223

224

........

( 30

.

. ) (

Abstract
3T

3T

The research aims to disclose the ground for the behavior of the impact of the
dimensions of organizational culture in determining the characteristics of the
organizational structure and its role in achieving the levels of organizational growth
appropriate to the features of the cultural position in the General Company for the
manufacture of soft drinks is a private sector company to contribute in Baghdad, has
been used questionnaire as a tool to collect data and information from Research sample,
which amounted to (30) Director and analyzed their responses using the coefficient of
correlation and regression. And produced search results that the dimensions of
organizational culture in the company researched was characterized by trends in routine
conservative thinking, which impact in determining the organizational structure of the
company under examination is characterized by the characteristics of high complexity
and formal, central, and in turn, led to the achievement levels of short-term (limited) of
organizational growth. The study made a number of recommendations was the most
important need for the development of the company cultures of the case indicate the
dimensions of flexibility, creativity and change in the design of the properties of a
flexible architecture to achieve growth with long-term ranges.

.
225

 2012

.

) ( :

-:

- .
- .
- .
- .
-: :

- )

(
.

- .

-: :

- .

.
- .
226

 ........

-: :
) (1 -:
-1 -: )( Vertical Design
.
-2 -: -:
- ) (orilly & chatman ) .(Harrison
- ) (Aston ).(Burins & Stalker
- ) (
) (1

-: :

-:
- -:
-1 .
-2 .

-3 .
227

 2012

- -:

-1 .
-2 .

-3 .
-: -:

.
-: -:

-1 : .
-2 -: ) (30

-3 -:
2011/3/1- 2010/3/1 .
-4 -:
.
-: -:

) (

) (30

) (30
-:

-1 )

-2 ) ( -3 .
-: -:

-1 -: ) (3 %87
%13

228

 ........

-2 -:
) (49-45)(54-50 ) (%80
) (
.

-3 -: ) (25 %94

) (
.
-4 -: ) (3
.
-5 -: )

(16

%53

) 21-16 (
.

229

 2012

) (3

*%

55
54-50
49-45
44-40
40

*23-19

*18-15

*14-13

*12-15

*9-7

25
24-20
19-15
14-10
10

14-10
10

26
4
30

87
13
%100

4
16
8
2

13
53
27
7

21
20-16
15-11
10-6

8
1
1
8
12

27
3
3
27
40
%100

7
9
8
6

23
30
27
20

%100

5-1
14

47

11

47

16

%100

6
%100

8
15
5
2

27
50
17
6
%100

6
%100

5-4
3-2

12
18

40
60
%100

-:

%
100

*

230

 ........

-:

-:
-

-2 -:

-
.

- ) (Questionner

)
( ) ( ) (

) (Likert1961
) ( 12345 .

-: ) (
-: ) (1
) ( .
) 1 (5 ) (Orilly&Chatman
)
(

) (345

) (12
. ) (2
) ( ) (11
)6 (17

) (345

) (1,2
)

231

(Aston ) (Tom Price

 2012

) (Burins& Stalker ) (
.
- ) (3 ) (7

)18 (24 ) (345

) (12
*2

*1

-: ) ( -: P

*1
P

(o.95)(o.96)(o.94

-: -:

*2
P

-1 -:
-2 -3 .

- )(1

* -:1 ) (
.2007
* -:1 ) (
.1998
* -:1 ) (
.1998
* -:2 ) (2002 .
* -:2 )

232

........
)(1

/
Harrison;1972, 1978P119- 128

Deail &Kenndy 1982p.12-24

Paul;1984;P63-84

Hofsted;1984;P389

Robbins;1990;P.439

Hofsted;1994.P.12

.


.
.

-1 -:

.
) (Gibson;1994;P.62
.
.
) (Kurt Lewin;1994;P.460
.
.
)

(
* : / / .
/ .
/ / / .2
* :
) (3.3 -5 ) (2.7-32 ) (1.5 -2.6
1

233

 2012

-2 -:

)(Peters&waterman;1982) (Deail&Kenndy;1982

) (Hofstede;1980) (Harrison;197 ) (1997 Slak

) 2008 .(2

) 2003 .(265

) 2003 . (265 )
( -:

- ) (individual initiative .

- ) -: (Risk Tolerance
.
- ) -:(integration .
- ) -: (Communcation Patterns
.

- ) -: (Conflict Tolerance
(Robbins 1990 .P. 439) .

Robbins

) (
) ( .

