of what is taught

A popular view about children's differences in learning is that they have different general abilities

or aptitudes, and hence there are "stronger" and "weaker" pupils. Another popular view is that

children have their own ways of thinking. As a result, if there are forty pupils in the classroom,

there will be forty ways of understanding.

We look at this differently, not because these two viewpoints do not carry any truth, but because

they do not provide a good point of departure for addressing the issue. In contrast, we wish to

focus on the 'object of learning', by which we mean the knowledge and skills that we hope the

pupils will develop; we wish to focus on what is taught and how it is made sense of by the pupils.

Our point of departure is that children understand what they are supposed to learn in a limited

number of different ways. Our research shows that teachers who pay close attention to such

differences (or variation) are better able to bring about meaningful learning for their pupils.

Children learn better not only because they become more focused on the object of learning, but

also because they are exposed to the different ways their classmates deal with or understand the

same content.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/intro/e_intro_m3.htm

Variation in teachers' ways of dealing with particular topics

Teachers have daily encounters with pupils, and from these they build up a bank

of knowledge about the different ways pupils deal with particular concepts or

phenomena, as well as a working knowledge of how to handle these differences.

This knowledge is so powerful and becomes part of their daily teaching that

sometimes it is unnoticed by the teachers themselves.

We view such knowledge as extremely valuable. By knowing in advance the prior

knowledge and understandings of the pupils, we can be more effective in helping

pupils to learn what is intended.

Therefore, instead of letting this knowledge remain at the back of the teacher's

mind, it should be identified, sharpened, and systematically reflected upon, and

above all, shared with other teachers.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/intro/e_intro_m3.htm

Variation as a teaching method

When we notice that some pupils have difficulties with their learning, it means that these pupils have

not grasped the critical features of what has to be learnt. To cater for individual differences, the

teacher should identify these critical features and help pupils to focus on them. This can be done by

means of variation, i.e. using examples, non-examples, multiple representations, etc to give

prominence to what is and what is not critical to the understanding of a particular object. For

instance, the concept of having the same digit added on to itself for a number of times is critical to

the understanding of multiplication, whereas the recitation of multiplication table without

explanation is not.

In our everyday experience, we cannot focus on everything at the same time. While some are taken

for granted, some others are held in focal awareness. Features that are taken for granted or in the

background are only discerned when they vary (Bowden & Marton, 1998, Marton & Booth, 1997).

For example, a bird in the tree may not be noticed until it flies away and its movement catches the

eye of the observer.

Seen from this light, what is varied and what remains unchanged during the lesson is of decisive

importance in determining how effective the lesson is.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/intro/e_intro_m3.htm

Learning Studies in Mathematics

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson

on 'Perimeter and Area'

L e a r nin g Stu d y 5:

P. 4 M a t h e m a t i c s l e s s o n o n ‘ P e r i m e t e r a n d A r e a ’

Allen Leung

Duration

The second research period was from 19th January to 22nd June 2001, during which

thirteen meetings were held after school hours.

During the first meeting, teachers promptly determined that they would like to do

a research lesson on ‘area and perimeter’. The researchers were rather surprised by their

decision, as ‘area and perimeter’ appeared to be quite a simple concept. However, the

teachers were able to show the researchers that the students had difficulties in

understanding this concept for the following reasons:

The teachers noticed that students often mixed up the formulas for area and

perimeter, as well as their measuring units. Moreover, most students were able to solve

problems on ‘area’ or ‘perimeter’ easily, but they had great difficulties answering

questions that involved both concepts, such as questions in the Hong Kong Attainment

Test related to ‘area and perimeter’ on which most students scored poorly. Students at

P.5 and P.6 appeared to share similar problems as well. Therefore, the teachers were

eager to help students to solve this problem as early as possible, hence giving students a

good foundation for future studies.

in understanding, as well as their common misconceptions concerning the topic, which

both the researchers and the teachers agreed to be very crucial for mapping out the

teaching plan.

These were students who appeared to have not even a superficial

1

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

formulas for area and perimeter, as well as their

measuring units. Moreover, most students were able to

solve problems on ʻareaʼ or ʻperimeterʼ easily, but they

had great difficulties answering questions that involved

both concepts, such as questions in the Hong Kong

Attainment Test related to ʻarea and perimeterʼ on which

most students scored poorly. Students at P.5 and P.6

appeared to share similar problems as well.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

Students thought that the perimeter of a rectangle should

be equal to the length times the width even though they

knew that this was the formula for area.

the larger the area of a rectangle becomes; and as the

shape of the rectangle changes, so does the area.

rectangle is doubled, the area would also be doubled. In

other words, they thought that the perimeter and the area

usually increase at the same rate.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

A Gap in Curriculum

the curriculum, rather, they were treated as two

different topics.

concepts together in the hope of providing students

with an opportunity to learn through comparison and

contradiction. Moreover, they believe that 'area and

perimeter' should be taught along with other related

topics, such as the characteristics of polygons.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

the reason for their studentsʼ difficulty in grasping the basic

concepts of perimeter and area might lie in the fact that

these concepts were usually 'definedʼ by the teachers via

formulae rather than by using studentsʼ intuitions of space

and measurement. Some teachers pointed out that students

often confused the two formulae by using them

interchangeably. This might indicate that the concepts of

perimeter and area are purely symbolic for students,

missing out the primitive geometrical elements.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

perimeter, different areas:

◆ The school is planning to build a

rectangular fishpond with a fixed amount

of wiring to surround its shape. What

dimensions would give the largest

fishpond?