-3 -: Culture and org. structure

)

(
)(Evant; 1992 ; P.239 ) (Hodge ,Anthany ,Gales; 1996.P.207
234

 ........

) (
.
-4 -:

-:
-: ).(Nave;1985/ Hofsetde;et al;1990 - -: ). (Harrison ; 1972 ;1978

(Harrison; 1972;1978) . (Harrison ; 1972 ;1978 ). -: ) (Harrison ; 1972 ;1978 - -: .

- -:

.
-: ((Harrison ; 1972 ;1978) -:

- ) (Glaser;1983;/ Nave; 1985; /Amsa;1986/Denison;1990

- ) .(Pettigrew;1979

- ).(Goldwell&Partrcia;1992
.
) -: (

-1 -:

(Robert Appleby; 1984;P.75 ) -:

) (Stoner; Free man;1992;P.312

) . )

&GIBSON

(ivanovich;1994;P.470
-1 -: -2 -3
235

 2012

) ( -4 .

) -:

( .

-2 -:

) .2003. (106

-3 -: Characteristies/Dimensions

-:
)(Robbins;1990;P.5
- -2 Complexity -3 Formalism Centralization

)(Hall;1988;P.50

) (Horizontal-differe ntiation

) (Vertical- differentiation ) (Ferritorial-diff
.
.

) . (Robbins ;1990;P.65

) (

.

)(Robbins ;1990;P.65

236

 ........

-4 -:


-:

-1 ) Weber 1947 Weber ) (

)
() . 199044 1989(64

(Organism-Mechanism

-2 )

) (Burns&Stalker,1961kP.110-121

-3 ) (Child;1973;189-190 child

.
-4 ) (Mintzberg;1981;P.103-115
:

-1 -2 -3 -4 -5.

.

Burns&Stalker

-: -:

-1 --: Growth

) (Star buck ; 1965 )

237

 2012

(
) 2007 .(159

(French&Bell;1973;P.15). ) 2004 . (351

) ,1996 ; p .193

Johnson 8 & Scholes ) (Diversification

. }

) ( )
( ) ) (Conglomerate
({ )
-:

2004 (303

-1
.
-2
.

-3
-:
-2 -:

) .(Certua;1990P.90 )
; / Pitts & Lie ; 1996 / Bowmeen & Asch

; 1996 ; P .8

. / Harvey ; 1988 ; P. 113 / Iorsch 1986

.(Clueck ; 1988 ; P. 207

.
- -:

. ) .

.(1986.P.120:
238

Rue &Holland

 ........

- -:
) (
)

( ). (1986;P.121: Rue &Holland

- :

) 1996 (165
-3 -:

) (
.
-:

-1 ) ( ) (

) ) (2
2002 .(219

) (2

)(

239

%10
%
%45
%45
%25
%25
%25
%25
%25
%50
%50
%
%

 2012

-2 ) (Brown&Laverick;1994;P.92

.

-3 ) (Marris
) . 1998 . ( 83

-4 ) (Doyle,Wright;1989,P.171
.

( .
-4 -:

-:

-1 ) (Balight1994

.
-2 ) (New mam,Nollen;1996;P.753
) (

-

-:
) - (-:
) (321

.
-1 ) (1)-: (2
) (4
) ( ) (
) ( ) (0.69 ) (0.01 ) (T
) (4 )
240

........

)
( ) (1 )
( . ) (4

) ( )

(0.67 ) (0.01 ) (T

. )
(

) (2 )
(.
)(4

)
(

* 0.66

*0.64

* 0.61

*0.66

*0.61

*0.62

*0.66

*0.65

*0.69
*0.63

*0.64

*0.67

5.387

2.0301

5.014

2.003

*P <0.01
-2 )-: (3
) (5 ) ( )

( ) (0.65 )( )

(T

) (4.913 ) (1.003 ) (0.01

) ) (
) ( ) (3 )

( .

- -: ) (6,5,4
) ( ) ( .

241

 2012

)(5

T
T

1.003
4.913
0.65

-1 -:
) (6
) ( ) (

) (F ) (5.3 ) (0.001
) (
) ( . ) (0.83 ) (R2
P

) (0.17 .
) ( )

( ) (4
) ( .

)(6

R2
F
B
A

0.831
21.03
0.69
0.72

P

-2 )-:(5

) (7
(F

) ( ) ( )

) (0.001 ) (R2
P

) (0.88
) (0.88

) (%12
. ) (5 )
( .
242

 ........

)(7

R
F
B
A

0.884
22.970
0.68
6.981

2
P

-3 )-:(6

) (R2 ) (8
P

(0.80

) (0.80

) (20%
) (F ) (21.81

) (0.001
)
(.