◆ Students will be grouped and given pieces

of unit-square to construct their rectangular

fishponds. They will be asked to count the

number of unit-square used.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

P.4 Mathematics lesson on 'Perimeter and Area'

area, different perimeters:

◆ What is the least amount of wiring needed

(hence the most economical) to surround a

fishpond with a given area?

◆ Students will be grouped and given pieces

of unit-square to construct their

rectangular fishponds. They will be asked

to count the number of units that give the

perimeter.

http://iediis4.ied.edu.hk/cidv/e_front.asp?Open=2

Assessment for Learning (Secondary Mathematics)

The Open-ended Questions

Examples of open-ended

questions and samples of

students' work can be found in

this booklet.

It is prepared by the

Mathematics Education section

of EDB and distributed to

schools in 2003.

this type of questions be used

in our teaching.

Assessment for Learning (Secondary Mathematics) The Open-ended Questions

Assessment for Learning (Secondary Mathematics) The Open-ended Questions

Assessment for Learning (Secondary Mathematics) The Open-ended Questions

(b) their relations

are twice of x plus 1

(b) for each pair of numbers,

their difference is a multiple of 5

Assessment for Learning (Secondary Mathematics) The Open-ended Questions

Low attaining students can think mathematically

affective issues, disrupted education and

specific learning difficulties. ... can also be due

to lack of development in the ways of thinking

about mathematics which come naturally to

those who, hence, succeed. Often, however,

support for weaker students focuses on rules,

techniques and procedures - sometimes called

the 'basics' of mathematics.

Watson, A. (2005) In Houssart, J., Roaf, C., & Watson, A. (2005). Supporting mathematical thinking. London: David Fulton.

(Chapter 2)

Low attaining students can think mathematically

Emphasis might be on recall and application, yet these

learners have not remembered and may not recognise

situations as familiar ones in which to apply their

knowledge. Little emphasis is generally given to helping

them develop ways of thinking which may improve future

learning. Little help is given them to construct complex

understanding which provides the context for recall and

application of procedures. Little attention is given to

building on pupils' existing understanding and mental

images. Currently, the materials provided to schools for

those 'falling behind' largely fit this description (that is,

rules, techniques and procedures), though of course they

may be imaginatively used by teachers to create more

challenging lessons.

Watson, A. (2005) In Houssart, J., Roaf, C., & Watson, A. (2005). Supporting mathematical thinking. London: David Fulton.

(Chapter 2)

Watson, A. (2006)

doing mathematics, and show that learners in a very

disadvantaged group were all able to demonstrate

mathematical ways of thinking. This contrasts with 'normal'

practices in which low-attaining learners are taught

simplified mathematics.

rather than deficiencies of knowledge; thinking abilities

ought to be nurtured, rather than left to atrophy while

focusing on mundane content. Nurturing mathematical

thinking is a job requiring skills and techniques which come

from a structural understanding of mathematics.

Watson, A. (2006). Raising achievement in secondary mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press. p.102

'Boring' lessons

Observation of many mathematics lessons aimed at low-attaining

learners ... confirms that many such lessons frequently deal with

simplified mathematics, broken down into step-by-step

processes, often in short chunks, or packed with practical

features such as colouring in, cutting out, tidying up and so on.

Typical arguments for this approach are persuasive and

commonplace. For example, it is said that learners who cannot

concentrate for long periods need frequent changes of task; they

grow bored if you do not change the topic every lesson; they need

activity which uses their energy because many are so-called

'kinaesthetic' learners; they need the quick success which comes

from getting things right easily; and so on. The irony of these

arguments is that if you follow these guidelines low attainment is

the inevitable results, as well as the reason. It is simply

impossible to learn mathematics if one is constantly changing

topic, or task, or doing related but irrelevant tasks, or only doing

the easy bits, or being praised for trivial performance.

Watson, A. (2006). Raising achievement in secondary mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press. p.103

'Boring' lessons

teaching mathematics is that learners who find mathematics

hard are thus often taught in ways which make it hardest for

them to learn it. Simultaneously, students who get stuck at

the lower levels of the National Curriculum in secondary

school have to churn through content requiring a high level

of accuracy and technical recall, while peers are doing work

which is much more interesting and in which technical

inaccuracies such as minor algebraic mistakes, dropped

negative signs, and forgotten multiples are tolerated as less

important than overall conceptual understanding.

Watson, A. (2006). Raising achievement in secondary mathematics. Maidenhead: Open University Press. p.103

- final project - teaching geometry using the sims 3Uploaded byapi-278394112
- Demonstration Method of TeachingUploaded byHellenKyakuwaire
- The Coffin is Too Big for the HoleUploaded byQurratu Aen Mansor
- ask 5th grade math curriculum parent viewUploaded byapi-238962940
- Eng Short Story-MariahUploaded byRicky Law Lui Kee
- test10_math5.pdfUploaded byAshini
- How to prepare Schemes of work, a paper presented at Ntchisi Secondary School workshop of Heads of DepertmentUploaded byAndrew Mkomba
- Contemporary LitUploaded byismi
- Sample Essay TSL3102-Lit Essay AssignmentUploaded byAnymassayo Huhu
- Advanced GRE Math Questions - Version 3Uploaded byDillon Valadez
- Introduction to School Based ExperienceUploaded byare_niece02
- What Nietzsche Really SaidUploaded byKurt Borg
- EDUC354 Course OutlineUploaded byMellisa Jouni
- We Could Kill Mr. Birch (Social Structure)Uploaded byDuffy Fy
- edu 5201 lesson plan revisedUploaded byapi-354947197
- NOTES - 3.9 - Related RatesUploaded byShannon Burton
- 3DPrintingGAK-12StandardsUploaded byeddienemec
- Y9endofyearexam2006Uploaded byLing Wang
- TnP - Venkata Subbu.BUploaded byVivek Jhunjhunwala
- math measurements for toms logoUploaded byapi-208349712
- 6thGradeSkillsListforParentsQ4Rev.215Uploaded byTracy Orr Harris
- 2007 CE MATH SolutionUploaded byapi-3723549
- Maths FormulaeUploaded byrishabh_41
- let us c chp 1Uploaded bytooba mukhtar
- ACT & SAT Formula SheetUploaded byD4wgY
- stage 3 mathsUploaded byapi-208000806
- Wrksht - Google Earth ActivityUploaded bydriverw
- Application of IntegrationUploaded byToh Li Cheng

- Assessment for LearningUploaded byArthur Lee
- Assessment for Learning presentation on Sep 21Uploaded byArthur Lee
- PGDE_statistics_v1Uploaded byArthur Lee
- 64 Interview QuestionsUploaded byshivakumar N
- Professional Development Course 08/09 Advance in Curriculum Studies and TeachingUploaded byArthur Lee
- Sketchpad usesUploaded byArthur Lee
- PGDE_algebra_v1Uploaded byArthur Lee
- introduce AutographUploaded byArthur Lee
- introduce TI-NspireUploaded byArthur Lee

- hsc lesson planUploaded byapi-298710183
- Buzan and Waever the en School RepliesUploaded bymilanlipovac
- team a self-guided social media training manual and presentation 9Uploaded byapi-324079029
- melville reflectionUploaded byapi-350092850
- lessonplan-piaraUploaded byapi-371272173
- autismUploaded byapi-290014343
- ted 5150 case studyUploaded byapi-283941611
- art_educationUploaded byChanakya Vyas
- Verbal and Written Communication SkillsUploaded byPipoy Amy
- How Do We Perceive Colour?Uploaded byDionne Angela Donnelly
- Introduction to NBAUploaded byBalamurugan Karnan
- Continuous Formative Assessment in flipped classroomsUploaded byHoda Elhadary
- Royal Hotel CaseUploaded bySaâd Fariid
- A Meta-Analysis of Emotional Intelligence Effects on Job SatisfactionUploaded byicslyr
- BE 118 SamplsUploaded byMJ Botor
- Briefly Explain PhilosophyUploaded byAshenPerera
- jacquelyn kinder cumulative reflection letter 1Uploaded byapi-458138247
- Overview Of Employee TunoverUploaded byJerin James
- Ipcrf FinalUploaded byJoemel Mark Mamugay
- annotated bibUploaded byapi-272051363
- genre analysis-1Uploaded byapi-217047551
- Noe7e_PPT_ch02.pptxUploaded byMatt Pae
- Fuzzy Applications in Industrial Engineering - Cengiz Kahraman.pdfUploaded bypongerke
- Behavioral Sciences MCQUploaded byMuhammad Bilal
- MBA 595 Reflection Essay Solution PaperUploaded byShivaani Aggarwal
- Presentation 4Uploaded byRosetta Renner
- 10 Little MonkeysUploaded bystachel2
- The Da Vinci Studio School of Creative EnterpriseUploaded byNHCollege
- Writing Adjectives Visual LiteracyUploaded bydherick21
- assignment_1Uploaded bySayaka Meguro