(6 )

)(8

R
F
B
A

0.801
21.81
0.61
6.04

2
P

)- (
- -:
) (9 )(5-4-3-2-1
.
) (2.5
) (2.4

) (2.6
) (2.6
) . (2.5

243

 2012

)(9

-1
.
-2

.
-3

.
-4
.
-5

.

10

2.5

17

2.4

12

2.6

18

2.6

15

2.5

- -: ) (10 )6 (17

)( -:
-1 -:
) (76 )(4 .
) (3.8
) (

) (98 ) (4 .) (3.8

.
-2 -:
)

(10

) (13121110 ) (4.1)(4.2)(4.4)(4.3

244

 ........

-3-:
-
)

(
.
)

(3.6)(3.7)(3.5

) (17,16,14 ) (10
.

- ) 15 (

) (17,16,14

) (3.6 ) 15 (10

245

 2012

) (10 -1

7
8
9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

-:
- )
10
(
-
.
-: -
8
-
-: -
10
-
-:
-
11

-2
-: -
.
13
- .

-:
15
- .
- .
-: -
11
.
-

10
-1-:
-
-3

-:
- .
4
- .

-:
2
-
.
- .
-:
-

4
-
.

-:
-
.
-
.

246

13

14
11
-

4
8
-

3
2
-

1
-

3.8
4
-

12

3.8

4.3

13
-

2
-

4.4
-

16
-

2
-

1
-

4.2
-

15
-

5
-

4.1
-

12

14

3.5

16
-

11
-

1
-

3.6
-

17
-

7
-

1
-

1
-

3.7
-

4
-

2.

3.6

........

- -:
) (11 ) 18 (24
-:
) (
) (4.3 ) -18 (
) -18( )( ) (

) (19
(2.4
)
) (19 ) (11

(4.3
)
) (22
) (2120
) (4.1
) (23 .
) (24 ) (2.4

) (11

-18 -:
-
.
- )
(.
- .

-19

-20 -:

14

12

4.3

12

25

28

-22

13

14

-23

-21 -:

-24

2.4

3.1

4.3

11

12

4.1

10

11

2.4

247

20

 2012

-:
- -:
-1
.
-2 ) (
.
-3
.
- -:
-1



) (.
-2

.
-3
.
-4
. ) (43

). (Hodge;1991;P309
-5
.



. ) (Robbins
)(Robbins;1990;P.233
-6
-: /
. /

.
-7 .
-:
-:


248

 ........

.(Scott;1992;P.261
. )

. -: .

.
-8


) . (.
-9 .
}
-10 ) (
) ( {

. -:


)
(.
-11 )
( .

.
-12



)
( .
-13
)

( . .

*
-1 )
(
.

-2
) ( ). (
-3 .
249

 2012

-:

-1

-2

. .

-3

.

-4


.
-5
.

-6

.

250

 ........

-1 (1991) .128
-2 (2003) . 265-123-106
-3 ) ( . 1996
-4 :
1991. 40
-5 (2002) . 119
-: -1 ) (
1998 . 303-351-165
-2 )
(
2007. 159
-3
1989 11.64
-4
66.44
-: ) : ((2008 )/ umranyat.blogs pot . com 26 .

1-Amsa(1986) " Organizational Culture" A work group Behavior;An Empirical study .Journal
of management studies.
2- Baligh,H H(1994) " Components of culture nature interconnections and Relevance to the
Decisions on the organization structure" management Science.
3- Burns . Y. stalker. G.(1961) " the management of Innovation". London; Tavistoct
Publications.
4- Bowman, G,& Asch,D.(1996)," Managing strategy" Great pritain .
5- Brown,D.M.& Laverick,S.(1994),"Measuring corporate performance" long Range Planning.
6- Certo,C.S.& Pual,P.J.(1990),"Strategic Management Four.& Proess", new york.
7- Child .J. (1973),"Predicting and under standing organizational structure " administrative
Science Quarterly.
8- Deail.T.E.Kennedy.A.A.(1982)Corporate culture: Addison " Wesley Publishing CO.Inc.
9- Denison .D.R. (1991) "Corporat culture and organizational effectiveness". Book Reviews,
Dyer Gibb Administrative Science Quarterly 36.3 .
10- Doyle, O.J. Wright L.(1989) " A comparative study of U.S. and Japanese Marketing
strategies in the British Market" international Journal of Research in Marketing .
- Evan, 1992, organizational Theory.11
12-Frnch, W.L.& Bell ,C,H,(1973) "Organization Development" ( prentice Hall Englewood
cliffs).

251

2012

13- Glaser, Z.S.; Hacker K.(1983) "Measuring interpreting organizational culture"; management
Communication Qurterly, 1.2 .
14- Glueck , W.F& Jauck , L.R.( 1988), Business Policy & strategic management, 4th,ed new
york.
15- Hall,R.H.(1988), "organization structures processes and culture Comes" 4/e; prentice-Hall.
16- Harrison,E.F.(1978)" mangment" 4/e; Houghton Miffilmcom Boston .
17- Harvy ,D.F.( 1988),"strategic management and Business Policy" , 2nd ed U.S.A.
18- Harrison; R.(1972), Understanding your organizations character", Harvard Business Review
May-June.
19- Hofsted .G,(1984), the cultural Relativity of Quality of life concept. Academy of
management Review.July.
20- Hofsted .G. Neuijea.B. ohayv. D.D. sanders.G(1990)," masuring organizational cultures":
A Qualitative study Across Twenty cases: Administrative Science Quarterly,35 .
21- Hofsted.G.(1994)"Business cultures":Unsco courier April,Vol 47,Issue,4.
22- Hofsted.G(1980)." Culture consequences international Differencess in work-Related
values." Beveriy Hills CO; saga publications .Inc.
23- B.J. Hodge and William P. Anthony,(1991)," organization theory Astrategic Approach." 4
th,ed .Boston, Mass: Allen and Bacon.
24- Hodge,B.J, an thouy,W.P. Gals,LM,(1996), organization Theory: A strategic Approach"
new Jersey.
25- James L. Gibson. John Ivancevich, and James Donnelly, Jr. (1994)"organization: Behavior
structure and Processes, 8th ed .Homewood, lll: IRWIN, Inc.
26-James A.Stoner and R.Edward Feeman (1992), management, 5th ed(Englewood Cliffs.Nj:
Prentice-Hall,Inc).
27- Johnson,G.& Scholes K,(1996)"Exploring corporate strategic: text & cases,"(Prentice Hall
international .
28- KURT Lewin in keith Davis and John new strom (1989)." Human Behaviov at work, 8th ed,
new York; Mc Graw- Hill Book CO.
29- Lorsch.J.W.(1986)," managing culture; the invisible Barvier to strategic change" California
management Review,XXV lll,2, Winter.
30- Mintzbarg.H.(1981) organizational Design;Fsshion or Fit Harvard Business Review, JanFeb.
31- Nave,J.L.(1985) Gauging organizational Climete Management Solutions .
32- New man, K.& Nollen, S.D.(1996)," Culture and Congress ;the Fit between management
oractices and national culture,"A.S.O. September 4th.
33- OReilly,C.A. lll. Chatman J. Caldwell D-F.(1992) Peple and organization culture Aprofile
Comparison Approach to Assessing Person organization Fit. Academy of management
Journal.
34- Peters.T.J. Waterman.R. H."in search of excellance: Lesson for American Best- Run
Companies: new yoyr Harvard & Row.
35- Pitts .R.A. Lel D.(1996)," Strategic management" neyourk .
36- Robbin .S.P.(1990)"organizational theory." New Jersey: Prentice Hall international . .
37- Robert . C.Appleby,(1994),Modren Business Administration 3th ed.(London: Pitman
Publishing Ltd.). .
38- Rue and Holland, " strategic management concepts and experiences," ( new york: Mc GrawHill ), Inc ( 1986) ..
39- Worichard Scott,(1992),"organizations: Rational ,Natural and open systems 2nd
ed.(Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice Hall Inc.)..
P

252

........

) (
: )
- ) ( :

-1
40

-2

-5

44 -40

-3

-4

-6

5-1

49 -45

54 -50

14 -10

19 -15

10 -6

15 -11

3-2

253

55

24 -20

25

20 -10

5-4

21

 2012

-: -:

1
2
3
4
5

-1

.

.

.
.

.

-2 ) ( -1-:

7
8
9

10

11

12

13

-:

-:
- ) (

-
.
-: -
-
- -:
-
-: -
-

-2

-: - .
-
.
-:
- .
- .
-: - .
-

-1 -:
-2

254

........
-

14

-:
- .
- .
-:
- .
- .
-:
-
-
.

17

-:
- .
-
.

15

16

-3

-18 -:
-
.
-
) (.
- .

-19

-20 -:
-21 -:

-22

-23

-24

255